FREE NEWSLETTER

Should Retirees Get a Temporary Flat Tax Window on IRA and 401(k) Withdrawals?

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Jeff Peck on 5/18/2026

A friend shared an interesting idea from David Bach’s “IRA Flat Tax” proposal, and it got me to thinking.

Here is the white paper if you haven’t read it:

IRA Flat Tax White Paper – David Bach.pdf – Google Drive

The basic idea is simple: for a limited window, maybe 2026–2033, retirees could voluntarily withdraw money from traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, and similar retirement accounts at a flat federal tax rate — possibly around 12%.

The goal would be to make it easier for retirees to use the money they spent decades saving, instead of letting fear of taxes, RMDs, and complicated tax planning keep that money locked up until later in life.

On paper, I can see the argument.

Many retirees did the right thing. They worked, saved, invested, delayed gratification, and built retirement accounts. But once they retire, some are afraid to touch the money because every withdrawal feels like a tax event, an IRMAA risk, or a planning mistake.

A temporary flat-tax window might encourage people to spend, gift, convert, repair homes, help family, travel, or simply enjoy more of what they earned while they are still healthy enough to use it.

But there are fair questions too.

Would this mostly benefit people with larger retirement accounts? Would it pull too much future tax revenue forward? Would it complicate Social Security taxation, Medicare premiums, and long-term tax planning? And would Congress ever create something this simple without adding layers of rules?

My Practical Take:

Retirement accounts were built to support retirement — not just to become a tax puzzle for retirees and heirs. A simple, temporary tax window could be a useful idea, but the details would matter greatly.

Would you support a temporary flat tax on traditional IRA and 401(k) withdrawals?

And if the rate were 12%, would it change how you handled withdrawals, Roth conversions, gifting, or spending in retirement?

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R Quinn
6 hours ago

The comments here are encouraging when you compare what is posted on social media which is essentially – why should we pay taxes, but give us more, including free healthcare.

Dave Melick
8 hours ago

That 7-year window would have adverse effects on federal revenue that investors have known about all along. Doesn’t seem appropriate to change such laws that only benefit some rather than all.

Dan Smith
9 hours ago

I agree with the two guys below.

R Quinn
9 hours ago

We should not be supporting anything that lowers federal revenue as long as we are adding trillions to the national debt. We are currently creating a crisis level burden for our children and grandchildren.

This reminds of the plethora of social media posts saying SS should be increased instead of Congress giving itself a raise- which hasn’t occurred since 2009 and of course, one has nothing to do with the other.

Last edited 9 hours ago by R Quinn
Michael01670723
10 hours ago

Not good policy with a $1.9 trillion federal budget deficit.
Unless we somehow start to reign in federal spending.

Free Newsletter

SHARE