FREE NEWSLETTER

The Victim Might Be You

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: William Housley on 5/21/2025

Who Is the Victim of a Ponzi Scheme?

  • Age: Often 50 or older, particularly retirees looking for stable income or to preserve capital.
  • Education: Many victims are college-educated—some with advanced degrees.
  • Financial Status: Typically middle to upper-middle class, with meaningful retirement savings or liquid assets.
  • Investment Experience: Usually have some experience, but not deep technical knowledge—confident, but not always skeptical.

Sounds like a typical HumbleDollar reader, doesn’t it?

Each year, 20 to 40 Ponzi schemes are uncovered in the U.S., though the true number may be higher due to underreporting and undetected cases. Based on historical patterns:

  • Small schemes are usually exposed within 1 to 3 years.
  • Mid-sized schemes tend to last 3 to 5 years.
  • Large-scale frauds can run unchecked for 10 to 20 years.

Notable examples:

  • Bernie Madoff: Operated for 17–20 years, defrauding investors of an estimated $65 billion (including fictional profits).
  • Allen Stanford: Ran a 15–20 year scheme involving about $7 billion in losses.
  • Tom Petters: Lasted roughly a decade, with losses around $3.65 billion.

If we assume 30 schemes are discovered each year and each one lasts around 5 years, that implies there may be about 150 active Ponzi schemes in the U.S. at any given time.

With each scheme affecting 50 to 200 people, that puts an estimated 7,500 to 30,000 people currently invested in active Ponzi schemes—completely unaware their money is at risk.

How Much Do Victims Lose?

Typical individual losses range from $20,000 to $100,000, though some victims—especially retirees or those targeted by trusted advisors—lose far more.

In 2020 alone, over $3.5 billion in losses were tied to reported Ponzi schemes, according to data compiled by regulatory agencies and sites like Ponzitracker.com.

In larger schemes, victims have lost entire retirement accounts, life savings, or in some cases, millions.

Who Are the Schemers?

Ponzi schemers are rarely shadowy outsiders. More often, they’re familiar faces with impressive résumés:

  • Demographics: Predominantly male, ages 35 to 65, operating at the peak of their professional lives.
  • Education: Often hold degrees in finance, business, law, or accounting.
  • Credentials: May have—or falsely claim—licenses like Series 7, CPA, or CFP.
  • Persona: Appear polished, confident, and successful. They often embed themselves in religious, social, or professional communities to cultivate trust.

The victims often look like you—and the perpetrators often resemble a fiduciary advisor you’d gladly trust with your financial future. Ponzi schemes don’t just rely on greed—they thrive on familiarity, trust, and social credibility. Victims are not fools; they’re often prudent, responsible individuals who were deceived by people who knew exactly how to earn their confidence.

If this makes you uneasy, that’s not a bad thing. It’s a reminder to ask tough questions:

What systems do I have to verify the people managing my money?

Be skeptical of investments offering consistently high returns with low or no risk—that’s the most persistent red flag of all.

Note: AI tools supported the research and drafting of this article. I wrote it because several of my friends have been deeply affected by Ponzi schemes, and I want to raise awareness about their devastating impact.

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick Brennan
1 month ago

When I had too much time on my hands during the pandemic lockup, I began reading books about why people believe demonstrably false things, and how people get conned. There is a great book by Maria Konnikova, The Confidence Game, in which she explains how conns work on our minds and why we fall for various scams. Konnikova is a Harvard PhD in psychology, and is a self taught world class poker player. As I age, I find reading books like this provides armor against all those conn artists out there who’ve found so many ways to try to make us their next mark.

Last edited 1 month ago by Patrick Brennan
R Quinn
1 month ago

If you want to see how easily people believe demonstrably false things, just go on social media. Post a blatantly false narrative on something like Social Security or health insurance and masses of people will accept it as fact with no apparent effort to seek out facts.

What is posted doesn’t even have to appear logical on its face. People will accept it. It’s no wonder when greed is involved it’s even easier to con people.

it makes me wonder how we ever moved out of caves.

Winston Smith
1 month ago

Per the financial status of the typical victim …

The truly wealthy probably let their financial consultants do the investigation so they don’t get burned

The poor don’t own enough financial assets to make it worthwhile. Note that States run lottery games to make money. To me THOSE
are a huge scam.

So … that leaves us middle class folks with a lifetime of accumulated financial assets who fend for themselves. And, unfortunately, as we age we seem to be more susceptible to scams.

For example, I have a huge Federal Income Tax liability that those nice people will resolve for me if I give them my Social Security number and bank account information.
Who knew?

R Quinn
1 month ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

State lotteries are a tax on the lower income and poor who spend a greater percentage of their income on lotteries than any other income group.

DAN SMITH
1 month ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

Winston, amen to your dislike of state lotteries. Most have payouts in the 50 to 70% range, making them illegal in gambling loving Nevada, whose state law requires at least a 75% payout.

bbbobbins
1 month ago

As this thread gets diverted to general scam awareness be aware that the more aggressive Ponzi schemes operate with layers of assurance. Your friends and family may be providing testimonials while they themselves have been taken in. But there are usually some hallmarks like lack of coverage in traditional channels, an urge to invest now, unverifiable returns etc etc.

I guess if something passes all your personal due dilligence you can always initially make a de minimis investment (that you can afford to lose) and see how easy it is to take it out again. Could be an absolute loss but save you from far worse.

