FREE NEWSLETTER

Happiness lies not in the choice, but in making a decision and eliminating the uncertainty created by choice.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Any concern?

"No qualms at this point, let's check back in a few months."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

Wrapping It Up

"Ken - this is a great post on how different people have different plans. I worked until I didn't want to work (at work) ever again. It's great to hear you were able to manage a post-retirement engineering career that makes you happy. Your social security decisions are different from mine because my wife and I have different conditions to consider."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

Time to Be Fearful

"Started in 2016 then big dip ~2019…"
- William Housley
Read more »

Social Security Spousal Benefits

"The SSA has a update page titled Social Security Fairness Act: Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) update The update states - If you were already receiving benefits that were affected by WEP or GPO, the last month WEP or GPO applied was December 2023. Any payment adjustments due would begin for benefits payable starting in January 2024 (paid in February 2024). To receive increased payments for those months, you had to have been entitled to benefits that were either fully or partially reduced by WEP or GPO for those months. If you were not receiving benefits that were affected by WEP or GPO because you did not previously apply for those benefits, then you will need to contact us to file an application for benefits. The Social Security Fairness Act did not change the provisions of the Social Security Act that govern the retroactivity of benefit applications. Retroactivity for some retirement and survivor’s benefits is generally limited to six months before the month in which the benefit application is filed, although some claims based on disability may be entitled to 12 months of retroactive benefits. Those rules remain unchanged. Since the Social Security Fairness Act was signed, we have consistently encouraged people who had never applied or were not sure if they applied to consider applying for benefits because the date of your application might affect when your benefits begin. I read the above SSA comments to apply retroactivity to retirement and survivor’s benefits and thus may not apply to her spousal benefits the later of after 2023 or when you claimed your benefits 2 years ago. That being said I would think it would be prudent to file her claim ASAP, before the end of March 2026, to start the clock on any retroactive payments as it is unclear to me what the position the SSA may take."
- William Perry
Read more »

Private Credit Stress?

"I put private credit and private equity in my "too hard" pile. Between the opacity and the lockup periods, I can't justify the trade-off for a few (maybe) extra return points. If they get to the point that they need to raise funds from 401(k) savers, I say let them go through the public markets, with all of the associated disclosures and regulations. Most won't need them to reach their goals."
- Kenneth DeLuca
Read more »

Ninety Nine, I mean Eight Retirement Tips

"Kenneth Tobin, 1% of 1% of every line they cast, can pay for a fair amount of advertisements and mailings. "
- Michael Flack
Read more »

