FREE NEWSLETTER

What’s market efficiency? If there’s a $20 bill lying on the sidewalk, Wall Street grabs it—and then happily sells it to you at a markup.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

The 34% Return I’m Glad I Missed

"I think we're talking past each other. Let me be concrete: I needed £X per year in retirement income. A 25% allocation to a 4.25% yield fund would generate that £X. A 10% or 15% allocation wouldn't—it would generate less than half what I needed. I understand what you're saying—that a 10-20% tactical shift shouldn't feel like a major restructuring, and if it does, that signals rigidity. I agree with that principle. But in this specific case, the threshold wasn't arbitrary portfolio philosophy—it was income math. Anything less than 25% didn't solve the problem I was trying to solve. So the choice was: commit 25% to a single-country fund (which solved the income need but created concentration risk), or find a different income solution entirely. I chose the latter because 25% in one market felt like excessive concentration for retirement capital. That's not rigidity—it's risk management. If a better opportunity comes along that meets my needs without concentrated exposure, I'll consider it. But I won't second-guess sound risk decisions just because one outcome would have been lucrative."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Sell America

OVER THE PAST YEAR, a new term has entered the lexicon: “Sell America.” The idea is that investors are losing confidence in the U.S. economy due to persistent deficits and concerns about other policy choices. Owing to these fears, some investors are pulling money out of U.S. stocks and reallocating to international markets. Others are opting for gold and silver. The result: In 2025, for the first time in a long time, international stocks demonstrably outpaced domestic equities, gold rose nearly 70% and silver more than doubled. These trends have continued into 2026. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 is just fractionally positive. Meanwhile, global stocks outside the U.S. have gained 8.5%, with some international markets delivering even stronger returns. An index of Asian markets is up 17%. Some analysts are now predicting a more fundamental shift away from U.S. markets. A recent Bloomberg headline read, “Anywhere but the U.S.” It argued that “U.S. exceptionalism is under pressure.” Matthew Tuttle runs an investment firm in Connecticut. In a recent article, he argued that other countries are building a “kill switch” for U.S. technology. “The world is building optionality away from U.S. policy and platform dependence.” In France, he says, the government is encouraging companies to stop using Zoom. One German state has been moving government data away from Microsoft. Countries around the world, he says, are pursuing “digital sovereignty.” Do these trends mean that we should all be pursuing Sell America strategies with our portfolios? Recent data might point in that direction. But I would proceed with caution, for two reasons. First, there’s no guarantee that current trends will continue. Just in the past year, we've seen how quickly things can reverse. After years of middling performance, international stocks significantly outperformed. The proximate cause was White House policy, but as we’ve seen so many times in the past, policies aren’t permanent and often reverse. We’ll have another election in 2028. In the meantime, any number of other variables could affect investment markets at any time. Indeed, an unexpected reversal hit gold and silver just last week. Why? One explanation is that it was in response to the White House’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve. Whatever the cause, though, this is an example of how quickly things can change. Another challenge with the Sell America trade is that commentators, at any given time, tend to focus most on the issues that are in the news. But surprises occur regularly. Look no further than the appearance of Covid-19 in 2020 or the advent of consumer-facing AI tools in 2022. Each had a material impact on investment markets, but neither was expected. This occurs all the time. When investors are looking left, something appears from the right. Whatever we’re all focused on today might be valid, but it represents just a fraction of what will actually occur in the future. Some years ago, the consulting firm Callan developed what it calls the periodic table of investments. In a color-coded format, it illustrates the returns of various asset classes from year to year. What patterns does it reveal? In short, none. At any given time, it’s a patchwork. Markets can go from first to worst and then back again. This happens regularly. The second problem with the Sell America trade—or any other tactical trade—is that even if we could forecast the future, that still wouldn’t guarantee investment profits. Howard Marks, a longtime investor and author, explains it this way: “In order to produce something useful,” he says, “you must have a reliable process capable of converting the required inputs into the desired output. The problem, in short, is that I don’t think there can be a process capable of consistently turning the large number of variables associated with economies and financial markets (the inputs) into a useful macro forecast (the output).” You might, in other words, correctly forecast the result of the next election or how far the Fed will cut interest rates. Significant as those variables are, however, they are still just part of the immense number of moving parts that ultimately combine over time to drive markets. The result: An event that might appear to be positive can end up having no effect because of another, concurrent event, or because investors interpret an event in an unexpected way. We saw this happen as recently as this week. On Wednesday, an employment report was released with results that were far better than expected. But when the market opened Wednesday morning, prices were mixed, with many stocks in the red. Why? At least two other factors were at play. First, there’s the fear that a strong employment report—a sign of a strong economy—will cause the Fed to move more slowly in lowering rates. And since higher rates are generally bad for stocks, the result, counterintuitively, is that a strong employment report—an otherwise positive sign—can end up driving the market down. Another reason stocks were weak on Wednesday: A theme in recent weeks has been the fear that AI will damage the software industry because it is getting so much better at writing code. This concept is known as “vibe coding,” and the idea is that, in the not-too-distant future, any layman will be able to create their own software on demand. That story ebbs and flows from the headlines, but it happened to be getting more discussion this week. Investment markets, in other words, are like an old fashioned scale, constantly weighing a mix of factors—and stories—on each side. The challenge, though, is that no one has a complete picture of what factors will be on the scale at any given time. To be sure, some forecasts do turn out to be accurate. If you have a view on how a particular policy will turn out, you could be right. The challenge, though, is that when we focus on just one factor—whether it be tariffs or the debt or an election—we’re looking at things through too narrow a lens. For this reason, Warren Buffett has always emphasized the futility of making economic forecasts. “In the hard sciences, you know that if an apple falls from a tree, that it isn't going to change over the centuries because of…political developments or 400 other variables... But when you get into economics, there's so many variables…” Retired Fidelity fund manager Peter Lynch perhaps said it best: “I’ve always said if you spend 13 minutes a year on economics, you’ve wasted 10 minutes.” The Sell America trade may have some reasonable basis. But in the absence of a crystal ball, I’m not sure it’s sufficient enough for investors to dramatically alter their plans.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Financial Trauma

