FREE NEWSLETTER

Saving is gratification delayed. Borrowing is pain postponed.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Reaching Two-thirds of a Century!

"Love it, Rick. Happy birthday. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

Americans and their credit cards

"Well, IMO, the credit card companies are not really the injured party in people not paying off their credit cards. Have you looked at the terms on your credit card? The interest rate? The late fees? How long it takes to pay something off if you make the minimum payment? Did you know if you pay off your card in installments that you get charged an extra month of interest the month after you pay it off? Can you tell I hate credit cards? Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

The Intentional Spendthrift

"Dana, you've hit on one of my trigger points. Ordering wine at a hotel or restaurant genuinely aggravates me—knowing I could walk into a liquor store and get the same bottle for 80% less spoils the enjoyment. I'm a big fan of BYO restaurants."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Beyond Bank Accounts

I OPENED MY FIRST bank account in the US at a local credit union (CU) close to my workplace. The CU had several convenient offers for employees of our company. With minimal effort, I opened checking and savings accounts, got free checkbooks and a credit card despite having no credit history in the US.

I was so pleased with the convenience that I handled all my banking needs through this CU for many years. That included direct deposit of my salary, payments and withdrawals, a car loan, and certificates of deposit (CDs) as my savings grew. I still maintain my checking account here and occasionally enjoy special favors as a longtime loyal customer.

Eventually, I realized that I earned very little interest from the bank deposits. I shopped around, found other banks with better rates, opened several accounts here and there, and moved my money around.

I felt good about being proactive and getting a better return on my cash reserve. But that feeling was short-lived as I started learning more about personal finance and investments. Tired of chasing yields in bank accounts, I eventually embraced US Treasurys (debt issued and backed by the US Government) as my alternative to savings accounts and CDs.

For those unfamiliar with US Treasurys, think of them as CDs with maturities ranging from four weeks to 30 years. They're widely used as a "safe investment" by individual, institutional and even sovereign investors around the world.

There are some key differences, though. Bank deposits are insured only up to $250,000. US Treasurys, on the other hand, are backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. Therefore, there is virtually no default risk regardless of the investment amount.

Treasury interest rates, both short-term and long-term, are heavily influenced by monetary policy actions of the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Treasury interest rates directly affect many interest rates we encounter in everyday life: bank accounts, CDs, mortgage, car loans, personal and business loans, and so on.

Treasury interest rates are often higher than comparable bank products. Why? Because the intermediary financial institutions take their cut for operational costs and profits. Result? Suboptimal, or sometimes almost non-existent, interest on bank deposits.

But wait. What if I need my money back?

With bank deposits, I can walk in and withdraw cash from my account. If my money is locked in a CD, I may have to pay a penalty for early withdrawal, but I can still access it fairly quickly. What happens if I'm holding Treasurys? Do I need to wait until maturity?

That leads us to another important aspect of US Treasurys: their extremely high liquidity.

I can certainly buy newly issued Treasurys and wait until maturity, but I don't have to wait for these events. Investors around the world buy and sell Treasurys in the open market every day, making them one of the most liquid investments in existence.

Their liquidity, safety and meaningful return make Treasurys a compelling alternative for both short- and long-term cash reserves.

Sounds interesting? That's exactly how I felt after doing my own research. All I needed to figure out was the best way to invest in them.

Instead of buying Treasurys directly from the US Treasury, I use my brokerage accounts and buy and sell individual Treasurys or Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the open market, just like stocks or funds. (I used to participate in Treasury auctions through the brokerage account to buy new issues and set my holdings to auto-roll upon maturity, but I eventually stopped doing that to keep things simple.)

For annual expenses and short-term cash needs, I like short-term, highly liquid, Treasury ETFs with a practically negligible expense ratio.

For money expected in three to four years, I favor short- and intermediate-term Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) ETFs. TIPS have a lower interest rate compared to equivalent regular Treasurys, but their principal is adjusted with inflation, helping mitigate the risk of unexpected inflation.

For cash reserves further into the future, five years or more, my preference is a ladder of individual TIPS bonds, each maturing in a specific future year. Bond trading is slightly more involved than ETFs or stocks, so target-maturity TIPS ETFs can also be a reasonable alternative despite their slightly higher management fees.

Is there a catch compared to keeping money in conventional bank accounts?

I can't think of any, but there are two noticeable differences worth understanding.

First, unlike money sitting in bank accounts, Treasury investments fluctuate in value because they constantly change hands in open markets. For short-term Treasurys, the fluctuations are usually tiny. For intermediate- and long-term Treasurys, the swing can be more noticeable, especially when there's a major change in the interest rate expectation. Thankfully, these fluctuations are usually modest, and over time Treasurys often come out ahead compared to bank deposits.

The second difference deserves a bit more attention.

With a bank account, you can get hold of your money almost immediately. Treasury investments, however, may take a couple of business days to turn into spendable cash. You need to sell the ETF or bond during market hours. Once the transaction settles, usually the next business day, the proceeds can then be transferred out to the checking account for spending. In some cases, you may be able to carry on your spending activities directly from the brokerage account.

Over time, I shifted most of my liquid savings to Treasurys because of the improved result. Yet I still see many people leaving large cash balances in bank products or chasing yields from one bank to another.

I suspect the main reason is simple: lack of familiarity with US Treasurys.

  Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

TreasuryDirect changing login procedure to mandate ID.me later in 2026

"In the county I live in there recently has been just two smaller local financial institutions who still redeemed US government paper savings bonds. Both financial institutions (one a bank with a state charter, one a credit union) has limited that service strictly for their own account holders whose banking accounts are with long term customers with active accounts. With all of the changes currently occurring at Treasury Direct my expectation is the number of financial institutions redeeming old paper savings bonds for customers will soon be zero. Over the counter sales of paper savings bonds ended in 2012 and the purchase of paper savings Bonds using overpayment of taxes (which next to no one did) ended in 2025. If you own paper US Bonds you are likely doing your heirs a favor by redeeming them sooner rather than later."
- William Perry
Read more »

Tax Complications – How SS Benefits interact with Other Income

"Hung, You are welcome. I have become a big fan of Dinkytown's 1040 calculator for quick estimates. I believe that AARP's calculator is based on Dinkytown's also. The calculations in the original post can be completed in a few minutes."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

Feeling TIPSy?

