FREE NEWSLETTER

If there’s a risk you can afford to shoulder yourself, why pay an insurance company to shoulder it for you?

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

The High Cost of Financial Advice: A Tale of Two Portfolios Revisited

"Know thyself! 😀 …you are doing what’s right for you."
- Andy Morrison
Read more »

Value of Waiting

I WAS THINKING ABOUT Jonathan the other day on my morning walk, which happens more often than you might think. It’s hard not to think about him when you have HumbleDollar coasters in your living room and a HumbleDollar shopping bag in your car that you use for groceries. My wife confiscated the HumbleDollar cup I had been using for my morning tea, and it now has a new home in our bathroom holding her toothbrush and toothpaste. There’s even an apron somewhere in the house that Jonathan once sent to all the writers. Ever since I started writing for HumbleDollar in 2017, Jonathan has influenced my retirement. I now own the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (symbol: VT) in my investment portfolio because of his recommendation. He liked it for its “broad global diversification in one low-cost fund that covers virtually all publicly traded companies worldwide.” It struck me as a good way to simplify our holdings. I didn’t just borrow some of Jonathan’s investment ideas; I also borrowed some of his words he used when editing my articles. I began peppering my writing with words like fret, upshot, and folks. He once told me, “While your grammar is occasionally a bit dodgy, you have a great ear for language.” I was too embarrassed to ask him what he meant by a “great ear for language.” When I retired, I never imagined that writing for HumbleDollar would become such a big part of my retirement, and I’m grateful to Jonathan for that. I also didn’t think my retirement would be so fluid. I pictured something far more stable: remaining single, living in a one-bedroom condo, and fending for myself. My life now is different. I’m married and live in a three-bedroom home in another city. One of the biggest changes, however, has nothing to do with geography. It has to do with money—specifically, how financial decisions change when there are two people instead of one. I learned that lesson early in our marriage. We got married in August 2020. That December, I woke up one morning and saw blood in my urine. I went to an urologist who ran a series of tests, but it took about a month to determine the cause.   During that time, I decided to consolidate our remaining investment holdings to make things easier for Rachel to manage in case something happened to me. Most of our money was already at Vanguard, except for a 401(k) from my former employer that was invested in a stable value fund. It still held a significant balance. Without much hesitation, I moved it into a bond fund at Vanguard. Not too long afterward, the bond market nosedived. The fund performed poorly—especially compared to the stable value fund the money had been in. The upshot: I panicked—and paid for it. It wasn’t a good time to make a financial decision while I was under stress. Some of the worst money moves happen when emotions are running high—selling stocks at the bottom of a bear market or rushing to act after an unexpected windfall. More often than not, it’s better to wait until you’re clearheaded before making a decision. At the time, I was also fretting about whether Rachel would qualify for my Social Security benefit, which is much larger than hers. You have to be married for at least nine months. I found myself counting off the days. Another financial decision became more complicated simply because we were now a couple: what to do with the three properties we owned—my condo, Rachel’s house, and the house I had inherited. Neither of us wanted to be landlords at this stage of our lives. We were excited about getting married and starting a new life together. I decided to sell my condo during the pandemic, which wasn’t easy. Rather than wait, I accepted an offer of $380,000—$43,000 below the asking price. Rachel decided to wait and rent out her house for two years. She didn’t get caught up in the excitement or rush into selling. As it turned out, that patience paid off. When the for-sale sign finally went up, I would stop by the house to water the yard and rake the falling leaves. One day, a real estate agent and his client were there looking at the property. They kept asking me whether the price listed on the brochure was correct. Rachel’s agent had intentionally priced the house at the lower end of the range in hopes of creating a bidding war. I told them they would have to talk to my wife and her agent because it wasn’t my house. The agent asked how long we had been married. When I told him two years, he nodded and said, “I get it. She wanted to wait until she was sure about the marriage before selling the house.” Rachel laughed when I told her what he said. She wasn’t waiting to see if the marriage would work. She waited because selling a house is a major financial decision, and she didn’t see any reason to rush it. Two years later, the timing turned out to be just right. The market had improved and the strategy worked exactly as planned. There were multiple offers, and the final sale price was well above what it would have been earlier. At the time my wife sold her house, Zillow’s estimated price of my condo was $484,000—$104,000 more than I received. I don’t really know why I was in such a rush to sell. Maybe it had something to do with the pandemic, my mother’s recent death, my sister and brother-in-law moving out of state, or the stress of renovating our new house. It was an emotional time for me, and I was probably searching for some stability in my life. What I’ve learned—both from Jonathan and from being married—is that good financial decisions usually come from patience, not urgency. When I feel anxious or pressured to act, I’m more likely to make a mistake. When I slow down, think things through, and listen—especially to my wife—the outcome is usually better. Managing money well isn’t about always making the right move. It’s about avoiding the wrong ones—and knowing when to wait.  Dennis Friedman retired from Boeing Satellite Systems after a 30-year career in manufacturing. Born in Ohio, Dennis is a California transplant with a bachelor’s degree in history and an MBA. A self-described “humble investor,” he likes reading historical novels and about personal finance. Follow Dennis on X @DMFrie and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

A Message to Young Readers: Your Crisis Is Coming.

"Thanks mom & dad, both yours for the help they gave you, an mine for the $12,000 (20%) down payment on my family of 5's first house in Concord, CA in 1975!"
- David Rhoades
Read more »

Choices, choices everywhere

"Greg, your article reminded me about how Spouse and I were hoping to get a convertible or sports car when the kids grew up. We had a generous friend who gave our son an older Camaro that we drove to visit our folks. It was so low to the ground that we had trouble getting in and out of it. And we are short! LOL! Needless to say, our dream of a sports car changed. Thanks for the laugh and good memory. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

Helping Adult Children

"Personally, this is a very important topic, and I do not want to inadvertently appear to favor one child over another. I mentally distinguish ordinary gifts from what I think of as strategic investments. The former are more or less equal in size. The latter, used for such things as a house down payment or help with a large repair bill, may be tailored as I take their relative financial positions into account. While we do this gifting quietly, they are all aware, understand and agree with our logic."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

When $2100 is not what it appears. The Medicare Part D trap

"The generic equivalent of amoxicillin also includes clavulanate. Costco has the generic combination for $20."
- parkslope
Read more »

