Go to main Forum page »
My wife Suzie is in Spain visiting her dad and I’ve taken the opportunity for a solo trip to my vacation home. On the fourth day Suzie rang for a catch-up and told me all about the visit. After we rang off I thought back over the last few days and realised I hadn’t interacted with anyone in a meaningful way since leaving home.
It wasn’t a conscious decision. I’d visited the local grocery store and loaded up on supplies but used the self service tills, filled the car using “pay at pump” and drove off without speaking to anyone. During the previous four days the longest conversation was “a pint of Guinness please” when I popped into the local bar on the way back from a coastal walk.
I haven’t been in the slightest bit lonely. I’m very content with my own company and I’ve spent the time reading, walking, cooking and generally chilling out…if I’m honest, it’s great. But there’s a danger in how easy modern life enables you to navigate your days without the need to converse with other people.
With an ageing population, this frictionless way of living could easily slip into social isolation, particularly if someone has lost a partner and family ties are hindered by distance. It’s an outcome that needs to be guarded against.
What strikes me most is how seamlessly I’d drifted into minimal human contact. There was no dramatic withdrawal, no conscious turning away from conversation. I simply followed the path of least resistance that modern convenience had laid out, and before I knew it four days had passed in near silence. It was effortless, which is precisely what makes it unsettling.
For me this was a temporary escape — a brief interlude before returning to Suzie, my tennis matches and the ordinary rhythm of a life filled with social gatherings. But what if there was no return? What if you were living alone after losing a spouse, with children scattered abroad and absorbed in their own busy lives? The same systems that enabled my peaceful solitude could very easily become a trap. You could go weeks with nothing more than a “contactless delivery, thanks” or a mumbled greeting to a neighbour in the hallway.
Because the research tells us this isn’t harmless. Social isolation among the elderly increases mortality risk by margins comparable to smoking or obesity. It accelerates cognitive decline, weakens immune function, and dramatically increases the likelihood of depression. The body needs human connection as much as it needs food or sleep. Yet we’ve built a world where you can effectively disappear from human contact while still functioning, still shopping, still existing.
And the isolated and the lonely are exactly the people the scammers come for. The fraudulent phone call that gets answered because any voice is a welcome one. The too-good-to-be-true investment opportunity that goes unchallenged because there’s no one trusted nearby to say “wait, does this feel right?” The authoritative stranger who takes his time, builds a little relationship, and then systematically dismantles a lifetime of savings. It’s easy to talk about financial scams as though the victims were careless or naive, but often the real vulnerability isn’t a lack of intelligence — it’s a lack of people. An elderly person could go from active to isolated to financially devastated without anyone necessarily noticing, least of all the systems designed to serve them.
The infrastructure of isolation is already built, efficient and frictionless. I experienced four days of it and found it peaceful. But I keep thinking about those who might experience four months, four years, with the silence growing around them. The answer is perhaps simply to notice — when elderly neighbours seem to be withdrawing, when their routines become smaller, when weeks pass between proper conversations. To be the person who creates those moments of connection: the chat at the checkout, the phone call that goes beyond pleasantries, the invitation repeated even when it’s declined the first time.
I don’t have solutions, but I know now how easy it is to slip into that quiet — and how important it might be to pay attention when others do.
Now in my early 80’s, I’ve lived in a rural setting most of my life. And, long ago I found comfort in having a multitude of hobbies that offer an intellectual stimulus.
More and more my wife of 58 years and I find it a challenge to find people to talk to that aren’t polarized in their politics or social activism. Having a sane normal conversation has become such a chore, it is better not have those discussions. Does that create a sense of isolation? Sure, but being alone is not the same as loneliness. We have a select circuit of dinner guests and we value those relationships.
But, equally, maintaining our 40 acres along with hobbies that include oil painting, gardening, and making traditional Japanese knives, keeps us very busy. In our case retirement has been rich by having activities that are intellectually simulating while using our hands.