NOT TOO LONG ago, Treasury Inflation Protected Security (TIPS) was a relatively obscure investment for safe long-term fixed-income investments. For the first twenty years of the new century, consumer prices were mostly stable or rising at a too-slow-to-notice rate. Why bother with anything related to inflation? Sadly, persistently low inflation made us complacent on the biggest long-term risk of bond investments -- the insidious unexpected inflation that robs us of the purchasing power of our “safe” investments. Yes, let’s not forget that the biggest risk of bond or bond-like investments is unexpected inflation. Any bond or CD with a maturity beyond a few years must either offer a sufficiently high interest rate to compensate for sudden bouts of inflation, or have its principal adjusted for the inflation actually realized. The former is nearly impossible to find without sacrificing safety. The latter is what TIPS is for. To be clear, the market and investors always expect some level of inflation. Therefore, a bond’s effective interest rate - measured by its YTM (Yield to Maturity) - must be high enough to not only compensate for “expected” inflation and the uncertainties around it but also provide a meaningful increase in the purchasing power of the original principal.  A concrete example might help. Consider a 10-year US Treasury nominal bond with a face value of $1,000, selling at $1,000 and paying 5% annual interest. The interest rate reflects the expectations about inflation and other factors over the next 10 years. The rate would be lower if market expected lower inflation, and higher if market expected the opposite. The omnipresence of inflation means we’re likely to lose some purchasing power when we get our $1,000 in 10 years. It won’t buy what $1,000 buys today. By how much? That’s the thousand dollars question (pun intended).  There isn’t a readily available number that explains why that 10-year Treasury Bond yields 5% instead of 3% or 7%. Investors essentially take a leap of faith that annual inflation stays low enough over the 10-year period for the interim interests to compensate for the purchasing power loss, plus some changes. Most of us are perfectly comfortable assuming that inflation won’t be as high as 5% for 10 years. But are we fooling ourselves? I suggest using an inflation calculator to see for ourselves. Spoiler alert: Late 1960s through early 1980s can be an eye-opening period. How’d we feel if the next 10 years turn out to be something similar? Think about how you might feel when you safekeep your money in a so-called secure investment, give up higher returns available from risky investments, and then encounter an inflationary regime. Your minimum expectation was that your purchasing power would remain intact and perhaps improve a little by the time your bond matures. Instead, unforeseen inflation erodes your purchasing power and compromises the financial goal the fund was supposed to cover.  Your “safe” investment fails you completely. You realize that it wasn’t safe at all.  If unexpected inflation is so devastating, why are we so lax about it?  I can think of two reasons.  First, our minds haven’t adapted to the reality that, unlike to a “real” asset like a bag of rice or a gallon of gasoline, money in its current form is inherently self-eroding. It slowly loses its worth over time. A hundred dollars sitting around will still be a hundred dollars next year, but it won’t buy the same amount. We don’t intuitively perceive the continuous loss of purchasing power. Even when we do internalize it with some effort, we get used to the “pace” of the loss. In other words, we view inflation as steady and unexpected inflation as highly unlikely. Alas, all it takes is a single prolonged inflationary period to change that perception. By then, however, the damage to existing fixed income investments may already be done. Frankly, I’d be very wary of keeping my long-term “safe” money -- fund that I need to preserve beyond a three-year horizon - in any form that isn’t protected against unexpected inflation. For bond investments, the most meaningful option would be TIPS. Why? Because, in addition to being secured by the full faith and credit of the US Government just like any other Treasury securities, TIPS provides three important assurances upfront. First, it provides protection against unexpected inflation, which is a realized inflation that differs from what we expected when purchasing it. If the actual inflation averages 12% instead of the expected 2%, the principal is automatically adjusted to reflect the actual inflation. No guesswork or unexpected risk involved. Second, it provides a “real interest rate” upfront that tells us how much the purchasing power of the investment will increase over time, regardless of what the actual inflation turns out to be. Buying a 10-year TIPS with real 2% annual interest means the investment’s purchasing power will grow 2% per year over the holding period, before considering taxes and other factors. The third aspect is more nuanced. It involves the possibility of inflation being lower than expected, or even negative inflation (aka deflation). Let me elaborate. If a regular nominal 10-year Treasury Bond offers 5% annual yield and an equivalent TIPS offers a real annual interest rate of 2.75%, the market-implied inflation, the breakeven inflation rate, is roughly 2.25% (5% minus 2.75%). Actual inflation, of course, will be known only after 10 years when the bond matures. Suppose the actual inflation turns out to be only 1.25%. The nominal Bond investor would end up with more purchasing power than the TIPS investor because the TIPS principle would be adjusted by only the actual 1.25% inflation rate.  The primary objective of the TIPS investor would still have been met: preserving and improving purchasing power by about 2.75% annually. But there would be a “missed opportunity”. The nominal Treasury investor would end up with even greater purchasing power. Does it mean that a TIPS investor can face an unlimited opportunity cost if inflation turns out to be negative? What happens if the actual inflation is, hypothetically speaking, negative 5%, in a severely deflationary period? Does the TIPS investor get back proportionately reduced principal at maturity? Thanks to the third assurance of TIPS, the answer is NO.  TIPS guarantees that the principal returned at maturity will never fall below the original face value. During periods of deflation, the inflation-adjusted principal can fall below its face value and the interim interest payments will decline accordingly. But at maturity, the principal is floored at the original principal amount. Therefore, the breakeven inflation rate, the difference between the yield of a nominal Treasury bond and the real yield of an equivalent TIPS, represents the maximum annual yield advantage that the nominal bond can have over TIPS in an unexpectedly low inflation regime.  To summarize, a TIPS investor gets unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation, while accepting a limited opportunity cost should the actual inflation be low or even negative. The magnitude of that trade-off is reflected in the breakeven inflation rate at the time of the TIPS purchase.  An aside: given the destructive impact of deflation on economy and society, policy makers are generally more concerned about preventing prolonged deflation than about preventing modest inflation. Therefore, prolonged deflation is usually considered less likely. Still, we cannot ignore deflation risk altogether and should be prepared for the possibility that TIPS can underperform a nominal bond if inflation runs low.  Therefore, the decision to favor TIPS over an equivalent nominal Bond hinges in part on the current breakeven inflation rate. If it’s low enough, favoring TIPS can be an easy decision. Getting unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation is worth accepting the relatively small opportunity cost if inflation comes below the breakeven rate. There is, however, a cautionary note about buying TIPS bonds in the secondary market, especially older issues. Consider a 30-year TIPS bond issued 20 years ago and a 10-year TIPS issued within last 6 months. Both might appear to be valid choices if they mature within a few months of each other and offer similar yields. But beneath the surface, one may be more favorable than the other.  The older TIPS will likely have a much higher inflation-adjusted principal because it accumulated 20 years of inflation adjustments. But the protection against unexpected deflation applies only to the bond’s original face value, which is typically $1,000.  In a prolonged deflationary period, the older bond has much more room for its inflation-adjusted principal to decline before reaching the $1,000 floor. The newer issue, whose adjusted principal is much closer to the $1,000 face value, has less exposure to this risk. Therefore, all else being equal, I’d favor a TIPS with a low inflation-adjusted factor when buying in the secondary market. All things considered, my vote goes to TIPS for long-term “safe” investments, provided the break-even inflation is reasonably low. For secondary market purchases, however, a high inflation-adjustment factor would give me pause.   Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