SOMETIMES WORLD events beyond your control create a hard reset point in your financial life. A before and after. For me, that point was the 2007 Great Financial Crisis (GFC). The psychological scars still reverberate into my current life.   Looking back, I was aware of something rumbling about in the financial landscape but didn't take much notice due to being deeply involved in running my business. Little did I realize the impact heading my way. At that point, we had finally reached a good place in life. It was ten years since founding my company and the memory of the first five tough, lean years were a fading thought in my mind. Meaningful cash was flowing into our personal accounts, and business was very profitable with dreams of life-changing expansion on my mind. Nothing seemed impossible. We were young and proud of our achievements. Mid-2008 saw banks in my country going under and the government stepping in to prop them up. My wife Suzie worked for a large UK-based international bank. I distinctly remember one Saturday morning chatting together about the crash in Suzie's employer's share price and whether we should take a big personal position. We both thought the company was fundamentally strong and a massive bargain. Any thoughts about investing went out the window by that Monday afternoon. My bankers called me to an urgent afternoon meeting. With little in the way of diplomacy, immediate repayment of loans and overdrafts was demanded within seven days. The final insult was informing me that a small, unused $100 overdraft on my personal account was withdrawn with immediate effect. Shell-shocked understates how I felt as I left the meeting. It’s a bit of a blur, and so were the next 18 months of fighting for survival. All of mine and Suzie's personal capital was poured into the business, and inventory was run down to the lowest possible level to generate cash flow. My suppliers had to wait for payment, and I purchased stock almost daily for over a year. Beyond the financial strain and exhausting work schedule, there was another weight I carried—guilt. My suppliers had to wait for payment, and that violated something fundamental in me. It was a matter of my honour and honesty. My conscience gave me no choice about paying them back; it's just what you have to do. But the delay itself felt like a breach of my word, a compromise of values I'd never imagined I'd make. The bitter irony wasn't lost on me: the banks who'd shown zero consideration in demanding immediate repayment had forced me into a position where I had to ask suppliers for the very grace my bankers refused to extend. Personally, the main anxiety I felt during the first year of our struggle was the thought of approaching the tax authorities. I was terrified of telling them I couldn't gather the capital to fully pay the corporation tax bill. Unbelievably they were the most understanding of all my creditors and accepted a three month delay without protest. It's hard to convey the unease and vulnerability we both felt. At least I had some agency trying to control our business. Suzie only saw our savings evaporate and me working 16 hour days seven days a week. We also had the worry that Suzie worked for one of the banks involved in the crisis. Our only dependable income could disappear with the snap of a corporate finger. We had no answers, but we had each other. Slowly our heads peeked above the black clouds of despair. I went from juggling cash flow on a daily basis, banking every check within an hour of receipt and praying it didn't bounce, because I wasn't sailing these stormy waters alone—my customers had issues also and they were stretching my credit terms to breaking point. One day, more than a year into the crisis, I realised there was enough in our business account. I didn't need to rush to lodge the check in my hand; one more day could pass…the beginning of a turnaround. By the middle of the third year, we had turned things around and managed to get a firm financial footing, with the business now operating on a cash-positive model. This enabled Suzie and me to start refilling our personal finances. Never again would I be dependent on credit in any manner. This reset point lasted until I sold my business earlier this year and still holds sway in my personal financial life. Undoubtedly, there was an opportunity cost to my fundamental and permanent management shift. Growth had to be slow and organic, not explosive and fueled by lending. My personal wealth would possibly be much larger if I had gone cap in hand to the banks. For me, it wasn't a hurdle I wanted to cross. A comfortable life was enough. I didn't need riches. While it was a traumatic experience, I feel it was an overall positive result. Debt changed from a way of business life to an unnecessary instrument that was also banished from our personal lives. Not much good came out of the GFC, but a dislike and avoidance of debt was the best result for our long-term peace of mind and future retirement. It wasn't a lesson I wanted or expected but it was one I certainly learned and took to heart. Have you ever reached a financial reset point in your life? Was it, like for Suzie and me, a nearly unbearable burden at the time? In hindsight, does it now seem like a worthwhile experience to overcome? Or was it too large to overcome and still negatively affecting your financial well-being? ___ Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

Helping Adult Children

"I suspect many parents help their adult children in some manner.  I was no exception. Helping can take various forms. The children were groomed for technical engineering careers and schooled in critical thinking and various forms of independence, so it was no surprise that they decided to go to engineering school.   If they had decided to go to in-state public colleges, I agreed to a free ride. However, they decided to go out of state. In that case they were responsible for a portion of the costs. They took out loans. It was a token amount, and I wanted them to see a portion of their post-graduate paycheck go to the education of their choice. It was to be a reminder of the consequences of their decision. One was able to get a partial scholarship, too.  The costs were high; one college was about $100,000 a year. When they graduated, I was nearly debt free, but I had suspended funding for my retirement for a few years. Helping can take different forms. During college, I turned over a well-used vehicle to each. It was serviced, had new tires and brakes, etc. The vehicles were expected to perform with simple routine maintenance for several years, and did. They paid insurance, etc. Eventually they sold these and purchased something better. I got a portion of the proceeds. When they graduated, I gave them each a “grubstake” loan. This was to assist them with rent and other necessary, initial expenses. All had good jobs upon graduation. I gave them lots of time to repay this. One took about 6 years and had to be reminded. One decided upon an advanced engineering degree, paid for by his company. He attended school nights and part-time.   Today, all are in their 40s, are independent, have excellent careers, own their homes and have well-funded retirement plans. There were some bumps, and good jobs at stable companies can be difficult to find from time to time.   In fact, they are in better financial shape at their age than I was when I was in my 40s.  We are available for any reason, but the children take pride in their independence and accomplishments.  "
- normr60189
Read more »

Evaluating the Economics and Operational Structure of Black Limo Service in Miami, FL

"Suggest emailing Bogdan, or using the "Report an Issue" form. He doesn't seem to monitor the forum very often."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

Taxes on foreign stocks

"I mentioned here recently that I held an international fund in taxable for the tax credit, and was informed that there was a limit on how much I could deduct. I am well below the limit, but others may want to read this explanation."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

What does ”means” mean?

"Thank you, Richard, for the clarification. We're in the same stream."
- Fred Coldwell
Read more »

Home Prices and Affordability

"I have told my children in the past to never spend more than 75-80% of what they are qualified for. Whomever qualifies you is determining what is the MAXIMUM they are willing to risk loaning you. They have their, not your best interests in mind when producing your limit."
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Choices, choices everywhere

"When my oldest and now 38 year old son was in high school he asked me why I didn't drive a nicer car. "You could afford it dad." (At the time I was driving a 6-year-old VW Passat.) I gently explained to him that I chose to drive the car I did so that there would be money available to help pay college tuition for him and his two younger siblings. Now, more than twenty years later, He's a dad who drives a 6 year old car as he plans for his daughter's future. While it was not my intent at the time to teach him about the value of deferred gratification or the importance of considering the impact of choices he makes, it appears to have had a lasting effect. (In retirement I bought a very comfortable EV, not top of the line but very nice.)"
- Ocher
Read more »

