FREE NEWSLETTER

If the parents are paying, a college education is priceless. If they aren’t, it’s an investment—and the return better outweigh the cost.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Before Someone Else Decides

"Marilyn, I love that a rainy afternoon led you to explore both later-life living options and flights to Greece! You’ve captured exactly what I hoped readers might take away: planning ahead doesn’t mean deciding—or moving—today. It means discovering what possibilities exist between staying home and entering a CCRC, and considering how they might work financially and practically. Finding a place that could accommodate both of you—and your dog—without a large upfront payment sounds well worth keeping on the radar. Showing the information to your daughter is also a gift. She’ll know what might appeal to you if circumstances change. Many of us hope for a fast exit, but having a Plan B can provide peace of mind. In the meantime, Greece sounds like an excellent Plan A!"
- Kathleen Rehl
Read more »

Today in Financial History

"J, you have accomplished the most difficult part of the dilemma, which in my opinion, is finding that trustworthy and successful needle in the haystack."
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

Taking a Loss?

"Steve, I'm going to put my ignorance on display. I was unaware of target date bond funds (until now). They actually have a fixed expiration date! Your yield is nearly 1% better than my CD LADDER. Amazing."
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

Beware the CFP Designation?

"My state allows a Professional Engineer (PE) to move their license to inactive status to eliminate continuing education (CE) requirements but continues to charge the current $280 every two year license. Each state and controlling board may also have their own rules to reactivate your license by completing a certain level of CE in lieu of having to retake the exam, you are just not allowed to do any paid professional work after your license is changed to inactive status. The benefit to me for going inactive when I stopped professional work as a CPA is I remain in my professional society and enjoy seeing old colleagues at the local chapter monthly meeting. In the event I should ever want to do paid work again I would just need to complete a specified amount appropriate CE. The dozen or so lunches I get each year at the chapter meetings offsets the small cost the state society charges me for an inactive status membership and helps keep me current on the matters I am still interested in. I doubt I will ever need to work for pay again and being inactive creates an easy excuse to say no on the infrequent inquiry of could I help out during tax season."
- William Perry
Read more »

Inflation, prices, COLAs, retirement and the last 16 years

"I had a government employee who was a 1040 tax client back in 1984 when an earlier law change occurred that mandated all members of congress pay into the social system. See SS historical FAQ #5."
- William Perry
Read more »

Subconscious Frugality

"I applaud the cost-effectiveness of the course's double-nine concept! ... One reason I stopped even my rare rounds decades ago was that I had spent too much time searching in vain for the balls I sprayed all over the hilly courses."
- Joe Kiefer
Read more »

$400,000 Mistake

BOB MADE A very expensive tax mistake. Doctors told Bob that he only has a year to live… What did Bob do?

He decided to gift a house to his only son before passing away. The house is worth $2,000,000 that he bought back in 1970 for $50,000 in an expensive suburb of California.

The son decided to sell the house and paid about $430,000 in federal taxes.

$430,000 that could have been $0 instead…

How?

When you gift a property to someone, they receive a "carryover basis." It basically means the same price the original owner purchased it for.

The basis of that house was $50,000, so the son had to pay capital gains tax on the difference between the $2 million sale price and the basis, at rates reaching up to 23.8% on the top portion of the gain. But this is where a step-up in basis could come into play.

Assets such as a house or shares held in a brokerage account, when owned inside an estate rather than an irrevocable trust, receive a step-up in basis to their fair market value (FMV) at the time of the decedent's death, per IRC Section 1014. In our case, if Bob held that house in his own name, passed away, and his son received the house, he would've gotten a step-up in basis to the current value, or $2M.

At the time of the sale, if sold for $2M, he would pay $0 in federal taxes, though state tax might still apply. That's about $430,000 of "savings."

"But who cares, Bob is dead anyways?"

While true, many parents still want to make sure their children don't have to pay half a million in taxes. They want their children to enjoy the fruits of their hard labor.

Specifics

The step-up in basis can be a bit nuanced, depending on how the assets are held and titled.

First, the step-up in basis typically adjusts to the market value, unless an election is made to use the value six months after the date of death, subject to certain rules.

The step-up in basis also doesn't apply to assets held in an irrevocable trust , though we will cover some strategies for that later, or to assets held in qualified retirement accounts, such as IRAs and 401(k)s.

In a community property state (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), the basis steps up whenever a spouse dies. You will typically need to complete a form to receive this step-up in a brokerage account. 

For assets held in joint tenancy, the step-up applies only to the deceased partner's share. For example, Bob and Jenice have a house worth $300,000 with a $50,000 basis. After Bob passes away, Jenice will have a $175,000 basis in the house, calculated as ($300,000 minus $50,000) divided by two, plus $50,000.

There are also two additional things to keep in mind:

1. Living on the right assets

Bob, age 75, has two accounts: a traditional 401(k) worth $500,000 and a brokerage account worth $500,000. Bob's diagnosis isn't good.

