“..not an opinion piece.” It’s labeled “Opinion” at the top of the page. The piece is more than four years old and was almost universally panned by readers, many of whom identified themselves as CPAs. Several said it was the worst thing they’d ever read in the WSJ.
“I’ve occasionally heard mention, without much in the way of specifics, of a ‘longevity benefit’ in staying with the same insurance company rather than constantly shopping around and switching.” Some auto insurers may actually charge you more for coverage if you remain loyal and don’t shop around and switch occasionally. See https://www.npr.org/2015/05/08/403598235/being-a-loyal-auto-insurance-customer-can-cost-you
Bullying? I merely wondered if you’d be willing to enforce your own editorial policy in a consistent and neutral manner. That you’re not so inclined is disappointing, but not really surprising.
Comments
You should delete it. The OP has posted similar provocations in the past and will probably continue to do so until he’s stopped.
Post: No financial wisdom here other than ….
Link to comment from April 12, 2025
FYI it’s “Maybach.”
Post: Care to join me on my yacht cruising the Mediterranean? Do you envy the super wealthy? RDQ
Link to comment from March 18, 2025
Including when it comes to punctuation, it seems.
Post: A Quinn-Worthy Rant by Jonathan Clements
Link to comment from February 24, 2025
Won’t happen. Musk is trolling you.
Post: What will you do with $5,000?
Link to comment from February 22, 2025
“..not an opinion piece.” It’s labeled “Opinion” at the top of the page. The piece is more than four years old and was almost universally panned by readers, many of whom identified themselves as CPAs. Several said it was the worst thing they’d ever read in the WSJ.
Post: A Tax Filing Conundrum
Link to comment from February 21, 2025
They seem to think “Roth” is an acronym of some sort, rather than the surname of a former senator from Delaware.
Post: Quinn ponders taxes, laws, freebies and the future of retirement. Logic need not apply.
Link to comment from February 10, 2025
“I’ve occasionally heard mention, without much in the way of specifics, of a ‘longevity benefit’ in staying with the same insurance company rather than constantly shopping around and switching.” Some auto insurers may actually charge you more for coverage if you remain loyal and don’t shop around and switch occasionally. See https://www.npr.org/2015/05/08/403598235/being-a-loyal-auto-insurance-customer-can-cost-you
Post: Home, Auto & Umbrella Insurance—“Longevity Benefit”?
Link to comment from January 25, 2025
Bullying? I merely wondered if you’d be willing to enforce your own editorial policy in a consistent and neutral manner. That you’re not so inclined is disappointing, but not really surprising.
Post: Limits of Power by Jonathan Clements
Link to comment from January 19, 2025
Nice. Let’s see if Jonathan calls out your blatantly political post, as he’s done in the past with right-coded posts. Not holding my breath.
Post: Limits of Power by Jonathan Clements
Link to comment from January 18, 2025
You could have written those words four years ago, but you didn’t. Why not?
Post: Limits of Power by Jonathan Clements
Link to comment from January 18, 2025