Go to main Forum page »
On July 4th, the president signed a significant new tax and spending bill into law. The text of the bill runs to almost 900 pages and affects nearly every corner of the tax code, including personal, business and estate tax rules.
Below I summarize the provisions I see as most relevant to financial planning. It’s important to note that many of the provisions are retroactive to the beginning of 2025.
The formal name of the law is the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” and it is, for the most part, positive for taxpayers. It does come at a cost, though, which I’ll address further below.
Personal income tax rates: The most significant element of the new bill is that it makes the current tax brackets permanent. Because these had been scheduled to revert in 2026 to a much higher set of rates, this should provide greater certainty as you think about financial plan for the coming years.
Standard deduction: The standard deduction is essentially unchanged but will receive a bit of an increase for 2025—an additional $750 for single filers and $1,500 for those married and filing jointly—providing a small additional tax benefit for this year.
Itemized deductions: A provision that had been the subject of significant debate was the so-called SALT cap. By way of background, prior to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), state and local taxes had been fully deductible against federal income taxes. But since 2018, this deduction had been capped at $10,000 for both single and married taxpayers. The new law increases the cap but in a limited way and only for a limited time.
Between 2025 and 2029, the cap will be increased from $10,000 to $40,000, but this higher cap won’t apply to everyone. A phaseout will apply to incomes between $500,000 and $600,000. Beyond $600,000, the lower cap of $10,000 will apply. This will make tax planning especially important for those with incomes in the neighborhood of that phaseout range. For better or worse, though, this will only be an issue for the next five years, after which this provision will expire.
For business owners who had been taking advantage of a pass-through entity tax (PTET) strategy as a workaround to the SALT cap, there is good news. Despite a push by some in Congress to prohibit these strategies, they will be unaffected.
Bonus standard deduction: There has been a misconception that the new law will make Social Security exempt from income tax. That is not true, but a new provision in the law offers a benefit for many Social Security recipients: A deduction of $6,000 per person will now be available to taxpayers age 65 and older. This new deduction will be on top of existing deductions, including the existing extra deduction that already applies to those 65 and up. But unfortunately, this special deduction isn’t quite as generous as it appears. It only applies for tax years 2025 through 2028, and it comes with an income cap. It will phase out as income increases above $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for those married and filing jointly.
Qualified business income (QBI) deduction: For business owners, the new law makes the QBI deduction permanent and enhances it a bit.
Charitable giving: When it comes to charitable giving, the new law is a mix bag, providing a benefit to some but imposing a cost on others.
Taxpayers who make charitable gifts but not enough to itemize deductions will benefit under the new law. Starting next year, single filers will be able to deduct up to $1,000 of donations, and joint filers will be able to deduct up to $2,000.
A separate new provision, however, will make charitable giving a bit less tax efficient for those who itemize. Starting next year, charitable gifts will only be deductible to the extent that they exceed 0.5% of adjusted gross income. For example, if a taxpayer has income of $100,000 and contributes $2,000 to charity, the first $500 (0.5% x $100,000) will no longer be deductible. Only the remaining $1,500 can be deducted. This provision will go into effect next year, making charitable gifts relatively more valuable in 2025 than in 2026, all things being equal.
An additional note on this new 0.5% requirement: It used to be that qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) and charitable gifts that could be itemized were the same tax-wise except for the IRMAA impact. But with the new 0.5% rule on charitable deductions, that will make QCDs—for those who meet the age threshold—relatively even more valuable starting next year.
Estate tax: Starting in 2026, the estate tax lifetime exclusion was scheduled to be cut in half, from approximately $14 million per person to $7 million. While these are both big numbers, the lower threshold would have made the estate tax a consideration for many more people. Under the new rules, the lifetime exclusion will not revert and will actually increase somewhat. Beginning in 2026, the exclusion will be $15 million per person.
This should provide much greater certainty for planning purposes. That said, no law can ever be considered truly permanent. A future administration, with a politically aligned Congress, could make the rules more punitive again, and it is a real possibility. Though the estate tax provides minimal revenue to the government, it’s a political football. For that reason, I would characterize the new rules as only semi-permanent.
529 accounts: Prior to the 2017 TCJA, withdrawals from 529 accounts were permitted only for higher education. The TCJA loosened that restriction, allowing withdrawals of up to $10,000 per student per year for K-12 education. Beginning next year, this limit will be increased to $20,000. Parents will also be able to use 529 funds for a broader set of educational institutions, including vocational and certification programs.
Trump accounts: The law creates a new type of savings account for children known as “Trump accounts.” They’ll be similar to IRAs but with a few key differences. Unlike IRAs, children won’t be required to have income in order to contribute, meaning that parents could begin funding one of these accounts from the time a child is born. Employers will also be able to contribute to accounts for employees’ children without the contributions counting as income. For business owners, this opens up an interesting new employee benefit opportunity. Also, a pilot program will provide a $1,000 tax credit to parents who open a Trump account, but this credit will apply initially only to children born in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.
These new accounts will come online in July 2026, and the initial contribution limit will be $5,000 per year.
Cost: These new rules are almost universally positive for taxpayers. As the saying goes, however, there is no such thing as a free lunch. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the new rules will add $3.4 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years. That’s on top of the existing debt load of $36 trillion, which is growing at a rate of about $2 trillion per year. Because both political parties continue to show no serious interest in addressing this issue, the result is that interest expenses will continue to consume a growing portion of the federal budget. But if a future Congress chose to get serious about this issue, there is a possibility that future tax rates could move higher. For that reason, I suggest a multi-year outlook as you think about your estate plan.
The new law contains hundreds of other provisions, but upon initial review, this is what seems most important for financial planning purposes.
Another nice summary of OBBB here:
https://www.theretirementmanifesto.com/obbba-tax-changes-while-trekking-through-the-alps-a-pre-go-go-reflection/
“There has been a misconception that the new law will make Social Security exempt from income tax.” is a very neutral way of saying that Trump has publicly and repeatedly stated this lie.
A note of caution if you are calculating the phase out of the bonus standard deduction for taxpayers over age 65. The phase out for couples filing jointly is from $150,000 to $250,000 modified adjusted gross income. Many articles I have seen say to reduce the $12,000 bonus by 6% of the amount your income exceeds $150,000. Note that that is 6% per person. For an income of $175,000, the excess is $25000. 6% of $25,000 is $1500. For a couple with this income, the bonus deduction is reduced by $3000 ($1500 x 2) for a deduction of $9000. I was initially confused by this and others may be as well.
MAGI ($) | Deduction Remaining ($)
—————-|————————-
150,000 | 12,000
175,000 | 9,000
200,000 | 6,000
225,000 | 3,000
250,000 | 0
Great note Howard,
In his newsletter of this morning Mike Piper, CPA corrected a comment on this topic he made in his prior newsletter.
His correction stated –
In the context of a married couple filing jointly who are both age 65+, the way I originally read the text of the Act, I understood it as the total deduction amount phasing out at a 6% rate (which would have the phaseout range go from $150,000 to $350,000).
Instead, it is actually the $6,000 base amount per person that phases out at a 6% rate. In other words, for a married couple, both spouses’ deductions are being phased out simultaneously. Point being, you only need $100,000 of excess MAGI before the deduction is fully phased out. (That is, by MAGI of $250,000, a couple will not receive any senior deduction.)
I expect we will see additional explanations regarding tax law changes and new tax law that are included in the OBBBA. Fortunately we all have months rather than days to get up to speed on the new tax law.
It is my understanding that the bill also includes a tax deduction for the interest paid for a new vehicle. There are restrictions. It must be new, assembled in the U.S., for personal use, of certain type and not exceed certain gross weight, etc. The deduction is phased out for higher earners.
I have a question re: $6,000 deduction. you say: “A deduction of $6,000 per person will now be available to taxpayers age 65 and older.” I have not read that it’s $6000 per person. So assuming my my wife & I have AGI < $150,000, we get a total of $12,000 add’l deduction? While my wife is 65 (or will be in NOvember), she is not drawing social secrity benefits yet.
Here is my understanding of the new deduction. It is a maximum of $6,000 per person. You don’t have to be drawing SS benefits to get it. As long as both spouses are 65 and meet the $150K limit, the total MFJ deduction would be: $31,500 (base) + $3,200 (additional for age) + $12,000 (new bonus) = $46,700.
The $6,000 per-person deduction is reduced by 6 percent of the amount of MAGI that exceeds the income limits. So a married couple that had $200,000 in income would each get a $3,000 ($50,000 x 0.06) deduction, or $6,000 total.
The deduction is completely eliminated for single filers with MAGI above $175,000 and for married-filing-jointly couples with MAGI above $250,000.
From the Journal of Accountancy article update 7/7/2025 after passage of OBBBA-
Personal exemptions and senior deduction: The Senate bill permanently sets the deduction for personal exemptions at zero. However, it provides a temporary $6,000 deduction under Sec. 151 for individual taxpayers who are age 65 or older. This senior deduction begins to phase out when a taxpayer’s MAGI exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 in the case of a joint return). It will be in effect for the years 2025 through 2028.
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2025/jun/tax-changes-in-senate-budget-reconciliation-bill/
Thanks for the update on the B cubed bill. We appreciate your sorting it all out. The truth is we need to REDUCE the deficit.
The ACA tax cliff comes back and is basically a large tax increase. Win some and you lose some.
Many of us in Europe are bemused by this bill and the likely increase in America’s debt seems very scary.
So are we Rita….
Another one that may be of interest to some is that if your student loan is discharged due to total and permanent disability or death you will no longer get a 1099-C so the loan amount won’t be considered ordinary income and thus taxable as income. The pandemic pause stopped this and they were set to start back up 1/1/26. Note- this was always true for disability if that was done via the VA, but not via Social Security or a physicians letter. This is NOT retroactive because of the pandemic pause stopped them to begin with.
Also the Public Service student loans, teach student loans, etc. will still be discharged after 10 years of qualified employment with no 1099-C. Nothing was touched in that respect. Although now, outside of that, there will only be 2 repayment plans. The rest have been cancelled.
There are limits on the amount of school loans medical and dental students can take out which is $200,000. That doesn’t even cover tuition at any private medical or dental school and even many state schools. As it is almost impossible for these students to work part time due to rotations they are going to either need parental help or take out private loans. This will cut down on the number of students who can even go to especially medical or dental school (although usually they don’t have night rotations or 12+ hour shifts) due to no way to pay for it plus their living expenses, books, lab fees, etc.
Graduate students are limited to $100,000 which might work if the graduate student has a grad assistantship (masters students usually don’t, just PhD students) and based on the fact that it takes, on average 5-7 years to finish a PhD many of these students will struggle to pay for school.
In my opinion we are damaging our ability to have highly trained professionals that some fields need like in STEM, college faculty, doctors, etc.
Liz: While I can appreciate your concerns for doctors and dentists, etc., regarding limits on student loan debt, for many other graduate students this is a blessing in disguise.
After spending 40 years in financial services and 15 years in academia, i assure you,a great numnber of “graduate students” have no business being in school. This is especially true for PhD students.
During my doctoral studies, which I started and completed in my 60’s, I was surrounded by 20 year old and 30 year old students, “finding themselves.” Many of their dissertations were garbage, and merely “checked the boxes” for graduation.
Considering the number of faculty positions available annaully is roughly 1/3 of the number of graduatung PhDs, for most of these students, universities are simply taking their money, or more correctly, Government Student Loan money, and producing unemployable graduates.
I am actually encouraged by the recent realization that college educations for many are no tthe answer…and that pursuing careers in the trades makes much more sense, intellectually and financially.
Take a guess which of the following individuals, on average, chieves greater financial success and actually contrubutes to the ecomnmy of the US…
A master plumber, electrician, HVAC installer/repairman….or a PhD, in any non-STEM field?
Kevin, you’ve brought back the good old grad school debate—what’s the point? Making better humans, better careers, or just giving tenured profs a place to loiter in tweed. Either way, with AI running the script soon, we’re all chasing a goalpost that’s moving like the Fed Fund Rate.
This analysis is fine, but it’s the hundreds of other provisions that I’m most concerned about – that no one has yet analyzed and reported on.
Does anyone know where – other than reading the bill for myself – I can find more info on this?
https://usafacts.org/articles/whats-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/?utm_source=USAFacts_Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=07_07_25_Flagship_OBBBA%20and%20trade%20%26%20tariffs&_kx=ZynK5EGkE-D_TxiWwrqCJspAzMFGUbJX4TZHzIdAvI5-CXiHaSLYGDqJKLML-R5o.SH8aQb
Lots of unbiased data on the bill:
https://usafacts.org/articles/whats-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/?utm_source=USAFacts_Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=07_07_25_Flagship_OBBBA%20and%20trade%20%26%20tariffs&_kx=ZynK5EGkE-D_TxiWwrqCJspAzMFGUbJX4TZHzIdAvI5-CXiHaSLYGDqJKLML-R5o.SH8aQb
Google brings up some summaries but they leave many things out. I had to use the search function in the bill to find out what happened to getting 1099-C’s once the pandemic pause ended. Results: student loans that are canceled because of total and permanent disability or death of the student (does not explicitly address parent student loans for students and so no idea what is happening with those under these circumstances) will not result in a 1099-C (this was already the case if the student used the VA for this and, of course, the pandemic pause stopped anyone from getting a 1099-C).
And there, as you noted, far more things not addressed in most summaries of this long bill.
Thank you, Adam, for putting things in plain English for us. I appreciate it. Chris
All these temporary changes and phaseouts are wasting my time with extra planning (changing my spreadsheets).
Hi Adam,
A great article as usual.
I’m a little confused though. Would you please expound on, “But with the new 0.5% rule on charitable deductions, that will make QCDs—for those who meet the age threshold—relatively even more valuable starting next year.” How so?
Thaks
Here’s my take,*for those who itemize*, quoting Adam: “It used to be that qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) and charitable gifts that could be itemized were the same tax-wise except for the IRMAA impact…”
The .5% rule reduces the amount that can be claimed as an itemized deduction, but does *not* reduce the amount that can be claimed as a QCD. Therefore…”that will make QCDs–for those who meet the age threshold–relatively…more valuable starting next year”, when these new rules take effect.
Its refreshing to read a non-partisan, clearly written and easily understood explanation for a complex bill. Thank you.
Also of interest to many HD readers: the 1099-K reporting threshold for third parties is now $20,000 on more than 200 transactions, retroactive to 2021. In addition, 1099-NEC reporting threshold is moved from $600 to $2,000, effective in 2026, and is indexed to inflation.
Just to clarify, the provision for the charitable deduction for those who don’t itemize only becomes effective in 2026 (not available for 2025), but it is permanent.
A sincere thank you Adam.
It’s an ugly big bill!
Before the BBB Act (for my family)
Didn’t itemize; SALT cap didn’t matter. Taxed on Social Security, didn’t feel poor. Got full SS and Medicare. Ate oatmeal, nuts and salad. TurboTax got confused. My kids paid their FICA and built careers
After the BBB Act
SALT cap rose, still not itemizing. SS credits come, won’t feel richer. Same full Medicare benefits. Same oatmeal, nuts and salad. TurboTax more confused. My kids still pay FICA – work even harder.
Eight Years Later
SS shrunk. Medicare pays less. Older, may be sicker if drugs are unaffordable. Oatmeal still manageable, but nuts and salad, not so much
If AI takes my kids’ jobs, FICA might not matter
All the sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Yikes, I’ve read a lot of articles about the bill, but I missed the one about charitable contributions. Ugh.
On the other hand, the deduction for tipped workers is definitely going to help my daughter, who makes her living as a server/bartender.
Plus there doesn’t seem any interest to address the big problems related to SS and Medicare solvency. Two things Congress has been urged to do by the trustees for more than ten years.
The promise of “tax free” Social Security won’t offset a 20% cut in benefits.
Adam, thanks for a nice summary.
Adam, Thank you for your summary. This is very helpful! I was aware of most of those changes that impact us, but I couldn’t find the detail of when the standard deduction charitable giving law went into effect. My goal this year is to simplify and de-clutter and the garage is getting full of items to donate.