$3 Trillion S&P 500 Gatecrashers

HAVE YOU GIVEN any thought to what's about to happen to your S&P 500 tracker? Three enormous IPOs are expected later this year: SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Based on their most recent private transactions, SpaceX appears to be valued at around $1.25 trillion, OpenAI at roughly $800 billion, and Anthropic at approximately $380 billion. Combined, we could be looking at close to $3 trillion in private market value that wants to go public. To put that in perspective, the entire S&P 500 is worth roughly $60 trillion. That's not a routine year for markets. That could be a very large event indeed. I suspect the vast majority of people with money sitting in a tracker fund have absolutely no idea it's coming. Those that do might have read some of the more sensational claims I've seen about immediate, disruptive wholesale change to the S&P 500. I think those articles are getting ahead of themselves. These companies might not automatically land in your S&P 500 tracker the day they list. The index has hard rules, and two of them seem particularly relevant. A company generally needs to have been profitable for four consecutive quarters before it qualifies. OpenAI and Anthropic are both, as far as we can tell, burning through enormous amounts of capital. They may well not meet that bar at IPO. There's also a float requirement, where roughly half of a company's outstanding shares typically need to be publicly tradeable. These businesses will almost certainly debut with tiny floats, possibly somewhere between 5% and 10% of shares in public hands. That could disqualify them from day one. SpaceX is possibly the closest to profitability of the three, but the float issue likely applies across the board. One area of uncertainty is the selection committee. This has some discretion around the inclusion of larger IPOs. They could choose to move faster than the rules imply. So the story might not be your tracker being immediately and dramatically restructured. The story could be more drawn out than that, and perhaps more interesting for it. What does this mean in the short term? I can only offer informed speculation. To my mind, volatility seems likely around the listings themselves. Not necessarily because of forced index rebalancing, but because the float issue creates its own kind of pressure. Enormous companies carrying enormous implied valuations, but only a sliver of shares in circulation. Limited supply, near-unlimited institutional demand, and a market full of retail investors who've been reading about these companies for years and finally get their shot. I would guess we should expect wild price swings during those early trading days, though I could be wrong about the scale of it. Rotation risk is worth watching too, I think. Investors might pull money out of existing AI bets, the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft, and move it directly into OpenAI and Anthropic the moment they're publicly available. If that happens, the stocks that have driven your tracker's returns for the last three years could face sustained selling pressure, not because anything's wrong with those businesses, but simply because a shinier, newer version of the same trade has just arrived. A throwaway thought for anyone holding individual shares rather than trackers. The companies most at risk of ejection are those sitting at the bottom of the index. When a business loses its S&P 500 membership, every passive fund becomes an automatic seller. That can hit the share price hard, nothing wrong with the company, just forced selling as a side effect of something big happening at the very top. Worth knowing if any of those smaller names are in your portfolio. Medium term it could get more interesting still. If and when these companies do meet the profitability and float requirements, which could, I think, be years after their IPOs rather than months, every S&P 500 tracker on the planet becomes an automatic buyer. Hundreds of billions flowing into SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic whether fund managers want it or not. The mechanics of passive investing would turn every tracker holder into an investor in these three companies with absolutely no say in the matter. That's the bit people rarely stop to think about. Passive investing isn't neutral. It just means someone else is making your decisions for you. Then I come to the big question: do these businesses actually deserve these valuations? It's worth noting that every major IPO of recent years has tended to trade down from its private valuation once the public gets a proper look at the books. The venture capital guys who set those private prices aren't always right, and public markets have a habit of finding that out fairly quickly. If the same happens here, your tracker should hopefully be buying them at a fair price by the time they filter into the realm of inclusion within that tracker. It has to be said, that's not guaranteed. I'm not trying to be alarmist. These aren't penny stocks being hyped and I think that matters. OpenAI's revenue had already surpassed $20 billion by the end of 2025. SpaceX is targeting what could be the largest public offering in history. Anthropic has BlackRock, Blackstone, Microsoft and Nvidia on its books. These are real businesses generating real money with the biggest and most sophisticated names in global finance and technology behind them. That doesn't make them cheap at these prices, but it does make them a very different proposition from the usual IPO hype cycle. The bottom line for the average investor? We probably don't need to do anything dramatic. But it doesn't hurt to understand that the passive, set-and-forget vehicle you own may look quite different over the next few years, not necessarily in a single sudden lurch, but gradually, as these companies either earn their way into the index or don't. The index you bought into always changes but the next few years will definitely see bigger changes than normal. If nothing else, it'll be interesting to see what happens going forward…Eyes open.
Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

My Window is Open – Come In

"Thanks for writing a positive and timeless message."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

The Bear Market Survival Kit (Pharmaceuticals Not Included)

"There will be a sizeable correction one day. You can bet on it. We each should answer the question "Are you in thought, or in action?" and you are in action."
- normr60189
Read more »

Any concern?

"No qualms at this point, let's check back in a few months."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

Wrapping It Up

"Ken - this is a great post on how different people have different plans. I worked until I didn't want to work (at work) ever again. It's great to hear you were able to manage a post-retirement engineering career that makes you happy. Your social security decisions are different from mine because my wife and I have different conditions to consider."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

Time to Be Fearful

"Started in 2016 then big dip ~2019…"
- William Housley
Read more »

Social Security Spousal Benefits

"The SSA has a update page titled Social Security Fairness Act: Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) update The update states - If you were already receiving benefits that were affected by WEP or GPO, the last month WEP or GPO applied was December 2023. Any payment adjustments due would begin for benefits payable starting in January 2024 (paid in February 2024). To receive increased payments for those months, you had to have been entitled to benefits that were either fully or partially reduced by WEP or GPO for those months. If you were not receiving benefits that were affected by WEP or GPO because you did not previously apply for those benefits, then you will need to contact us to file an application for benefits. The Social Security Fairness Act did not change the provisions of the Social Security Act that govern the retroactivity of benefit applications. Retroactivity for some retirement and survivor’s benefits is generally limited to six months before the month in which the benefit application is filed, although some claims based on disability may be entitled to 12 months of retroactive benefits. Those rules remain unchanged. Since the Social Security Fairness Act was signed, we have consistently encouraged people who had never applied or were not sure if they applied to consider applying for benefits because the date of your application might affect when your benefits begin. I read the above SSA comments to apply retroactivity to retirement and survivor’s benefits and thus may not apply to her spousal benefits the later of after 2023 or when you claimed your benefits 2 years ago. That being said I would think it would be prudent to file her claim ASAP, before the end of March 2026, to start the clock on any retroactive payments as it is unclear to me what the position the SSA may take."
- William Perry
Read more »

Private Credit Stress?

