This is a thought exercise.
Suppose that you owned a home in Pacific Palisades, or Altadena that was destroyed by one of the wildfires. You have been through a very tough time. The fires are out, and after reporting your loss, you are waiting to hear from the company adjuster. You have a big decision to make……Will you rebuild?
Our little housing area here in the PNW has about 2000 single family homes. The first ones were built in 1976, and the build out was completed 20 years later. Between the start, and today, there has been only one structure totally destroyed by fire. And, I think this is really the norm with modern building codes. There have been a number of other fires but none with 6 digit damage amounts. The 2200SF home that was destroyed was owned by an elderly man and he elected not to rebuild. His homeowner’s insurance paid to have the debris removed, and he sold the lot to a builder. Our HO association had the plans for the home and the builder was able to rebuild using those plans with only minor updates for changes in the building code. The whole process took about 9 months. The original owner settled his claim with his insurance company and received the Actual Cash Value of the structure, plus his additional living expenses up to the time of the sale of the lot. You cannot collect the cost to rebuild unless you actually do so. ACV is defined in most policies as the Replacement Cost of the structure using “materials of like kind and quality” less depreciation. The home had been built in 1978 and the fire occurred in late 2009. I don’t know how much depreciation was deducted; perhaps 20%.
Let us think for a minute about what the property owners faced after the Paradise, CA fire (Camp Fire 18000 structures burned) in 2018, and what the people who have lost their homes in the current fires in Los Angeles will face.
1. Hazardous waste. Fire debris from modern materials including plastics and electronics is hazardous and must have special, expensive handling. In some cases top soil will need to be removed as well. Your HO insurance usually includes an additional 10% for debris removal. Because so many homes have been destroyed the government will have to make a decision about what to do with this waste.
2. Damage to infrastructure. All above ground utilities will need to be replaced. There may be damage to some in the ground utilities. Without electricity to your lot, you cannot rebuild.
3. Shortage of contractors and building materials. This will cause rebuilding to be MUCH more expensive through supply and demand, and profiteering.
4. Redesign and creation of building plans, and permitting. With thousand of people trying to do the same thing, the bureaucracy will be burdened and slow. There are only so many architects.
5. Insufficient insurance coverage. Typically in a catastrophe , a significant % of destroyed houses will not have enough coverage to pay for replacement. Many existing policies will not have coverage for required building code upgrades. There will be disagreements with the insurance company about what existed before the fire. (We had gold door knobs and marble floors.) Many people who rebuild will want to build something different than what they had…
6. The time required to replace the home will be much longer than people imagine. With 12000 buildings destroyed, just going through the adjustment process with the insurance companies will be difficult and time consuming and emotionally draining.
7. Living in the rebuilding area while reconstruction is going on is going to be very, very difficult. If your home is done first, you will be living in a place with no stores, no restaurants, no schools, and the constant din of rebuilding. The rebuilding zone will be visually sterile, with no vegetation, no landscaping, etc. There will be odors both from the fire, and construction.
8. You don’t know if you will you be able to insure your new home both during the course of construction, and after it is completed. Only one insurance company has begun selling policies in Paradise.
9. Just finding temporary housing for the residents of 12000 homes is going to really stress the rental housing market.
So, after going through all the trauma of being burned out of your home, seeing everything you own destroyed, knowing that it is going to take years before you can be in your rebuilt home, are you going to want to rebuild? Or perhaps, will you take the ACV payment settle up with your mortgage company, sell your lot, and relocate somewhere else?
I had thought about many of the things that you mentioned. At 75, I could easily be in assisted living or even deceased by the time the home would be livable again.
I live in an area (Rochester NY) which isn’t prone to natural disasters, but other factors, such as how much longer I can drive safely, already come into consideration when I ponder any major purchase or other change in my life.
the online version of the Wall Street Journal published an article on January 17: “His Malibu House Burned Down Six Years Ago. He’s Finally Done Rebuilding”. Worth a read to get an understanding.
I’d re-evaluate. If I had to start over, that would open a lot of possibilities. I don’t view this as financially much different than a severe business failure, or a marital divorce, etc. The emotional toll, that’s another thing but perhaps moving on, starting over and never looking back would be a good choice. Speaking from experience. In a massive fire, entire infrastructure is destroyed. Where this occurs makes a difference. Towns get wiped off the map by tornadoes every year. Different geographical areas offer impediments to rebuilding and restoration.
Buy a small trailer, park it on the lot. The utility hookups might need to be redone above ground but should be fine below. Once the rebuilding surge is done then rebuild (if your insurance company will let you). But of course rebuild to be fire resistant or fire proof. Don’t forget the windows or shutters. Many houses burn from the inside out because of the radiant energy of the fire coming through the windows. Good aluminum clad double pane windows or non-wood shutters can make a difference.
#1- can you afford to rebuild? Many lost insurance not long before the fires.i
I wouldn’t rebuild, esp in CA, where govt is focused on all the wrong things. I’d be scared to find out that I couldn’t get a permit for 12-18 months as the wealthy have likely already started the process with lawyers and architects.
A good question is what are the best places for a retiree to go to? Most lists I see tend to gloss over the issues that places present.
I loved visiting New Orleans before Katrina and have gone back since. Every time, looking up at the water, I thought that it was ridiculous.
After Katrina, I did not support rebuilding.
Pacific Palisades along the water, no. Make it a public beach until the ocean claims it.
Altadena, maybe.
Go read the recent article in this newsletter about the benefits of renting. Every time I think about natural disasters or war, I think of the benefits of renting.
Pacific Palisades will never be the same. It is Pacific Scarred Earth, and it may well be decades before any real normalcy returns, because even if you can rebuild in a year or two, most of the owners of lots around you probably cannot, and the land itself will look bleak indefinitely. That goes way beyond my time horizons. So, even if my property was on the oceanfront, I’d call it a day there, sell the dirt to someone younger who is willing to accept the tradeoffs to achieve their own future dreams, and leave California for a place that offers beauty, more calm and better public services at a lower price. I wonder what the result has been in Maui and Banff. I expect similar views there.
We were in Banff in September, and judging by the crowds, it is doing fine. Jasper, however, is different. The highway was closed so we couldn’t even consider visiting.