Federal debt

"As long as the people who run the show keep thinking the way to get out of debt is to cut income it is going to get exponentially worse."
- Kenn Garner
Read more »

$40 Trillion of Debt

SOME MILESTONES are auspicious. Others are not. This week, the Treasury announced that the federal government’s debt had topped $40 trillion for the first time. Government debt is nothing new, but the problem is now of more concern, for two reasons. First, the scale has grown. An apples-to-apples way to look at the government’s debt load is to compare it to GDP—the economy’s total annual output. On this basis, outstanding debt now exceeds 100% of GDP, a level we haven’t seen since the period immediately after World War II. That brings us to the second concern: If the government isn’t able to balance its books while the economy is strong, as it is today, lawmakers will have less flexibility to act when the next recession occurs. For a brief period about five years ago, a theory known as modern monetary policy entered the conversation. The idea, popularized by a book titled The Deficit Myth, was that we shouldn’t be so concerned with deficits—that the U.S. government should be able to borrow more or less as much as it wants. What we’ve seen, though, is that eventually deficits do matter. In simple terms, the government now takes in about $6 trillion per year in revenue, but it's spending almost $8 trillion, resulting in deficits of roughly $2 trillion. And just like a consumer who's run up a big credit card bill, interest payments now consume an ever-larger portion of annual spending. In round numbers, the government this year will spend about one in every six tax dollars it collects on interest and will spend more on interest than on defense. Why have the numbers gotten so much worse? The first factor was Covid. The government had to take extraordinary measures to pull the economy out of recession. But while that spending was mostly justified, the problem is that Congress grew accustomed to larger budget shortfalls and has been unwilling to rein things back in. Congress, in fact, went in the opposite direction when it passed a set of tax cuts a few years back. Those cuts might not have been such a problem, except that one of the lasting effects of the pandemic was inflation. It hit a high near 10% in 2022, and while it’s come down from that peak, it's still higher than it was prior to 2020. What’s the connection between inflation and the deficit? It’s more indirect, but it may be the government's biggest problem at this point. The Federal Reserve's primary strategy in fighting inflation is to raise interest rates, and that's exactly what it did beginning in 2022. That helped with inflation but became a problem for the deficit because the government is such a large borrower, and higher interest rates translated to higher borrowing costs. Unfortunately, the issue has now started to compound on itself. Despite the Fed’s lowering rates, which it has done a handful of times over the past few years, market interest rates have remained stubbornly high, especially long-term rates. That’s because the government is being forced to pay more to borrow, just like any prospective borrower whose finances look shaky. This has become something of a chicken-or-the-egg problem. If rates were lower, the deficit might shrink considerably. But rates may not drop until investors see that lawmakers have gotten serious about the issue.  Why hasn’t Congress addressed the problem? In short, it’s because the two most obvious solutions—raising taxes or cutting spending—are the last thing any politician wants to do. Ironically, this may be the one area where both parties are fully aligned. Hopefully Washington begins to get serious about the problem. For better or worse, though, this is the situation we’re in. Against this backdrop, what steps might you consider for your portfolio? Because the deficit is so closely tied to interest rates, the first area I’d focus on would be your bond holdings. With long-term interest rates at multi-decade highs, there might appear to be an opportunity to profit from long-term bonds if rates were to drop. I would be cautious, though. Just this week, we’ve seen volatility in long-term rates, and things could easily go the other way. For that reason, I recommend a conservative posture toward bonds, with the majority in short-term holdings, only a small amount in intermediate-term and none at all in long-term bonds. To be sure, this might mean forgoing some profits if rates come down, but in my view, the bond side of a portfolio should be the part that helps investors sleep at night rather than another area to worry about. What other steps could you take? I’d give thought to your long-term tax exposure. It’s possible that politicians will eventually get serious and raise taxes, and if they do, you’d want to be in a position to manage your own tax bill. Fortunately, there is one clear route to inoculating part of your portfolio against tax increases, and that’s to look for ways to build up dollars in a Roth account: If you’re in your working years, you could contribute to a Roth IRA or a Roth 401(k). Your employer might even allow for so-called mega back-door Roth contributions. If you’re retired or happen to have a low-income year, consider a Roth conversion.  A final recommendation: If you have a net worth over $10 million or so, you might give thought to estate tax strategies. Today the federal estate tax applies only to individuals with more than $15 million in assets, but this threshold has been a political football and could easily end up much lower. As recently as 2008, it was at just $2 million. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