Yes, I am a NIIT wit

"Thanks to Ormonde for mentioning Line 9 on Form 8960. This will be my first year taking Form 8960 to the tax prom, which I believe starts at 10:40. I’m sure we’ll have a good time dancing with the other forms. BTW, I understand that νιιτ is Greek for “big wallet” - or does it mean “fat wedding”? Including investment expenses on Line 9 – such as interest, state taxes, and even foreign taxes – is a good suggestion. But unless these deductions result in a net investment income on Line 12 that’s lower than the amount on Line 15 (i.e., MAGI minus a threshold, e.g., $200k for Single), there’s no benefit to determining those investment expenses.  As Ormonde says, if you reduce the investment income, it won’t matter unless it affects how much sticks up above the threshold amount."
- F William Matthewson
Read more »

The Monthly Mystery of the Vanishing Paycheck

"When I worked in wealth management, trying to get a client to pull together any sort of budget was frustrating at best. It was beyond not knowing how to do one, and much more a case of they simply didn't want to know how much and where their money was being spent. On more than one occasion, I had a client declare firmly that they did not have a spending problem, but that we had an investment problem!"
- UofODuck
Read more »

Punched in  the Mouth

"Greg, I think this highlights one of the value propositions provided by a financial advisor: the ability to robustly stress-test a plan to see how it holds up under multiple extreme scenarios, consequently giving you more faith and peace of mind before retirement."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

The 34% Return I’m Glad I Missed

"I think we're talking past each other. Let me be concrete: I needed £X per year in retirement income. A 25% allocation to a 4.25% yield fund would generate that £X. A 10% or 15% allocation wouldn't—it would generate less than half what I needed. I understand what you're saying—that a 10-20% tactical shift shouldn't feel like a major restructuring, and if it does, that signals rigidity. I agree with that principle. But in this specific case, the threshold wasn't arbitrary portfolio philosophy—it was income math. Anything less than 25% didn't solve the problem I was trying to solve. So the choice was: commit 25% to a single-country fund (which solved the income need but created concentration risk), or find a different income solution entirely. I chose the latter because 25% in one market felt like excessive concentration for retirement capital. That's not rigidity—it's risk management. If a better opportunity comes along that meets my needs without concentrated exposure, I'll consider it. But I won't second-guess sound risk decisions just because one outcome would have been lucrative."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Sell America

OVER THE PAST YEAR, a new term has entered the lexicon: “Sell America.” The idea is that investors are losing confidence in the U.S. economy due to persistent deficits and concerns about other policy choices. Owing to these fears, some investors are pulling money out of U.S. stocks and reallocating to international markets. Others are opting for gold and silver. The result: In 2025, for the first time in a long time, international stocks demonstrably outpaced domestic equities, gold rose nearly 70% and silver more than doubled. These trends have continued into 2026. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 is just fractionally positive. Meanwhile, global stocks outside the U.S. have gained 8.5%, with some international markets delivering even stronger returns. An index of Asian markets is up 17%. Some analysts are now predicting a more fundamental shift away from U.S. markets. A recent Bloomberg headline read, “Anywhere but the U.S.” It argued that “U.S. exceptionalism is under pressure.” Matthew Tuttle runs an investment firm in Connecticut. In a recent article, he argued that other countries are building a “kill switch” for U.S. technology. “The world is building optionality away from U.S. policy and platform dependence.” In France, he says, the government is encouraging companies to stop using Zoom. One German state has been moving government data away from Microsoft. Countries around the world, he says, are pursuing “digital sovereignty.” Do these trends mean that we should all be pursuing Sell America strategies with our portfolios? Recent data might point in that direction. But I would proceed with caution, for two reasons. First, there’s no guarantee that current trends will continue. Just in the past year, we've seen how quickly things can reverse. After years of middling performance, international stocks significantly outperformed. The proximate cause was White House policy, but as we’ve seen so many times in the past, policies aren’t permanent and often reverse. We’ll have another election in 2028. In the meantime, any number of other variables could affect investment markets at any time. Indeed, an unexpected reversal hit gold and silver just last week. Why? One explanation is that it was in response to the White House’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve. Whatever the cause, though, this is an example of how quickly things can change. Another challenge with the Sell America trade is that commentators, at any given time, tend to focus most on the issues that are in the news. But surprises occur regularly. Look no further than the appearance of Covid-19 in 2020 or the advent of consumer-facing AI tools in 2022. Each had a material impact on investment markets, but neither was expected. This occurs all the time. When investors are looking left, something appears from the right. Whatever we’re all focused on today might be valid, but it represents just a fraction of what will actually occur in the future. Some years ago, the consulting firm Callan developed what it calls the periodic table of investments. In a color-coded format, it illustrates the returns of various asset classes from year to year. What patterns does it reveal? In short, none. At any given time, it’s a patchwork. Markets can go from first to worst and then back again. This happens regularly. The second problem with the Sell America trade—or any other tactical trade—is that even if we could forecast the future, that still wouldn’t guarantee investment profits. Howard Marks, a longtime investor and author, explains it this way: “In order to produce something useful,” he says, “you must have a reliable process capable of converting the required inputs into the desired output. The problem, in short, is that I don’t think there can be a process capable of consistently turning the large number of variables associated with economies and financial markets (the inputs) into a useful macro forecast (the output).” You might, in other words, correctly forecast the result of the next election or how far the Fed will cut interest rates. Significant as those variables are, however, they are still just part of the immense number of moving parts that ultimately combine over time to drive markets. The result: An event that might appear to be positive can end up having no effect because of another, concurrent event, or because investors interpret an event in an unexpected way. We saw this happen as recently as this week. On Wednesday, an employment report was released with results that were far better than expected. But when the market opened Wednesday morning, prices were mixed, with many stocks in the red. Why? At least two other factors were at play. First, there’s the fear that a strong employment report—a sign of a strong economy—will cause the Fed to move more slowly in lowering rates. And since higher rates are generally bad for stocks, the result, counterintuitively, is that a strong employment report—an otherwise positive sign—can end up driving the market down. Another reason stocks were weak on Wednesday: A theme in recent weeks has been the fear that AI will damage the software industry because it is getting so much better at writing code. This concept is known as “vibe coding,” and the idea is that, in the not-too-distant future, any layman will be able to create their own software on demand. That story ebbs and flows from the headlines, but it happened to be getting more discussion this week. Investment markets, in other words, are like an old fashioned scale, constantly weighing a mix of factors—and stories—on each side. The challenge, though, is that no one has a complete picture of what factors will be on the scale at any given time. To be sure, some forecasts do turn out to be accurate. If you have a view on how a particular policy will turn out, you could be right. The challenge, though, is that when we focus on just one factor—whether it be tariffs or the debt or an election—we’re looking at things through too narrow a lens. For this reason, Warren Buffett has always emphasized the futility of making economic forecasts. “In the hard sciences, you know that if an apple falls from a tree, that it isn't going to change over the centuries because of…political developments or 400 other variables... But when you get into economics, there's so many variables…” Retired Fidelity fund manager Peter Lynch perhaps said it best: “I’ve always said if you spend 13 minutes a year on economics, you’ve wasted 10 minutes.” The Sell America trade may have some reasonable basis. But in the absence of a crystal ball, I’m not sure it’s sufficient enough for investors to dramatically alter their plans.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Financial Trauma

