FREE NEWSLETTER

The Anatomy of a Threshold Rebalance: April 2025

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Mark Crothers on 3/13/2026

I drink the odd can of Coke Zero — sugar free, caffeine free. Unfortunately the caffeine free version is rarely on offer, but on those odd occasions when I discover it at a good discount I buy multiple cases. I enjoy a good bargain.

My instinct for a bargain extends to my retirement portfolio. I scratch that itch by having a policy statement around rebalancing during market volatility. Normally I only rebalance once a year, but my policy statement has a clause to enact a threshold rebalance if the equity portion of my portfolio drops more than 15% — a once and done strategy. It’s only been triggered four times in the last ten years. While it’s not a process everyone would be comfortable with, I thought you might find it interesting to see what it looked like in April 2025.

The “Liberation Day” tariff announcement triggered a tariff tantrum in global equity markets, with a corresponding drop of 15% that activated my rebalance strategy. Being a few weeks away from completing the sale of my business and entering retirement, I nearly decided not to bother, but after a few hours of contemplating I thought “what the hell” and went ahead anyway.

It’s not a difficult thing to do. I simply identified the overweight bond allocation and sold down into the underweight equity portion of my portfolio. The swap brought my asset allocation back to target with a few clicks of a mouse on the Vanguard website. I wasn’t buying the dip on a gut feeling, it was happening because my rules mandated a return to my target allocation after a 15% drop. No emotion required.

One small but worthwhile footnote: I carried out the rebalance within a tax-advantaged account, which meant no capital gains tax to worry about, the swap happened in a sheltered environment and I could act without a tax bill arriving the following spring. Whether that’s relevant to you depends entirely on your own account structure and circumstances, so it’s worth a moment’s thought before you click. The mechanics of a rebalance are simple; the type of account you do it in can matter quite a bit.

After that I ignored the market noise and political kerfuffle and got on with my life, which at that stage meant dealing with all the small hassles that come with selling a business.

So what was the outcome? It turned out there was a very small window of opportunity to capture the equity sell-off. Within three days the market stabilised and started to rebound. The capital I redeployed from bonds into stocks outperformed the rest of my equity portfolio by a margin of 20% over the following nine months, all because of a simple rebalance back to target allocation.

Would I have regretted it if I hadn’t bothered? Honestly, probably not. My portfolio was already built to carry me through retirement, the rebalance was a bonus, not a necessity. Missing the equity discount would have been a bit like walking past the Coke Zero on offer and shrugging. Nice when it works out, but the day goes on perfectly well either way.

Would I do it again? Yes, because the policy says so, not because I knew how it would turn out. The rebalance worked well this time. Next time the market might keep falling for another six months after I pull the trigger. The point isn’t the outcome, it’s having a rule you can execute without needing to be right.

I’ve since retired, sold the business, and opened a fresh can of Coke Zero. The portfolio is back to target allocation and the policy statement sits in a drawer, waiting for the next tantrum. Although, at the moment, I’m more interested in finding some discounted coke zero, my stash is running low.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Gardner
1 hour ago

You are very bold since the day you made the rebalance; it was a coin toss! Taco was still a tasty Mexican dish on that day 🙂

I asked Claude to do some research for me and here is what it told me:

“Liberation Day’s VIX spike to 52 and ~19% S&P drawdown ranked among the worst in history by speed, but the market treated it as a reversible policy shock rather than a structural crisis like 2008 or COVID (both VIX 80+). The full round-trip took just three months — compared to five months for COVID and four years for the GFC — because the source of uncertainty had a visible off-switch.”

Last edited 1 hour ago by Mark Gardner
David Lancaster
5 hours ago

Mark,
Have you ever considered one additional mechanism that I utilize to harvest drops in the market? As I have written previously I rebalance quarterly to our target allocation as we are living off our investments until we claim Social Security at 70. One other trigger that I use in my (unwritten) investment policy statement. When there is a market correction (5% drop from the recent high) I overweight my portfolio towards stocks by 5%, and when a bear market (10% drop) occurs I overweight it by 10%. After that I keep the overweight position until the market reaches a new high, but quarterly rebalance to those higher targets. During COVID I kept investing more at every 5% drop with the last purchase within days of the bottom, but in that case sold back 5% at every 5% increase in the market as I was not sure how long the market would be depressed. I made a fair profit, but if I had been greedier I could have made a killing.

Last edited 5 hours ago by David Lancaster
Mark Gardner
1 hour ago

I think this strategy works in fast V shaped recoveries but not so sure about bear markets like the 2000 one. You might want to backtest your approach and see how it would have done. I didn’t own any bonds back in 2000, but I vividly remember the cuts from catching that falling knife.

Free Newsletter

SHARE