New in 2025 – Code Y on 1099-R box 7 for QCD’s

"Here is a link to the 2026 draft 1099-R instructions dated Jun 17, 2026 wherein the IRS writes, on a preliminary basis, the following - ...unexpected issues occasionally arise, or legislation is passed—in this case, we will post a new draft of the form to alert users that changes were made to the previously posted draft... Code Y for box 7a on Form 1099-R. We added code “Y” to the list of codes for box 7a to identify a qualified charitable distribution (QCD). See Qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), later. For tax year 2026, the use of code Y to report a QCD is optional. If you are completing and filing a 2026 Form 1099-R, you may choose, but are not required, to enter code Y in box 7a. It is difficult to provide timely, clear and objective guidance when the agency who interprets the laws passed by congress and writes the detailed regulations have not finalized their rules for the tax year we are more than halfway through. My intent in this updated post was to encourage using a direct from IRA custodian to charity method for those who are making qualified distributions to avoid potential tax compliance headache for you and your tax preparer. I do not have any idea if your broker will choose to use code "Y" regardless of the method of how the QCD is distributed."
- William Perry
Read more »

The Federal Debt and Social Security Payments

"Some really good thoughts here. I was pondering this topic after reading a WSJ article on the deficit. My conclusion:the typical representation of huge deficits generated from Social Security and Medicare ignores revenue from employers, employees and taxation of SS."
- Harold Tynes
Read more »

If Retirement  is Getting Close

"This way that extra distribution above the RMD will be tax-free to her heirs instead of taxed as ordinary income."
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Reaching Two-thirds of a Century!

"Love it, Rick. Happy birthday. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

Americans and their credit cards

"Well, IMO, the credit card companies are not really the injured party in people not paying off their credit cards. Have you looked at the terms on your credit card? The interest rate? The late fees? How long it takes to pay something off if you make the minimum payment? Did you know if you pay off your card in installments that you get charged an extra month of interest the month after you pay it off? Can you tell I hate credit cards? Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

The Intentional Spendthrift

"Dana, you've hit on one of my trigger points. Ordering wine at a hotel or restaurant genuinely aggravates me—knowing I could walk into a liquor store and get the same bottle for 80% less spoils the enjoyment. I'm a big fan of BYO restaurants."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Beyond Bank Accounts

I OPENED MY FIRST bank account in the US at a local credit union (CU) close to my workplace. The CU had several convenient offers for employees of our company. With minimal effort, I opened checking and savings accounts, got free checkbooks and a credit card despite having no credit history in the US.

I was so pleased with the convenience that I handled all my banking needs through this CU for many years. That included direct deposit of my salary, payments and withdrawals, a car loan, and certificates of deposit (CDs) as my savings grew. I still maintain my checking account here and occasionally enjoy special favors as a longtime loyal customer.

Eventually, I realized that I earned very little interest from the bank deposits. I shopped around, found other banks with better rates, opened several accounts here and there, and moved my money around.

I felt good about being proactive and getting a better return on my cash reserve. But that feeling was short-lived as I started learning more about personal finance and investments. Tired of chasing yields in bank accounts, I eventually embraced US Treasurys (debt issued and backed by the US Government) as my alternative to savings accounts and CDs.

For those unfamiliar with US Treasurys, think of them as CDs with maturities ranging from four weeks to 30 years. They're widely used as a "safe investment" by individual, institutional and even sovereign investors around the world.

There are some key differences, though. Bank deposits are insured only up to $250,000. US Treasurys, on the other hand, are backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. Therefore, there is virtually no default risk regardless of the investment amount.

Treasury interest rates, both short-term and long-term, are heavily influenced by monetary policy actions of the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Treasury interest rates directly affect many interest rates we encounter in everyday life: bank accounts, CDs, mortgage, car loans, personal and business loans, and so on.

Treasury interest rates are often higher than comparable bank products. Why? Because the intermediary financial institutions take their cut for operational costs and profits. Result? Suboptimal, or sometimes almost non-existent, interest on bank deposits.

But wait. What if I need my money back?

With bank deposits, I can walk in and withdraw cash from my account. If my money is locked in a CD, I may have to pay a penalty for early withdrawal, but I can still access it fairly quickly. What happens if I'm holding Treasurys? Do I need to wait until maturity?

That leads us to another important aspect of US Treasurys: their extremely high liquidity.

I can certainly buy newly issued Treasurys and wait until maturity, but I don't have to wait for these events. Investors around the world buy and sell Treasurys in the open market every day, making them one of the most liquid investments in existence.

Their liquidity, safety and meaningful return make Treasurys a compelling alternative for both short- and long-term cash reserves.

Sounds interesting? That's exactly how I felt after doing my own research. All I needed to figure out was the best way to invest in them.

Instead of buying Treasurys directly from the US Treasury, I use my brokerage accounts and buy and sell individual Treasurys or Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the open market, just like stocks or funds. (I used to participate in Treasury auctions through the brokerage account to buy new issues and set my holdings to auto-roll upon maturity, but I eventually stopped doing that to keep things simple.)

For annual expenses and short-term cash needs, I like short-term, highly liquid, Treasury ETFs with a practically negligible expense ratio.

For money expected in three to four years, I favor short- and intermediate-term Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) ETFs. TIPS have a lower interest rate compared to equivalent regular Treasurys, but their principal is adjusted with inflation, helping mitigate the risk of unexpected inflation.

For cash reserves further into the future, five years or more, my preference is a ladder of individual TIPS bonds, each maturing in a specific future year. Bond trading is slightly more involved than ETFs or stocks, so target-maturity TIPS ETFs can also be a reasonable alternative despite their slightly higher management fees.

Is there a catch compared to keeping money in conventional bank accounts?

I can't think of any, but there are two noticeable differences worth understanding.

First, unlike money sitting in bank accounts, Treasury investments fluctuate in value because they constantly change hands in open markets. For short-term Treasurys, the fluctuations are usually tiny. For intermediate- and long-term Treasurys, the swing can be more noticeable, especially when there's a major change in the interest rate expectation. Thankfully, these fluctuations are usually modest, and over time Treasurys often come out ahead compared to bank deposits.

The second difference deserves a bit more attention.

With a bank account, you can get hold of your money almost immediately. Treasury investments, however, may take a couple of business days to turn into spendable cash. You need to sell the ETF or bond during market hours. Once the transaction settles, usually the next business day, the proceeds can then be transferred out to the checking account for spending. In some cases, you may be able to carry on your spending activities directly from the brokerage account.

Over time, I shifted most of my liquid savings to Treasurys because of the improved result. Yet I still see many people leaving large cash balances in bank products or chasing yields from one bank to another.

I suspect the main reason is simple: lack of familiarity with US Treasurys.

  Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

TreasuryDirect changing login procedure to mandate ID.me later in 2026

"In the county I live in there recently has been just two smaller local financial institutions who still redeemed US government paper savings bonds. Both financial institutions (one a bank with a state charter, one a credit union) has limited that service strictly for their own account holders whose banking accounts are with long term customers with active accounts. With all of the changes currently occurring at Treasury Direct my expectation is the number of financial institutions redeeming old paper savings bonds for customers will soon be zero. Over the counter sales of paper savings bonds ended in 2012 and the purchase of paper savings Bonds using overpayment of taxes (which next to no one did) ended in 2025. If you own paper US Bonds you are likely doing your heirs a favor by redeeming them sooner rather than later."
- William Perry
Read more »

Tax Complications – How SS Benefits interact with Other Income

"Hung, You are welcome. I have become a big fan of Dinkytown's 1040 calculator for quick estimates. I believe that AARP's calculator is based on Dinkytown's also. The calculations in the original post can be completed in a few minutes."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

Feeling TIPSy?

NOT TOO LONG ago, Treasury Inflation Protected Security (TIPS) was a relatively obscure investment for safe long-term fixed-income investments. For the first twenty years of the new century, consumer prices were mostly stable or rising at a too-slow-to-notice rate. Why bother with anything related to inflation? Sadly, persistently low inflation made us complacent on the biggest long-term risk of bond investments -- the insidious unexpected inflation that robs us of the purchasing power of our “safe” investments. Yes, let’s not forget that the biggest risk of bond or bond-like investments is unexpected inflation. Any bond or CD with a maturity beyond a few years must either offer a sufficiently high interest rate to compensate for sudden bouts of inflation, or have its principal adjusted for the inflation actually realized. The former is nearly impossible to find without sacrificing safety. The latter is what TIPS is for. To be clear, the market and investors always expect some level of inflation. Therefore, a bond’s effective interest rate - measured by its YTM (Yield to Maturity) - must be high enough to not only compensate for “expected” inflation and the uncertainties around it but also provide a meaningful increase in the purchasing power of the original principal.  A concrete example might help. Consider a 10-year US Treasury nominal bond with a face value of $1,000, selling at $1,000 and paying 5% annual interest. The interest rate reflects the expectations about inflation and other factors over the next 10 years. The rate would be lower if market expected lower inflation, and higher if market expected the opposite. The omnipresence of inflation means we’re likely to lose some purchasing power when we get our $1,000 in 10 years. It won’t buy what $1,000 buys today. By how much? That’s the thousand dollars question (pun intended).  There isn’t a readily available number that explains why that 10-year Treasury Bond yields 5% instead of 3% or 7%. Investors essentially take a leap of faith that annual inflation stays low enough over the 10-year period for the interim interests to compensate for the purchasing power loss, plus some changes. Most of us are perfectly comfortable assuming that inflation won’t be as high as 5% for 10 years. But are we fooling ourselves? I suggest using an inflation calculator to see for ourselves. Spoiler alert: Late 1960s through early 1980s can be an eye-opening period. How’d we feel if the next 10 years turn out to be something similar? Think about how you might feel when you safekeep your money in a so-called secure investment, give up higher returns available from risky investments, and then encounter an inflationary regime. Your minimum expectation was that your purchasing power would remain intact and perhaps improve a little by the time your bond matures. Instead, unforeseen inflation erodes your purchasing power and compromises the financial goal the fund was supposed to cover.  Your “safe” investment fails you completely. You realize that it wasn’t safe at all.  If unexpected inflation is so devastating, why are we so lax about it?  I can think of two reasons.  First, our minds haven’t adapted to the reality that, unlike to a “real” asset like a bag of rice or a gallon of gasoline, money in its current form is inherently self-eroding. It slowly loses its worth over time. A hundred dollars sitting around will still be a hundred dollars next year, but it won’t buy the same amount. We don’t intuitively perceive the continuous loss of purchasing power. Even when we do internalize it with some effort, we get used to the “pace” of the loss. In other words, we view inflation as steady and unexpected inflation as highly unlikely. Alas, all it takes is a single prolonged inflationary period to change that perception. By then, however, the damage to existing fixed income investments may already be done. Frankly, I’d be very wary of keeping my long-term “safe” money -- fund that I need to preserve beyond a three-year horizon - in any form that isn’t protected against unexpected inflation. For bond investments, the most meaningful option would be TIPS. Why? Because, in addition to being secured by the full faith and credit of the US Government just like any other Treasury securities, TIPS provides three important assurances upfront. First, it provides protection against unexpected inflation, which is a realized inflation that differs from what we expected when purchasing it. If the actual inflation averages 12% instead of the expected 2%, the principal is automatically adjusted to reflect the actual inflation. No guesswork or unexpected risk involved. Second, it provides a “real interest rate” upfront that tells us how much the purchasing power of the investment will increase over time, regardless of what the actual inflation turns out to be. Buying a 10-year TIPS with real 2% annual interest means the investment’s purchasing power will grow 2% per year over the holding period, before considering taxes and other factors. The third aspect is more nuanced. It involves the possibility of inflation being lower than expected, or even negative inflation (aka deflation). Let me elaborate. If a regular nominal 10-year Treasury Bond offers 5% annual yield and an equivalent TIPS offers a real annual interest rate of 2.75%, the market-implied inflation, the breakeven inflation rate, is roughly 2.25% (5% minus 2.75%). Actual inflation, of course, will be known only after 10 years when the bond matures. Suppose the actual inflation turns out to be only 1.25%. The nominal Bond investor would end up with more purchasing power than the TIPS investor because the TIPS principle would be adjusted by only the actual 1.25% inflation rate.  The primary objective of the TIPS investor would still have been met: preserving and improving purchasing power by about 2.75% annually. But there would be a “missed opportunity”. The nominal Treasury investor would end up with even greater purchasing power. Does it mean that a TIPS investor can face an unlimited opportunity cost if inflation turns out to be negative? What happens if the actual inflation is, hypothetically speaking, negative 5%, in a severely deflationary period? Does the TIPS investor get back proportionately reduced principal at maturity? Thanks to the third assurance of TIPS, the answer is NO.  TIPS guarantees that the principal returned at maturity will never fall below the original face value. During periods of deflation, the inflation-adjusted principal can fall below its face value and the interim interest payments will decline accordingly. But at maturity, the principal is floored at the original principal amount. Therefore, the breakeven inflation rate, the difference between the yield of a nominal Treasury bond and the real yield of an equivalent TIPS, represents the maximum annual yield advantage that the nominal bond can have over TIPS in an unexpectedly low inflation regime.  To summarize, a TIPS investor gets unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation, while accepting a limited opportunity cost should the actual inflation be low or even negative. The magnitude of that trade-off is reflected in the breakeven inflation rate at the time of the TIPS purchase.  An aside: given the destructive impact of deflation on economy and society, policy makers are generally more concerned about preventing prolonged deflation than about preventing modest inflation. Therefore, prolonged deflation is usually considered less likely. Still, we cannot ignore deflation risk altogether and should be prepared for the possibility that TIPS can underperform a nominal bond if inflation runs low.  Therefore, the decision to favor TIPS over an equivalent nominal Bond hinges in part on the current breakeven inflation rate. If it’s low enough, favoring TIPS can be an easy decision. Getting unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation is worth accepting the relatively small opportunity cost if inflation comes below the breakeven rate. There is, however, a cautionary note about buying TIPS bonds in the secondary market, especially older issues. Consider a 30-year TIPS bond issued 20 years ago and a 10-year TIPS issued within last 6 months. Both might appear to be valid choices if they mature within a few months of each other and offer similar yields. But beneath the surface, one may be more favorable than the other.  The older TIPS will likely have a much higher inflation-adjusted principal because it accumulated 20 years of inflation adjustments. But the protection against unexpected deflation applies only to the bond’s original face value, which is typically $1,000.  In a prolonged deflationary period, the older bond has much more room for its inflation-adjusted principal to decline before reaching the $1,000 floor. The newer issue, whose adjusted principal is much closer to the $1,000 face value, has less exposure to this risk. Therefore, all else being equal, I’d favor a TIPS with a low inflation-adjusted factor when buying in the secondary market. All things considered, my vote goes to TIPS for long-term “safe” investments, provided the break-even inflation is reasonably low. For secondary market purchases, however, a high inflation-adjustment factor would give me pause.   Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

