FREE NEWSLETTER

Forum › Behavior

And Another Thing….

Henry James is one of my favorite authors.  In the late 1880s He wrote a novel, Washington Square,  which was adapted into a play and an award winning movie, “The Heiress”.  Olivia dehavilland starred as Catherine Sloper, a shy, ordinary looking, socially awkward young woman, who stands to inherit a large fortune.

Montgomery Clift, was Morris Townsend, her handsome, charming but ne’er do well suitor—and a wonderful English actor, Ralph Richardson, as Dr. Austin Sloper, Catherine’s father. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heiress

In a scene from the movie, Dr. Sloper informs Morris that he is not a suitable candidate as a husband to his daughter,  because he is “simply not in the right category.” (to choose from) for someone in Catherine’s position, whereupon Morris launches into an impertinent rebuke in attempt to disprove Dr. Sloper’s opinion.  When the argument continues and Dr. Sloper’s opinion of Morris as a fortune hunter is confirmed, he summarily dismisses Morris by showing him the door, simply telling him…”you push me to it…you argue too much.”

While face to face debate has always been a part of our culture,  the internet has given some people permission to become insulting, rude and negative to those who don’t agree with them.  It’s all too easy to minimize the impact of what we are saying when we are behind a computer screen. It can also be easy to do something we may regret.  In a moment of anger, one little message and one little click, can cause damage we can never take back.

Usually, when people argue  on the internet, it’s not to resolve an issue or to understand each other, it’s just about spouting an opinion and seeking attention, or just to get one up on you by flouting, what they consider, is their superior intellect.  So what’s the point—you are rarely going to change someone’s opinion.  All it does is create hostility. .

I’d like to believe I am naive, rather than stupid, but I’ve just begun to wake up to the notion that there are trolls out there in comment land—people who argue just to argue. They only want to mock others who don’t agree with their views, and rile others up.

Even when one person is faced with logical reasoning and solid evidence that proves them wrong;  rather than relent they will resort to personal attacks, There is no payoff to winning an argument.  So unless it involves your integrity or an obvious need to clarify your position, let it go. Some people bring out the best in us, and others—well, they bring out a less than ideal version of ourselves.  .

It takes a lot for me  to get my Irish up.  I’m still learning to quell a slight pugilistic tendency to give these irksome people a Brooklyn beating. Just Joking. But as Jonathan Clements wrote in his summation of personality types,  “Understanding who we are—and the mistakes we’re inclined to make won’t necessarily prevent us from messing up, but it’s clearly a step in the right direction.” And, by all means, look out for the trolls.

More On This Topic

Email Alerts for this Comment Thread
Notify of
28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Scott Masters
1 year ago

I shuttered all my social media accounts. There are less than 20 people (other than family) that I communicate with via text on a regular basis. I realized that I don’t care about half the opinions out there. And to quote the great singer songwriter Paul Thorn, “I don’t like half the folks I love” LOL. BUT, so far this forum has remained wonderfully civil. Salute to all of you.

DAN SMITH
1 year ago
Reply to  Scott Masters

I’d forgot Thorn’s line. I shall borrow it for my own purpose.

Cammer Michael
1 year ago

Humbledollar is a rare corner of the internet that has not devolved into incivility. We need to protect this.

There is an additional problem with what people post on the internet. We now have a government which appears to be embarking on a program to silence dissent by financially punishing institutions and individuals. We could be targets for what we say. For example, today I saw that a very wealthy member of the government threatened to sue a former congressman because of his speech. This could be done against any of us who post religious or political views that gov’t, or anyone with significantly more wealth, does not like.

My grandfather, who was an attorney, represented many people in the 1950s who were impoverished by HUAC cases against them. As a matter of financial planning, we again need to recognize that what we post could have negative financial implications.