This is not intended to be a political post. Indeed, I could easily have written these words four years ago, when Republicans were fretting over Joe Biden’s election.
Political partisans often freak out when their favored party loses at the ballot box, prompting them to take rash financial actions. But with Donald Trump set to return to the Oval Office on Monday, I’d advise sitting on your hands. The fact is, presidents are not omnipotent—and can face swift punishment if their actions unnerve the population. Consider:
- We may only have national elections every few years, but investors vote every trading day. Do folks disapprove of what the president is doing? Up go bond yields and down go share prices. My left-leaning professors at Cambridge would refer to this as a “capital strike.” Such big market movements make politicians sit up and take notice.
- We could also see a capital strike in CEO offices and boardrooms. Do business leaders dislike the direction that the president is taking the economy? They could opt to scale back marketing and capital spending, causing economic growth to slow and perhaps triggering a recession.
- Even consumers can go on strike. An extreme example: Think about what happened when fear of the future hit all of us during the early days of the pandemic. According to Bureau of Economic Analysis data, personal consumption expenditures shrank more than 10% in 2020’s first six months.
- A third of senators and all members of the House of Representatives are up for reelection in less than two years, and history tells us the ruling party typically loses seats. Right now, the Republicans hold the slimmest of majorities in the House. Today’s shocking revelation: Politicians like to get reelected—and at least some Republican congressmen will likely shy away from voting for legislation that could hurt their election chances in November 2026.
- Extreme policies are likely to be challenged in the courts, dragging out their implementation for months or even years.
- Resistance from federal government bureaucrats can also put a brake on radical change. On that score, readers might enjoy the British TV series Yes Minister. Inclined to blame the liberal “deep state” for resisting Trump? Yes Minister was partly inspired by the diaries of British Labor Party politician Richard Crossman.
My advice: Relax, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. The media and White House decibel level may be higher than usual over the next few years. But I strongly suspect the movie won’t be so different from those we’ve seen before.
I posted this piece on Jan. 17, shortly before the current administration took office. It unleashed a flurry of political comments, as you can read below.
Despite what some readers claimed, my point wasn’t to denigrate the new administration, but rather to point out the limits of power and to caution folks against rash financial actions, something I’ve continued to do.
For those who are managing their portfolio with an eye on DC, please give the piece another read. Yes, there are indeed limits to political power in the U.S., as we’ve discovered over the past four months.
And no matter what your political persuasion, please don’t engage in partisan commentary.
Thanks for this update. I enjoyed hearing your voice on Rick Ferri’s 5/27/2025 Bogleheads on Investing podcast with you, Jason Zweig, and Christine Benz as guests that you linked on the HD Articles on Other Sites. Great commentary on how your sixty two WSJ articles in your new book were selected and organized.
Any article that mentions not only political parties but individuals also, had to know that personalities and comments will for as they have that by and large are not welcomed or appreciated by most HD readers. A simple glance at responses easily shows that by all the red arrows
Stay the course, per Barron’s, S&P 500 returns by president
1953-1957 Eisenhower (R) 71%
1957-1961 Eisenhower (R) 34%
1961-1965 Kennedy/Johnson (D) 45%
1965-1969 Johnson (D) 18%
1969-1973 Nixon (R) 17%
1973-1977 Nixon/Ford (R) -13%
1977-1981 Carter (D) 31%
1981-1985 Reagan (R) 30%
1985-1989 Reagan (R) 68%
1989-1993 Bush (R) 52%
1993-1997 Clinton (D) 79%
1997-2001 Clinton (D) 73%
2001-2005 Bush (R) -12%
2005-2009 Bush (R) -28%
2009-2013 Obama (D) 85%
2013-2017 Obama (D) 52%
2017-2021 Trump (R) 67%
2021-2025 Biden (D) 56%
Average 40% per term or 10%/year no mystery there