From a tax-planning perspective, it might make a lot more sense to withdraw, say, $50,000 a year from the 401(k) to live on, $20,000 of which would be required minimum distributions (RMDs), and pass down the brokerage account to his beneficiaries.

This is because the brokerage account likely has a lot of gains. Bob bought many stocks in his 30s and 40s that could be stepped up now. But a more in-depth analysis might be needed if Bob has a lot of income and is in a high marginal tax bracket.

2. Selling the right lots

Say Bob has a $500,000 brokerage account. Some of the stock purchases have a low basis, meaning a lot of capital gains, and some have a high basis, meaning fewer capital gains.

It's best to sell the high-basis stocks, which come with a lower capital gains tax, and pass down the low-basis stocks to the beneficiaries.

Planning matters. These mistakes can cost thousands of dollars in unnecessary taxes. As always, make sure to consult a licensed CPA or estate attorney with your unique circumstances.

 

Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  
Read more »

Social Security

AT FIRST GLANCE, Social Security appears straightforward. During our working years, we pay into it, and in retirement, it sends us a monthly check, guaranteed for life. Unfortunately, it isn’t always so simple. Below are five aspects of the system that are frequently misunderstood. Benefits estimates. Look at a Social Security statement, and an easy-to-read chart provides estimates of the benefits available at various ages. The heading above the chart reads, “Personalized Monthly Retirement Benefit Estimates Depending on the Age You Start.” That seems clear. But there’s a caveat that can make the chart misleading. Off to the side, there’s a further explanation that reads: “These personalized estimates are based on your earnings to date and assume you continue to earn [your most recently reported salary] per year until you start your benefits.” The numbers shown, in other words, are not guaranteed.  Why would the statements be presented this way? It’s because the Social Security Administration can’t predict when any given person will stop working, so for simplicity of presentation, it assumes that someone will continue working and continue earning the same income each year into the future and will then retire and immediately claim benefits. For most people, this isn’t how it works out, but Social Security has no way to know what each person will choose. That’s why benefits statements shouldn’t be taken at face value. How can you forecast your actual benefit? Fortunately, Social Security’s website provides a calculator that allows custom calculations based on actual retirement expectations. Continuing to work. Some people worry that there would be a negative impact if they chose to continue working after claiming Social Security. This concern isn’t totally unfounded. It’s known as the Social Security earnings test, but there are some details to be aware of. First, the earnings test doesn’t apply after a worker reaches Full Retirement Age. And second, to the extent that benefits are reduced in the years before FRA, Social Security will add back those amounts to future checks. So working while on Social Security shouldn’t be viewed as so problematic. Maximum benefit. All things being equal, Social Security retirement benefits increase with each year that you wait, up until age 70. This is broadly understood. The problem, though, is that oftentimes people view it almost as a rule to wait until 70, but that isn’t always the best choice. For married couples, especially where one spouse has accumulated a larger benefit, there are two reasons why one spouse might claim earlier than 70. The first relates to what’s known as the spousal benefit. This is a feature that originated in the days when more families had just one working spouse, and it provides a benefit to spouses who haven’t worked the requisite 10 years to earn a benefit. In general, the spousal benefit is equal to half of the higher-earning spouse’s benefit at their Full Retirement Age (FRA), which is now age 67 for most people. The only requirement is that the lower-earning spouse can’t start benefits until the higher-earning spouse has started his or her own benefit. The spousal benefit is terrific, but a commonly misunderstood limitation is that—unlike a worker’s own benefit—it doesn’t continue to increase each year until age 70. It hits a maximum at the spouse’s FRA. For that reason, it’s important for a spouse to not delay beyond that point.  Even when both spouses have accrued their own benefits, it often makes sense for the spouse with the smaller benefit to claim somewhat earlier than 70. To understand why, we need to look at it from the perspective of the higher earning spouse’s benefit. Because that benefit would also be available to the lower-earning spouse in the form of a survivor’s benefit (discussed further below), that larger benefit will be available to either spouse as long as either is living. The smaller benefit, on the other hand, has value only while both spouses are living. And while it’s unfortunate to say, that is statistically less likely. For that reason, I generally recommend that the lower-earning spouse claim at, or around, Full Retirement Age. When to claim. In most conversations about Social Security, people tend to talk about claiming decisions in round numbers—claiming at 67 or 68, for example. The reality, though, is that you can claim at any time between ages 62 and 70. You don’t need to wait for your birthday, and the benefit simply increases by a bit for each month that you wait. I find this helpful because it allows flexibility in how we think about claiming. Not sure whether to start at 67 or 68? You can easily split the difference. Survivor benefits. To understand how the survivor benefit works, imagine a married couple, Joe and Jane. Joe’s benefit is $5,000 per month, and Jane’s is $4,000. Now suppose that Joe passes away. At that point, Jane wouldn’t be able to claim the combined total of $9,000. However, she could claim a survivor’s benefit that would increase her monthly check from $4,000 to $5,000, matching what Joe was receiving. That’s the simplest case, but the survivor benefit decision is often more complicated because it also depends on the age of the survivor. Survivor benefits can be claimed as early as age 60, and that can be helpful in certain situations, but there’s also a penalty for claiming too early. Benefits can be reduced by nearly 30%. In other words, and importantly, Jane wouldn’t automatically be entitled to $5,000 just because that was what Joe was receiving. When would Jane be able to claim the full $5,000? For this determination, Social Security uses a yardstick known as the Full Retirement Age for Survivors. This isn’t exactly the same as the standard FRA, but it’s close. (Social Security provides a calculator to look it up.) What might this look like in practice? Suppose Jane were a year shy of the FRA for survivors at the time that Joe died. In this case, Jane would have a choice. She could claim her survivor’s benefit at that time, but her total check would come out to somewhat less than $5,000. Fortunately, Social Security doesn’t automatically turn on survivor benefits when a spouse dies, thus providing survivors more control. In Jane’s case, she might continue with her own benefit of $4,000 per month for one more year. Then, once she became eligible for 100% of the survivor’s benefit, she could claim the full $1,000 to reach $5,000.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"I’ve done a lot of jobs since my official “retirement “ 15 years ago at age 57 due to a layoff. Fortunately I was fully vested in my union pension. Moved from California to Colorado, got my CDL and drove a gas truck for 6 years. Did a lot of very scenic (and sometimes scary) mountain driving. My wife tired of the cold winters, so we reretired, sold the house, bought a motorhome and started traveling. Found a company that paid us to travel doing gas line surveying across country. Did that for about 4 years and settled down near my oldest son to be near grandkids. To keep from being bored, I drove a school bus for 2 years. Now I only drive for overnight and longer field trips because they pay me for every hour I’m away from home. So it’s been a very gradual transition to fully retired."
- Mike Wyant
Read more »