Perfect Portfolio

WHAT'S THE BEST way to manage your investments? A new book titled Your Perfect Portfolio helps answer this question. I spoke this week with the author, Cullen Roche. Adam Grossman: The title is Your Perfect Portfolio with an emphasis on your Cullen Roche: I was very intentional about saying “your perfect portfolio” because everyone’s different, everyone’s unique. So I wrote this book with the intent of studying lots of different strategies and styles. I go into detail on the history behind the portfolios, why they’re popular, their origin story, then I describe the history of how they’ve performed, and the pros and cons, and who these portfolios might be good and bad for. The goal is to help people not only understand all the different options out there, but hopefully arrive at a point where they can look at certain styles or strategies and say, “This is the portfolio that’s perfect for me.” Adam: You start the book with 10 essential principles. One is that beating the market is very hard. Cullen: The numbers are daunting. Over 20 years, 95% of active investors will underperform a simple index. More importantly, beating the market is literally not a good financial goal, because typically when people are chasing returns, they’re really chasing risk. Adam: Another of your essential principles is that asset allocation is a temporal conundrum. Cullen: We talk about diversification across different asset classes, but people don’t often talk about diversification across different time horizons. Especially from a financial planning perspective, I think the difficulty is that it’s really a time problem. When you sit down with somebody and you start mapping out their financial goals, you’re really trying to make sure that people have enough money at certain times in their life. [Dartmouth College finance professor] Ken French said that risk is uncertainty of future consumption, which I think is a perfect way of summarizing it. Asset allocation, to me, is really a time-based problem. Adam: In the second part of your book, you discuss 20 different portfolio options. Let’s start with the simplest one: 100% bonds. What are the pros and cons? Cullen: I’m a huge advocate of very, very short-term instruments. I’m somewhat hypercritical of very long-duration bonds. I love the concept of matching assets to liabilities, which is what banks and pension funds do. It’s even more applicable to your average individual investor. So I try to be rigorous about matching assets and liabilities inside of portfolios, but when you get to longer-term Treasurys, they’re not very good liability matching instruments, because of the risk. Bonds can be wildly volatile instruments that, on a risk-adjusted basis, just don’t generate very good returns. Today, a 30-year Treasury bond is yielding 4.5%, and has a duration, or interest rate sensitivity level, of 18%. If you’ve got a 15-plus year time horizon, the probability of the stock market outperforming bonds is very, very high.  Adam: At the other end of the spectrum, there’s 100% stocks. If someone were 30 or 40 years old, with decades until retirement, should that person go all-in on stocks?  Cullen: You should think of your human capital as sort of a fixed income allocation. The income you’re generating from your job functions a lot like a bond, and so if you’re making $100,000 a year, you can think of that as a $1 million bond that is paying 10%. So someone who’s 20 years old, who’s got 40 years of runway, they actually have a lot more potential to take equity market risk, because they’ve basically got a 40-year bond that is going to be paying them 10% a year. It’s arguably the greatest asset that person has. They’ve got a much higher risk capacity because of that. Adam: Is age the only consideration in deciding on an allocation? Cullen: I also like to break it up by portfolio type. For a 50-year-old with a Roth IRA and a taxable account, their Roth has a very different return and risk profile than their taxable account. They’ve got the luxury in the Roth IRA of thinking of that account as maybe a multi-generational account. So that piece of your portfolio might be 100% stocks. Adam: So any given person might have more than one perfect portfolio? Cullen: Yes, you’re not just building one sort of homogeneous portfolio. You can pick and choose and have lots of different perfect portfolios of your own. Adam: Between the extremes of 100% bonds and 100% stocks, the book looks at the traditional 60-40 strategy as well as the Bogleheads three-fund portfolio. What are the pros and cons? Cullen: The three-fund portfolio is a bond aggregate fund, a domestic stock fund, and a foreign stock fund. It’s just three funds. It can be bought for close to 0% fees. It’s incredibly elegant in its simplicity. That and the 60-40 strategy have stood the test of time. But you can also argue that there are elements in them that are too simple. You don’t have a cash bucket, so if you’re going through 2022, and you were a retiree with the three-fund portfolio, you maybe didn’t feel that comfortable. You probably felt like you wanted a fourth bucket inside of that portfolio at times during that year.  Adam: After deciding on their perfect portfolio, how often should investors revisit their strategy? Cullen: Only when life changes. For longer-term goals, I don’t think you should tinker too much. You should probably just buy index funds and set it and forget it. Let them serve long-term needs. Adam: In deciding whether to change strategy, should investors respond to the news? Cullen: The financial media is incentivized to say almost hyperbolic things all the time, because they’re just trying to get your attention. And that’s counterproductive to a lot of what good, sound portfolio management requires.  Adam: Gold makes an appearance in some of the portfolios in your book. How do you think about gold? Cullen: Gold is a really tough asset to think about because it doesn’t generate cash flows. There’s no way to really value it. Some people view gold as almost like fiat currency insurance, which I don’t think is irrational. But nobody knows how to value it.  And it’s had this huge run-up. When an asset goes up a whole lot in a very short time period, that creates what I call price compression. Let’s say that gold can be reasonably expected to generate 8% per year, for instance. And let’s say it gains 70%, like it did last year. What happens, in my view, inside of an environment like that, is that you’ve taken a whole bunch of those average 8% years, and you’ve compressed them all down into one year. And what this does is creates much greater sequence of return risk going forward, where the probability is higher of the prices decompressing at some point. The classic example of price compression was the NASDAQ bubble. If you bought at the very top of the NASDAQ 100 back in 2000, you’ve generated an 8% return per year—a really good return, even if you picked the absolute worst time to buy. The kicker, of course, is that you went through 15 to 20 years of just horrific sequence of return risk inside of that portfolio. So when I see an asset booming like gold, that’s the risk. Adam: Another portfolio is the endowment model. It’s gotten a lot of discussion recently because of the potential for private funds to enter 401(k) plans. How should individual investors think about the endowment model? Cullen: This is a really hard one. You almost need your own research team to actually manage a good endowment portfolio. They’re really complex, they’re hard to replicate. And you’ve got a huge fee compounding effect inside a lot of these portfolios. For the vast majority of people, you really don’t need to try to do anything that sophisticated, because there’s other really simple models where you can get low-cost, diversified asset allocation without giving yourself brain damage trying to overcomplicate everything. Adam: In a paper you wrote in 2022, you introduced a concept you call Defined Duration Investing. Could you talk about how that works? Cullen: It’s kind of like a bucketing strategy, where I’m bucketing things into very specific time horizons, but I’m doing it in a much more personalized way, where each bucket is serving a specific financial goal and matched to a specific asset. Then you can allocate it in a much more quantified way, mapping out the expenses and liabilities. For instance, we need one year of emergency funds. That’s going into a T-bill ladder. We have a house down payment for $200K that we need to set aside. That’s going into a three-year instrument. And then you’ve got retirement goals 20 years out. We’re matching that to a 20-year type of instrument. You can start to build a rigorously, temporally structured portfolio utilizing this methodology. When I wrote the paper three years ago, I was trying to quantify the time horizon of the stock market, in order to quantify the sequence of returns risk in the market.  The thing that I always disliked about bucketing strategies was that they don’t really quantify or communicate the time horizon to people. They use these vague sorts of terms like “short-term” and “long-term.” The question I always run into is determining what long-term means. Learning to think across very specific time horizons is really useful, because it creates this clarity, matching assets to future liabilities. And I mitigate a lot of the behavioral risk in my portfolio, because I understand exactly what my asset-liability mismatch looks like, and if there is one or not.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Laid Off

"Venicio, while condolences are in order, so might be congratulations. I’m sure being laid-off after thirty years of commitment and service feels like (and is in my opinion) a form of betrayal. And I’m sure you both feel unmoored and mournful.  But if you both are in fact financially fine,,  I suspect that given time you will look back at this unsettling event as an unintended but ultimately fortuitous gift (i.e being able to fully share your retirement together, sooner rather than later). Major marriage altering events such as yours bring to mind the last lines of Milton’s “Paradise Lost”.  As you may recall, having been “laid off" by the boss, Adam and Eve are forced to retire from Eden.  I’ll leave you in the hands of Milton: Some natural tears they drop'd, but wip'd them soon;  The World was all before them,  where to choose Their place of rest,  and Providence their guide:  They hand in hand with wandering steps and slow,  Through Eden took their solitary way."
- Retired
Read more »

Don’t Let Mr Market Bully You: A Gentle Reminder of Your Built-In Protection

"The greatest mistake an investor can make is constantly changing their strategy. You should be grounded in the reasons behind your allocation and only review it if significant assumptions about spending, health, or lifespan have changed. A fee-only financial advisor is the best investment when fear or greed makes you want to take action. Unfortunately, the more intelligent you are, the stronger the “itch” becomes and seeking the counsel will save you regret."
- Mark Gardner
Read more »

The High Cost of Financial Advice: A Tale of Two Portfolios Revisited

"Know thyself! 😀 …you are doing what’s right for you."
- Andy Morrison
Read more »