Federal debt

"As long as the people who run the show keep thinking the way to get out of debt is to cut income it is going to get exponentially worse."
- Kenn Garner
Read more »

$40 Trillion of Debt

SOME MILESTONES are auspicious. Others are not. This week, the Treasury announced that the federal government’s debt had topped $40 trillion for the first time. Government debt is nothing new, but the problem is now of more concern, for two reasons. First, the scale has grown. An apples-to-apples way to look at the government’s debt load is to compare it to GDP—the economy’s total annual output. On this basis, outstanding debt now exceeds 100% of GDP, a level we haven’t seen since the period immediately after World War II. That brings us to the second concern: If the government isn’t able to balance its books while the economy is strong, as it is today, lawmakers will have less flexibility to act when the next recession occurs. For a brief period about five years ago, a theory known as modern monetary policy entered the conversation. The idea, popularized by a book titled The Deficit Myth, was that we shouldn’t be so concerned with deficits—that the U.S. government should be able to borrow more or less as much as it wants. What we’ve seen, though, is that eventually deficits do matter. In simple terms, the government now takes in about $6 trillion per year in revenue, but it's spending almost $8 trillion, resulting in deficits of roughly $2 trillion. And just like a consumer who's run up a big credit card bill, interest payments now consume an ever-larger portion of annual spending. In round numbers, the government this year will spend about one in every six tax dollars it collects on interest and will spend more on interest than on defense. Why have the numbers gotten so much worse? The first factor was Covid. The government had to take extraordinary measures to pull the economy out of recession. But while that spending was mostly justified, the problem is that Congress grew accustomed to larger budget shortfalls and has been unwilling to rein things back in. Congress, in fact, went in the opposite direction when it passed a set of tax cuts a few years back. Those cuts might not have been such a problem, except that one of the lasting effects of the pandemic was inflation. It hit a high near 10% in 2022, and while it’s come down from that peak, it's still higher than it was prior to 2020. What’s the connection between inflation and the deficit? It’s more indirect, but it may be the government's biggest problem at this point. The Federal Reserve's primary strategy in fighting inflation is to raise interest rates, and that's exactly what it did beginning in 2022. That helped with inflation but became a problem for the deficit because the government is such a large borrower, and higher interest rates translated to higher borrowing costs. Unfortunately, the issue has now started to compound on itself. Despite the Fed’s lowering rates, which it has done a handful of times over the past few years, market interest rates have remained stubbornly high, especially long-term rates. That’s because the government is being forced to pay more to borrow, just like any prospective borrower whose finances look shaky. This has become something of a chicken-or-the-egg problem. If rates were lower, the deficit might shrink considerably. But rates may not drop until investors see that lawmakers have gotten serious about the issue.  Why hasn’t Congress addressed the problem? In short, it’s because the two most obvious solutions—raising taxes or cutting spending—are the last thing any politician wants to do. Ironically, this may be the one area where both parties are fully aligned. Hopefully Washington begins to get serious about the problem. For better or worse, though, this is the situation we’re in. Against this backdrop, what steps might you consider for your portfolio? Because the deficit is so closely tied to interest rates, the first area I’d focus on would be your bond holdings. With long-term interest rates at multi-decade highs, there might appear to be an opportunity to profit from long-term bonds if rates were to drop. I would be cautious, though. Just this week, we’ve seen volatility in long-term rates, and things could easily go the other way. For that reason, I recommend a conservative posture toward bonds, with the majority in short-term holdings, only a small amount in intermediate-term and none at all in long-term bonds. To be sure, this might mean forgoing some profits if rates come down, but in my view, the bond side of a portfolio should be the part that helps investors sleep at night rather than another area to worry about. What other steps could you take? I’d give thought to your long-term tax exposure. It’s possible that politicians will eventually get serious and raise taxes, and if they do, you’d want to be in a position to manage your own tax bill. Fortunately, there is one clear route to inoculating part of your portfolio against tax increases, and that’s to look for ways to build up dollars in a Roth account: If you’re in your working years, you could contribute to a Roth IRA or a Roth 401(k). Your employer might even allow for so-called mega back-door Roth contributions. If you’re retired or happen to have a low-income year, consider a Roth conversion.  A final recommendation: If you have a net worth over $10 million or so, you might give thought to estate tax strategies. Today the federal estate tax applies only to individuals with more than $15 million in assets, but this threshold has been a political football and could easily end up much lower. As recently as 2008, it was at just $2 million. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 69: WE CAN’T control whether stocks rise or fall, but we can ensure we pocket whatever the market delivers—by diversifying broadly, holding down investment costs and minimizing taxes.

think

EASTERLIN PARADOX. Within a society, those with higher incomes tend to say they’re happier, observed economist Richard Easterlin in 1974—and yet, as the society’s income climbs over time, overall happiness doesn’t increase. For instance, the U.S. standard of living has more than doubled over the past four decades, but happiness hasn’t budged.