What I Retired To

"Thank you for sharing your story. It sounds as though you truly found your calling in medicine, and there’s no greater compliment than hearing from patients that you made a difference in their lives. I was struck by your comment that it wasn’t the work itself that led you to retire, but everything around it that changed. Sadly, I suspect many professionals have reached that same conclusion. It also sounds as though you’ve carried your love of learning into retirement through your reading, volunteering and staying engaged. I only wish there were an easier way for experienced physicians like you to continue helping others in a volunteer capacity. There is still so much wisdom to share."
- Andrew Clements
Read more »

Value of Waiting

I WAS THINKING ABOUT Jonathan the other day on my morning walk, which happens more often than you might think. It’s hard not to think about him when you have HumbleDollar coasters in your living room and a HumbleDollar shopping bag in your car that you use for groceries. My wife confiscated the HumbleDollar cup I had been using for my morning tea, and it now has a new home in our bathroom holding her toothbrush and toothpaste. There’s even an apron somewhere in the house that Jonathan once sent to all the writers. Ever since I started writing for HumbleDollar in 2017, Jonathan has influenced my retirement. I now own the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (symbol: VT) in my investment portfolio because of his recommendation. He liked it for its “broad global diversification in one low-cost fund that covers virtually all publicly traded companies worldwide.” It struck me as a good way to simplify our holdings. I didn’t just borrow some of Jonathan’s investment ideas; I also borrowed some of his words he used when editing my articles. I began peppering my writing with words like fret, upshot, and folks. He once told me, “While your grammar is occasionally a bit dodgy, you have a great ear for language.” I was too embarrassed to ask him what he meant by a “great ear for language.” When I retired, I never imagined that writing for HumbleDollar would become such a big part of my retirement, and I’m grateful to Jonathan for that. I also didn’t think my retirement would be so fluid. I pictured something far more stable: remaining single, living in a one-bedroom condo, and fending for myself. My life now is different. I’m married and live in a three-bedroom home in another city. One of the biggest changes, however, has nothing to do with geography. It has to do with money—specifically, how financial decisions change when there are two people instead of one. I learned that lesson early in our marriage. We got married in August 2020. That December, I woke up one morning and saw blood in my urine. I went to an urologist who ran a series of tests, but it took about a month to determine the cause.   During that time, I decided to consolidate our remaining investment holdings to make things easier for Rachel to manage in case something happened to me. Most of our money was already at Vanguard, except for a 401(k) from my former employer that was invested in a stable value fund. It still held a significant balance. Without much hesitation, I moved it into a bond fund at Vanguard. Not too long afterward, the bond market nosedived. The fund performed poorly—especially compared to the stable value fund the money had been in. The upshot: I panicked—and paid for it. It wasn’t a good time to make a financial decision while I was under stress. Some of the worst money moves happen when emotions are running high—selling stocks at the bottom of a bear market or rushing to act after an unexpected windfall. More often than not, it’s better to wait until you’re clearheaded before making a decision. At the time, I was also fretting about whether Rachel would qualify for my Social Security benefit, which is much larger than hers. You have to be married for at least nine months. I found myself counting off the days. Another financial decision became more complicated simply because we were now a couple: what to do with the three properties we owned—my condo, Rachel’s house, and the house I had inherited. Neither of us wanted to be landlords at this stage of our lives. We were excited about getting married and starting a new life together. I decided to sell my condo during the pandemic, which wasn’t easy. Rather than wait, I accepted an offer of $380,000—$43,000 below the asking price. Rachel decided to wait and rent out her house for two years. She didn’t get caught up in the excitement or rush into selling. As it turned out, that patience paid off. When the for-sale sign finally went up, I would stop by the house to water the yard and rake the falling leaves. One day, a real estate agent and his client were there looking at the property. They kept asking me whether the price listed on the brochure was correct. Rachel’s agent had intentionally priced the house at the lower end of the range in hopes of creating a bidding war. I told them they would have to talk to my wife and her agent because it wasn’t my house. The agent asked how long we had been married. When I told him two years, he nodded and said, “I get it. She wanted to wait until she was sure about the marriage before selling the house.” Rachel laughed when I told her what he said. She wasn’t waiting to see if the marriage would work. She waited because selling a house is a major financial decision, and she didn’t see any reason to rush it. Two years later, the timing turned out to be just right. The market had improved and the strategy worked exactly as planned. There were multiple offers, and the final sale price was well above what it would have been earlier. At the time my wife sold her house, Zillow’s estimated price of my condo was $484,000—$104,000 more than I received. I don’t really know why I was in such a rush to sell. Maybe it had something to do with the pandemic, my mother’s recent death, my sister and brother-in-law moving out of state, or the stress of renovating our new house. It was an emotional time for me, and I was probably searching for some stability in my life. What I’ve learned—both from Jonathan and from being married—is that good financial decisions usually come from patience, not urgency. When I feel anxious or pressured to act, I’m more likely to make a mistake. When I slow down, think things through, and listen—especially to my wife—the outcome is usually better. Managing money well isn’t about always making the right move. It’s about avoiding the wrong ones—and knowing when to wait.  Dennis Friedman retired from Boeing Satellite Systems after a 30-year career in manufacturing. Born in Ohio, Dennis is a California transplant with a bachelor’s degree in history and an MBA. A self-described “humble investor,” he likes reading historical novels and about personal finance. Follow Dennis on X @DMFrie and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Before Someone Else Decides