SOMETIMES WORLD events beyond your control create a hard reset point in your financial life. A before and after. For me, that point was the 2007 Great Financial Crisis (GFC). The psychological scars still reverberate into my current life.   Looking back, I was aware of something rumbling about in the financial landscape but didn't take much notice due to being deeply involved in running my business. Little did I realize the impact heading my way. At that point, we had finally reached a good place in life. It was ten years since founding my company and the memory of the first five tough, lean years were a fading thought in my mind. Meaningful cash was flowing into our personal accounts, and business was very profitable with dreams of life-changing expansion on my mind. Nothing seemed impossible. We were young and proud of our achievements. Mid-2008 saw banks in my country going under and the government stepping in to prop them up. My wife Suzie worked for a large UK-based international bank. I distinctly remember one Saturday morning chatting together about the crash in Suzie's employer's share price and whether we should take a big personal position. We both thought the company was fundamentally strong and a massive bargain. Any thoughts about investing went out the window by that Monday afternoon. My bankers called me to an urgent afternoon meeting. With little in the way of diplomacy, immediate repayment of loans and overdrafts was demanded within seven days. The final insult was informing me that a small, unused $100 overdraft on my personal account was withdrawn with immediate effect. Shell-shocked understates how I felt as I left the meeting. It’s a bit of a blur, and so were the next 18 months of fighting for survival. All of mine and Suzie's personal capital was poured into the business, and inventory was run down to the lowest possible level to generate cash flow. My suppliers had to wait for payment, and I purchased stock almost daily for over a year. Beyond the financial strain and exhausting work schedule, there was another weight I carried—guilt. My suppliers had to wait for payment, and that violated something fundamental in me. It was a matter of my honour and honesty. My conscience gave me no choice about paying them back; it's just what you have to do. But the delay itself felt like a breach of my word, a compromise of values I'd never imagined I'd make. The bitter irony wasn't lost on me: the banks who'd shown zero consideration in demanding immediate repayment had forced me into a position where I had to ask suppliers for the very grace my bankers refused to extend. Personally, the main anxiety I felt during the first year of our struggle was the thought of approaching the tax authorities. I was terrified of telling them I couldn't gather the capital to fully pay the corporation tax bill. Unbelievably they were the most understanding of all my creditors and accepted a three month delay without protest. It's hard to convey the unease and vulnerability we both felt. At least I had some agency trying to control our business. Suzie only saw our savings evaporate and me working 16 hour days seven days a week. We also had the worry that Suzie worked for one of the banks involved in the crisis. Our only dependable income could disappear with the snap of a corporate finger. We had no answers, but we had each other. Slowly our heads peeked above the black clouds of despair. I went from juggling cash flow on a daily basis, banking every check within an hour of receipt and praying it didn't bounce, because I wasn't sailing these stormy waters alone—my customers had issues also and they were stretching my credit terms to breaking point. One day, more than a year into the crisis, I realised there was enough in our business account. I didn't need to rush to lodge the check in my hand; one more day could pass…the beginning of a turnaround. By the middle of the third year, we had turned things around and managed to get a firm financial footing, with the business now operating on a cash-positive model. This enabled Suzie and me to start refilling our personal finances. Never again would I be dependent on credit in any manner. This reset point lasted until I sold my business earlier this year and still holds sway in my personal financial life. Undoubtedly, there was an opportunity cost to my fundamental and permanent management shift. Growth had to be slow and organic, not explosive and fueled by lending. My personal wealth would possibly be much larger if I had gone cap in hand to the banks. For me, it wasn't a hurdle I wanted to cross. A comfortable life was enough. I didn't need riches. While it was a traumatic experience, I feel it was an overall positive result. Debt changed from a way of business life to an unnecessary instrument that was also banished from our personal lives. Not much good came out of the GFC, but a dislike and avoidance of debt was the best result for our long-term peace of mind and future retirement. It wasn't a lesson I wanted or expected but it was one I certainly learned and took to heart. Have you ever reached a financial reset point in your life? Was it, like for Suzie and me, a nearly unbearable burden at the time? In hindsight, does it now seem like a worthwhile experience to overcome? Or was it too large to overcome and still negatively affecting your financial well-being? ___ Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

Helping Adult Children

"I suspect many parents help their adult children in some manner.  I was no exception. Helping can take various forms. The children were groomed for technical engineering careers and schooled in critical thinking and various forms of independence, so it was no surprise that they decided to go to engineering school.   If they had decided to go to in-state public colleges, I agreed to a free ride. However, they decided to go out of state. In that case they were responsible for a portion of the costs. They took out loans. It was a token amount, and I wanted them to see a portion of their post-graduate paycheck go to the education of their choice. It was to be a reminder of the consequences of their decision. One was able to get a partial scholarship, too.  The costs were high; one college was about $100,000 a year. When they graduated, I was nearly debt free, but I had suspended funding for my retirement for a few years. Helping can take different forms. During college, I turned over a well-used vehicle to each. It was serviced, had new tires and brakes, etc. The vehicles were expected to perform with simple routine maintenance for several years, and did. They paid insurance, etc. Eventually they sold these and purchased something better. I got a portion of the proceeds. When they graduated, I gave them each a “grubstake” loan. This was to assist them with rent and other necessary, initial expenses. All had good jobs upon graduation. I gave them lots of time to repay this. One took about 6 years and had to be reminded. One decided upon an advanced engineering degree, paid for by his company. He attended school nights and part-time.   Today, all are in their 40s, are independent, have excellent careers, own their homes and have well-funded retirement plans. There were some bumps, and good jobs at stable companies can be difficult to find from time to time.   In fact, they are in better financial shape at their age than I was when I was in my 40s.  We are available for any reason, but the children take pride in their independence and accomplishments.  "
- normr60189
Read more »

Evaluating the Economics and Operational Structure of Black Limo Service in Miami, FL

"Suggest emailing Bogdan, or using the "Report an Issue" form. He doesn't seem to monitor the forum very often."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

Taxes on foreign stocks

"I mentioned here recently that I held an international fund in taxable for the tax credit, and was informed that there was a limit on how much I could deduct. I am well below the limit, but others may want to read this explanation."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

What does ”means” mean?

