Go to main Forum page »
I’ve been feeling pretty ropey these last few days, with a dose of COVID keeping me from my normal activities. Reading my beloved history books has been keeping me occupied. My current read is “The History of Money by Jack Weatherford”, highly recommended if that’s your thing. Because I’ve nothing better to do, I thought you might find a little article on the subject of interest.
Let’s face it, the concept of a “store of value” is nearly as ancient as old Father Time, arising from our need to preserve today’s labor for tomorrow’s use. Before money existed, this was just about anything useful for survival. I think learning how we moved from trusting cattle to trusting central bankers tells more about human nature than any boring economics textbook.
In the very first barter systems, your wealth was perishable. Think grain, livestock, and gathered food. The first collective human brainwave was finding durable commodities, because you can’t exactly save three years’ worth of fish for your daughter’s wedding.
This is when commodity money entered stage left and took a bow, from around 9,000 BC to 1,000 BC. Development was erratic, not universal, but who’s counting? Early stored wealth needed intrinsic value and durability. Cattle and grain dominated in Mesopotamia, for example. Grain became Sumeria’s first unit of currency, recorded in the world’s first spreadsheet, carved in clay rather than Excel. Elsewhere, salt, shells, and furs emerged as money because they were desired, durable, and didn’t rot.
The next breakthrough came with precious metals, possessing handy properties: durability, the ability to split, portability, scarcity. Unlike cattle, gold wouldn’t wander off or require feeding. To my mind, that was a considerable improvement.
Sometime in the region of 3,000 BC, standardized metal weights, what we now call precious metal bullion, became common stores of value in the ancient world. You trusted the metal’s value to pay for your next temple construction, not the local warlord or king. Rarity, not the ruling mob, guaranteed value.
The next evolution was coined money in 600 BC. The Lydians, a kingdom in modern-day Turkey, stamped guaranteed weight onto shiny bits of metal. This introduced trust, the top dogs guarantee. It helped that the metal’s inherent value ensured its role as stored wealth. Basically, the king’s face said “trust this,” while the gold said “but even if you can’t, I’m still valuable.”
That just about wraps it up for the next 1,500 years or so, until I guess what we could call the “modern era,” when another more recognisable shift starts to occur: the change from intrinsic to extrinsic value, from metals with intrinsic value to paper with nothing more than an extrinsic promise to back its value up.
Taking a leaf out of the great merchant families’ use of promissory notes that had developed because the merchants couldn’t be arsed hauling tons of coins everywhere they wanted to trade, early banks started issuing paper receipts for gold stored in their vaults. The paper was worthless, although I guess it would be great for starting fires, but represented a claim on real value. Trust now depended on the issuer’s ability to redeem receipt notes. This worked brilliantly until someone issued more receipts than gold, discovering the art of lending out money you don’t actually have. The first person to try this wheeze was either a genius or desperate, quite possibly both.
To overcome this problem, a new idea was floated: the Gold Standard, from the 19th to mid-20th century. Currencies were pegged to specific amounts of gold. The note burning a hole in your pocket was a government promise: “This represents actual gold—but please don’t all ask at once.” When everyone did, it was called a bank run—not an ideal situation!
When the US ended gold convertibility in 1971, the world shifted to what is called fiat money: currency backed by nothing but government decree and collective trust. We essentially replaced “this represents gold” with “this represents governmental faith and credit, maintained through sound monetary policy.” It’s now trust all the way down. No gold required. Just faith in central bankers. You can see why central banks have become so important and stock markets hang on there every word.
I’m sure you’re getting bored reading this. Happily, we’ve arrived at the end of the road, or possibly not, I haven’t discussed the next great idea: Bitcoin and the vast array of cryptocurrencies. Quite frankly, I’m feeling too unwell to tackle that hotbed topic. I’m away for some tablets and a little lie-down.
Brilliant summary, Mark—it’s fascinating how every shift in the history of money boils down to where trust is placed. From intrinsic value in commodities to stamped authority on coins to institutional promises with paper and now collective faith in central banks. What strikes me is how each transition seems stable until a new form of trust emerges to replace it. With gold purchases rising and digital assets gaining ground, it feels like we might be standing at the edge of another monetary turning point.
We could definitely be on the cusp of a transition, trust is the major issue holding it back. As you say, trust is foundational for change.
Mark,
Thank you for posting about “The History of Money”. It seems quite interesting. I’ve added it to my (overly long) ‘to be read’ list.
That sounds just like my list!
Well Mark you may be feeling “ropey”, and I’m no neurologist, but your brain (and “pen”) seem to be still functioning well!
I enjoyed the article. At 80 years old, I think the S&P will continue to work for me. The Gold runup will end, and likely will not be pretty. Our grandchildren will be deciding how to use and invest in Crypto, that is going to happen, but not sure what form it will take. I sure would like to be here in the year 3000, to see how it all plays out!!!
Thanks Mark. Another great book on the history of money, but more about how money actually works is, “Broken Money”, by Lyn Alden. It’s a great read. Anyway, we are now in the midst of a 54 year experiment where all the world’s currencies are fiat, controlled by governments and central banks. How’s it going? Well, I believe the run up in gold and silver prices, especially the large purchases of gold by foreign central banks, tells us a great deal about the future. There is more and more distrust in the dollar, in the U. S.’s ability to manage it’s budget, and so governments and central banks around the world, and many investors, are turning to gold as neutral reserve store of value. I don’t see this trend slowing down any time soon. Hard assets, going forward, may provide the best protection from currency debasement.
Thanks for the recommendation! Central bank gold purchases could possibly be signaling concerns about fiat stability. The shift toward hard assets as a hedge against debasement does seem to be accelerating. It’ll be interesting to see how this unfolds
Sound monetary policy? At the risk of revealing too much about myself, I used to collect weird stuff when I was a little kid. Considering the direction our monetary policy is taking us, perhaps I should have held on to my collection of empty toilet paper rolls; they could be the next tulip or crypto.
Very interesting post.
Hope you get feeling better soon, Mark
Mark, feel better. I will say a prayer for you. Chris
Are you sure you haven’t been to the “Stone” lately?😎
I’m bored hanging out at home feeling sorry for myself… when your Irish and bored you create stories 😂
The U.S. took the first step off the internal gold standard for currency in 1934 with the Gold Reserve Act. Nixon’s exit from Bretton Woods in 1971 ended the external convertibility of currency to gold, too.
It’s all just a dream. Do you want to take the red pill or the blue pill? 😉
Hope you feel better soon.
For any of you history geeks out there like me The Breton Woods Accord, establishing the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, was signed in1944 at the Mount Washington Hotel at the base of said mountain here in northern NH. It was one of four NH “grand hotels” built around the turn of the 20th century being fed by patrons riding trains from the cities of New England and New York. It Was built from 1900 and 1902 at a cost of $1.7 million (approximately $64 million today) and 250 craftsmen from Italy were brought in to build it.The automobile led to the demise of many of the grand hotels, but the Mount Washington Hotel still stands and is vibrant today.
Maybe I’ll mix them together and take a purple pill 💊
Thanks for the article. While you’re on the topic, you might enjoy Bill Bernstein’s book on the history of trade.
Thanks for the tip. It’s now added to my reading list.
I recently finished Bernstein’s A Splendid Exchange: How Trade Shaped the World and The Birth of Plenty: How the Prosperity of the Modern World was Created, and highly recommend both books.