FREE NEWSLETTER

The Edge of Indifference

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Mark Crothers on 10/15/2025

I don’t know if there’s an academic term for one aspect of my personality. I honestly struggle to articulate what it is. The best I can do is describe it as a total lack of emotional investment in the political and economic situation in the world around me, an absence of the ability to deeply care about the personalities and themes of the great political and financial stage. It puzzles me that people feel so passionately about these events and figures.

The contradiction is that I’m intellectually engaged and interested in the financial and business landscape and the underlying economic systems supporting the world economy. As for politics, I’m totally agnostic. My only interest is in how the leader of the moment’s policies intersect with the economy and their impact on the financial world. Beyond that, our political mob could be from Mars for all I care.

So why am I sharing this personal worldview? It’s simple: I have many annoying facets, but the detachment I’ve described is, I think, the state we should aspire toward in our financial and particularly our investment lives.

What I call “detachment” can be viewed as prioritization. I’m not emotionless, I care about understanding the systems. I don’t care about the hyperbolic theatre that accompanies actual events. I process political information for its long-term, systemic impact, a change in corporate tax rates, a shift in regulatory framework, and immediately discard the rhetoric and personality clashes.

I feel some investors get burned because they conflate the globe’s economic systems with the political and media circus. The economy operates on innovation, productivity, and wealth generation. The circus is a nonstop source of short-term noise, driven by election cycles, geopolitical shocks, and breathless financial headlines.

This noise is specifically engineered to bypass your rational thought process. Behavioral finance tells us it triggers our deepest cognitive biases, such as loss aversion, which makes us twice as likely to panic-sell to avoid a perceived loss, or herd mentality, which pushes us to follow the crowd, often right into stretched valuations. This emotional coercion, often framed as indispensable “analysis,” is the primary destroyer of long-term wealth.

What my personal disposition really amounts to is a form of Stoicism applied directly to capital. The central idea is simple: focus your energy only on what you can control. The Stoic investor knows that the identity of the person in office, the daily market fluctuation, and the geopolitical crisis of the hour are all firmly in the column of the uncontrollable.

Although it’s a natural part of my makeup, I feel these characteristics are worth cultivating for any investor. Automate your decision-making away from the emotional brain. Consume information for its data and reject the drama. When the market, fueled by anxiety, is screaming, remind yourself that you are merely witnessing the emotional masses temporarily mispricing assets. Your goal is not to predict the next short-term move but to survive the noise with your discipline, and your portfolio, intact.

Emotional detachment isn’t a lack of feeling; it’s a choice of where to direct your precious energy. Feel what you want about the world. Just don’t let it touch the portfolio. The market will always offer you an emotional reason to act. Your edge is refusing to take it.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bbbobbins
1 day ago

Lots of things are uncontrollable on an individual level. Doesn’t mean we should totally ignore them. A politically invoked nuclear conflict anywhere will be pretty damaging to all the world’s citizens and could more than rewrite existing financial systems.

It pays where possible to elect political leaders who can compromise.

Mike Gaynes
1 day ago

I envy you your detachment, Mark. It would be healthier for me if I were able to duplicate it.

Humble Reader
2 days ago

I remember on the day of the 9-11 attacks, while almost everyone in the office I worked at was huddled in front of the TV monitor in the lunch room, I spent the day working at my desk as usual, with only occasional updates about the day’s events. It is not that I did not care about the unfolding tragedy. It is because I had long learned how to compartmentalize my emotions. Once I understood what was happening, I also knew that there was not anything at all I could do on that day that would make any difference. So I continued my normal work routine.

And yes, this separation of emotion from investment decisions is definitely a trait that would benefit any investor. After all, it’s only money.
 

DAN SMITH
2 days ago
Reply to  Humble Reader

… separation of emotion from investment decisions is definitely a trait that would benefit any investor.
Exactly!

R Quinn
2 days ago

History is full of examples of what happens when a society becomes detached from what is happening in their country, the world. It never goes well economically or otherwise.

R Quinn
2 days ago
Reply to  Mark Crothers

But you may want to expand your attachment. 😎

Edmund Marsh
2 days ago

It sounds like you’re describing an ear trained to recognize a pitch, and you aren’t buying. It’s usually wise to be slow in shifting a position, whether it’s our opinion or our portfolio.

Free Newsletter

SHARE