"I put private credit and private equity in my "too hard" pile. Between the opacity and the lockup periods, I can't justify the trade-off for a few (maybe) extra return points. If they get to the point that they need to raise funds from 401(k) savers, I say let them go through the public markets, with all of the associated disclosures and regulations. Most won't need them to reach their goals."
- Kenneth DeLuca
Read more »

Ninety Nine, I mean Eight Retirement Tips

"Kenneth Tobin, 1% of 1% of every line they cast, can pay for a fair amount of advertisements and mailings. "
- Michael Flack
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 24: OUR ONLY earthly immortality will be the memories of others. We should make sure those memories are good—by spending our wealth on special times with friends and family.

Truths

NO. 16: WE’RE TOO self-confident. We imagine we’re smarter than other investors and can beat the market averages. This leads us to trade too much, make big investment bets and buy actively managed mutual funds. What if we’re at least partially successful? We may attribute our gains to our own brilliance—leading us to take yet more risk.

think

REAL RETURNS. Just because our investments climb in value doesn’t mean we’re making financial progress. Instead, we need to earn a “real” return—one that outpaces inflation. Over the long haul, savings accounts will deliver a negative real return, bonds should offer a modest real gain and stocks could outpace inflation by a healthy margin.

act

SUPPOSE YOU LOST your job. How long could you go before your financial life unraveled? This isn’t an issue for retirees—which is why they need little or no emergency money. But if you’re working, your plan for unemployment might include a cash reserve, slashing discretionary spending, a home equity line of credit and withdrawing Roth contributions.

Manage that tax bill

Manifesto

NO. 24: OUR ONLY earthly immortality will be the memories of others. We should make sure those memories are good—by spending our wealth on special times with friends and family.

Spotlight: Careers

When You Love What You Do. Definitely NOT a rant.

Regular HumbleDollar readers are likely familiar with my passion for dogs. I adore dogs and find I generally prefer their company to that of many humans. 
Three years ago I retired. I had spent thirty years working in laboratories. I generally enjoyed the work but I was never particularly passionate about it. I spent my weekdays working in order to support my dog hobby on the weekends. 
Right after I retired, my husband and I toyed with the idea of starting a dog training business.

Read more »

The Very Last Time? Nope, Just Glad It’s All Over!

We often read those poignant articles about never truly knowing when we’re experiencing something for the very last time—that final hug, or the last time we carry our child. A bit sad, I tend to skip them. But I’ve been thinking from the opposite viewpoint: those “OMG, thank goodness I don’t have to do that again!” moments.
As a recent retiree, I can easily recall a few such glorious moments. Early starts, for instance, never bothered me much at the time,

Read more »

Buying Freedom

IF 20-SOMETHINGS ASK me for financial advice, I suggest getting a job right out of college and saving like crazy, so they quickly get themselves on the fast track to financial freedom.
If 60-somethings ask me for advice, I advocate a phased retirement, seeking part-time work in their initial retirement years and, if they enjoy it, perhaps keeping it up into their 70s.
Yeah, I know, I sound like a real killjoy. My advice raises an obvious question: Is there ever a time when we should cut ourselves some slack and not have a job?

Read more »

Making money – out of touch with the good old days. Maybe just a little rant

I’m old and perhaps out of touch, I admit it, but it still upsets me when I hear talk of little opportunity, no money to be made, unfairness, inequality even. What’s new? I say there are always opportunities, just look for them even if it occasionally means lower self-esteem. Never give up. 
During the years working, like a lot of people, I was subjected to the affects of nepotism, playing favorites, back stabbing and all the baggage that goes with corporate life.

Read more »

Running Away from Home (Again)

Writing has always been my friend. Now uncertain about the direction to take it, I’ve been feeling a little lost. I became aware of this when Alberta discovered my high school yearbook while searching for papers she needed for a book chapter she was preparing.
It had been sixty years since I last opened the white book with “Hewlett High School Class of 1963” imprinted in dark blue across the cover. Slowly turning the pages, I became nostalgic reading the comments friends made alongside their postage stamp pictures.

Read more »

Change Lanes, Expand Your Wheelhouse, Learn Some New Tricks

Of the things I have learned from HumbleDollar, and more specifically from Jonathan, is that increasing birthrates and immigration alone won’t solve our Social Security and Medicare quandaries. People need to work longer. 
I have pushed back on that idea by pointing out that for many employed in what I call the brutal occupations, working longer is easier said than done. While I stand by that sentiment, I know people who have changed lanes, expanded their wheelhouse and learned some new tricks. 