"Thank you, Richard, for the clarification. We're in the same stream."
- Fred Coldwell
Read more »

Home Prices and Affordability

"I have told my children in the past to never spend more than 75-80% of what they are qualified for. Whomever qualifies you is determining what is the MAXIMUM they are willing to risk loaning you. They have their, not your best interests in mind when producing your limit."
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Choices, choices everywhere

"When my oldest and now 38 year old son was in high school he asked me why I didn't drive a nicer car. "You could afford it dad." (At the time I was driving a 6-year-old VW Passat.) I gently explained to him that I chose to drive the car I did so that there would be money available to help pay college tuition for him and his two younger siblings. Now, more than twenty years later, He's a dad who drives a 6 year old car as he plans for his daughter's future. While it was not my intent at the time to teach him about the value of deferred gratification or the importance of considering the impact of choices he makes, it appears to have had a lasting effect. (In retirement I bought a very comfortable EV, not top of the line but very nice.)"
- Ocher
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 8: RETIREMENT may be our final financial goal, but we should always put it first. Why? It’s easily our most expensive goal, so it takes decades of savings and investment gains to amass enough.

humans

NO. 24: MANY FOLKS hate the stock market’s uncertainty and love the predictability on offer elsewhere. Problem is, if we focus too much on predictability, we’ll likely end up with a conservative mix of bonds and cash investments that saves us from big market fluctuations, but exposes us to the risk of losing money after factoring in inflation and taxes.

think

COUNTERPARTY risk. This is a fancy way of saying, “The folks on the other side of the deal might fail to deliver on their part of the bargain.” On Wall Street, the term is often applied to private securities transactions, such as currency swaps, and to insurance products. Buying a lifetime income annuity? You need to consider the risk that the insurer might go bust.

act

PROVE YOUR LOVE. Today, we celebrate Valentine’s Day. Want to show your love for your family? Make sure you have enough life and disability insurance. Check that you have a robust, up-to-date estate plan. And talk to your family about how much financial help you can provide while you’re alive—and what they can expect to receive upon your death.

How to think about money

Manifesto

NO. 8: RETIREMENT may be our final financial goal, but we should always put it first. Why? It’s easily our most expensive goal, so it takes decades of savings and investment gains to amass enough.

Spotlight: Retirement

A Costly Choice

I RECEIVED A GREAT education at Northwestern University in the 1980s. But the school’s commitment to excellence seems to have fallen short when it comes to the 403(b) retirement savings plan for teachers and staff.
Northwestern’s plan offers a generous 5% match and more than 400 investment choices, according to court filings. The lengthy list contained some clunkers, though, such as retail-class mutual funds when the plan could have offered lower-cost institutional shares instead.

Read more »

To Be or Not to 403(b)

I BEGAN MY CAREER at a small startup biotech company, only to realize the place had too much office politics, plus not enough credit was given for new discoveries. That was at odds with what I wanted, which was to be a research scientist focused on the basic principles underlying diseases.
Fortunately, I was offered a tenure-track academic position at a large medical school in Houston. I never looked back. Indeed, I consider myself one of the fortunate few who woke early each and every day to pursue their life’s passion.

Read more »

The Fear of Letting Go

Retirement sounded so great to me a few years ago. Now as I face the reality of it, I find myself having panic attacks. “No more income? I will end up a homeless bag lady on Main Street….” I find myself thinking.
All irrational thoughts since I will have a COLA pension supplemented by my savings and will receive social security in 18 months.  These revenues will come close to matching my current net pay when I start social security.

Read more »

Rookie Mistakes

I LIKE TO THINK of myself today as a pretty savvy investor. But I wasn’t savvy when I started out. Despite attending business school and earning a master’s degree in computer science, I knew nothing about managing money or saving for retirement, so I initially made a number of blunders—but also one particularly lucky choice.
My first real job after college was in 1987, as a systems programmer for the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

Read more »

Leaving Early

LIKE OTHERS, I TOOK my first part-time job as a teenager and, once working fulltime, stayed at it steadily for decades. Being an adult meant being a worker, affiliated with some firm or another, one industry or another.
My plans for ever exiting the labor force were vague: “Save for the future, so someday you will retire with honor and dignity to spend your waning days as you desire.” I saved steadily,

Read more »

Rolling the Dice

IN JANUARY 1946, a man named Stanislaw Ulam found himself confined to a hospital bed, having suffered an encephalitis attack. A brilliant scientist and a veteran of the Manhattan Project, Ulam wasn’t the type to sit idly while he recuperated. Instead, after playing innumerable games of solitaire to pass the time, Ulam began to examine the statistical aspects of the game.
Among the questions he asked: How can you accurately estimate the probability of winning a game?

Read more »

Spotlight: Marsh

Money Memories

Six years ago, Jonathan Clements published an article in HumbleDollar recounting some of the  anecdotal influences on his financial thinking. Rather than research and facts, he explained, it’s often the exploits we experience, the tales we’re told or the comments that come our way that shape how we view money matters. I know that holds true for me. Years later, I can still hear the voices and see the faces attached to these events: 1. In the summer of 1973, the gasoline shortage had our nation waiting in line at the pumps. I was age 11, and excited about spending the first of several summers with my grandfather. Meanwhile, he was unhappy about President Nixon asking gasoline sellers to restrict sales, and remembering wage and price controls from two years earlier. He was also intent on giving me an economics lecture.  “Supply and demand” was his incessant mantra, meaning the markets should be allowed to freely operate. At the time, I was too young to grasp the significance of his words, but they apparently sunk into my psyche. Today, even public policy decisions that appear sound or necessary make me wonder what possible unintended consequences time will reveal. 2. During most of the last two decades, with savings account interest rates bumping along the bottom, I often thought wistfully of a conversation I had in the early 1980s with my great-uncle Jake. He was elated with the 9% interest he was collecting on his certificates of deposit. What would it take to return to those heydays, I mused, with cash actually paying its keep? During the last couple of years, I found out. It’s true that everything comes with a price. 3. In my early 20s, at one of my sales jobs, I worked for Gene, who owned a small automotive parts rebuilding business. In the late afternoons, after I returned to the shop, I often saw him manning the counter, tending to walk-in business. At times, discussion of price for a part led to haggling. When Gene had his fill of the conversation, he’d politely show the would-be patron the exit door. After the customer left, he’d turn to me and say, “I want all the good business I can get, but that’s not good business.” Later, when I owned my own marine construction business, I’d recall his words when it became apparent that a prospective client was asking for charity, rather than service. 4. Some years ago, I would occasionally tune-in to Dave Ramsey's radio program as pitiful callers related their financial predicaments to Dave, then listen to his response. Ramsey created his niche among listeners woefully in debt, often from overspending. As he quickly worked through their problems, he had his ear tuned to hear of spending he considered unnecessary. “Would you borrow money to buy that?” he’d ask. That logic probably doesn’t resonate with everyone, but it did with me. As my wife and I were paying down our debt, I came to view every dollar that wasn’t buying a necessity or paying off a loan as borrowed money. That thinking may have cut down our fun, but it quickly shrunk our debt, as well. 5. Sometime in early 2009, with the stock market down over 50% from its peak in October 2007, a young co-worker asked me if I was still buying stocks. I told her I was “buying all I can.” At the time, my talk was more bravado than bravery. I knew stocks were on sale, but I was still shaky from seeing my savings cut in half. Looking back, I’m glad I followed my head, instead of my gut.
Read more »