Michael1
1 month ago
Reply to  bbbobbins

Excellent point.

Jeff Long
1 month ago

I have used a password manager for decades, and use a paid version for $10 a year. Cheap insurance for my security, and using it is second nature.

mytimetotravel
1 month ago

Just like the Edward Jones agent. Also to be avoided.

Not answering the phone if it doesn’t recognize the caller is an excellent first line of defense. My email provider and T-Mobile also seem to do a very good job of blocking spam.

Norman Retzke
1 month ago

It really can happen. 

A retiree friend self-managed their finances and was approached by U.S. government officials with a request to assist in a sting operation. My friend made the mistake of providing the password to a retirement account to the officials.

More than $200,000 was illicitly removed from that account and was never recovered. It was a clever scam and there were no U.S. government officials involved.

DAN SMITH
1 month ago

Great information. I’ve not known any victims of Ponzi schemes, but I have known victims of other types of fraud. 

  1. The grandson scam
  2. Phony IRS agent scam
  3. Romance scam
  4. Nigerian Prince scam
  5. Iraq Dinar scam

An AARP Fraud Watch Network survey of victims identified some behavioral characteristics: Victims reported that they more frequently receive targeted phone calls and emails from brokers, they make five or more investment decisions each year, and more of them respond to remote sales pitches – those delivered via telephone, email or television commercials.

If you receive unsolicited emails there is a good chance your address is on the dark web. Consider getting some new addresses.  I use one only for friends and family, another for established relationships with my bank, my investment company, and my insurance companies. I also have a third address I use for miscellaneous things such as requests for product information. 

Smart phones have a seldom used tool to direct all calls from unknown callers directly to voicemail. Everyone that is anyone to me is in my phone’s address book; if you ain’t on the list, my phone ain’t ringin’. 

I cannot stop the unwanted invitations I receive via the post office for free dinners, but they are easily discarded.

Norman Retzke
1 month ago
Reply to  DAN SMITH

For years I had a folder containing various letters from various foreign government officials, UK lottery officials, foreign business entities and so on. They all had one thing in common. All were scams designed to get my funds. I suspect many small C-Corps such as mine experienced this, too.

Jeff Bond
1 month ago

If you receive an email from the government, a financial institution, or a commercial entity asking you to click a box to log in – don’t do it, even if it seems legitimate. Instead, open a web browser (I use DuckDuckGo) and navigate to the site yourself. Do not use AI, Siri, or Alexa to navigate to a site. Do it yourself with search tools. Use the search result that refers directly to the entity you’re attempting to reach.

Here’s a simple example. If you receive an email that Paul Simon is playing a concert near you, and you decide to purchase tickets, then do a browser search for something like “Paul Simon Tour 2025”. Then, when you see the results, select the link to Paul Simon’s website, or perhaps the venue you plan to visit, but not ticket resellers like StubHub or VividSeats. Go to the official site for the event.

David Lancaster
1 month ago
Reply to  Jeff Bond

Instead, open a web browser (I use DuckDuckGo) and navigate to the site yourself. Do not use AI, Siri, or Alexa to navigate to a site. Do it yourself with search tools. Use the search result that refers directly to the entity you’re attempting to reach.”

Even this technique doesn’t guarantee a legitimate search result. Last year I learned that a family member had passed away in the evening. I searched for flights on Kyack and found one. I had some questions so decided to Google Frontier Airlines customer service phone number (be aware that incredibly I found out the next day they don’t have one for anyone until 24 hours before the flight unless you have elite status) and obtained tickets using the search result number. Was told I would get tickets within 24 hours. After I hung up, this was about 1 am, I started to get “that feeling” after re-reading an email I received confirming I would receive tickets within 24 hours. I researched the company in the e-mail (it was not Frontier) and had a pit in my stomach after reading the company, based in Montreal, had
numerous complaints. Luckily I used my credit card and called to cancel the charges.

My mistake, was doing this late in the evening when I was tired. But the biggest mistake was clicking on the first search result listed and not looking closely to see it was a “sponsored” result. What I have come to learn is that most of the time the first several listed results from Google Chrome results are not the company you Googled, but a sponsor who pays Google to be listed first.

BTW I recently learned that once you decide a flight from a travel site such a Kyack you are better off obtaining your tickets via downloading the airline’s app.

Olin
1 month ago

To tag along about DuckDuckGo, I’ve been using it for a long time. A nice feature about it is no ads popping up. Makes it nice when reading HumbleDollar on a smart phone.

mytimetotravel
1 month ago
Reply to  Olin

I’m another long time DuckDuckGo user, but they are listing ads at the top of the search results now. I also use an ad blocker, which works very well.

Liam K
1 month ago
Reply to  Olin

Another good one is Brave browser. So far I’ve blocked over 107k(!) advertisements since starting to use it a year ago. It makes the web so much more pleasant.

Olin
1 month ago
Reply to  Liam K

Thanks for mentioning Brave. I also use Brave on my laptop, but DuckDuckGo as the search engine.

Jeff Bond
1 month ago

Great point. I should have included a warning to beware of the “sponsored” sites.

In my example, StubHub or VividSeats are sponsored sites. They have paid a fee to the search engines to make sure they are included in relevant search requests.

Randy Dobkin
1 month ago
Reply to  Jeff Bond

One good thing about browsers or apps that save and fill in your passwords is that they don’t fill in your password on a fake website. So you can use that as a red flag.

Free Newsletter

SHARE