"Marilyn, I love that a rainy afternoon led you to explore both later-life living options and flights to Greece! You’ve captured exactly what I hoped readers might take away: planning ahead doesn’t mean deciding—or moving—today. It means discovering what possibilities exist between staying home and entering a CCRC, and considering how they might work financially and practically. Finding a place that could accommodate both of you—and your dog—without a large upfront payment sounds well worth keeping on the radar. Showing the information to your daughter is also a gift. She’ll know what might appeal to you if circumstances change. Many of us hope for a fast exit, but having a Plan B can provide peace of mind. In the meantime, Greece sounds like an excellent Plan A!"
- Kathleen Rehl
Read more »

Today in Financial History

"J, you have accomplished the most difficult part of the dilemma, which in my opinion, is finding that trustworthy and successful needle in the haystack."
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

Taking a Loss?

"Steve, I'm going to put my ignorance on display. I was unaware of target date bond funds (until now). They actually have a fixed expiration date! Your yield is nearly 1% better than my CD LADDER. Amazing."
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

Beware the CFP Designation?

"My state allows a Professional Engineer (PE) to move their license to inactive status to eliminate continuing education (CE) requirements but continues to charge the current $280 every two year license. Each state and controlling board may also have their own rules to reactivate your license by completing a certain level of CE in lieu of having to retake the exam, you are just not allowed to do any paid professional work after your license is changed to inactive status. The benefit to me for going inactive when I stopped professional work as a CPA is I remain in my professional society and enjoy seeing old colleagues at the local chapter monthly meeting. In the event I should ever want to do paid work again I would just need to complete a specified amount appropriate CE. The dozen or so lunches I get each year at the chapter meetings offsets the small cost the state society charges me for an inactive status membership and helps keep me current on the matters I am still interested in. I doubt I will ever need to work for pay again and being inactive creates an easy excuse to say no on the infrequent inquiry of could I help out during tax season."
- William Perry
Read more »

Inflation, prices, COLAs, retirement and the last 16 years

"I had a government employee who was a 1040 tax client back in 1984 when an earlier law change occurred that mandated all members of congress pay into the social system. See SS historical FAQ #5."
- William Perry
Read more »

Subconscious Frugality

"I applaud the cost-effectiveness of the course's double-nine concept! ... One reason I stopped even my rare rounds decades ago was that I had spent too much time searching in vain for the balls I sprayed all over the hilly courses."
- Joe Kiefer
Read more »

$400,000 Mistake

BOB MADE A very expensive tax mistake. Doctors told Bob that he only has a year to live… What did Bob do?

He decided to gift a house to his only son before passing away. The house is worth $2,000,000 that he bought back in 1970 for $50,000 in an expensive suburb of California.

The son decided to sell the house and paid about $430,000 in federal taxes.

$430,000 that could have been $0 instead…

How?

When you gift a property to someone, they receive a "carryover basis." It basically means the same price the original owner purchased it for.

The basis of that house was $50,000, so the son had to pay capital gains tax on the difference between the $2 million sale price and the basis, at rates reaching up to 23.8% on the top portion of the gain. But this is where a step-up in basis could come into play.

Assets such as a house or shares held in a brokerage account, when owned inside an estate rather than an irrevocable trust, receive a step-up in basis to their fair market value (FMV) at the time of the decedent's death, per IRC Section 1014. In our case, if Bob held that house in his own name, passed away, and his son received the house, he would've gotten a step-up in basis to the current value, or $2M.

At the time of the sale, if sold for $2M, he would pay $0 in federal taxes, though state tax might still apply. That's about $430,000 of "savings."

"But who cares, Bob is dead anyways?"

While true, many parents still want to make sure their children don't have to pay half a million in taxes. They want their children to enjoy the fruits of their hard labor.

Specifics

The step-up in basis can be a bit nuanced, depending on how the assets are held and titled.

First, the step-up in basis typically adjusts to the market value, unless an election is made to use the value six months after the date of death, subject to certain rules.

The step-up in basis also doesn't apply to assets held in an irrevocable trust , though we will cover some strategies for that later, or to assets held in qualified retirement accounts, such as IRAs and 401(k)s.

In a community property state (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), the basis steps up whenever a spouse dies. You will typically need to complete a form to receive this step-up in a brokerage account. 

For assets held in joint tenancy, the step-up applies only to the deceased partner's share. For example, Bob and Jenice have a house worth $300,000 with a $50,000 basis. After Bob passes away, Jenice will have a $175,000 basis in the house, calculated as ($300,000 minus $50,000) divided by two, plus $50,000.

There are also two additional things to keep in mind:

1. Living on the right assets

Bob, age 75, has two accounts: a traditional 401(k) worth $500,000 and a brokerage account worth $500,000. Bob's diagnosis isn't good.

From a tax-planning perspective, it might make a lot more sense to withdraw, say, $50,000 a year from the 401(k) to live on, $20,000 of which would be required minimum distributions (RMDs), and pass down the brokerage account to his beneficiaries.

This is because the brokerage account likely has a lot of gains. Bob bought many stocks in his 30s and 40s that could be stepped up now. But a more in-depth analysis might be needed if Bob has a lot of income and is in a high marginal tax bracket.

2. Selling the right lots

Say Bob has a $500,000 brokerage account. Some of the stock purchases have a low basis, meaning a lot of capital gains, and some have a high basis, meaning fewer capital gains.

It's best to sell the high-basis stocks, which come with a lower capital gains tax, and pass down the low-basis stocks to the beneficiaries.

Planning matters. These mistakes can cost thousands of dollars in unnecessary taxes. As always, make sure to consult a licensed CPA or estate attorney with your unique circumstances.

 

Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  
Read more »