Value of Waiting

I WAS THINKING ABOUT Jonathan the other day on my morning walk, which happens more often than you might think. It’s hard not to think about him when you have HumbleDollar coasters in your living room and a HumbleDollar shopping bag in your car that you use for groceries. My wife confiscated the HumbleDollar cup I had been using for my morning tea, and it now has a new home in our bathroom holding her toothbrush and toothpaste. There’s even an apron somewhere in the house that Jonathan once sent to all the writers. Ever since I started writing for HumbleDollar in 2017, Jonathan has influenced my retirement. I now own the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (symbol: VT) in my investment portfolio because of his recommendation. He liked it for its “broad global diversification in one low-cost fund that covers virtually all publicly traded companies worldwide.” It struck me as a good way to simplify our holdings. I didn’t just borrow some of Jonathan’s investment ideas; I also borrowed some of his words he used when editing my articles. I began peppering my writing with words like fret, upshot, and folks. He once told me, “While your grammar is occasionally a bit dodgy, you have a great ear for language.” I was too embarrassed to ask him what he meant by a “great ear for language.” When I retired, I never imagined that writing for HumbleDollar would become such a big part of my retirement, and I’m grateful to Jonathan for that. I also didn’t think my retirement would be so fluid. I pictured something far more stable: remaining single, living in a one-bedroom condo, and fending for myself. My life now is different. I’m married and live in a three-bedroom home in another city. One of the biggest changes, however, has nothing to do with geography. It has to do with money—specifically, how financial decisions change when there are two people instead of one. I learned that lesson early in our marriage. We got married in August 2020. That December, I woke up one morning and saw blood in my urine. I went to an urologist who ran a series of tests, but it took about a month to determine the cause.   During that time, I decided to consolidate our remaining investment holdings to make things easier for Rachel to manage in case something happened to me. Most of our money was already at Vanguard, except for a 401(k) from my former employer that was invested in a stable value fund. It still held a significant balance. Without much hesitation, I moved it into a bond fund at Vanguard. Not too long afterward, the bond market nosedived. The fund performed poorly—especially compared to the stable value fund the money had been in. The upshot: I panicked—and paid for it. It wasn’t a good time to make a financial decision while I was under stress. Some of the worst money moves happen when emotions are running high—selling stocks at the bottom of a bear market or rushing to act after an unexpected windfall. More often than not, it’s better to wait until you’re clearheaded before making a decision. At the time, I was also fretting about whether Rachel would qualify for my Social Security benefit, which is much larger than hers. You have to be married for at least nine months. I found myself counting off the days. Another financial decision became more complicated simply because we were now a couple: what to do with the three properties we owned—my condo, Rachel’s house, and the house I had inherited. Neither of us wanted to be landlords at this stage of our lives. We were excited about getting married and starting a new life together. I decided to sell my condo during the pandemic, which wasn’t easy. Rather than wait, I accepted an offer of $380,000—$43,000 below the asking price. Rachel decided to wait and rent out her house for two years. She didn’t get caught up in the excitement or rush into selling. As it turned out, that patience paid off. When the for-sale sign finally went up, I would stop by the house to water the yard and rake the falling leaves. One day, a real estate agent and his client were there looking at the property. They kept asking me whether the price listed on the brochure was correct. Rachel’s agent had intentionally priced the house at the lower end of the range in hopes of creating a bidding war. I told them they would have to talk to my wife and her agent because it wasn’t my house. The agent asked how long we had been married. When I told him two years, he nodded and said, “I get it. She wanted to wait until she was sure about the marriage before selling the house.” Rachel laughed when I told her what he said. She wasn’t waiting to see if the marriage would work. She waited because selling a house is a major financial decision, and she didn’t see any reason to rush it. Two years later, the timing turned out to be just right. The market had improved and the strategy worked exactly as planned. There were multiple offers, and the final sale price was well above what it would have been earlier. At the time my wife sold her house, Zillow’s estimated price of my condo was $484,000—$104,000 more than I received. I don’t really know why I was in such a rush to sell. Maybe it had something to do with the pandemic, my mother’s recent death, my sister and brother-in-law moving out of state, or the stress of renovating our new house. It was an emotional time for me, and I was probably searching for some stability in my life. What I’ve learned—both from Jonathan and from being married—is that good financial decisions usually come from patience, not urgency. When I feel anxious or pressured to act, I’m more likely to make a mistake. When I slow down, think things through, and listen—especially to my wife—the outcome is usually better. Managing money well isn’t about always making the right move. It’s about avoiding the wrong ones—and knowing when to wait.  Dennis Friedman retired from Boeing Satellite Systems after a 30-year career in manufacturing. Born in Ohio, Dennis is a California transplant with a bachelor’s degree in history and an MBA. A self-described “humble investor,” he likes reading historical novels and about personal finance. Follow Dennis on X @DMFrie and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

A Message to Young Readers: Your Crisis Is Coming.

"Thanks mom & dad, both yours for the help they gave you, an mine for the $12,000 (20%) down payment on my family of 5's first house in Concord, CA in 1975!"
- David Rhoades
Read more »

Choices, choices everywhere

"Greg, your article reminded me about how Spouse and I were hoping to get a convertible or sports car when the kids grew up. We had a generous friend who gave our son an older Camaro that we drove to visit our folks. It was so low to the ground that we had trouble getting in and out of it. And we are short! LOL! Needless to say, our dream of a sports car changed. Thanks for the laugh and good memory. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

Helping Adult Children

"Personally, this is a very important topic, and I do not want to inadvertently appear to favor one child over another. I mentally distinguish ordinary gifts from what I think of as strategic investments. The former are more or less equal in size. The latter, used for such things as a house down payment or help with a large repair bill, may be tailored as I take their relative financial positions into account. While we do this gifting quietly, they are all aware, understand and agree with our logic."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

When $2100 is not what it appears. The Medicare Part D trap

"The generic equivalent of amoxicillin also includes clavulanate. Costco has the generic combination for $20."
- parkslope
Read more »

Perfect Portfolio

WHAT'S THE BEST way to manage your investments? A new book titled Your Perfect Portfolio helps answer this question. I spoke this week with the author, Cullen Roche. Adam Grossman: The title is Your Perfect Portfolio with an emphasis on your Cullen Roche: I was very intentional about saying “your perfect portfolio” because everyone’s different, everyone’s unique. So I wrote this book with the intent of studying lots of different strategies and styles. I go into detail on the history behind the portfolios, why they’re popular, their origin story, then I describe the history of how they’ve performed, and the pros and cons, and who these portfolios might be good and bad for. The goal is to help people not only understand all the different options out there, but hopefully arrive at a point where they can look at certain styles or strategies and say, “This is the portfolio that’s perfect for me.” Adam: You start the book with 10 essential principles. One is that beating the market is very hard. Cullen: The numbers are daunting. Over 20 years, 95% of active investors will underperform a simple index. More importantly, beating the market is literally not a good financial goal, because typically when people are chasing returns, they’re really chasing risk. Adam: Another of your essential principles is that asset allocation is a temporal conundrum. Cullen: We talk about diversification across different asset classes, but people don’t often talk about diversification across different time horizons. Especially from a financial planning perspective, I think the difficulty is that it’s really a time problem. When you sit down with somebody and you start mapping out their financial goals, you’re really trying to make sure that people have enough money at certain times in their life. [Dartmouth College finance professor] Ken French said that risk is uncertainty of future consumption, which I think is a perfect way of summarizing it. Asset allocation, to me, is really a time-based problem. Adam: In the second part of your book, you discuss 20 different portfolio options. Let’s start with the simplest one: 100% bonds. What are the pros and cons? Cullen: I’m a huge advocate of very, very short-term instruments. I’m somewhat hypercritical of very long-duration bonds. I love the concept of matching assets to liabilities, which is what banks and pension funds do. It’s even more applicable to your average individual investor. So I try to be rigorous about matching assets and liabilities inside of portfolios, but when you get to longer-term Treasurys, they’re not very good liability matching instruments, because of the risk. Bonds can be wildly volatile instruments that, on a risk-adjusted basis, just don’t generate very good returns. Today, a 30-year Treasury bond is yielding 4.5%, and has a duration, or interest rate sensitivity level, of 18%. If you’ve got a 15-plus year time horizon, the probability of the stock market outperforming bonds is very, very high.  Adam: At the other end of the spectrum, there’s 100% stocks. If someone were 30 or 40 years old, with decades until retirement, should that person go all-in on stocks?  Cullen: You should think of your human capital as sort of a fixed income allocation. The income you’re generating from your job functions a lot like a bond, and so if you’re making $100,000 a year, you can think of that as a $1 million bond that is paying 10%. So someone who’s 20 years old, who’s got 40 years of runway, they actually have a lot more potential to take equity market risk, because they’ve basically got a 40-year bond that is going to be paying them 10% a year. It’s arguably the greatest asset that person has. They’ve got a much higher risk capacity because of that. Adam: Is age the only consideration in deciding on an allocation? Cullen: I also like to break it up by portfolio type. For a 50-year-old with a Roth IRA and a taxable account, their Roth has a very different return and risk profile than their taxable account. They’ve got the luxury in the Roth IRA of thinking of that account as maybe a multi-generational account. So that piece of your portfolio might be 100% stocks. Adam: So any given person might have more than one perfect portfolio? Cullen: Yes, you’re not just building one sort of homogeneous portfolio. You can pick and choose and have lots of different perfect portfolios of your own. Adam: Between the extremes of 100% bonds and 100% stocks, the book looks at the traditional 60-40 strategy as well as the Bogleheads three-fund portfolio. What are the pros and cons? Cullen: The three-fund portfolio is a bond aggregate fund, a domestic stock fund, and a foreign stock fund. It’s just three funds. It can be bought for close to 0% fees. It’s incredibly elegant in its simplicity. That and the 60-40 strategy have stood the test of time. But you can also argue that there are elements in them that are too simple. You don’t have a cash bucket, so if you’re going through 2022, and you were a retiree with the three-fund portfolio, you maybe didn’t feel that comfortable. You probably felt like you wanted a fourth bucket inside of that portfolio at times during that year.  Adam: After deciding on their perfect portfolio, how often should investors revisit their strategy? Cullen: Only when life changes. For longer-term goals, I don’t think you should tinker too much. You should probably just buy index funds and set it and forget it. Let them serve long-term needs. Adam: In deciding whether to change strategy, should investors respond to the news? Cullen: The financial media is incentivized to say almost hyperbolic things all the time, because they’re just trying to get your attention. And that’s counterproductive to a lot of what good, sound portfolio management requires.  Adam: Gold makes an appearance in some of the portfolios in your book. How do you think about gold? Cullen: Gold is a really tough asset to think about because it doesn’t generate cash flows. There’s no way to really value it. Some people view gold as almost like fiat currency insurance, which I don’t think is irrational. But nobody knows how to value it.  And it’s had this huge run-up. When an asset goes up a whole lot in a very short time period, that creates what I call price compression. Let’s say that gold can be reasonably expected to generate 8% per year, for instance. And let’s say it gains 70%, like it did last year. What happens, in my view, inside of an environment like that, is that you’ve taken a whole bunch of those average 8% years, and you’ve compressed them all down into one year. And what this does is creates much greater sequence of return risk going forward, where the probability is higher of the prices decompressing at some point. The classic example of price compression was the NASDAQ bubble. If you bought at the very top of the NASDAQ 100 back in 2000, you’ve generated an 8% return per year—a really good return, even if you picked the absolute worst time to buy. The kicker, of course, is that you went through 15 to 20 years of just horrific sequence of return risk inside of that portfolio. So when I see an asset booming like gold, that’s the risk. Adam: Another portfolio is the endowment model. It’s gotten a lot of discussion recently because of the potential for private funds to enter 401(k) plans. How should individual investors think about the endowment model? Cullen: This is a really hard one. You almost need your own research team to actually manage a good endowment portfolio. They’re really complex, they’re hard to replicate. And you’ve got a huge fee compounding effect inside a lot of these portfolios. For the vast majority of people, you really don’t need to try to do anything that sophisticated, because there’s other really simple models where you can get low-cost, diversified asset allocation without giving yourself brain damage trying to overcomplicate everything. Adam: In a paper you wrote in 2022, you introduced a concept you call Defined Duration Investing. Could you talk about how that works? Cullen: It’s kind of like a bucketing strategy, where I’m bucketing things into very specific time horizons, but I’m doing it in a much more personalized way, where each bucket is serving a specific financial goal and matched to a specific asset. Then you can allocate it in a much more quantified way, mapping out the expenses and liabilities. For instance, we need one year of emergency funds. That’s going into a T-bill ladder. We have a house down payment for $200K that we need to set aside. That’s going into a three-year instrument. And then you’ve got retirement goals 20 years out. We’re matching that to a 20-year type of instrument. You can start to build a rigorously, temporally structured portfolio utilizing this methodology. When I wrote the paper three years ago, I was trying to quantify the time horizon of the stock market, in order to quantify the sequence of returns risk in the market.  The thing that I always disliked about bucketing strategies was that they don’t really quantify or communicate the time horizon to people. They use these vague sorts of terms like “short-term” and “long-term.” The question I always run into is determining what long-term means. Learning to think across very specific time horizons is really useful, because it creates this clarity, matching assets to future liabilities. And I mitigate a lot of the behavioral risk in my portfolio, because I understand exactly what my asset-liability mismatch looks like, and if there is one or not.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 43: IF OUR GOAL is investment growth, we should almost never buy insurance products. That means no cash-value life insurance, costly variable annuities or indexed annuities.

humans

NO. 68: WE SPEND our days focused on goals, but achieving them rarely delivers the happiness we imagine. Instead, it’s the journey we truly enjoy. This is captured by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s notion of flow. We’re often happiest when engaged in challenging activities we’re passionate about, consider important and feel we’re good at.

act

THROW STUFF OUT. Almost all of us have too many possessions. Those possessions come with an ongoing cost if, say, we rent a storage locker or we feel compelled to own a larger home. A suggestion: Make it a rule that, for every item of clothing or every tchotchke you buy, you have to give away at least one—and perhaps two—items that you already own.

Truths

NO. 13: WE GET MORE pain from losses than pleasure from gains. This leads us to shy away from stocks, because we loathe market declines. We sell our winners quickly, fearful our gains will turn into losses. We also hang on to losers too long, hoping to “get even, then get out” and thereby avoid the regret that comes with selling for less than we paid.

Estate planning

Manifesto

NO. 43: IF OUR GOAL is investment growth, we should almost never buy insurance products. That means no cash-value life insurance, costly variable annuities or indexed annuities.

Spotlight: Retirement

Do farmers get to retire?

In an article published today titled Retiring from Farming is Complex and Not Always Planned the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College discusses the additional challenges that farmers face in their retirement planning.
https://crr.bc.edu/retiring-from-farming-is-complex-and-not-always-planned/
My wife and I are just back from a road trip Christmas visit with two of our adult children and their families that included driving across Indiana twice. After again seeing the vast farm lands and work I wanted to express my gratitude and appreciation to our farmers who keep us fed and whose efforts helps make my comfortable retirement possible.

Read more »

2025 Retirement Countdown

It’s January 1, and my retirement countdown app says “5 months and 29 days”! Now that it’s 2025, it really seems close.
I have a bunch of financial tasks of my winter quarter sabbatical/pre-retirement list and have already taken care of the first two:

Increase (double) contributions to my tax-deferred accounts (403B/457). With over-50 catch-up contributions, in 2025, I can contribute $31,000 max to each account, or $62,000 total. Since I’ll only be working for six of the 12 months,

Read more »

Getting to the Number

WHAT WILL RETIREMENT cost? One solution to this riddle is to save as much as we can and hope it’ll cover our expected expenses. Finding the right answer—the exact amount of savings required—can involve hours of calculation, and even then there’s a fair amount of uncertainty.

At my financial planning firm, we help clients with this calculation. Our starting point: We believe the foundation of most retirement plans should be Social Security. Many Americans choose to take Social Security earlier than their full retirement age (FRA).

Read more »

Buffett’s Pension

AS MY OLD NEWSPAPER company slid toward bankruptcy, it signed over the deeds to its newspaper buildings to the pension plan in an effort to meet its obligations. It was like burning the furniture to keep the house warm—and it worked about as well as you might expect.
When the company finally filed for bankruptcy in 2020, it laid the blame on its unfunded pension obligations. The pension fund was short by $1 billion,

Read more »

Enough Already

“WHEN YOU’VE WON the game, stop playing with the money you really need.” That’s something my longtime friend and fellow author William Bernstein is fond of saying—and lately it’s been on my mind.
There’s been much handwringing over 2017’s stock market rally. Looked at objectively, it hasn’t been that startling. As of Sept. 29, the S&P 500 was up 14.2% for the year-to-date, with dividends reinvested—a good year, but nothing compared to the 25%-plus years we saw in 1991,

Read more »

Bewildering Benefits

WHEN I CLAIMED SOCIAL Security benefits, I had no idea how much there was to know—and how much I didn’t know. Bear in mind that the Social Security website didn’t exist until the late 1990s, and back then only minimal services were accessible through the site. In addition, most people didn’t fully appreciate the advantages of delaying benefits.

In my naïveté, I thought I would go to my local Social Security office to find out what options were available for claiming,

Read more »

Spotlight: Fourneau

Hard-Earned Lessons

IN MARCH 1999, I began my job at the chemical plant where I still work today. During the weeklong orientation, I had my 26th birthday. It was the start of a job where I felt I couldn’t make any excuses. I needed to be an adult. I would be making good money. After graduating high school in 1991, I’d averaged $18,000 to $23,000 a year in various jobs. In my first full year at the plant, I made $42,000. The next year, after completing the training program and working 500 hours of overtime, I made more than $60,000—good pay for a guy in his late 20s with a high school diploma. Over the years, I’ve heard many bits of advice from the old-timers at the plant. I’ve also picked up many lessons from watching these folks over the past two decades. The first lesson came during an informal talk that a worker gave at the orientation. Today, it probably wouldn’t be allowed because it would be considered financial advice from someone without any formal credentials. But his talk was valuable in its simplicity and its roots in real-life experience. The technician implored us to begin contributing to our 401(k) immediately. He talked about the company match and how it was free money. He suggested we consider our investment allocations carefully. Because of our young age, he believed we should be in the aggressive portfolio. We had time to ride out the rough spells, he said. I began to save in the 401(k). There was a whiff of euphoria in the air. The market had been on fire for the past few years and it was still raging. Returns of 20% or more were typical. This technician, who was approaching retirement, was feeling good seeing his balance grow to numbers he’d never thought possible. A few years later, around the mid-2000s, I saw the same man. He was now retired and bagging groceries part-time. Maybe the dot-com crash burned him and he needed a job for a bit. Maybe he was bored and wanted something to do. I didn’t feel comfortable enough to ask, and he didn’t work at the store that long. Many veterans at the plant had started in the 1970s. The company had something similar to a 401(k) back then. As the great bull market began in 1982, they rode an incredible wave until 2000. Over time, I began to see the role luck and timing played in investment results. When you were born, and when you got hired, all had a big impact on your returns. If I were to guess, I’d say 98% of the plant workers saved in the 401(k). My older brother had been hired a few years before me. When he started, the old-timers in his area always told him, “You can’t afford not to.” My brother never read The Wall Street Journal. I would ask him occasionally which funds he was in. He’d say he hadn’t looked in a while and wasn’t sure. He left it alone for the most part and retired early. I checked my funds often, moved my money around more than him and haven’t done as well. I would hear rumors occasionally of the few who never joined the 401(k). They had lost out on hundreds of thousands of dollars, maybe a million. But I could understand how this might happen. Many in the plant were from poor or working-class families. Some started families when they were young. They may have thought about saving. But they probably always felt they couldn’t afford the 7% of pay they needed to get the full company match. They were raising kids and paying bills. Often, their spouse was staying at home and that was important to them. Maybe they’d start next year. In that era, the pension plan was generous. The folks who were whispered to have never joined the 401(k) would invariably retire later, usually as soon as they could claim Social Security at age 62. Between Social Security and the pension they earned over 35 to 40 years of service, they could replace all the income they were making at the plant. It was always interesting to see the moment people pulled the trigger. One lady—a friend of mine—had started working at the plant in her 20s. She had a straight-day job later in her career, but then unfortunately had to return to the production line and work the swing shift that came with it. She started her week one Sunday with the 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift. She was frustrated with the poor planning from leadership the week before. Her night was going to be stressful, with all kinds of problems and little support. As I helped her with a question, she had a few choice words about the mess and said that she was calling her financial advisor that week to see what options she had. She’d worked decades and made good money. A single mom, she’d raised her kids and, by then, they’d finished college. She retired a few months after that night and has enjoyed the years that followed. I was happy to hear that. She was a sweet lady. In her early years at the plant, it couldn’t have been easy being one of the few women, but she made it. One of my coworkers got called out one weekend in the freezing cold of winter to deal with a problem. As he was walking around, examining all the pipes while trying to solve the issue, he asked himself, “What the hell am I doing here on a Saturday night?” He put in for retirement, though he worked several more months. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] I saw him at Wal-Mart a few years ago. That call-out was just a blip, he told me. He said the real reason for his retirement was that his sister had passed away and it was weighing on him. He had plenty of money. Life was too short. There was a kind, older guy on my shift who grew up on an Iowa farm and had worked in our area since the early 1970s. I went to his retirement party. He waved his wallet at an old friend, smiling as he said, “This thing has decided every major decision in my life.” Like many I saw at the plant, he had put family first. His kids were raised and done with college. A small early retirement package pushed him over the finish line. He told me he was ready to be done with swing shift work and with the plant. But he then took a job as a school janitor for 20 years and finally retired for good with an Iowa state pension to add to his retirement savings. One old friend, who had been my Little League baseball coach for a short time, told me—when I saw him at a bar a few years after he retired—that he simply did some math and felt comfortable calling it a career. He added together his 401(k)’s historical annual return, his pension and his other savings, and asked himself if he could live off half that number. He could. He shared with me something I hadn’t heard many folks say. He had a great-paying job. He’d had it for decades. He didn’t really need the job anymore. And he knew that someone out there, a young person most likely, did need the job he had. It would change his or her family’s life, like it changed his and mine, so he retired. One guy, who was a bit of a miser, said he put his notice in when no one told him not to. His wife and his financial advisor both agreed he had enough money to retire. He had worked for more than 30 years. He was still on the swing shift. He’d invested in some Iowa farmland before the prices skyrocketed. He was frugal, and had his 401(k) and pension. He seemed to abhor debt and that had served him well. One recent retiree had been in leadership roles for more than half of his blue-collar career, so he hadn’t worked swing shifts for decades. He had many years under the old, more generous pension system. Yet, unlike so many in the plant, he wasn’t missing a beat. His mind was sharp, he was fit and still full of energy. I’ve always thought that some 20% of plant workers have the skills, ambitions and mindset that aligns well with the work we do. He was one of them. I never heard him pine to be an artist or chase a different dream or career. His talents were valuable and he had kept up with the changing technology. In his early 60s, I know he could easily have done the work for another 10 years. He shared with me that it would be silly to still be working at the plant in his 70s. What was the point? He retired after 40 years. We quickly discovered, when he headed off to winter in Florida, all the “little” problems he’d been solving that no one else noticed. I enjoy talking with the younger people who have been hired in droves since the baby boom generation exited the plant. If they’re interested and ask, I’ll share some of the mistakes I made with my money while working at the plant. I also let them know that I intend to keep my job there. Even after 23 years, I hesitate to call it a career. I don’t know why, I just do. Most know me as the guy who wrestles in a mask. It wasn’t my dream to work at the plant, and my talents don’t always align with my job. But I do my work well. People seem to like having me on their team, so I must be doing okay. I appreciate all the lessons that my coworkers have taught me over the years. And I hope the younger generation working at the plant has picked up a thing or two from me. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn't at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading and writing about personal finance, investing and his other interests. Juan, who is married with two children, retired from the ring after wrestling on the independent circuit for more than 25 years. He wrestled as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow Juan on Twitter @LatinThunder1, visit his website and check out his previous articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

My First Retirement

I LOST A MATCH ON Nov. 12 against my former tag-team partner, Kevin Gutierrez, who wrestles under the colorful name “Corn Boi.” It was a classic Lucha Libre stipulation match. I put my mask on the line, and Kevin would cut his shoulder-length hair if he lost. Mask versus hair—or, as they say in Mexico, mascara versus cabellera. We had many tried-and-true plot lines going for us. Teacher versus student. Old friends and tag partners who were now fighting furiously against each other. Older, bitter, crotchety veteran wrestler—that’s me—frustrated with this not-so-serious newer generation. It was a good story. All the while, I knew how it would end—with me losing my mask and announcing my retirement from wrestling. I’ll wrestle a goodbye match or two next summer, but essentially, I was done. When I put on the mask at age 40, I remembered a line from the great wrestling journalist Dave Meltzer. He wrote the obituary for Junkyard Dog, the African-American grappler who was a Main Event star and drew tons of money in the New Orleans area and later in the World Wrestling Federation. “If he had kept his weight under control and continued training, he could have been a star into his 50s like Ric Flair, The Crusher or Dick the Bruiser.” [caption id="attachment_1536026" align="alignright" width="400"] Juan's final wrestling match. Photo by Clint Dye of Tag Team Photography.[/caption] Right there, Meltzer had given me the formula for longevity in the sport. Ric Flair also said in his podcast that the enemy of any professional wrestler was inactivity. So, for the past nine years, I’ve tried to keep a regular wrestling schedule. If I didn’t have a match, I headed up to the Black & Brave wrestling school in nearby Davenport, Iowa, and worked out in that hard ring. It all helped. My work actually improved as I had regular access to a ring for the first time in my career. My body felt good. I eliminated the heavy weights from my training, especially exercises that stressed my lower back. I kept my weight under control. At five feet nine inches, I never allowed myself to go above 230 pounds, even during the holidays. Most of the time, the scale read around 215, and occasionally I got to a fit 208 pounds. With my tan, and dedicated work in the gym, I looked the part. Kevin and I worked hard at the school. I insisted we train the way we performed in front of a crowd. It was invigorating to finally be able to work on my craft in a way I had never done. When I was young, I wasn’t willing to move to locations that would have given me the chance to get in the ring and train with other pros. To be in a position to get to work with Kevin was an opportunity I couldn’t pass up. Even at age 48. After several long practice matches last summer, I could feel the repercussions. A headache was a given. When I went to wrestling school in 1994, we were hyper-focused on our bodies. Our neck, back, shoulders and knees were our injury concerns. Those were the dangers that weighed on our minds. [caption id="attachment_1536024" align="alignleft" width="400"] Juan surrenders his mask. Photo by Clint Dye of Tag Team Photography.[/caption] But our minds—our brains—were not a concern. Now, it was becoming one for me. The science of concussions and chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a progressive brain disease, are today well-known and ominous. The physicality of the sport also let me know that, while I could handle both the rigors of the training and my young contemporaries, my recovery was slower. It took me days or a week to recover fully from a 15-minute training match. What was most heartbreaking was seeing something so clearly at my advancing age that I never thought about in my 20s. I had talent. Some of the kids who graduated from the intense, three-month training program at the school didn’t have the same aptitude for the life of a wrestler. I was an athlete. Some others didn’t move as naturally in the ring. I saw countless young men hit the weights hard and still not look all that impressive, considering the time they were putting in. My body had always responded to training. I loved pumping iron, which some wrestlers considered more of a required chore. Lifting weights cemented what I had been feeling since I turned 40. Wrestling was my calling. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] I had pursued it, yes. But I had never given it the time, sweat and dedication that the craft demanded. I was always negotiating the price. As I approach turning 50 next March, Father Time was telling me I was pushing the limits. It didn’t matter how long or consistently I trained—the end was near. Especially if I wanted to dictate my last chapter, rather than have it decided for me. As we age, we begin to feel more physically vulnerable. You hesitate to climb on a roof or step too high on a ladder. All because you see or experience firsthand the physical dangers that life presents. You lose the invincible feeling of your youth, the blissful ignorance you had in your 20s. [caption id="attachment_1536025" align="alignright" width="402"] Juan with opponent Kevin Gutierrez, also known as Corn Boi. Photo by Antonio Varela.[/caption] When I would climb to the top rope of the ring to deliver an exciting move, my balance was not what it once was. My awareness of the risk I was taking, however, was ever-present. Pursuing your passion, versus following the safe route, is something folks have been dealing with for many centuries. HumbleDollar’s editor offered this great piece of advice a while back: “I’d put in a plug for earning and saving starting in our 20s, so we can pursue our passions in our 50s, when we likely have a better idea of what’s important to us.” That’s great advice if your talents and pursuits are cerebral. But what if they have a large physical element? I wish I could retire at 55 from the chemical plant where I work and then hit the road to do wrestling shots all over the country. But for my dream, that’s not an option. As Warren Buffett once said, “It's a little like saving sex for your old age.” My passion had a limited window, and it passed long ago. After the match, my kids and I headed to Applebee’s for a late-night meal. I told them this would be an aspect of the business I’d miss. My wallet was full from the generous pay. We drew a great crowd and the promotor paid me well—$300—plus my daughter sold lots of merchandise. I came home with more than $600 in my pocket. The match was good. I had delivered in the ring. For the fans, for the promotion company, for Kevin. My kids and I were all smiling and enjoying the meal and the glow from the evening. It was nearing midnight, well past my bedtime. But I knew the euphoria from the evening would keep me up late. A few days after the show, Kevin and I had a chance to talk on the phone. After our conversation about the past few days, he asked me how I’d felt at the end of our match. How did it feel in the ring taking off the mask with my sister, my nephews and my family in the audience? With the fans and wrestlers all watching and thanking me for my career? Grateful. Grateful was all I could think of. To have been physically able to get to that match, when the summer before I was questioning if I could reach the finish line and allow us both to have this moment. Grateful to have had a dream, and to get paid for it. Grateful to have been able to pursue it and enjoy everything that came with the journey. And—most of all—grateful that I was able to maintain my health, my job at the chemical plant and my family along with it. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn't at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading and writing about personal finance, investing and his other interests. Juan, who is married with two children, retired from the ring after wrestling on the independent circuit for more than 25 years. He wrestled as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow him on Twitter @LatinThunder1. Check out Juan's previous articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Why I Won’t Wait

FINANCIAL EXPERTS often advise retirees to delay claiming Social Security. Their actuarial tables and statistics make a compelling case. Still, as soon as I’m eligible, I’ll strongly consider claiming Social Security. Why? I never knew either of my grandfathers. My mom’s dad died of a stroke when she was age 19. One of my favorite photos of my parents’ wedding is that of my uncle—my mom’s oldest brother—walking her down the aisle. My grandfather never got to see my parents wed. My dad’s father died very young as well. Dad had no memory of his father. My dad Jorge passed away at 72. I was grateful he had 10 years of retirement, and was able to enjoy his grandchildren and have some years of leisure. He had earned it after almost 40 years at a retread factory. One summer, I worked as a temp at the same factory. Despite the modern machines and far safer working conditions, it was hot and the work physically demanding. I was 25 years old and in good shape, but it was still tough. It made me appreciate the work my dad did to support our family all those years. Along with his pension, he was able to retire only by claiming Social Security benefits at age 62. My father-in-law Mike was a kid from a working-class background. The only high school graduation gift he received was a Vietnam draft letter. After a tour of duty that exposed him to Agent Orange and constant military combat, he came home and started a small business as a plaster contractor. He made a living. He didn’t get rich. For more than 15 years, to earn extra money, he worked at the local bowling alley after a full day of backbreaking plaster work. When I met my wife, he no longer had his second job, but continued hanging plaster ceilings and doing repair work fulltime until he claimed Social Security “early.” He continued to work part-time, doing small jobs until he paid off his mortgage and was able to retire fully. To say his work was hard on his body is an understatement. His knees, back, hands and neck all paid a price for the incredible workmanship he displayed with his craft. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] I’ve had it easy compared to my dad and father-in-law. But I did work a swing shift for 20 years. One week, I’d work 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. I’d get the weekend off and go in Sunday night for my week of graveyard shifts, 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. On Friday morning, I’d get off work at 7 a.m. and not have to return until Monday at 3 p.m., when I’d start my week of 3-11s. I always slept fine when I was on the graveyard shift. But as I got older, it began to wear on me. Currently, I’m just working straight days. I didn’t expect working a straight day-shift schedule at the plant to be that different, but it’s been enlightening to see how much better I sleep and feel. I understand the numbers and statistics that support claiming Social Security benefits later. But I can’t help but want to hedge my bets and claim my benefits at age 62. I’m 100% certain that, if I’m still working at the plant at that age, I won’t hesitate to retire and claim my benefits. That would go double if I was still working a swing shift. Hooking up a railcar in subzero temperatures at 3 a.m. in January isn’t something I’ll be doing if I can supplement my retirement savings with Social Security. The numbers a financial advisor can show me in his temperature-controlled office won’t be enough to convince me to go to work on a wintry Iowa Sunday night for one more shift than is absolutely necessary. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn’t at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading about personal finance and investing. Juan, who is married with two children, can still be seen in the ring on the independent professional wrestling circuit. He wrestles as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow him on Twitter @LatinThunder1. Juan's previous article was Taking on Tenants. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Wrestling for Money

IN THE FALL OF 1994, when I was 21, I made the trip south from Iowa down I-35 to Texas. I was starting my wrestling training on Commerce Street in downtown Dallas at Doug’s Gym. What I wasn’t expecting were the financial lessons I picked up from some of the colorful professional wrestlers of that era. Doug’s Gym wasn’t air-conditioned. It had a classic collection of weights and machines. I felt transported back in time, using the same equipment that Jack LaLanne and Steve Reeves would have used decades before. Doug Eidd still owned and ran the old-school gym, which he opened in 1962. The building was across the street from the police station where Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald days after President Kennedy’s assassination. I was there to meet Doug’s cousin, Skandor Akbar or, as we called him, Ak. His real name was Jim Wehba, and he was 60. He had the brawn, broken-down knees and walk of a retired professional wrestler. As I began to train and spend time at Doug’s Gym, we would get visitors. They all came to hear Ak’s stories. It became clear that Ak was good with his money. He was not wealthy. But over the years, he had made a good income working in some of the major wrestling territories. He’d spent time in New York working for Vince McMahon Sr. He’d made a good living there, despite missing out on the chance to have a Main Event program with the Italian-born strongman and champion Bruno Sammartino. Fellow Texan Stan Hansen broke Sammartino’s neck in Madison Square Garden, costing Ak his big payday. Instead of New York glory, Ak had extended stays in Georgia, Australia and the Dallas office of a promoter who had wrestled under the name Fritz Von Erich. But his home base became Mid-South Wrestling. Mid-South was a big territory that covered the states of Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi and parts of Texas. Eventually, in the late 1970s, Ak transitioned out of the ring to become a manager. He participated in a great era of wrestling and made good money until the oil bust of 1987. That’s when Vince McMahon Jr.’s national expansion caused the old territory system to dry up. Unlike most wrestlers of that era, Ak saved his money. He lived frugally, though he always spent money on quality cars. He explained that he depended on a car’s reliability to get him to his bookings. Besides, he spent so much time driving, he wanted to be comfortable. A second big expense for Ak was taxes. Many wrestlers of that era failed to pay their quarterly taxes, so they often fell behind. Fines would follow from the IRS, so they would dig themselves into an even deeper hole. Since Ak paid his Social Security payroll taxes, he received benefits in his golden years. He also made a little cash from small wrestling bookings and the students he trained. Ak lived in a paid-off house, so he was comfortable. On the wall of Doug’s Gym was a tattered picture of another legendary wrestler, Bruiser Brody. Doug told me on my first day at the gym that he missed his deceased friend Bruiser, whose real name was Frank Goodish. Bruiser was another grappler known for his frugal ways. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] Bruiser ate tuna fish right out of the can to provide cheap, quality protein to his massive 6-foot 5-inch, 300-pound frame. If he was paying for a hotel room, Bruiser shared it whenever possible—along with the car rides to the next town. On the income side, Bruiser insisted on getting his full value when it was time to get paid. He often butted heads with promotors over his demands. He made a fortune for that time, earning more than $15,000 a week during tours of Japan. Tragically, Bruiser was stabbed to death backstage at a wrestling event in Puerto Rico in 1988. The final Texas wrestler who gave me a lesson in finance was John Layfield. In January 1995, Layfield came into the gym to work out with us. He wanted to keep his cardio in shape for his weekly title matches at The Sportatorium, an old Dallas wrestling venue. Layfield was flat broke then. He was signed as a free agent with the then-Los Angeles Raiders, but was released before the season. A year of football in the World League hadn’t amounted to much. Independent wrestling in Texas wasn’t paying well at the time. As he approached 30, Layfield was banking on his athletic background—and his 6-foot 6-inch frame—to make it to the big time in professional wrestling. The transformation he made from that first day in Doug’s Gym was amazing. After that practice session, I saw Layfield climb the ranks to WWE Champion, earning six figures. That was impressive but not surprising, given his talent and drive. It was his stock-picking abilities and business mind that transformed Layfield into a wealthy man. He’s been a featured financial commentator, first on CNBC and later on Fox Business Network. He began to run in circles that allowed him to meet his current wife, Meredith Whitney, a prominent investment manager. Those of us who enjoy reading and discussing money can find lessons in frugality and creating wealth everywhere. Even in a dusty old iron dungeon like Doug’s Gym, surrounded by sweaty, professional wrestlers living the circus life. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn’t at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading about personal finance and investing. Juan, who is married with two children, can still be seen in the ring on the independent professional wrestling circuit. He wrestles as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow him on Twitter @LatinThunder1. Juan's previous articles were Why I Won't Wait and Taking on Tenants. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Logging the Hours