Read more »

Spotlight: Lim

In Search of Balance

“WHEN THE FACTS change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” Those words are sometimes attributed to Paul Samuelson, one of the the 20th century's most influential economists. Due to a litany of cognitive biases—especially status quo and confirmation bias—letting go of cherished beliefs is easier said than done. Which brings me to the topic of bonds and, more specifically, their role in the classic balanced portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. This mix is often the starting point for the moderate-risk investor seeking to balance risk and return. Since 1926, it’s generated an impressive 9.1% annualized return and has done so with far less volatility than an all-stock portfolio. Its worst year was 1931, when it fell 26.6%. But one fact has changed over the past century, and it makes the historical record moot. Nominal interest rates are at rock-bottom levels—not just decade lows, but multi-century lows. Bonds serve two primary roles in a portfolio: income and ballast. With bond yields near zero before inflation and deeply negative after inflation, income is not a great reason to hold bonds, perhaps with the exception of Series I savings bonds. What about as ballast for a portfolio? A major appeal of bonds, particularly Treasurys and investment-grade bonds, is their relative price stability and the inverse correlation that bond prices often have with share prices. As I’m fond of saying, a bad year in the bond market can be matched or exceeded by a bad day in the stock market. But investing is all about risk and return. With the 10-year Treasury yielding just 1.6%, is that measly return really worth the interest rate risk posed by potentially rising rates? In a 60-40 portfolio, a 1.6% bond yield contributes just 0.64% to the overall portfolio’s return, and that’s before…
Read more »

Ignore the Score

I NEED TO CONFESS: I’m obsessed with the financial markets. Most weekdays, I check up on U.S. stocks, emerging markets, the EAFE (Europe, Australasia and Far East) index, the 10-year Treasury yield, gold and even the U.S. dollar index, or DXY, as it’s known. Then, at the end of most days, I view my updated portfolio online. I don’t know why I do this. Deep down, I know it’s irrational. At university, I was an electrical engineering major, studying signal processing. This subfield of electrical engineering focuses on the analysis of signals in things like sounds and images. One thing I learned was that all signals contain both information and noise. Electrical engineers work hard to design filters that eliminate noise while preserving the information in a signal. What does this have to do with my financial obsession? Day-to-day fluctuations in markets clearly represent noise. Whether the stock market closes up or down on a given day is mostly a coin toss. There’s little to be gleaned from following the financial markets’ daily gyrations. From my study of behavioral finance, I also know that humans have an asymmetric emotional reaction to gains and losses. Losses leave us sadder and more fearful than gains produce joy and optimism. The net effect of being a close market observer? Undue pain and stress. Still, I’ve always prided myself on taking market volatility in stride. I have a natural proclivity to go against the herd. When the stock market crashed, I would be in there buying. When it soared, I would raise cash. It made sense, then, to stay on top of markets—or so I told myself. What I’ve come to realize is that my obsession is not just unhealthy, but a symptom of a larger malady. The essence of my addiction is a…
Read more »

Funny Money

DO YOU SEE THINGS clearly when it comes to money? Here’s a test to find out. Which of the following scenarios would you prefer? A 5% raise, but the inflation rate is 10%. A 3% salary cut, but the inflation rate is 0%. If you chose the 5% pay raise, you’ve fallen victim to a “money illusion.” This term describes our tendency to view money in nominal terms instead of inflation-adjusted “real” terms. In the first scenario, you would have 5% more money to spend but you’d be able to buy 5% less in goods and services, thanks to the 10% inflation rate. In the second scenario, your nominal income would be down 3%—and that would also be your loss in purchasing power, because inflation was 0%. Consider another hypothetical. Say you paid $200,000 in cash for a house 30 years ago. You sell the home for $500,000. Let’s ignore sales commissions, taxes and other expenses. Would you be happy with this investment? On one hand, you would have made $300,000 on a nominal basis. But if you assume an annual inflation rate of 3%, your $200,000 home should be worth $485,452 after 30 years. On a real basis, you’d only come out $14,548 ahead on the sale. Had you invested the same $200,000 in the stock market, assuming a 7% annualized return, your investment would be worth $1.5 million after 30 years. The money illusion stems from our view of the dollar as a fixed unit of measurement, like the inch or the mile. In reality, the dollar is a store of value that fluctuates. The value of a dollar in 1982 has shrunken to just 35 cents today. Put differently, a dollar today could only buy a third of the goods and services that it could have bought…
Read more »