Social Security

AT FIRST GLANCE, Social Security appears straightforward. During our working years, we pay into it, and in retirement, it sends us a monthly check, guaranteed for life. Unfortunately, it isn’t always so simple. Below are five aspects of the system that are frequently misunderstood. Benefits estimates. Look at a Social Security statement, and an easy-to-read chart provides estimates of the benefits available at various ages. The heading above the chart reads, “Personalized Monthly Retirement Benefit Estimates Depending on the Age You Start.” That seems clear. But there’s a caveat that can make the chart misleading. Off to the side, there’s a further explanation that reads: “These personalized estimates are based on your earnings to date and assume you continue to earn [your most recently reported salary] per year until you start your benefits.” The numbers shown, in other words, are not guaranteed.  Why would the statements be presented this way? It’s because the Social Security Administration can’t predict when any given person will stop working, so for simplicity of presentation, it assumes that someone will continue working and continue earning the same income each year into the future and will then retire and immediately claim benefits. For most people, this isn’t how it works out, but Social Security has no way to know what each person will choose. That’s why benefits statements shouldn’t be taken at face value. How can you forecast your actual benefit? Fortunately, Social Security’s website provides a calculator that allows custom calculations based on actual retirement expectations. Continuing to work. Some people worry that there would be a negative impact if they chose to continue working after claiming Social Security. This concern isn’t totally unfounded. It’s known as the Social Security earnings test, but there are some details to be aware of. First, the earnings test doesn’t apply after a worker reaches Full Retirement Age. And second, to the extent that benefits are reduced in the years before FRA, Social Security will add back those amounts to future checks. So working while on Social Security shouldn’t be viewed as so problematic. Maximum benefit. All things being equal, Social Security retirement benefits increase with each year that you wait, up until age 70. This is broadly understood. The problem, though, is that oftentimes people view it almost as a rule to wait until 70, but that isn’t always the best choice. For married couples, especially where one spouse has accumulated a larger benefit, there are two reasons why one spouse might claim earlier than 70. The first relates to what’s known as the spousal benefit. This is a feature that originated in the days when more families had just one working spouse, and it provides a benefit to spouses who haven’t worked the requisite 10 years to earn a benefit. In general, the spousal benefit is equal to half of the higher-earning spouse’s benefit at their Full Retirement Age (FRA), which is now age 67 for most people. The only requirement is that the lower-earning spouse can’t start benefits until the higher-earning spouse has started his or her own benefit. The spousal benefit is terrific, but a commonly misunderstood limitation is that—unlike a worker’s own benefit—it doesn’t continue to increase each year until age 70. It hits a maximum at the spouse’s FRA. For that reason, it’s important for a spouse to not delay beyond that point.  Even when both spouses have accrued their own benefits, it often makes sense for the spouse with the smaller benefit to claim somewhat earlier than 70. To understand why, we need to look at it from the perspective of the higher earning spouse’s benefit. Because that benefit would also be available to the lower-earning spouse in the form of a survivor’s benefit (discussed further below), that larger benefit will be available to either spouse as long as either is living. The smaller benefit, on the other hand, has value only while both spouses are living. And while it’s unfortunate to say, that is statistically less likely. For that reason, I generally recommend that the lower-earning spouse claim at, or around, Full Retirement Age. When to claim. In most conversations about Social Security, people tend to talk about claiming decisions in round numbers—claiming at 67 or 68, for example. The reality, though, is that you can claim at any time between ages 62 and 70. You don’t need to wait for your birthday, and the benefit simply increases by a bit for each month that you wait. I find this helpful because it allows flexibility in how we think about claiming. Not sure whether to start at 67 or 68? You can easily split the difference. Survivor benefits. To understand how the survivor benefit works, imagine a married couple, Joe and Jane. Joe’s benefit is $5,000 per month, and Jane’s is $4,000. Now suppose that Joe passes away. At that point, Jane wouldn’t be able to claim the combined total of $9,000. However, she could claim a survivor’s benefit that would increase her monthly check from $4,000 to $5,000, matching what Joe was receiving. That’s the simplest case, but the survivor benefit decision is often more complicated because it also depends on the age of the survivor. Survivor benefits can be claimed as early as age 60, and that can be helpful in certain situations, but there’s also a penalty for claiming too early. Benefits can be reduced by nearly 30%. In other words, and importantly, Jane wouldn’t automatically be entitled to $5,000 just because that was what Joe was receiving. When would Jane be able to claim the full $5,000? For this determination, Social Security uses a yardstick known as the Full Retirement Age for Survivors. This isn’t exactly the same as the standard FRA, but it’s close. (Social Security provides a calculator to look it up.) What might this look like in practice? Suppose Jane were a year shy of the FRA for survivors at the time that Joe died. In this case, Jane would have a choice. She could claim her survivor’s benefit at that time, but her total check would come out to somewhat less than $5,000. Fortunately, Social Security doesn’t automatically turn on survivor benefits when a spouse dies, thus providing survivors more control. In Jane’s case, she might continue with her own benefit of $4,000 per month for one more year. Then, once she became eligible for 100% of the survivor’s benefit, she could claim the full $1,000 to reach $5,000.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"I’ve done a lot of jobs since my official “retirement “ 15 years ago at age 57 due to a layoff. Fortunately I was fully vested in my union pension. Moved from California to Colorado, got my CDL and drove a gas truck for 6 years. Did a lot of very scenic (and sometimes scary) mountain driving. My wife tired of the cold winters, so we reretired, sold the house, bought a motorhome and started traveling. Found a company that paid us to travel doing gas line surveying across country. Did that for about 4 years and settled down near my oldest son to be near grandkids. To keep from being bored, I drove a school bus for 2 years. Now I only drive for overnight and longer field trips because they pay me for every hour I’m away from home. So it’s been a very gradual transition to fully retired."
- Mike Wyant
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 21: A HIGH income makes it easier to grow wealthy. But no matter how much we earn, we’ll struggle to amass a healthy nest egg—unless we learn to spend less than we earn.

think

ANCHORING. Imagine the S&P 500 is up 20% over the past year. You might balk at buying stocks, because you’re anchored on the market’s old level and feel you’re overpaying at current prices. Or imagine your neighbors sold their home two years ago for $300,000. You might be reluctant to accept less for your home, even if property prices have since fallen.

humans

NO. 30: WE underestimate the power of compounding. Most folks grasp that invested money should grow over time, while carrying credit-card debt can trigger interest charges. But studies suggest we fail to appreciate just how much our money can grow if left to compound—and just how costly our debts can be if we fail to pay them off in short order.

think

GAMBLER’S FALLACY. When the dice hasn’t come up six for a while, we think a six is more likely. Similarly, if a money manager has previously beaten the averages or a Wall Street strategist has a history of predicting the market’s direction, we assume they’ll continue to make winning calls. But what if it's random, like the dice, and these folks were just lucky?

Great debates

Manifesto

NO. 21: A HIGH income makes it easier to grow wealthy. But no matter how much we earn, we’ll struggle to amass a healthy nest egg—unless we learn to spend less than we earn.

Spotlight: Insurance

How Big is Your Umbrella?