I GREW UP IN a blue-collar family. When money was tight, one strategy my dad used to improve the situation was simple but effective. Overtime, time-and-a-half and double-time were all terms I heard frequently throughout my childhood. In this Iowa factory town, those words can still be regularly heard at the taverns, bowling alley and family get-togethers. Overtime is the gift that can make a low-paying factory job worthwhile. Time-and-a-half turns that $12 job into a far more palatable $18 an hour, and can make the difference between renting and owning a home. If you can land that great job in your local area that pays $25 to $40 an hour, those overtime hours become truly lucrative. Once I began my job at the chemical plant in 1999, the idea of getting a second job went out the window. Making time-and-a-half became your second job. Spouses accommodated your overtime because neither of you could replicate that income elsewhere. I never developed the taste for overtime—or had the stamina to put in the hours—that some of my coworkers did. One year, I logged 500 hours of overtime. But I was single then, with no kids, and had just bought a house. The money came in handy furnishing my home, and my routine was pretty simple. Go to work for 12 hours. Hit the gym, sleep and eat. Repeat. This year, by contrast, I’ll log around 225 hours of overtime. Most of it is organic. I don’t seek it out. It's what I get when covering production demands and for vacations taken by others. We get paid biweekly. Today, my take-home pay is around $2,000 every two weeks. It doesn’t take much overtime to bump that up. If your life is set up to live off your 40-hour pay, the OT is all gravy. I once worked several 12-hour days, along with a Saturday, and brought home $3,000 after Uncle Sam took his hefty cut. It’s a good feeling, for sure, but you don’t see your family much during those two weeks. A year after I started in the plant, around 2000, one coworker told me he once broke the $100,000 mark. For those of us with high school diplomas, who live in a low-cost part of the country, that’s a lot of cash— an annual wage our parents never saw and money many of us never thought we’d make. But my coworker shared with me that it wasn’t worth it. He wanted to do it once, but it took 800-plus hours of overtime to do it. All you do is work, he said, and then recover from work. Some in the plant eat overtime like candy. They have the energy to work the hours and their batteries just run hotter. Some have spouses who stay at home with the kids. They work a ton of overtime and their partners don’t expect as much from them when they get home. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] An old boss spent the first half of his career doing shift work. After weeks of marathon shifts, he came home to an annoyed wife. As they sat down to dinner, he noticed she’d put name tags on their kids. He got the message. In fact, he worked so much overtime that he took a pay cut during his first years in a management role. He told me he knew he had a problem when he got agitated looking at a paycheck that didn’t have a single hour of overtime on it. Honestly, I admired how he put his three daughters through college and maintained his marriage. They always took vacations, and went camping as a family. He seemed like my dad. If he wasn’t at work, he was home. If he wasn’t at home, he was at work. Over the years, I’ve recognized a sadder element to a few of these overtime machines. They don’t want to be at home, and their family doesn’t seem to mind them being gone. The house is quiet, with the dad usually at work, and the fat checks keep rolling in. Not my cup of tea, but who am I to judge? One coworker shared a story from his old employer in Davenport, Iowa. The warehouse he worked in was notorious for its overtime. He knew he didn’t want that life when another employee, who was gravely ill, wasn’t responding when his family members spoke to him. But when they asked some of his coworkers to talk to him, he was acknowledging their voices. My friend said that did it for him. He began looking for another job. For the past five years or so, I’ve usually made around $50 an hour when I work time-and-a-half. The math is simple. Work 100 hours of overtime and you got an extra $5,000. Those workhorses doing 700 or more hours of overtime per year? That’s big money. These folks, who love their overtime, can recite their employer’s compensation policy as if it’s burned into their brains. One year, on July 4th, we were forced to work the holiday. Some coworkers, who were older and had families, wanted the day off. They were already going to get eight hours of straight time—which was their holiday pay—and they wanted to watch the parade and fireworks. I was on graveyards that week, so I started late, around midnight. I worked my night shift, and got time-and-a-half for those hours, plus my eight hours of holiday pay. I went home, got some sleep, and came back to cover someone’s 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift. I was pleasantly surprised when I got my check to see I received double time for those eight hours on the second shift. A few other local area employers pay just as well or even better. One of my friends from the gym, who works at the local power plant, has made some serious money maximizing his OT. He works hard and plays hard. He has a great relationship with his grown children and has been married for decades. He just isn’t the type to sit at home and watch Netflix all day. He grew up always having to work if he wanted name-brand jeans or a car. I was at a local barbecue and someone said that, in terms of pay, he was only below the general manager and the most upper management at his plant. I’ll be sticking with my overtime policy of only working when my team needs me to. If coworkers want the overtime hours and the cash that comes with it, they can have it. But it’s good to know that, if I do have to work some extra hours, I’ll get paid well for my time. Seems like a fair deal to me. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn't at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading and writing about personal finance, investing and his other interests. Juan, who is married with two children, retired from the ring after wrestling on the independent circuit for more than 25 years. He wrestled as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow Juan on Twitter @LatinThunder1, visit his website and check out his previous articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Born to Sell

I ONCE DABBLED IN the world of sales. I wasn't very good at it. In 1997, I got a job at Schwan’s, driving one of those yellow trucks you see in neighborhoods all over the U.S. selling frozen treats, ice cream and a variety of food. I thought it would be a delivery and service job. But I found out during the orientation and training that there was an element of sales. I read the books of motivational speaker Zig Ziglar in my free time and got some basic training in sales from the company. But as I began my route in the railroad town of Fort Madison, Iowa, I could see I needed help. A natural sales guy I was not. At a party one weekend, I ran into my dad’s old friend, Pablo. My dad was godfather, or padrino, to Pablo’s youngest son. I was interested in talking to him because he was a successful car salesman. As we talked about my struggles in sales, Pablo gave me a few tips. He also shared with me how he began his career. Pablo was from San Antonio. He spoke good English, but like many Hispanic men in my hometown of that era, he had a limited education. He dropped out of school in sixth grade to work because his family didn’t have a lot of money. He met his wife when they were both working as migrant laborers, following the crops. My Midwestern town is home to a Heinz manufacturing plant where, in the old days, migrant workers picked tomatoes from the fields and transported them to the plant. After one season in the mid-1960s, Pablo and his wife never went back to Texas. Instead, they decided to make a home here in Iowa. He met my dad at the retread factory, but he lost his job when he broke his leg. When he’d recovered, he landed a job as a janitor at the high school. Needing more money, he also worked as a janitor in the evening at the local Montgomery Ward store, where he was known as Paul. One day, the store decided to have a sales contest to see who could sell the most bedsheets. They divided the store employees into three groups, with the sales staff getting to pick their team from all the store employees. Though most of the traffic would be driven by the sales team, they wanted to include everyone in the contest. One manager suggested, as an afterthought, they include the janitors so they didn’t feel left out. Like the slow nerdy kid at dodgeball, Pablo was picked last. He was eager to win the prize and began to tell the customers he saw walking in about these fabulous bedsheets they just had to have. He found out he had a natural talent and began closing many sales. He was spending just as much time spotting leads as he was cleaning the store. It turned out that Pablo’s team won the contest. It wasn’t even close. Matter of fact, Pablo sold more bedsheets by himself than the rest of the store combined. The next day, after the contest was over, Pablo was pushing his broom, sweeping the floor as he always did. The store manager came up to him and suggested he put his broom down. He gave him a necktie and a job offer. “Paul, we think your skills would be better served selling.” [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] That humble beginning was the start of his sales career. Pablo eventually got a job as a car salesman in my hometown and consistently grossed six figures for more than 30 years. He put his sons through college, and one even became a school principal. When my dad bought a car, he always went to his “compadre Pablo.” I went with my dad once as he bought a small, ugly used Dodge Omni for my older brother. I had the privilege of driving the same car when I turned 16. You couldn’t see the wall in Pablo’s office for all the sales awards he’d won. I’m sure it helped that he was one of the few salesmen at that time who spoke Spanish. Ultimately, however, Pablo was just a fantastic salesman. He won sales contests that provided family vacations, the latest televisions and appliances, and he drove the dealership’s best demo car for free. At different times, he owned a theatre that played Spanish movies in the Quad Cities and a Mexican restaurant. He was also a landlord—all while working six days a week selling cars. When I saw him last week, enjoying his retirement, I asked him if he ever regretted working so hard all those years. Typical of his generation and background, he told me he never worked hard. He had seen migrant workers in the fields picking crops. That was hard work, he said. He made a sale, handed the ticket to the office, and his work was done. The hours were long, yes, but it never felt like hard work to him. Not bad for a Mexican-American kid with a sixth-grade education from a barrio in San Antonio. My sales career ended after six months. The long hours working my route were getting to me, so I put in my notice. I wasn’t making great money and, with my sales skills lacking, I didn’t see that changing anytime soon. I got a temp job that eventually led me to a position at the plant where I work today. It was a great move for me. I did develop an appreciation for the sales industry, though. The profession isn’t always given the respect it deserves. Every company relies on sales, and it’s a job that provides opportunity for those with sales talent, skills and drive. Your education, grades and background don’t matter in sales. What drives your career and salary is your results, and my dad’s friend Pablo is a great example of that. “Only in America,” as Don King would say. Juan Fourneau’s goal is to retire at age 55. When he isn't at his manufacturing job, he enjoys reading and writing about personal finance, investing and other interests. Juan, who is married with two children, retired from the ring after wrestling on the independent circuit for more than 25 years. He wrestled as a Mexican Luchador under the name Latin Thunder. Follow Juan on Twitter @LatinThunder1, visit his website and check out his previous articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »