FREE NEWSLETTER

Forum › Behavior

I don’t feel comfortable being “wealthy”

I have been pondering over this post for several days. I fear it will be misinterpreted, but here goes.

I don’t feel comfortable being wealthy. Like it or not, justified or not, planned or not I meet the typical definition of wealthy. These days that seems a dirty word – even though I’m not near the eight figure mark let alone ten.

I just finished our income taxes and it actually feels like we did pay our fair share. We pay IRMAA premiums and tax on 85% of our Social Security. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not complaining. The good thing as I see it is, wealthy is better than being rich. 

The terms “rich” and “wealthy” are often used interchangeably, but there’s a subtle, yet significant difference between them.

A rich person might have a high-paying job and live a lavish lifestyle, but their financial security could be vulnerable if their income suddenly stops.

A wealthy person, on the other hand, possesses assets that generate income, providing them with greater financial independence and stability.

Being rich is about having a lot of money, being wealthy is about having financial independence and security.

How do you know which you may be? I think it’s a feeling of security, but you can always measure yourself against the data. For example from the Federal Reserve on net worth. What their surveys show.

Ages 45-54 median $247,200 average $975,800

Ages 55-64 median $364,500 average $1,566,900

Ages 65-74 median $409,900 average $1,794,600

Age 75 +     median $335,600 average $1,624,100

So, if you exceed these numbers you might be wealthy. 

Investopedia has an article explaining net worth at various ages. Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko, authors of “The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America’s Wealthy” offered this formula as rule of thumb:

“Ideal” Net worth = Age X Pretax Income / 10

For example if your income is $60,000 and you are age 55, your ideal net worth according to these guys is $330,000. That seems mighty low to me. 

In many cases home equity will exceed that number. 

On the other hand, it looks reasonable when compared with the Federal Reserve data, but I wouldn’t call it “ideal.”  Actually, I don’t think it’s wealthy either. 

Does it all matter? To someone getting by on $45,000, earning $100,000 may be wealthy and so on. Some people with modest earnings may have accumulated a hefty net worth. 

In any case, there are better ways to be wealthy that don’t involve money. In that regard I feel we are well into ten figures. 

More On This Topic

Email Alerts for this Comment Thread
Notify of
74 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Donny Hrubes
1 year ago

Thank you King Richard,
I’m just fine with having excess spendable money at this time of life. Having done things throughout life to get to this point and succeeding, is very gratifying as the dream was fulfilled. I was a poor kid decades ago coming to Denver and just stuck around and worked life for the best, so I feel I should be successful from the effort.
Others who have not done the research or work may not be enamored with me.
A lady once told me, “What other people think of me, is none of my business.”
No reason to be regretful.

William Dorner
1 year ago

There is a lot of truth in that. It is difficult, especially in these current times to feel your wealth is at the right level, especially when you lose like 10% in 2 days! I imagine most Humble Dollar people are above the figures you listed. Actually, I would take Good Health over Good Wealth any day.

medhat
1 year ago
Reply to  William Dorner

Agreed. A bit unfortunate that there doesn’t seem a wealth (no pun intended) of objective, trustworthy, and reliable advice about getting and staying healthy that isn’t a cover for someone else’s snake oil or paid influencer scheme. And I greatly worry that the current US climate is such that the door to those charlatans has been opened wide, with no legitimate arbiter of truth to present a (relatively) non-biased counterpoint.

David Weiss
1 year ago

this one is easy…flip the thought.

being rich is function of how much?..an accounting.

being wealthy is a function of how long?..a measure of time–food, shelter, lodging, comfort, extravagances and choices ongoing?

the object of wealth is is inter-generational..me and mine will prosper ad infinitum.

shaquille o’neal said ‘you called me wealthy?..i’m rich, the guy who signs my checks is wealthy’ and then took steps to move to that vaunted category:

‘Shaquille O’Neal’s net worth is estimated to be $500 million, primarily from his successful NBA career and various business ventures. He continues to earn around $60 million per year from endorsements and other investments.’

https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-athletes/nba/shaquille-oneal-net-worth/