Truths

NO. 129: FOREIGN shares tend to rise and fall in sync with U.S. stocks, but that close correlation doesn’t mean you’ll get the same return. In many years, there’s a big performance difference between U.S. and foreign shares—and the gap is even larger in any given decade, with the two asset classes often taking turns posting strong results.

act

SHORTEN YOUR commute. Thinking of moving home or taking a new job? Research suggests that if you can keep your daily commute to under 20 minutes—and preferably walk to work—you will be happier. By contrast, a long commute, especially by car, is associated with greater unhappiness, worse physical health and a higher divorce rate.

Stocks bonds cash

Manifesto

NO. 69: WE CAN’T control whether stocks rise or fall, but we can ensure we pocket whatever the market delivers—by diversifying broadly, holding down investment costs and minimizing taxes.

Spotlight: Spending

Detailed tracking expenses and spending. Is there real value?

This is not criticism, it’s an inquiry.
Over the years I have read many times on HD about tracking expenses/spending. Some people pursue this in great detail, some seem to approach it like a hobby. There may be something motivating in knowing how every penny is spent. 
As you may suspect, I don’t know in detail where or how we spend our money. As long as the big picture is in balance I am happy. 
What I do know is the bank balance is $X at the end of the month,

Read more »

A Rant about the Price of Gas, Part II: Live Experiment

Let’s all collectively do a real time experiment regarding my recent post/rant about the price of gas.   Facts :
1) Israel attacked Iran last night.
2) Refineries were NOT hit.
3) The Strait of Hormuz remains open
4) according to Google, it takes about 5-7 weeks for oil from the Middle East to arrive in the US
5) as I write this,  the price of oil has gone up 8.67 % since yesterday.
How long will it take,

Read more »

Where and When Do You Spend?

This is not a political post, but the basis is a political action. Friday, Feb. 28, was the so-called Nationwide Economic Blackout. My wife and I decided to participate. For us, this wasn’t about specific retailers. We simply made no discretionary (or mandatory) purchases that day. It was not a difficult commitment.
Thinking about this over the weekend, I realized that the result of that day wasn’t anything special for us. There are many days that we spend absolutely nothing.

Read more »

A matter of significant financial concern – want fries with that?

Went out to dinner the other night with another couple. Connie an I ordered and then the others. “We’re going to split a meal,” the wife said.
Okay, won’t be dining with them again.  I think that is rude and unfair to the sever and the restaurant. Just about as rude as the people who finish their meal, pay their check and then sit and talk at the table while a score of folks stand about waiting for their turn. 

Read more »

The Value of Scratch Cooking in Retirement

Suzie and I had a delicious meal last night – slow-roasted chicken, stacked on a bed of buttery Irish champ with a Bailey’s Cream-infused peppercorn sauce, very tasty! Top-quality restaurant fare. But the thing was, I made it from scratch.
I’ve always, for as long as I can remember, had a passion for cooking. It’s one of my favourite activities and brings me immense personal satisfaction seeing people enjoy the food I’ve created. Now that I am retired,

Read more »

A Quick Question about Retirement Vacations

I’ve been at my holiday home for 10 days now, feeling relaxed and enjoying myself. It’s the first ‘holiday’ since retirement. What piqued my interest, though, is a subtle but distinct difference: this break feels less intense, is probably the word, than vacations I took while still working. It’s not the same kind of escape. Has anyone else noticed this after retirement?

Read more »

Spotlight: Southworth

Bucket List

WHEN YOU’VE BEEN saving and investing for a long time, you have a long list of things you wish you could do over. Like hanging on to Apple, instead of selling at $85 a share. Like buying an index fund, instead of that hot mutual fund that quickly turned cold. My wife calls these “what ifs.” We have a rule not to talk about them because they almost always lead to arguments about who was wrong. Of course, there are also “what ifs” on the positive side. What if we sold everything when the market crashed in 2000-02, 2007-09 and 2020? What if we hadn’t started saving in our 401(k) plans when we got married? What if I hadn’t chosen to leave corporate America to see the country in an RV and later entered seminary? My most positive “what if” these days is this: What if I hadn’t become a devotee of the bucket approach to retirement allocation in the past five years? Most of our negative financial “what ifs” happened when we forgot when we were going to need our money. Selling stocks or mutual funds just because they go up or down is foolish, especially when retirement is 10 or 20 years away. Kathleen and I were foolish a lot over the years, usually when the market boomed or busted. Discovering the bucket approach a few years ago has provided much more peace and financial serenity in our lives. We park two years of cash in certificates of deposit and savings accounts. Money for years three through seven goes into bonds and very-low risk mutual funds. Anything we won’t need for at least seven years is in stocks. Last year, when the stock market briefly crashed, I was—for the first time in my life—calm and serene because I…
Read more »