I’d love to talk more, but I’ve gotta get the tractor out and move some gravel on the driveway and work on a glitch in our StarLink home network. Perhaps I’ll see our neighbor and wave.
Bob, what a great post!
Bob, you’ve pulled the curtain aside and given me a glimpse of what sounds like a truly rich life. I hope I’m as blessed when I reach my eighties. I’m intrigued by the Japanese knife crafting and I hope you get that glitch sorted!
Very important and wonderful article. I was very lucky to have parents who taught me well, that the secret sauce to a LONG live is that social connection. Sure you have to blessed with good health too. I live in Independent Living with about 350 people who have rich social lives, and feel so privileged. Thanks for sharing such important life information.
I’ve always felt that if it came down to it, I’d choose a life rich in people and connection over one rich in possessions — though I’m grateful that particular trade-off has never been put to me.
thanks for a very important post. technology –when it creates ‘frictionless’ but non-human patterns of interacting– is not our friend. I’m introverted and love quiet time, but living in an apartment building with a friendly dog ensures at least a basic couple of dozen human and dog connections each day. Amazing how much that counts. Isolation as a risk factor for fraud also important– I know someone with dementia who is now totally dependent on a caregiver who is not honest. But that person is her lifeline to social activity. tragic.
HD seems to have quite a few dog lovers. While I’m not an animal person myself, I can certainly appreciate the social appeal. I’m currently working on a post about someone I know whose retirement has been transformed by a little four-legged companion.
On your other point, I think we’ll always be fighting an uphill battle against the morally bankrupt individuals in society who prey on the vulnerable.
Regarding scams, you perfectly described my client’s experience. She lost $25,000 through the grandparent scam. It can happen to anyone.
Dan, it’s heartbreaking to read stories of financial fraud against the elderly. While financial fraud is devastating at any age, it’s especially cruel when the victim is older—someone who no longer has the option of recovering the loss through work. I recently read about a court case where a pensioner’s caregivers had been helping themselves to their bank account. Who watches the watchers?
Four days is nothing. I was immunocompromised during Covid, and spent two years mostly home alone. Thanks to the library and the internet I was fine. However, I paid attention to the advice about social interaction for seniors, and am now living in a CCRC with a slew of opportunities for interaction.
I do wonder how much of the research on social interaction allows for the difference between extroverts and introverts. I block Sunday as introvert recharge day. BTW, I thought Irish pubs were renowned for conviviality.
My business supplied specialist cryogenic pipe flow equipment to the healthcare industry, which meant we were classified as an “essential business” and continued to operate, albeit on a reduced scale, throughout the lockdowns. My wife worked in a hospital and kept going in too, so to a large extent our daily routine and rhythm changed very little.
What I do have are vivid memories of driving across Ireland to visit hospital sites on roads that were completely empty. On one occasion, during the early days of lockdown, I travelled over 100 miles without passing a single vehicle. It was a strange, slightly unsettling experience — the silence of roads that would normally be busy made the whole thing feel surreal at times.
We did a lot of Zoom interacting during COVID–for work, of course, but also Friday night “happy hour” with my mom and siblings, a weekly Bible study with the church group that now meets in our home, and a Friday morning “coffee” with a group of neighbors. I would also do 1:1 Zooms with friends or coworkers to catch up. I found myself thinking of Zoom meetings as “going somewhere” even if I didn’t leave the condo (sometimes for days at a time). It was an interesting mental space.
My brother, who is not yet a senior, was mostly home alone in his apartment in San Francisco during COVID. His work mostly shut down for months, and he was lonely, starting to run out of money, and depressed. It didn’t help that he had heart bypass surgery only about eight months before everything shut down, and he was still dealing with the emotional aftermath of that. I was able to get him a kitten, who is now five-year-old Ernie the cat. That was one of my better big-sister moves. He got through it and is doing well now, but that was a rough period.
I cant top that, but we were quarantined in a stateroom on a ship in the Pacific for two weeks seeing no one.
My family (wife, sister-in-law, parents and nephew) were locked down in a Wuhan apartment for the first three months of the outbreak with no direct access to food. Leaving was forbidden and stores were closed. Their neighborhood had to use a community website to arrange surreptitious truck deliveries of rice and vegetables from outlying farms.
You’ve probably heard this story before, but it was your “cruise ship” articles that led me to HumbleDollar in early 2020. One of them came across my feed somehow, and that led me here!
I was already here, but waiting at my computer screen for the next installment of the series.
Mark, I enjoy your writing, I really do, but we agreed to keep a financial link to posts. I’ve scraped lots of ideas trying to adhere to that.
Richard, I’m a bit confused by your comment. The article has an entire paragraph dedicated to financial scammers specifically targeting lonely and isolated elderly people — the fraudulent phone calls, the bogus investment schemes, the predatory stranger who builds trust before stripping away a lifetime of savings. That feels pretty financial to me. What am I missing?
Mark, I don’t actually see that paragraph…possible it was an earlier draft that didn’t make it to posting?
Oh dear… it seems I’ve gone and posted an early version that was on my laptop. Honestly, I’m a bit of an idiot, who actually gives two completely different versions the same draft number? Apparently, I do. 😂
Do you have a 3rd version, I’d be interested. 🙂 enjoyed both previous versions.
Mike, would you believe I have five different versions of this article! Version one uses Irish English spelling throughout. Version two drops some of the Irish English phrases and Americanises others, while version three goes the whole way with US spelling. Version four is the one that was originally posted, and version five is the same but with the scammer paragraph added. If you think that’s convoluted, I emailed Bogdan an article idea the other day that’s already been through seven revisions — lol.
Is Irish English spelling different from English English spelling?
In a word, no — spelling-wise, Irish English and English English are the same. Being Irish myself, I’d naturally call it “Irish English” rather than “English English”. Where differences do show up is in grammar and construction; I’ll restructure distinctly Irish phrasing like “he be going to have a difficult retirement” into “he’s going to have a difficult retirement”, or “I’m after finishing that report” into “I’ve just finished that report”, but the spelling itself stays consistent…then I have to deal with the US English fixation with “z” and dropping “u” etc.
Mark, the only Gaelic words I knew before you came along were not fit to print on the forum. I’ve rather enjoyed learning some Irish/English words like jumpers, craic, and faffing about. See, I was paying attention.
Dan, glad you’re paying attention — when I called myself an “idiot” for posting the wrong edit, that’s not how it would naturally come out of my mouth. I’d much more likely call myself a “buck eejit”. Same meaning, much more Irish in flavour!
I have to say that I’m impressed, because if I were writing an article mainly read in Ireland, I wouldn’t begin to know how to infuse it with Irish flavor, I mean flavour.
That’s not so bad, you could do worse, Mark. You could try to dig an old fuel oil tank out of the ground.
Well… what can I say. Apparently idiocy has different levels of competency 😂
Happens to the best of us, Mark! I see you’ve updated the post.
Interesting observations. I want/need/crave social connection. Whether or not my wife is in town, I’m arranging lunches, playing pool or pétanque, going to concerts/shows, at church, working on a project at the local woodworking shop, or hanging out with neighbors. My wife and I also have lots of conversations.
As you mention, this is now – but what happens in the future? What if I outlive all my primary contacts? It’s unlikely, but possible. What would you or I do then? I assume I’ll still be reaching out to some folks (new folks?).
When my Dad was around 90, he mentioned loneliness. He had played golf for many years, gradually cutting back on the number of holes he played. I suggested going to a course or a Par 3 course for a few holes. He told me he had already outlived 2 foursomes and wasn’t willing to go that route again. Sheesh, that crystallized it for me. I’d never thought of his social activities with that perspective – but now it influences mine.
Jeff, I had to Google “pétanque” — it was a new one for me. Funnily enough, I’ve been thinking about giving lawn bowls a go; it strikes me as a skillful and pleasant way to spend a sunny afternoon. I’m hoping my fairly wide circle of friends in the younger generations will serve as a reliable social lifeline as I get older — assuming, of course, that I outlive my own generational peers.
Great reflection. This topic came up in conversation with Sharon a few days ago, from a different angle. I’ve realized since shifting to mostly-retired status, I’ve fallen into my old habits of taking the extra moment or two with the folks at the sales counter.
When life was busier, my only thought was seeking the self-service transaction, or speeding up my encounter with the clerk. I did my best to avoid a drawn-out conversation. Now, I’m trying to make up for my years as a silent customer by acting a little like a fellow human who appreciates good service, or encourages better service. I told Sharon I feel like I’ve rejoined a part of the community from which I’d been absent.
But, to your point, my decision takes effort to execute. For the person who’s taken an emotional hit, or one born with an inclination toward reticence, modern life is all-too-easy to provide shelter from the community. Some folks are good at helping. Sharon mentioned a sweet, young woman at church who seems to target those at the margins of social interaction. She’s often seen engaging that person in one-on-one conversation–maybe the only such conversation the awkward or lonely person will have that week.
A few days ago, Sharon and I made a list of people we’d like to host for a series of casual dinners in our home over the summer. She’s always up for that activity, but I was reluctant when leisure time was more scarce. It’s one of the luxuries my new schedule affords.
Edmund, since retiring I’ve noticed the same shift in myself. Grocery shopping is genuinely relaxing now — I’d even go so far as to say I enjoy it. Nine times out of ten I deliberately choose a staffed checkout, and I make a point of being at my most pleasant with the operator.
On the home front, several of my neighbours are octogenarians aging in place. We make a point of putting their bins out and bringing them back in on collection day, and we regularly stop for a chat. Every now and then we’ll drop in a home-cooked meal or a bunch of flowers. We’ve also introduced ourselves to their families and have their contact details to hand. It takes up very little time but I hope it makes a difference.
Unless I am in a hurry, which is rare as I’m retired, I don’t use self checkout. It’s my rebellion against doing the corporations’ job for free, and the job losses associated with them. I am Don Quixote tilting at corporate windmills.
I’ve seen two effect of my efforts. One, prices have not gone down due to the savings from not providing jobs to as many people.
Two, the number of human occupied checkouts have not increased.
We’ve done the “make a list” of people to have over for dinner thing, too. It’s all too easy for us to just slip into quiet evenings with just us if we’re not intentional about it.
“I think there’s a danger in how easy modern life enables you to navigate through your days without the need to converse and interact with other people.”
One reason for this is corporations have made this world a self service world. They want your money but they don’t want you to bother them. One example is Frontier Airlines. I had an issue after I bought my ticket. They don’t have a “customer service” phone number and will not speak with non-rewards customers until 24 hours before your flight. Seems that should be illegal. I will never partake of their services again.
Another factor is headphones and the like which are so ubiquitous. They send the message that the wearer doesn’t want to be bothered.
David, I have to confess — I’m guilty of the headphone sin myself. Whenever I’m on a plane, I tend to plug in and listen to audiobooks to pass the time.
No excuse for the airline, but the headphones issue is a matter of perspective. I see them as a sign of consideration for others – no way do I want to have to listen to someone else’s music/conversation. They might also be an introvert’s self- defense mechanism.
Yes, I’ve seen and heard too many speakerphone conversations and people who think it’s ok to watch videos out loud in waiting rooms.
I am experiencing a similar issue with Avelo Airlines, which arbitrarily canceled a leg of our flight and shifted us to similar seats on a flight a day later, which we can make happen but it leaves us with questions that need answering. I found myself 415th in the call rotation because they are of course “experiencing heavier than normal call volume” so I left a callback number. That was three days ago. Crickets. So I took to social media and, voila, I got responses from three different Avelo accounts. So maybe today I’ll get some things resolved. Or not.