Keeping It Going

AS 2022 APPROACHES, countless people will begin thinking about New Year’s resolutions—both financial and otherwise. There’s nothing quite like the start of a new year to inspire hope. Many of us will set big dreams and resolve to drop bad habits. According to Statista, just 9% of those who make New Year’s resolutions manage to keep them all. Meanwhile, by year-end, 28% haven’t kept any of their resolutions. What differentiates these two groups? Is it willpower or the lack thereof? Is it the audacity of the resolutions themselves? I don’t claim to know the answers to these questions. I do, however, know one thing. When it comes to keeping resolutions or forming new habits, there’s immense power in one phenomenon: keeping a streak going. Jerry Seinfeld discovered this truth decades ago. When asked for advice by a young comic, Seinfeld reportedly said, “The way to be a better comic is to create better jokes, and the way to create better jokes is to write every day.” He went on to describe his process. A large wall calendar hung in his room. Each day that he completed his task of writing jokes, he put a big red X over that day. Eventually, he would have a chain of Xs. His goal: Never break the chain. Two things about this strike me as salient. First, he focused on the process, not the final result. He didn’t resolve to become a great comic. He simply resolved to write every day. I imagine that some days were a struggle. But he put in the time all the same. He focused on writing jokes, one day at a time. In short, he was singularly focused on process. Second, the chain became a motivating force in and of itself. The longer the chain, the more motivated…
Read more »

Resolved: Sleep More

I HAVE BUT ONE New Year’s resolution: I’ll be working on a habit that promises to lower my risk of cancer, boost my immune system and decrease the odds that I’ll succumb to Alzheimer’s disease. This activity has a host of other health benefits: lower blood sugar levels, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and aiding weight loss. It has also been shown to improve mood, memory and creativity. What is this wonder drug and how much will it cost me? My resolution for 2022: Get more sleep. And not just more sleep, but higher quality sleep. I’ll admit that I’ve been a lifelong skeptic on the importance of sleep. Since my teenage years, I’ve gotten by with less than seven hours of sleep, sometimes far less. Like many people, I wore my sleep-deprived state as a badge of honor and a necessary evil in the pursuit of lofty ambitions. No more. My eyes were opened by a book by sleep scientist Matthew Walker called Why We Sleep. A professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and an eminent sleep researcher, Walker makes a compelling, evidence-based case for the importance of sleep and the costs we incur when we shortchange ourselves of its many benefits. The World Health Organization has declared sleep loss an epidemic throughout industrialized nations. As Walker points out, “It is no coincidence that countries where sleep time has declined most dramatically over the past century, such as the U.S., the U.K., Japan, and South Korea, and several in western Europe, are also those suffering the greatest increase in rates of the aforementioned physical diseases and mental disorders.” More than four centuries ago, the great bard himself spoke of sleep: “Balm of hurt minds, great nature’s second course, chief nourisher of life’s feast….” William Shakespeare was, as…
Read more »

Leaving the Country

ARE THERE TIMES when a near 100% international stock allocation makes sense? I believe there are—and that today is just such a moment. Never in my life have I had such a low allocation to U.S. stocks. My overall portfolio is 60% stocks and 40% bonds. But the stock portion is comprised of just 15% U.S., with the remainder held in international stocks, split evenly between emerging and developed markets. I realize that’s unorthodox. It would certainly be viewed as heretical by most financial advisors. But I believe there are four reasons to buck conventional wisdom: 1. The “traditional” international allocation is irrational. It seems that most financial advisors and institutions recommend that international stocks account for 20% to 30% of a portfolio’s stock allocation. Like one of the 10 commandments, this advice has been handed down from on high and accepted without questioning. But is this recommendation actually evidence-based? Research by the Vanguard Group suggests that the benefits of international diversification, in terms of reducing volatility, plateau at around 40% foreign stocks. Further international exposure, Vanguard contends, leads to increased volatility. Others have suggested using global GDP as a guide. Today, the U.S. represents 25% of global GDP, so following this line of thought would mean allocating 75% of a portfolio’s stock allocation to international shares. On the other hand, efficient market proponents suggest weighting a portfolio according to global market capitalization, which would mean holding about 44% in international stocks, since U.S. companies account for 56% of global stock market value. No matter how you slice it, allocating just a quarter or so of a portfolio to international stocks makes little sense—and even less sense when considering today’s valuations, which I’ll get to shortly. Of course, investors aren’t machines. They need to be comfortable with their portfolios. It’s my…
Read more »