FREE NEWSLETTER

Testing My Faith

Jamie Seckington

THOU SHALL NOT TIME the market. Thou shall not consider macroeconomic trends when allocating capital. Thou shall not listen to pundits on CNBC. Thou shall not engage in security analysis. Thou shall not dabble in options or individual stocks. Thou shall not shoot for the moon.

These are just some of the commandments sent down from on high to today’s index-fund investors.

As one of those investors, I assume that financial markets are more or less efficient, and that todays stock and bond prices reflect all available public information. I’m convinced that a stock can be neither under- nor overvalued. The financial markets are vast and I am small, and neither tea leaves nor mountains of Morningstar charts can tell me with any scientific certainty where the market will reside tomorrow or five, 10, 15 or 20 years from now.

But to paraphrase Chinese novelist Liu Cixin, while the amount of matter in the universe is finite, life blossoms exponentially. This we do know. Our specific form of life—humanity—has grown to eight billion folks who rely on a global economy to provide the goods and services they need and desire.

As a passive index investor, I believe that the global economy as a whole will continue to expand in a two-steps-forward-one-step-back manner for at least the rest of my lifetime and that of my immediate heirs. Therefore, my wife and I hold about 50% of our net worth in a globally diversified, passively managed stock index portfolio that we believe will grow in lockstep with the global economy. We intend—but make no promises—to hold this position until the end of our days.

Such an approach, while considered a conservative allocation by many, still requires a faith that often appears to fly in the face of common sense, as most faiths often do. Out of this tension, doubt springs eternal. I often find myself questioning my commitment to the commandments of passive investing.

Suppose I currently believe we’re in an asset bubble built on “dumb money” and its fear of missing out. Valuations seem stretched, artificial intelligence hoopla is everywhere, stories of teenagers buying Teslas with gains from their custodial accounts pepper the financial blogs, insiders are selling, and the tech bros’ favorite Monopoly money—bitcoin—is hitting record highs. Many signs point to bubble-like behavior.

As a passive investor and disciple of the efficient market hypothesis, all I need do is sit back and enjoy the show. My personal opinion is irrelevant. Todays share prices have been determined by a vast multitude of forces well beyond my power as an individual to control or predict. Perhaps Mr. Market is in the throes of “irrational exuberance” or perhaps his enthusiasm for future earnings will prove justified. Only time will tell. So, I sit tight and continue to dollar-cost average my households contributions to our nest egg into the same domestic and international total market funds that we have been buying into for years.

Yet, I cant help but wonder, Am I allocating capital or paying a tithe?”

Capitalists allocate capital in an effort to produce profits. They crunch numbers, weigh options, calculate risks, consider time horizons and evaluate competition. In other words, they reason. They analyze empirical data before they make a decision to invest a dollar.

By contrast, parishioners who pay a tithe are performing a ritual rooted in faith. They don’t evaluate their tithe’s return on equity or measure its current earnings yield. Such metrics don’t apply to acts of faith. Our parishioners never consider how many of their prayers were answered last month versus this month, or whether they should adjust this months tithe based on the results of such calculations.

Like passive investors, faithful parishioners continue to contribute to their cause month after month, year after year, without regard for day-to-day concerns. Such concerns, both passive investors and parishioners point out, are transient and easily vanquished in the long run.

I am not a religious person. I do not consider myself a person of faith. I believe in things that can be quantified, proven, recreated. I believe in the science behind vaccines and not in the magic of essential snake oils. I believe that the earth is round, revolves around the sun, and that eight billion people stick to its surface due to gravity. I believe that someone offering to sell me ocean-front property in Idaho is a liar, and should be tarred and feathered by regulators. In short, I believe in facts and the truths they tell.

My belief in facts and empirical analysis leads me on occasion to question my practice of passive investing, where I buy and hold a total market index without regard to todays underlying fundamentals. Indeed, when I say it out loud, the strategy seems nuts—almost cult-like. Am I in a trance? Have I been brainwashed? Indoctrinated by an algorithm? Drugged? How to explain my apparent mindless and ritualized investing behavior? How did I come to adopt an investing style that strips me of agency, autonomy and self-determination?

Sometimes, I think it is the math of buy-and-hold passive investing that sustains my faith. But even the math is based on historical precedent—meaning past performance. And, as every investor knows, past performance is no guarantee of future results.

While I believe that the math of passive investing trumps crystal balls, tea cup chart patterns, “you only live once” momentum plays, my gut, somebody else’s forecasts and any other form of stock market divination devised, such belief is predicated upon a hope. It is a hope that humanity will continue to grow and to evolve and not, instead, be swept into a new Dark Ages by war, environmental catastrophe and rising inequality. As a buy-and-hold passive investor, I must have faith that tomorrow will be brighter and that, in the long run, everything will turn out fine.

Forgive me if I have my doubts.

Jamie Seckington grew up on the beaches of Southern California listening to punk rock and raging against the machine. Decades later, he now lives a quiet life in north Idaho and reads HumbleDollar regularly. He has learned to appreciate the many ironies that life offers.

Want to receive our weekly newsletter? Sign up now. How about our daily alert about the site's latest posts? Join the list.

Browse Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Latscha
11 months ago

As a fellow passive investor (who sometimes strays), I found this to be an extremely relatable article. At the same time helped me to look at it in a way I haven’t before. Thanks for writing it.

jack facts
1 year ago

I’m with you. Timing not only takes time, but also requires assumptions and has a lousy record. But I do disagree with “have faith that tomorrow will be brighter.” Instead, I believe it is the days after tomorrow that are more important.

Chuck BV
1 year ago

I appreciate this thought provoking article. My thoughts: first, if you keep a 60/40 equities/fixed income portfolio and rebalance every once in a while, then that 40% part should smooth things out somewhat when the bubble bursts (careful, of course, if that is all in bond indexes, as we learned in 2022). Second, if you actually own your primary residence (as opposed to having a title, a mortgage, and a lien), that should be an additional buffer. Finally, the rising tide of the economical metaphor might not lift all boats, but widespread catastrophes are more equal-opportunity and for all of us our time here is limited. So we make are best bets to hedge against outliving our means of support and enjoy this moment, which is the only one we truly have. For me passive index fund investing is still a major part of making my best best.

Philip Stein
1 year ago

Jaimie, thank you for sharing your thoughts. You’ve given HumbleDollar readers much to think about. Here are some conclusions I drew from reading your article:

Regular dollar-cost averaging into a total market index fund may feel unwise at a time when the market seems euphoric. But the wisdom of an investment today doesn’t depend solely on share prices increasing indefinitely. As a passive investor, your future financial security also depends, perhaps to a greater extent, on the compound growth of your portfolio through reinvestment of dividends and the addition of new money. Personally, I wouldn’t regard such a mode of investing as a mindless ritual or “paying a tithe.” I would consider such activity to be disciplined.

If buying and holding a total market index fund is not justified when the market appears overvalued, what is the alternative? Reducing your stock holdings now only to reinvest later when the euphoria has subsided? That’s market timing and I think you’ll agree that it could be harmful. Charlie Munger was right: Don’t do anything to interrupt compounding.

Could today’s overvalued market be a blessing in disguise? If the current market euphoria is followed by a significant downturn, your continued regular investing will buy shares a lower prices. Buying low is when the real money is made in the stock market.

You mention that capitalists “crunch numbers, weigh options, calculate risks, consider time horizons and evaluate competition.” No doubt active money managers and individuals picking their own stocks do the same. But it is well known that active managers often trail their benchmarks. You don’t have to accept the efficient market hypothesis to justify passive investing.

Finally, I share your hope that we will avoid global conflagration from climate change, another world war, or some other catastrophe. But more than hope, I’m optimistic that technological advances will continue to promise us a brighter future. With that belief, I’m comfortable buying and holding total stock market index funds.

Last edited 1 year ago by Philip Stein
Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  Philip Stein

Thanks for unpacking a few of my generalizations and fleshing out some of the concepts touched upon in the essay. I agree with your point about discipline. Although, as someone pointed out further down in the comments, I think it is healthy to question one’s beliefs and behavior from time to time. Perhaps new information has been discovered that needs to be incorporated into my thinking, or maybe I have acquired new priorities that demand a fresh approach. We should always be asking questions. Life is dynamic and fluid and I am suspect of dogmatic attachment to a set of beliefs or practices. That said, passive investing using index funds works well for the reasons you point out above.

Will
1 year ago

Keep writing! Great voice.

Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

I appreciate the encouragement. Thank you.

johny
1 year ago

My wife is a card holding Catholic. She attends, prays and tithes like clockwork no matter what I say about the church’s past injustices and today’s questionable policies. While she holds hope that God’s Will will prevail and her spot in heaven is earned, my hope is more mundane. My faith and hope is anchored on the process and mathematics of indexing. Her retort is that while I may have our earthly life covered, she is doing her part to ensure a smooth transition to heaven.

Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  johny

Sounds like a great partnership! 👍

corrupt
1 year ago

While I don’t make a habit out of “timing” the market, if you are going to invest and you think the market is going to dip, why not wait?

Winston Smith
1 year ago

I’m NOT the most patient guy in the world.

Ask my wife. Ask my children. Ask my friends.

i check the stock market multiple times a day.

I (obviously) read Humble Dollar. And other investment related websites. I
read everything I can about economic and technological growth.

BUT … the vast bulk of my investments are in totally passive funds which I haven’t even bothered trying to rebalance more than once every 4 or 5 years.

As some great investor said (I can’t remember which one) “Time in market beats TIMING the market”.

Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

Yeah, I hear ya; I am similarly wired. I enjoy following the ebb and flow of the markets and the discourse that surrounds them. That said, I can’t claim any special insights destined to give me any kind of sustainable investing edge. And if I had an edge, I surely would not share it with anyone and jeopardize my advantage. 😂

Echoing your final thought, the late Charlie Munger supposedly once said, “The thing about compounding is that it works best when uninterrupted.”

David Powell
1 year ago

Read Factfulness by Hans Rosling and your faith in humanity’s ability to improve its world every day will be sustained.

Still, it is healthy to routinely question principles you follow so you’re not blindly following dogma. On rare occasion the world changes in a meaningful way for investors.

Jeff Bond
1 year ago

Thanks for this article. I’d like to hear more of your philosophies.

Brent Wilson
1 year ago

Great thought provoking article. One irony is that stock indexers can still display a lack of faith based on allocating more funds than they need (i.e. 5-10 years of expenses) to “safe” investments like cash and bonds. This is not a shot at your current 50% stock allocation, as I have no concept of your overall portfolio, but I do question the concept of a static asset allocation through one’s lifetime.

Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  Brent Wilson

Thanks for the kind words.
I agree, a static allocation through one’s lifetime is not optimal. As we are more than half-way through our lifetimes, and have something of a unique situation, my wife and I have adjusted accordingly. We definitely allocate more funds to “safe” investments than most, but there is something to be said for capital preservation—and a good night’s sleep.

Jeff
1 year ago

Jamie, Excellent contribution! Keep embracing the ironies that surround you.

Rick Connor
1 year ago

Jamie, thanks for an enjoyable article. I’ve had similar thoughts over my investing lifetime. I share your rational approach to life. My personal data show I’m a lousy stock evaluator. I have limited ability and, truth be told, interest in evaluating individual companies and figuring out if they are currently undervalued. My timing is invariably wrong. If I recommend a stock, run the other way. So I’ve tried to optimize the other things that create wealth – working hard, career advancement, automating savings, regular index investing, tax optimization, and staying out of my own way. I’ve also been a bit lucky at times. Much of my peak career earnings happened after the market crash in 2007/08. We had many years to max out our retirement savings at reduced prices.

Kenneth Tobin
1 year ago

The past 50 years has proven without an iota of doubt that passive index investing is and will always be the Gold Standard of Long Term Investing
Thank you Mr Bogle and Mr Malkiel

Michael1
1 year ago

One could attribute the ongoing dedication to index funds to faith, or to a thoughtful decision based on those data-driven processes you attribute to capitalists. Much has been written based on empirical data that o show why index funds are superior to stock picking or active management.

I suppose the difference may be whether we go through the analysis with every dollar, or go through it once, and decide on an allocation, built with index funds.

Of course there are both individual stock investors and indexers who more or less wing it. 🙂

Editing to ask, where’s your other 50 percent?

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael1
Jamie Seckington
1 year ago
Reply to  Michael1

All good points.

The other 50 percent is tied up in our apocalypse-proof bunker compound. Just kidding.

But the other 50 is in non-levered real estate and short term paper.

Dan Smith
1 year ago

LOL, I was thinking about how I could work the word “ironic” into my comment, then I read your bio. Great article Jamie. Should generate some interesting comments.

Kim Zimmerman
1 year ago

I strongly believe that if the stock market totally blows up, it really won’t matter where you have invested your money. Whether value and price match up today, well, that is a different question. I really enjoyed your article.

Kevin Bradford
1 year ago

“(T)hey got you thinkin’ that
What ya need is what they selling
Make you think that buying is rebelling” 😉

Great Article!

Free Newsletter

SHARE