Almost There

After years of retirement planning, the day has indeed arrived—almost. I’ve recently become a part-timer, working just three days each week in the outpatient physical therapy clinic, plus one Saturday per month at the acute-care hospital. Though I may be just semi-retired, the load already feels a whole lot lighter. How so? For starters, I’m focusing less on gaining more from my job. Oh, I’m still keen to treat patients. That’s what drew me to physical therapy in the first place. But I’m stepping back from the sundry other jobs that have attached themselves to me. Instead, I’ll nudge the younger folks toward new responsibilities as I concentrate on giving my best to a shorter schedule. How short? I’ve trimmed my three workdays to eight hours each, with afternoons free for other pursuits. My brief week of short days feels like a perpetual weekend, with its mix of work and play. There are trade-offs, of course. Shorter hours leave me with less earned income. In exchange, I get more disposable time. How to spend it?  Home provides plenty of projects. My list is long, from a bedroom and bath renovation inside to demolishing and resurrecting storage buildings outside. Though I enjoy both the planning and the labor, I’ll probably employ a hybrid of do-it-yourself and hired help. Other tasks–like breaking up the concrete footing and floor of the old chicken house I tore down two years ago–I’ll have to tackle myself. There is little room for equipment, and manual laborers are scarce. My garden beckons as well, especially the vegetables. From the peas I plant in January to the tomatoes of summer, I have vegetables in the garden and on the table every month of the year. That’s not a boast, just the product of my passion for nurturing plants to grow and yield fruit, and my family’s appetite for their taste.  My wife reminds me, however, that work shouldn’t consume all our retirement time. She’s ready for some leisure, especially travel. Alas, there’s a hitch to her plans. Our mothers are closing in on the century mark. Each continues to live in her home, which we fully endorse, but require help from us. As a result, our wandering is tethered by familial responsibility. Between family pulling one hand and the lure of play the other, where’s the balance as my wife and I seek to find fun together? We’ve found part of the answer close to home. For the last couple of decades, my wife and I have sacrificed our shared time to donate to busy, separate schedules. We are ready to reclaim that time, beginning with sunrise walks on my days off work. The exercise is moderate, but the conversation supplies substantial emotional nourishment. I’m reminded of the “windshield time” of a long drive together.  For real food, we’re venturing farther afield. We both love a good barbeque joint, but our standard meal is heavy on lighter fare. Since quality restaurants are scarce in small-town Georgia, especially those that serve the kind of fresh ingredients we prefer, we’re prepared to drive. After polling friends, we compiled a list of restaurants to check out in the surrounding communities. We’ve heard of married couples scheduling “date nights” to get a break from home life, but we have never indulged–until now. If our local plans sound unambitious, then so will our travel itinerary. Yes, we’re now just partly-employed, with a lot more free time to devote to one of my wife’s loves. But as I indicated above, we feel bound to stay near home. We figure a five to six hour drive is the limit of our leash. Rather than sit home and sulk, we’re determined to ferret-out enough fun within this perimeter to keep us busy until our circumstances change. Our first area of focus is the locale where our daughter attends college. Her school sits atop a mountain overlooking the small city where my wife found her first physical therapy job. We’ve moved a few hours away, but make annual return trips. We've sampled nearly every attraction on offer there, but our current plan puts us on the hunt for different game.  Our new strategy calls for frequent, short trips to create an extended, intermittent vacation. Our main base is a cozy Airbnb with enough amenities to feel like a second home. It lies in a quiet neighborhood, 15 walking minutes from an ice cream shop and a few restaurants, and a short drive from dozens of others.  But its best feature is proximity to miles of hiking trails. A five-minute stroll puts us on a trail up the mountain. From there, we can choose to loop back to our start in an hour or two, or make a day of it. We can even wander over to the college campus for a chat with our daughter.  For my daughter’s Easter break from classes, we traveled to our new spot to keep her on site to prepare for final exams. We did most of the hiking while she did all of the studying, but one morning the three of us drove across town for a few hours’ scrambling over boulders beside a cascading stream. I won’t say the walk was on par with the wilder trails we’ve trod, but on the trip back to our lodging we stopped to dig into a decent Mediterranean lunch. This style of hiking has its appeal. Our new lifestyle may be termed “retirement-lite” by folks who have permanently replaced their work schedules with weekday tee times and travel plans, but it fits us well. It affords me a measure of the work that soothes my psyche, while providing my wife with temporary relief from her travel itch. And it gives us both more of the element that has been missing from our lives for too long–time with each other.
Read more »

Passing It On

I KNOW I'M NOT WISE. Still, I’ve picked up enough wisdom to realize I didn’t have much of it when I was younger. At the very least, 60 years of stubbed toes, slips and falls have shown me that some paths shouldn’t be trod, while a few are worth traveling. I try to refrain from offering unsolicited advice. But I’ve lately had a growing desire to steer young adults toward choices that escaped my notice when I was their age—with a focus on three areas: Think about who came before us. As young adults, we frequently encounter situations that are new to us, but perhaps not to old timers. For instance, on the first day at a new job, or maybe as a new member at a place of worship, notice that you’re stepping into a structure that’s already in place. The old guys and gals may be doing a lot wrong, but they must also be doing something right. Asking for advice before offering it can ease acceptance of a brilliant idea, and may even help refine and improve it. I still cringe at the memory of situations when I failed to recognize my cluelessness. In the investment world, a plunging 401(k) can be unnerving for a first-timer. At such a moment, encouraging words from someone who’s seen a downturn or two can ease a young investor’s jitters. Meanwhile, in a buoyant market, young investors may be blind to risks that often go unnoticed by the uninitiated. It’s also good to remember that we can be a newbie, even when we’re old. Every year, I sail into unfamiliar waters, but that doesn’t mean they’re uncharted. Chances are, someone has tackled the task before or faced the same financial decision. If I’m smart enough to recognize my ignorance, the advice I need may be there for the asking. Think about who comes after us. During my middle years, I often focused only on meeting my own goals and responsibilities, with little thought beyond myself. I strove to keep up with the demands placed on my brain and my time by work, family and others. I must admit, it often seemed easier and more efficient to do a job myself, rather than teach another how it’s done. I may have also lacked the ability, and perhaps the humility, to relinquish control to someone else. In recent years, I’ve realized such thinking is short-sighted. I’ve begun to reflect on the responsibility I had to the brand new members of my circle, and how in the past I might have failed them. To make amends, I’ve begun reaching back not only to those just starting out, but also to colleagues just a few steps farther from the finish line than I am. Part of my exit plan is to help these busy people in their own middle years avoid my mistake—and recognize the value of training those who are younger. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] For example, at work, there are myriad ways that seasoned physical therapists can nurture younger ones. One important way is through clinical education, which is essential to turning out new rehab professionals. Each licensed therapist learned the ropes from an experienced therapist. I willingly devote extra time organizing our clinical education and encouraging our physical, occupational and speech therapists to give back to their profession. In my own life, the experience of caring for older relatives has taught my wife and me that eventually we’ll probably need to rely on someone who has intimate knowledge of nearly every aspect of our lives. That person is most likely our daughter. With that in mind, in addition to the training and parental support appropriate for a teen on the cusp of young adulthood, we sneak in topics that cover the broad continuum of her life and ours. We have begun sharing details of our finances and our plans for the future. I also encourage strangers to foster newcomers. Last year, when a friendly, young phlebotomist gave me much appreciated painless service, I called her supervisor to suggest she recognize the worker for her superior performance. About the same time, before a medical procedure, a timid, young nurse failed in her attempts to start my IV. An older nurse took over and quickly found the vein, but also found time to needle the novice about her inexperience. Before she left, I complimented the expert, but also suggested she give the young nurse some pointers. Think about what lies ahead. When I was young, time seemed such a cheap commodity. I thought I had years before I needed to start on the nitty-gritty of a financial plan. I also wondered who could possibly know what to plan for. I now realize I was wrong on both counts. Back then, even though I didn’t know it, I was in desperate need of good advice. If I live long enough, I’ll outlive my ability to earn money, but not the need or desire to buy the necessities and niceties of life. To accumulate enough funds, decades of diligent saving and investing are required. Even unknown events, like an early death or disabling injury, should be prepared for with life and disability insurance. Ed Marsh is a physical therapist who lives and works in a small community near Atlanta. He likes to spend time with his church, with his family and in his garden thinking about retirement. His favorite question to ask a young person is, "Are you saving for retirement?" Check out Ed's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Too Close for Comfort