Many HumbleDollar readers have saved and invested regularly over their working years and were able to retire comfortably. Unfortunately, a lawsuit could threaten that financial security.
One possible scenario: If, heaven forbid, you are involved in a traffic accident resulting in severe bodily injury or loss of life, a legal judgement against you could destroy your nest egg.
The liability coverage on a home or auto policy may not offer enough protection. For this reason,

Read more »

The Approaching Hurricane

WHEN I WAS A NEWSPAPER reporter in Florida in the early 1980s, we were preoccupied with the chance that a hurricane would spin out of the Gulf of Mexico and slam into Florida’s West coast. It would be the biggest story of our lives if a big one struck the low-lying coastal city of St. Petersburg. It never came our way, fortunately for everyone.
The most serious storm I covered back then was called the “no-name storm” because it didn’t muster hurricane-strength winds.

Read more »

Life Sentence

WOULD YOU ADVISE someone—who doesn’t drive, doesn’t need a car and doesn’t plan to get one in the foreseeable future—to buy car insurance? I wouldn’t. But it seems some financial advisors think otherwise. That, at least, is the impression I got when an acquaintance, whom I’ll call Laura, mentioned her variable universal life insurance policy to me.
A single woman in her mid-40s, Laura has a decent income and lives on her own. She has no one other than herself to support financially.

Read more »

The $20 Billion Problem

I am sure that we have all been following the current tragedy going on in Los Angeles with the large fires burning there.  One of my friends in the insurance industry told me that he had heard from someone in the reinsurance business that the total insured losses from these fires will be more than Twenty Billion Dollars.  
So, I have been thinking about how a catastrophe of this magnitude could be financed.  In insurance,

Read more »

Self Defense

ONE SPRING DAY IN 2022, an elderly woman entered Paris’s Picasso Museum to see a new exhibit. Among the items on display was a decorative blue jacket, which was positioned on a wall next to a portrait of Picasso.
The woman liked the look of the jacket, so she took it down from its hook, put it in her bag and quietly walked out the front door. Only later did the museum discover the theft,

Read more »

My Father’s Daughter

MY LATE FATHER SPENT his entire career, from the time he dropped out of college to marry my mother until the day he died at age 61, in the insurance business. My father was also a huge fan of the San Francisco 49ers, our hometown NFL team.
Last year, the 49ers cruised through the playoffs, led by the team’s dynamic young quarterback, Brock Purdy. But then, in the NFC Championship game against the Philadelphia Eagles,

Read more »

Spotlight: Retzke

Tweaking the 4% Rule

On April 25 Morningstar published an article "Retirees: Here’s How to Tweak the 4% Rule to Protect Your Nest Egg".  It includes a link to their Report "State of Retirement Income 2024".  The report requires an email address. With recent stock gyrations I thought that their most recent look at withdrawals and retirement accounts might be helpful. Here are a few points made in the article: "Morningstar researchers have investigated and identified their latest starting safe withdrawal rate. Here’s a hint: it’s slightly lower than the previous year. " About saving for retirement, "it’s pretty straightforward as long as you start early and you’re consistent about it. But when it comes to taking your retirement portfolio and figuring out how to turn that into a paycheck for yourself, that gets much more complicated." There’s sort of a balance. You want to make sure that you’re spending enough so that you can enjoy your retirement and enjoy hobbies and travel, that kind of thing, but not spend too aggressively so that you might have to cut back later in life. "A lot of people actually end up underspending." Morningstar states that their approach is different. "We decided that instead of looking at past data, we would do something more forward-looking, using market estimates for possible future returns." Looking at the past 15 years  Morningstar says the market returns were "actually the best 15-year period for stocks that we’ve seen going back to 1970." Morningstar has reduced their return assumptions for stocks and bonds. Morningstar's analysis looks at 900 outcomes using a base case of 3.7% and "various flexible or dynamic withdrawal strategies."  These alternatives "can often lift the starting withdrawal rate." Here's a link to the article: https://www.morningstar.com/retirement/retirees-heres-how-tweak-4-rule-protect-your-nest-egg  
Read more »

The Wages of Success

I worked and earned income from 1963 to 2022. I always saved a portion of my earnings. Some was “parked” in real estate, some in the stock market, some in bonds and some in a traditional savings account. Every dollar I saved represented many hours of true labor. Some was as a business owner, some as an engineer, some was “sweat equity” in my homes and RVs, and some labor was expended by maintaining a commercial property. I didn’t spend all of my income from “work”. I "parked" a portion of the proceeds from that work via investments so I could draw upon them in retirement. I concluded this would be "shadow working" while I was retired. Today, every dollar I pull from my retirement accounts represents wages for my past effort and work success. During my actual working life at least 10% of my hours were “banked” for the future. In essence the echoes of my many years of labor are reverberating today, in the present. My savings are working for me today, but every dollar represents a small amount of physical or mental labor I expended in the past. This perspective influenced how I invested. Each investment was as if I were asking myself “What company is worthy of my efforts”? Which companies would be better stewards and are aligned with my values? This was a personal approach to investing and I’m sure I left “profits” on the table; there were many companies I deemed to be unworthy, or which had unsavory businesses or business practices. As a business owner I made a decision each year about how much “profit” to leave in the company. I could invest it in my firm, or share with others via dividends, bonuses or profit sharing. I decided how much to invest…
Read more »

Using AI to create a robust investment plan

I’ve been dabbling in AI.  Began using precursor “Expert Systems” about 20 years ago, but the new apps are more generalized and interesting. I’m aware of the limitations and anyone who wants to use something like Gemini or ChatGPT should also be aware. They can (and do) generate false information with apparent confidence. This can deceive users. Such disinformation has been given the name "hallucination" or "confabulation" by AI experts. Interesting names for inaccuracy. However, using precise prompts seems to improve the response. I’ve been running tests on Gemini using a range of prompts to build an in-retirement portfolio. I call these "tests" because I have my answer to compare this AI expert to. My early explorations indicate this might be a useful tool to add to my other modelling methods such as Monte-Carlo simulations. I’m also exploring approaches to a more robust withdrawal strategy. All of this is to aid my younger spouse. If anyone is interested in Gemini's complete response, simply copy and paste my prompts into a query.  However, AI being what it is, I expect every response will be slightly different. Adding a few terms to the prompts does generate differing results. For example, I asked Gemini to: “Provide a model of an in-retirement portfolio. The portfolio is $1,500,000. Annual withdrawal is 5%. The portfolio is to have a duration of 25 years. Provide an optimal mix of stocks and cash or bonds. Stocks may include ETFs, individual stocks in the US and global. Minimize risk.” I used 5% withdrawal as a means to stress the response. I received a 1,000 word response. A statement of goals and assumptions (inflation, returns and withdrawal rate) were made. Then Gemini went on to provide an “Optimal Mix of Stocks, Bonds, and Cash (Risk-Minimized Focus)”, a “Detailed Asset Allocation”,…
Read more »

The Business of Investing

Jack Bogle is frequently quoted. Jack was the founder and chief executive of The Vanguard Group and is credited with popularizing the index fund. Here’s one of my favorite Bogle quotes: “The stock market is a giant distraction from the business of investing”. Warren Buffett is also often quoted.  Because Mr. Buffett purchased individual stocks, it was possible to observe how he approached investing as a business.  For example, Buffett eschewed tech stocks, yet had a large stake in Apple. I’ve taken this whole “business” approach to heart, and I do think it is helpful for all investors, even those who prefer index and bond funds. If approached as a business, it is implied that investing should not be emotional or  automatic.  That is not to say that we need to purchase individual stocks.  One of my favorite graphic examples is the “Callan Periodic Table of Investment Returns.”  I have copies going back to 1987 which is about when I began investing seriously.   The table shows the annual returns for key indices, from bonds to emerging markets to large cap stocks.  How these indices perform year by year is a helpful indicator of why diversification is important. I came late to the party at age 41.  Prior to that, while I was aware of investing, I was pre-occupied by building a life, including a business and saving.  My approach to “investing” included a share of a commercial building, from which to run my business.  While I have owned several homes, I never considered these to be investments.  To the contrary, these were expensive options which required maintenance. I decided to purchase less home than I could afford, make improvements over time and bank the rest.   I always purchased with the intent to own at least 10 years.  Most recent condo…
Read more »

Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs

Released: A SUMMARY OF THE 2025 ANNUAL REPORTS Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees "Based on our best estimates, this year's reports show that...... The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be able to pay 100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033, unchanged from last year’s report. At that time, the fund’s reserves will become depleted and continuing program income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of total scheduled benefits......" "As in prior years, we found that the Social Security and Medicare programs both continue to face significant financing issues. The non-health-specific intermediate (best estimate) assumptions for these reports were set in December 2024. The Trustees will continue to monitor developments, reevaluate the assumptions, and modify the projections in later reports." For more information go to the SS website: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
Read more »

Current status of diversification

Here are the 1-year trailing returns for various asset classes according to Morningstar: Bloomberg Commodity 9.16% LBMA Gold Price PM 34.59% Morningstar Global Core Bond GR 2.17% Morningstar US 5-10 Year Treasury Bond 3.09% Morningstar US 10+ Year Treasury Bond -5.85% Morningstar US Cash T-Bill 4.63% Morningstar US Core Bond 2.61% Morningstar US HY Bond 8.18% Morningstar US Market 16.79% Morningstar US REIT -1.17% Morningstar US Small Cap 10.85% A portfolio which contained an equally weighted amount of each of the above would show a gain of 7.7%. Without gold it would be 4.6%. According to the article “gold now ranks as the top-performing major asset class over the trailing 20-year period through Aug. 27, 2025, with annualized returns of 10.7%. It also ranks at the top over most other trailing periods….. Academic researchers Campbell Harvey and Claude Erb have found that, over time, gold prices tend to revert to the mean….  it’s probably not the ideal time to buy gold when it’s already trading near an all-time high.  ” The above from the article “Can the Gold Rush Continue” dated 9/2/2025
Read more »