Stuck in the Sand

MY WIFE AND I recently took our first mini-vacation since 2019. We traveled to the Outer Banks in North Carolina for a long weekend to celebrate our anniversary. The weather was perfect, the crowds were small, the food was delectable and the morning sunrise was spectacular. But none of these memories has stuck with me like the one that wasn’t so delightful. We spent a morning driving up the coast to enjoy the sights and sounds of the small villages and towns along the way, as well as the breathtaking vistas of the Atlantic Ocean. We were surprised when the two-lane road dead-ended on a beach. Four-wheel drive cars were invited to continue with hopes of seeing some of the wild horses who have roamed the beach for centuries. We own a four-wheel drive car, but I’d never driven on a beach before and my instincts were telling me, “Don’t do it.” We went ahead anyway. Within two minutes, we were stuck in the sand. Revving the engine and spinning the wheels made the situation worse, as did the non-loving words my wife and I exchanged. After finding no help in the owner’s manual, we got out to see what we could do. People driving by yelled, “Let the air out of the tires.” We got on our hands and knees to flatten out the sand around the wheels. We pushed special buttons in the car. Nothing worked. Eventually, someone stopped and offered to help push. I put the car in reverse and within minutes we were back on the road. The only wild horses we saw were on the postcards at the gift shop. But the experience hasn’t left me, probably because I often get metaphorically stuck in the sand. I’m guessing you do, too. Sometimes, it’s been in…
Read more »

CDs and Cemeteries

“A YEAR TO LIVE.” That’s the name of a class I’ve been teaching on and off for the past 20 years. My hope: Participants will gain more understanding, acceptance and peace about one of life’s few guarantees—death. This year’s class members have a little over five months left to live. Every group is a little different. Some people resist the practicalities of preparing for death: putting things in writing, making medical and funeral arrangements, and divvying up their possessions. Others struggle with the spiritual and emotional preparations, such as making amends, letting go of control and telling those close to them how much they’ve meant. Last month’s homework included visiting a local cemetery to reflect on how we’re doing. Less than half of this year’s class made time for the cemetery visit. Those who did reported little impact, saying that—since they plan on being cremated—the cemetery didn’t mean much to them. I visited our local historical cemetery for the first time. I’ve loved cemeteries for as long as I can remember. I make a point of visiting them whenever I can. They’re one of the few public places where we acknowledge death. Normally, I start by finding famous people’s plots, which are often a pilgrimage site. But this time, I couldn’t find the famous politicians’ or national championship coach’s resting places. I decided to find a shady spot, sit on a bench dedicated in memory to a loved one, and meditate. I was surrounded by the graves of Edward who died in 2017 at the age of 86, Nancy who died in 2013 at 77, and Titus Elijah who died at seven. Ken was born in 1942 and Jacqueline was born in 1947. No dates of death yet. I was reminded, once again, that the rich and famous—like the rest…
Read more »

Playing Games

REUBEN KLAMER, one of my greatest financial teachers, died last month. I never knew his name until I read his obituary. Klamer invented The Game of Life—the one that’s played with a spinner, a small plastic car full of blue and pink stick people, and lots of money. I grew up in the 1960s, long before the internet or video games. Board games were what we played when it was rainy outside or when we had family gatherings. Two games taught me about money more than any book or class: Monopoly and The Game of Life. Monopoly was my Economics 101 class. I learned about real estate, rental income and mortgages. I chose to be the banker whenever I could because I had access to more money—and could occasionally embezzle. I bought everything I could, mortgaged myself to the hilt, and reveled in the wheeling and dealing that started when people couldn’t pay their rent. Making deals was more fun than bankruptcy. Especially when I was the one coming up short. I learned about taxation, going to jail and the randomness of it all. The Game of Life was my advanced economics course. It was more comprehensive than Monopoly. I had to worry about education, family and the poor farm. I got a job and its value was in my annual salary, which was much more than the $200 I got when I passed Go. The more blue and pink stick people in my car, the more worry and joy I had. The money had bigger numbers and was more exciting. The roulette wheel replaced the dice. My favorite part of the game was that you could win it all, even if you were broke, by hitting the right number at the end of the game. I wonder how many…
Read more »

Answering the Call

ON NEW YEAR’S DAY 1994, life was looking pretty good. I was age 35 and, despite not having a college degree, was slowly climbing the corporate ladder. I’d just finished the most lucrative year of my career, and a semi-promotion promised to increase my income by 50% to 100%. My wife Kathleen was happily home-schooling our six- and 13-year-old boys, and we were thinking about buying a bigger house. Then life happened. On Jan. 4, my wife got the call from her doctor that her recent medical tests hadn’t turned out well. She had early stage breast cancer. That night, as we lay in bed, I blurted out something I probably shouldn’t have. But I believed it to be true. “This is going to be one of the best things that ever happened to us.” My terrified wife didn’t yell at me or punch me out. Instead, we held each other, and hoped and prayed that something good might come from our fear that she had a potentially terminal disease. The next few weeks would change our lives. My company was supportive of me taking time off to be with Kathleen during her treatments, but that time wasn’t enough. The company was downsizing and, although I wasn’t in the demographic they were targeting, I decided to take early retirement so I could be with my family fulltime. As Kathleen completed her radiation treatments, I told her we should follow one of our dreams and use most of my severance package to buy a used RV and take a trip around the country with our boys. At first, she thought I was insane. I had no job, she was recovering from cancer and we had never driven an RV before. Her friends, however, convinced her it was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. On…
Read more »

Thankful Tomorrow

I RARELY PREACH these days—at least in front of congregations—but I still recall how hard it was, every Thanksgiving week, to come up with something new to say about gratitude. The messages we hear and see this week will be fairly consistent: Buy more food and stuff. But also: Thanks be to God. Thanks for the life we enjoy. Expressing gratitude is indeed good. Practice more of it in your life, and life will be sweeter. Each year, I would express such sentiments and try to add some new angle to the message. The problem: At this time of year, gratitude becomes a cliche. My inner eight-year-old remembers how much I hated reciting everything I was grateful for at school and then again at the Thanksgiving dinner table. An eight-year-old gets tired of being grateful over and over again for his cat, his baseball cards and his family. It can get boring and eventually he starts making things up. At least this eight-year-old did. One of our challenges this time of year is to remember to cultivate an attitude of gratitude—and not an attitude of taking it for granted. As the holidays near, and we’re bombarded with requests for donations and holiday shopping commercials, it’s easy to forget that gratitude isn’t just a cliche to help sell things. Gratitude is one of the most important spiritual traits, and we would be wise to nurture and practice it. Research has shown that, “Gratitude helps people feel more positive emotions, relish good experiences, improve their health, deal with adversity, and build strong relationships.” A giving of thanks shouldn’t happen just on the second Monday of October or the fourth Thursday of November, depending on whether you live in Canada or the U.S. It’s a story and a way of life for every…
Read more »