WHEN I STARTED investing, I never thought much about risk, partly because I didn’t recognize that there were any. The investor questionnaires always placed me in the aggressive category. Even though I never ventured much beyond mutual funds, all were pure stock funds, except for a small position in a balanced fund that I briefly owned. I didn’t know much, but I had learned that stocks most likely meant growth over the long haul, and that’s what I wanted. Around age 50, I added some bond funds, but they were less than 10% of my total holdings. A few years later, on the advice of a fee-only financial planner, I moved more money into bonds, but my heart wasn’t in it. My allocation to bonds remained at less than 20%. Still, I thought I should take the advice I’d paid for. I had read about risk tolerance, and of the danger that investors find out too late that they weren’t as brave as they imagined. I understood that panic selling after a large market drop would be devastating to retirement savings, but I couldn’t relate. I had experienced a few declines since I started investing in 1998 and, while not fun, I never considered selling. Even so, I mentally filed the information away, knowing I had been humbled by hubris before. Sure enough, the early 2020 pandemic crash brought a new attitude. My head and my hands executed what I had learned were the right moves. I bought stocks, but I was also stung by my losses. This may have been compounded by the turmoil in my health care job. The seed of a new emotion was planted, but it barely had a chance to germinate because the market came roaring back. The rapid recovery and upward march of stocks after the 2020 crash was exciting. Checking my account balance was fun. But it also got me to look more closely at my retirement plan. I was five or six years from retirement. As my last year of work approached, I had planned to move gradually from stocks to short-term bonds and cash. I wanted to wind up with about five years of spending money that was protected from a stock market drop. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] But then that unfamiliar emotion, which had cropped up in early 2020, began growing again. It felt like my time horizon had suddenly shortened. After years of being a distant goal, it seemed like retirement was upon me. As the market rose through 2020 and into 2021, so did my uneasiness. There were other considerations, too. I liked my work, but I had begun yearning to spend at least some time on other pursuits. Also, my wife and I both had mothers over age 90 living semi-independently at home. I could envision a need to commit more time to them. On top of that, my wife had a brother in assisted living who already required more time than we could really afford to give. The upshot of all this rumination: My wife and I decided to move some of our future retirement spending money out of stocks immediately, rather than doing it gradually as my planned retirement age approached. Even so, 70% of our portfolio is still invested in stocks. We aren’t ready to fully retire. As long as things remain calm on the home front, our plan is to keep working and buying more stocks. But we wanted enough flexibility to handle an unexpected change in income over the next few years. I can’t claim that our decision was purely logical. But taking some risk out of our portfolio took some tension out of our lives. Did we make the right move at the right time? Looking back through the sunshine, I can see that stocks continued to grow after we sold—even after factoring in this year’s decline—and we missed out on some of that growth. We couldn’t have predicted that at the time, as we peered through the fog into the future. But I can tell you that today I’m glad we took some money off the table. Ed Marsh is a physical therapist who lives and works in a small community near Atlanta. He likes to spend time with his church, with his family and in his garden thinking about retirement. His favorite question to ask a young person is, "Are you saving for retirement?" Check out Ed's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Building Memories by Edmund Marsh

When my wife asked for a hint for the Father’s Day present I was hankering to get, I was stumped for a day or so. I don’t need a new tie or wallet, or the new garden tool that I sometimes suggest. My eventual answer didn’t surprise her, but she was amused. I’ve asked my daughter to answer two questions: What’s the origin of Father’s Day in our country, and does she think it’s worth observing? I already know the answer to the first question. The idea was born in the mind of a young woman who admired her father, but didn’t gain traction until championed by men’s wear retailers hoping to profit from the gift-giving. I figure the story will entertain my daughter, since she’s savvy to the commercial aspect of holidays, and loves to pick out the logical fallacies in an advertiser’s argument. But I’m curious to know how these feelings influence her answer to my second question. For me, the answer is yes, and I’m certain I’ll always honor the memory of my own father on Father’s Day. My father liked to work. As a young man, he poured many hours into his automotive service business, and later his jobs as a school administrator and county school superintendent. Never content with the limits of a regular business day, he also enlisted early morning, evening and Saturday hours to work out a new bus route, write a grant proposal or even build a new set of shelves for an office or classroom. I was usually recruited to help with the handy-man projects, even at a young age. The skills I learned during our labor have served me for a lifetime, though I was hardly a cheerful apprentice at the time. For him, on the other hand, work was a pleasure. But he worked at having fun, as well. He liked to hunt, and he was good at it, because he studied the game and practiced until he mastered it. As a boy, I benefited from his love of his hobby. We spent hours together during the season, and forged memories shared only by us. Decades later, I was shocked the day he told me a brain tumor was the cause of his recent headaches. He was about the age I am now. In typical fashion, the morning after a surgery to remove the tumor, he was out of bed and ready to go home and back to work. He returned to his job to complete his last four-year term as county school superintendent at age 66. In the early years of his retirement, he embarked on a flurry of building projects. First up was remodeling his own house, then my brother’s. And there were community jobs as well, such as constructing an outdoor pavilion attached to the old railroad depot for the local historical society and charitable handy-man work through his church. At age 71, he agreed to devote his time to a multi-year project to help me rebuild the house I now live in. His age gave him an edge, for he was schooled in the construction of old houses. In the beginning, it was a chore to keep pace with him. I worked full-time as a physical therapist, with off hours spent on the house, but he worked even when I was away. He was driven by the ticking clock and wanted to help me while he still could. His mind was tireless and he pushed his body beyond the point of exhaustion. A vivid memory illustrates his restless devotion: One weekend, as we sat in his truck gazing at the sagging joists and half-rotted decking of the dilapidated dock on my pond, he slyly asked what business I once plied. I sheepishly admitted I used to be a dock builder, and agreed my present dock was shameful. The following weekend, I was surprised to discover the dock had been repaired. My father had used his sleepless time in the wee hours to do the work by the headlights of his truck. My father’s brain cancer returned a dozen years after he was first diagnosed. That time, he received computer-guided radiation that killed the tumor, but also some of the surrounding brain tissue. Initially, his cognition was noticeably affected, but he improved, to slowly decline in the ensuing years. My father lived more than a decade after his second treatment, but he was not the same man. My overriding memories, however, are of the man who gave the last part of his best self doing all he could to help his family, until he could do no more. I hope my daughter will cherish a similar memory of me.
Read more »

