Paying to Avoid Pain

Jonathan Clements

IN RECENT YEARS, I’ve confronted a choice: I could fund my solo Roth 401(k)—or I could use the dollars to cover the tax bill on a large Roth conversion. I wish I could do both. But after using my earned income to pay living expenses and make financial gifts, I don’t have the necessary cash.

My choice: Go for the big Roth conversion.

Why? In part, it’s because I’m focused on shrinking my traditional IRA before I turn age 75 and have to start taking required minimum distributions (RMDs), which could push me into a much higher federal income-tax bracket. I’m especially focused on doing so in 2024 and 2025.

In early 2026, I’ll turn age 63, which means thereafter any Roth conversions have the potential to trigger the Medicare premium surcharge known as IRMAA, or income-related monthly adjustment amount, which is based on your income from two years earlier. On top of that, it’s possible federal income-tax rates will climb in 2026, assuming the individual tax cuts included in 2017’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are allowed to sunset.

But there’s an added reason to favor Roth conversions over contributing to my solo Roth 401(k). Suppose I have $24,000 in spare cash. I could stash that $24,000 in my solo Roth 401(k), which is appealing.

But it isn’t as appealing as using the $24,000 to cover the federal income-tax bill on a $100,000 Roth conversion. This assumes I’m in the 24% federal income-tax bracket. In other words, a Roth conversion gives me more bang for my buck, allowing me to get a bigger chunk of money growing tax-free, plus it means smaller tax bills down the road because it shrinks my traditional IRA.

My plan is to leave my Roth accounts to my two children. One is likely to be in at least as high a tax bracket as me, so it makes sense for me to pay my IRA’s tax bill instead. In fact, I may tweak the beneficiaries on my Roth and traditional IRAs, leaving more of my traditional IRA to the child in the lower tax bracket.

There’s also some possibility that I’ll tap my Roth accounts for my own use—if, for instance, I have a year with surprisingly high expenses and pulling yet more money from my traditional IRA would push me into a much higher tax bracket. On the other hand, from a tax perspective, my traditional IRA could also come in handy, notably for charitable giving and if I have a year with high deductible medical costs that I could offset against a traditional IRA withdrawal.

What if—unlike me—you’re fully retired and don’t have any earned income, and hence you don’t face the choice of either funding a Roth or converting part of your traditional IRA to a Roth? If you have taxable-account money to cover the conversion tax bill, it may still be worth making a big conversion.

Before you go ahead, there’s all manner of considerations, including the rate at which the conversion will be taxed, your projected tax bracket once you begin RMDs, and the potential impact on your IRMAA premium surcharges and on the taxation of your Social Security benefit. If you intend to bequeath your Roth accounts, you might also ponder your tax rate compared to that of your beneficiaries. In addition, you should consider whether you can pay the conversion tax bill without triggering additional taxes because, say, you’d have to sell highly appreciated stock to generate the cash needed to cover estimated taxes.

But as with my annual choice, keep in mind the leverage involved—that every $1,000 in extra income taxes paid will allow you to get many multiples of that sum shifted out of your traditional IRA and into a Roth, where it’ll then grow tax-free. Moreover, this maneuver has a little-appreciated advantage: By using taxable-account money to cover the tax bill on a Roth conversion, you thereafter avoid the tax bill on that taxable-account money.

Suppose you have $10,000 in a high-yield savings account that’s earning 5% in annual interest, or $500 a year. If you use that $10,000 to pay the conversion tax bill, not only will you move a big chunk of money into a tax-free account, but also you’ll no longer have that $500 a year in taxable interest.

Indeed, by using that $10,000 to pay the tax bill on a Roth conversion, it’s like you’re shifting the $10,000 into your Roth, where it will then grow tax-free. The tax savings from shrinking your taxable account is the reason it’s worth undertaking Roth conversions, even if you think your tax bracket in future will be similar to what it is today.

For those with greater wealth, there’s an added incentive to “prepay” the income taxes owed on their traditional retirement accounts: The net result is to reduce the size of your taxable estate. That could mean not only a smaller federal estate-tax bill—not a problem for the vast majority of families—but also less in state inheritance and estate taxes, which are an issue in a third of states, including where I live.

Jonathan Clements is the founder and editor of HumbleDollar. Follow him on X @ClementsMoney, on Facebook and on Threads, and check out his earlier articles.

Do you enjoy HumbleDollar? Please support our work with a donation. Want to receive daily email alerts about new articles? Click here. How about getting our twice-weekly newsletter? Sign up now.

Browse Articles

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Free Newsletter