Happy Conclusion

Jesse Cramer

FOR THE PAST FEW years, I’ve been on a Radiohead kick. For the uninitiated, Radiohead is an English rock band whose lead singer is Thom Yorke, known for his distinctive whining vocals—I mean that in a good way—and innovative songwriting.

As I read about Yorke, a quote from him leaped off the page: “When I was a kid, I always assumed that [fame] was going to answer something—fill a gap. And it does the absolute opposite.”

I immediately thought of the financial corollary. People assume money will make them happier or fill a void in their life. They grind and grind and grind until they finally reach retirement, or hit their financial independence number, or cross whatever threshold occupies their mind.

But does money really make us happy? Some studies say no. A famous 2006 study by five academics, including the late great Danny Kahneman, concluded, “The belief that high income is associated with good mood is widespread but mostly illusory. People with above-average income are relatively satisfied with their lives but are barely happier than others in moment-to-moment experience, tend to be more tense, and do not spend more time in particularly enjoyable activities.”

Kahneman and Angus Deaton added new findings in 2010, suggesting that emotional well-being rises with income “but there is no further progress beyond an annual income of ∼$75,000. Low income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone. We conclude that high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.”

A 2021 study added a new wrinkle. Matthew Killingsworth, of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, found happiness kept rising with income, with no limit at $75,000. Killingsworth notes that, “It’s a compelling possibility, the idea that money stops mattering above that point, at least for how people actually feel moment to moment. But when I looked across a wide range of income levels, I found that all forms of well-being continued to rise with income. I don’t see any sort of kink in the curve, an inflection point where money stops mattering. Instead, it keeps increasing.”

But why? If fame couldn’t fill Thom Yorke’s “gap,” is money somehow different? Can Killingsworth’s research be right? I have a suspicion, and it starts with a favorite phrase from one of my mentors: “I don’t know if money buys happiness. But it certainly buys flexibility.”

It turns out that this idea is a key part of Killingsworth’s theory. Higher earners are happier, in part, because of an increased sense of control over their life, he says. “When you have more money, you have more choices about how to live your life. You can likely see this in the pandemic. People living paycheck to paycheck who lose their job might need to take the first available job to stay afloat, even if it’s one they dislike. People with a financial cushion can wait for one that’s a better fit. Across decisions big and small, having more money gives a person more choices and a greater sense of autonomy.”

More money equals more flexibility, more autonomy and more satisfaction. But we’re still left with a puzzle. Why did Kahneman’s and Killingsworth’s results disagree? Fortunately, they got together to compare notes and discuss why their conclusions were in opposition. The upshot: It seems we need to view happiness and unhappiness not as opposites, but as separate phenomena.

The happiness spectrum, for example, might show the difference between a 10-day vacation in a luxury hotel and a four-day vacation in a motel. Both are “good” additions to life. We’d probably accept either. But more money buys you the better of the two.

What about unhappiness? Money can put a roof over our heads and food in our stomachs, preventing two unhappy outcomes. But much unhappiness is untethered from money. Money can’t prevent a messy divorce or change the chemical imbalance in your brain.

The $75,000 threshold “may represent the point beyond which the miseries that remain are not alleviated by high income,” concluded the two authors. “Heartbreak, bereavement, and clinical depression may be examples of such miseries.”

Kahneman’s and Killingsworth’s joint research allows us to answer two crucial questions. Can money increase happiness? Yes, and seemingly without limit. Can money decrease unhappiness? Yes, but only to a point.

The armchair psychologist in me would guess fame works similarly in Thom Yorke’s case. While fame might have made certain highs even higher, it—like money—can’t address many of life’s lows.

Jesse Cramer is the pen and voice behind The Best Interest, a blog and podcast. After a decade in aerospace engineering, Jesse switched careers and now works with clients at a fiduciary wealth management firm in Rochester, New York. Jesse enjoys reading, racket sports, and fostering dogs with his wife. His previous article was Horse Then Cart.

Do you enjoy HumbleDollar? Please support our work with a donation. Want to receive daily email alerts about new articles? Click here. How about getting our twice-weekly newsletter? Sign up now.

Browse Articles

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Free Newsletter