Looking to Leap

I'M THINKING ABOUT retirement—again. But this time, it isn’t my retirement, but rather my wife’s. I earn our family’s primary paycheck, so I’m usually the focus of our discussions when we sit down to scrutinize the numbers and comb through the calendar, looking for a date when we should each hang up our physical therapist’s goniometer. Even though I earn the bigger income, my wife has diligently worked just as long as I have, albeit in a changing capacity. In our 30s, we each began second careers as physical therapists at more or less the same time. I talked her into a blind date the week I started my first physical therapy job. She graduated PT school a couple of months later, and began work shortly thereafter. For five of the first seven years of our marriage, we spent most of our work days side-by-side in the same outpatient clinic. After our daughter was born, my wife’s hours on the job dwindled, while her responsibilities at home increased. On weekdays, she now applies her experience as a former high school biology teacher to instructing our daughter at home. On top of that, she acts as caregiver to family members, including round-the-clock on-call assistance for any needs that arise. And then, of course, there’s the usual tasks involved in keeping up a home. I help, but the brunt of the burden falls on my wife. Despite her hectic schedule, my wife continues to make a small but significant contribution at our workplace. She gives a few hours each month, plus some holidays, at our acute care hospital. Every few months, I ask if she’s ready to retire from her work away from home. My question brings a thoughtful expression, then the same reply of “not yet.” Our ongoing conversation about our respective retirement dates would have been rare a couple of generations ago. Planning for a joint retirement is a fairly recent phenomenon. Retirement planning was once a mostly solo endeavor, even for married couples. In most families, the husband was the sole breadwinner. The income side of the family’s economic life revolved around his career, with the wife playing a supporting role. The latter part of the 20th century witnessed a huge demographic shift. Women started pouring into the workforce. The percentage of women working doubled from 34% in 1950 to 60% in 2000. Last year, the figure stood at about 57%, and was even higher, at 60%, for women in the pre-retirement ages of 55 to 64. With dual incomes came a new challenge for couples—how to coordinate two retirements. Researchers note that retirement is increasingly complex, with variables that include when to call it quits, whether to move or not, how to use our time in retirement, and the implications of declining health. Doubling those factors with the addition of another person compounds the planning intricacies. Not all couples are adept at this financial dance, though they may not readily admit it. Seven out of 10 respondents to Fidelity Investments' 2021 couples and money study say they communicate at least very well about financial issues. But a deeper look at specific retirement topics reveals 48% disagree on the retirement date. Also, 51% are out of sync on the size of the nest egg necessary to retire, and a significant number lose sleep thinking about it. Additional worries are retirement health care expenses, outliving savings and being derailed by economic conditions beyond their control. The Fidelity survey also found gender continues to influence the planning partnership, with men more frequently taking the lead on longer-term retirement and investment planning. But in our case, the situation is more nuanced, because my wife has more of the planner personality. Against this backdrop, my wife and I dance to our own beat. Still, we’re not far out of step with other couples as we ponder if we’re retirement ready. We share the familiar financial concerns about income and insurance during retirement, along with the subjective query: Will retirement make me happier? I’m not yet ready for a permanent vacation, but how does my wife answer those questions? Income. When we launched our life together, my wife and I earned essentially the same amount. We also both started saving and investing for retirement with our first paychecks, kicking it off with 401(k)s and then soon adding IRAs. In the beginning, though, we followed different paths in choosing our funds. We even compared performance in a friendly competition. Eventually, however, we came to view our individual accounts as part of the same portfolio, a perspective that aids optimal planning. While I tend to take the lead in longer-term planning, my wife is thoroughly versed on our overall money plan and intimately involved in every decision. She also handles the daily money chores, and knows how much money flows in and out of our household accounts. For these reasons, she’s aware that the loss of her income wouldn’t create financial headaches. Insurance. My employer currently provides health insurance for my family and me. Even if I go part-time, we’re still covered. If I decide to retire fulltime at age 65—a little over three years’ away—Medicare will insure me. But at that juncture, my wife will be 62 and not yet eligible for Medicare. We’ll need to buy a private policy for her and our daughter, which we may pay for with my wife’s Social Security. According to Mike Piper’s Open Social Security calculator, 62 is the best age for her to claim, with me waiting until age 70. Emotion. When our young lives are weighed down with work, and retirement is a distant dream, it’s hard to imagine postponing the day we call it quits. Yet, when the moment arrives, the choice can bring indecision and even trepidation. The path ahead may appear greener, but who knows how much we’ll miss what we leave behind? My wife and I have a good bit of the interdependence—a “melding of the minds” in a relationship—that’s shown to be helpful during the shift to retirement. Still, I’m giving her room to decide when to give up her paycheck. Initially, she held onto her few hours of work as a caution and a comfort, just in case my income disappeared. Keeping a foot in the door would have allowed her to jump back in more easily. That concern should have faded as our savings grew, but old habits often die slowly. Maybe there’s still a sliver of uncertainty lurking in her mind. Her real hang up may be her feelings of guilt about leaving me to carry the weight by myself. But the weight isn’t solely on my shoulders. How does she retire from being a daughter, wife and mother? Even when she finally leaves her job behind, she’ll still only be half-retired. Ed Marsh is a physical therapist who lives and works in a small community near Atlanta. He likes to spend time with his church, with his family and in his garden thinking about retirement. His favorite question to ask a young person is, "Are you saving for retirement?" Check out Ed's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »