FREE NEWSLETTER

Money inherited is money that wasn’t worked for. Don’t be surprised if it gets squandered.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Shopping around – you versus the grocery store

"But people who don't have a coupon do pay that full price, right? The store knows what percentage of customers use the coupon, and what percentage do not, on each item. They can adjust their prices based on these percentages to get the revenue they need from that item."
- Ormode
Read more »

Somebody Has to Win

HOW DO YOU COMPETE in an investment contest when you’re a firm believer that investors can’t consistently beat the market averages? That was my dilemma several years ago.

A school not far from where I taught was given money by an alumnus to endow the St. Louis Area Collegiate Investment Contest. All colleges and universities in the area are invited to participate in the competition, which is held regularly. Each is given a hypothetical $1 million and asked to select 20 value stocks. An outside investment firm oversees the contest. They “invest” $50,000 in each of the 20 stocks. Whoever’s portfolio is worth the most two years later wins $10,000—real dollars, that is.

How do we select the 20 stocks for our entry? When I explain the contest to students, I also discuss the evidence that most investors don’t outperform the market. I suggest we could tape the stock pages of The Wall Street Journal to the wall and literally throw darts at it. Several students like this option.

But instead, I distribute Value Line’s current list of 100 stocks most likely to outperform the stock market over the next year. To focus on value stocks, I take these 100 stocks deemed most likely to outperform, circle the 40 or so companies with the lowest price-earnings ratios and ask students to select stocks from this list.

Value Line Investment Survey, which is often available at larger libraries, evaluates approximately 1,700 stocks. Value Line gives each stock a timeliness rating from one to five, indicating its belief that the stock will outperform the market over the next year. My initial list for the students draws on those stocks rated one for timeliness.

Rating             Number of Stocks    Meaning

1                      100                             Most likely to outperform

2                      300

3                      900

4                      300

5                      100                             Least likely to outperform

Value Line has a full-page analysis of each of these 1,700 stocks. Each stock gets a full review every 13 weeks, which means each week it updates this detailed analysis for about 130 stocks. But each week, all 1,700 stocks are evaluated for timeliness.

Some 30 or 40 years ago, there were a few academic studies indicating that Value Line could outperform the market averages. I have seen no recent independent studies of Value Line. My guess is that any advantage Value Line might have had decades ago no longer exists.

While I don’t believe Value Line will outperform the market, it’s one way to narrow down the list of potential stocks. It’s definitely safer than letting college students throw darts in a classroom.

Six schools entered the first contest. We won, receiving $10,000 and an oversized check. I took the check to our next faculty meeting and bragged about our business students. Most faculty assumed I had superior stock-picking skills, and I did not disabuse them of that view. But in my heart, I firmly believed it was just luck.

Six years later, we won again. If six schools enter each year, we ought to win about every six years. I didn’t point out that obvious fact when I went to the faculty meeting with that oversized check.

The very next year, we won again. Did that indicate we had a winning method? No. If six schools enter, and if the winner is completely random, the chance of this year’s winner winning again next year is one out of six. While my method of picking stocks might be superior, I believe two wins in a row is simply a random occurrence.

Recently, the contest was modified. Instead of starting just once a year, it now starts every semester. The payoff for winning was reduced from $10,000 once a year to $5,000 each semester. The number of participating schools has dropped to just four or five, increasing our odds of winning each contest.

Although I'm now retired, our school continues to follow the above method. Over the years, we have won $35,000. We call it our slush fund. Our department has used that money for additional faculty enrichment opportunities, student awards, end-of-the-year catered dinners for graduates and their families, and a host of other good causes. Perhaps most important, our finance students have learned some important lessons about how the stock market works.

Larry Sayler is the only person with a Wharton MBA who also graduated from Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey’s Clown College. Earlier in his career, he served as CFO for three manufacturing and service organizations. For 16 years before his retirement, Larry taught accounting at a small Christian college in the Midwest. His brother Kenyon also writes for HumbleDollar. Check out Larry's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

One World, One Kind of Work

"Thank you Jack. When I was in Costa Rica a young man showed us the home he had built on his family plot. It was a simple home but the pride, joy and humbleness that he showed has stayed with me."
- Andrew Clements
Read more »

How Far Behind is the IRS?

"This is a ridiculous but common situation, I have seen amendments take two years to process. Cutting jobs at the service is costing the government billions in lost revenue. Another way the slow processing costs taxpayers money is the interest the IRS will pay your mom for the delay, I think currently 6%.  I’ll probably get yelled at for bringing this up. While speaking to the IRS, did they happen to suggest that your mom could go ahead and pay the balance due from 2025? Doing so might help your mom to not stress about the situation. "
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

California, Here They Came

"It's so interesting to hear these stories of people on the move, Dana. It takes gumption to do what they (and you) did. Thanks for sharing!"
- D.J.
Read more »

Note to HD Writers and Contributors

"Posts with more than one link are held for moderation."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

For Richer, For Poorer: 37 Years of Compounding

"Today you would keep all three in order to make it the first three years of marriage with at least one functioning toaster, as now a days you have replace them annually when they break. As I have said to my wife we put a man on the moon nearly 60 years ago, but we can’t seem to manufacture a toaster that lasts much more than a year"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Treasury Tax Reporting

IF YOU HAVE a Money Market Fund (e.g. VUSXX, VMFXX), Treasury fund (e.g. SGOV), or any other Treasury ETF (e.g. VBIL), you need to know how to report it on your taxes correctly. If you don’t, you are overpaying on your state taxes unknowingly. 

How and why?

These funds hold U.S. Treasury Bills. Treasuries are exempt from state and local taxes. Of course, this only matters if you hold these funds in a taxable brokerage account, which most people do.

The broker sends you a 1099-DIV form, but it’s your responsibility to figure out how to report it on your taxes correctly. By the way, bad tax preparers can miss this sometimes, or if you self-prepare, this may be something you aren't aware of (I hope most of you reading HumbleDollar are familiar with this!)

This is one of those areas where the reporting rules are technically simple, but the execution is where people mess up. The IRS gets their share regardless (since interest is fully taxable at the federal level), but if you don’t adjust properly, your state will too, even when it shouldn’t.

The 1099-DIV doesn’t break out how much of the dividend was allocated to Treasuries. The software also wouldn’t know how much based on the 1099-DIV. This means that you generally have to figure out how to report it (or ensure your CPA does it correctly).

Now, the 1099-DIV will have a breakdown of every single stock/ETF you have, but you have to find out the percentage of a fund that holds Treasuries.

This percentage is not on your brokerage statement. It comes directly from the fund provider (Vanguard, iShares, Schwab, etc), usually buried in their “tax center” or “year-end tax supplement” pages.

Let me give you an actual example.

Say, in 2025, you received $5,000 of dividends from two funds.

Then, if you scroll down, you will see a “Detail Information” of your dividends:

Interest

We can see that $2,456.78 came from Vanguard Federal Money Market fund.

The entire $2,456.78 will be taxed at the federal level, but how do we figure out what’s taxed at the state level?

This is where the extra step comes is.

During the end of the year, the fund manager (e.g Vanguard for VMFXX) will post a “US government source income information” on their Tax page.

This report tells you what portion of the fund’s income is derived from U.S. government obligations (Treasuries), which is the key to the state tax exemption.

VMFXX

We can see that 66.61% of VMFXX holdings for the 2025 tax year were income derived from the U.S. government and, therefore, are not taxable at the state level.

So, we would take $2,456.78 * 0.6661 = $1,636. Of the total, $1,636 is derived from U.S. obligations, and you would only pay state taxes on the remaining ~$819.

That $2,456.78 is still fully taxable federally. This is strictly a state adjustment.

It’s also important to note that some states say "if less than 50% of the fund is from the U.S. government (like Treasury Bills), you can treat it as 0%.”

For example, California, Connecticut, and New York are some of these states. So, if the fund has only 35% coming from the Treasury, you shouldn’t even calculate the exempt amount for these states.

Now, if you buy Treasuries directly from TreasuryDirect, they will send you a 1099-INT, and you can just enter that information directly into the tax software. No extra calculations are needed. That’s because the income is already clearly identified as U.S. government interest, no allocation required.

So, how do you report that dividend interest calculation?

In most tax softwares, after entering the 1099-DIV, it will ask: "Did a portion of dividends came from a U.S. Government interest?'

So, you would just check it off/select and enter the amount from Treasuries ($1,636 in our example).

Behind the scenes, this flows into your state return as a subtraction or adjustment, depending on the state.

Some software might ask for the percentage of dividends that are state tax exempt. However, this is a bit tricky because you might receive other dividends in your brokerage account.

In that case, calculate the amount from the Treasury, say $1,636, and divide it by your total dividend amount (e.g. $5,000)

If you have someone do your taxes and you have some of these Money Market Funds or other Treasury ETFs, double-check your state tax return and see the amounts reported. This will save you some money. It's also not too late to amend your tax return if this was missed.

Specifically, look for a “U.S. government interest subtraction” or similarly labeled line item on your state return. If it’s zero and you held these funds, that’s a red flag.

If you live in a no tax state, this would not apply to you, but still good to know in case you move!

I hope you found this one valuable.

  Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

The Vision, the Babe , Einstein and the Q

"I’ve had many great meals at Jack Stack. Famous for burnt ends. No free meals, though."
- Harold Tynes
Read more »

Is saving really that hard? Nope, not for the great majority of Americans. 

"Then this country and the future of retirement is in serious trouble. At the same time 76 million Americans attend a Disney resort each year with families spending $5,000 to $9,000 each visit and many visiting multiple times. I’m pretty sure those families are not only the upper 20% There is always money to spend, not so much to save I guess."
- R Quinn
Read more »

The great COLA debate-maybe not the expected solution.

"Richard: I agree with much of that, particularly your last sentence. Seems that should already be the case. Where I differ is that our pensions are partially funded by our employers, partially by mandatory deductions from our pay, and a very small portion, 1-2%, by the State, thus, from taxes. Most of us considered our mandatory deductions to be very much like taxes, and, of course, the portion our employers (school districts) paid was funded primarily through property taxes."
- Dave Melick
Read more »

Happy 50th!

"thanx to bogle and malkiel for helping millions of retail investors everyone should read their books"
- Kenneth Tobin
Read more »

Shopping around – you versus the grocery store

"But people who don't have a coupon do pay that full price, right? The store knows what percentage of customers use the coupon, and what percentage do not, on each item. They can adjust their prices based on these percentages to get the revenue they need from that item."
- Ormode
Read more »

Somebody Has to Win

HOW DO YOU COMPETE in an investment contest when you’re a firm believer that investors can’t consistently beat the market averages? That was my dilemma several years ago.

A school not far from where I taught was given money by an alumnus to endow the St. Louis Area Collegiate Investment Contest. All colleges and universities in the area are invited to participate in the competition, which is held regularly. Each is given a hypothetical $1 million and asked to select 20 value stocks. An outside investment firm oversees the contest. They “invest” $50,000 in each of the 20 stocks. Whoever’s portfolio is worth the most two years later wins $10,000—real dollars, that is.

How do we select the 20 stocks for our entry? When I explain the contest to students, I also discuss the evidence that most investors don’t outperform the market. I suggest we could tape the stock pages of The Wall Street Journal to the wall and literally throw darts at it. Several students like this option.

But instead, I distribute Value Line’s current list of 100 stocks most likely to outperform the stock market over the next year. To focus on value stocks, I take these 100 stocks deemed most likely to outperform, circle the 40 or so companies with the lowest price-earnings ratios and ask students to select stocks from this list.

Value Line Investment Survey, which is often available at larger libraries, evaluates approximately 1,700 stocks. Value Line gives each stock a timeliness rating from one to five, indicating its belief that the stock will outperform the market over the next year. My initial list for the students draws on those stocks rated one for timeliness.

Rating             Number of Stocks    Meaning

1                      100                             Most likely to outperform

2                      300

3                      900

4                      300

5                      100                             Least likely to outperform

Value Line has a full-page analysis of each of these 1,700 stocks. Each stock gets a full review every 13 weeks, which means each week it updates this detailed analysis for about 130 stocks. But each week, all 1,700 stocks are evaluated for timeliness.

Some 30 or 40 years ago, there were a few academic studies indicating that Value Line could outperform the market averages. I have seen no recent independent studies of Value Line. My guess is that any advantage Value Line might have had decades ago no longer exists.

While I don’t believe Value Line will outperform the market, it’s one way to narrow down the list of potential stocks. It’s definitely safer than letting college students throw darts in a classroom.

Six schools entered the first contest. We won, receiving $10,000 and an oversized check. I took the check to our next faculty meeting and bragged about our business students. Most faculty assumed I had superior stock-picking skills, and I did not disabuse them of that view. But in my heart, I firmly believed it was just luck.

Six years later, we won again. If six schools enter each year, we ought to win about every six years. I didn’t point out that obvious fact when I went to the faculty meeting with that oversized check.

The very next year, we won again. Did that indicate we had a winning method? No. If six schools enter, and if the winner is completely random, the chance of this year’s winner winning again next year is one out of six. While my method of picking stocks might be superior, I believe two wins in a row is simply a random occurrence.

Recently, the contest was modified. Instead of starting just once a year, it now starts every semester. The payoff for winning was reduced from $10,000 once a year to $5,000 each semester. The number of participating schools has dropped to just four or five, increasing our odds of winning each contest.

Although I'm now retired, our school continues to follow the above method. Over the years, we have won $35,000. We call it our slush fund. Our department has used that money for additional faculty enrichment opportunities, student awards, end-of-the-year catered dinners for graduates and their families, and a host of other good causes. Perhaps most important, our finance students have learned some important lessons about how the stock market works.

Larry Sayler is the only person with a Wharton MBA who also graduated from Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey’s Clown College. Earlier in his career, he served as CFO for three manufacturing and service organizations. For 16 years before his retirement, Larry taught accounting at a small Christian college in the Midwest. His brother Kenyon also writes for HumbleDollar. Check out Larry's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

One World, One Kind of Work

"Thank you Jack. When I was in Costa Rica a young man showed us the home he had built on his family plot. It was a simple home but the pride, joy and humbleness that he showed has stayed with me."
- Andrew Clements
Read more »

How Far Behind is the IRS?

"This is a ridiculous but common situation, I have seen amendments take two years to process. Cutting jobs at the service is costing the government billions in lost revenue. Another way the slow processing costs taxpayers money is the interest the IRS will pay your mom for the delay, I think currently 6%.  I’ll probably get yelled at for bringing this up. While speaking to the IRS, did they happen to suggest that your mom could go ahead and pay the balance due from 2025? Doing so might help your mom to not stress about the situation. "
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

California, Here They Came

"It's so interesting to hear these stories of people on the move, Dana. It takes gumption to do what they (and you) did. Thanks for sharing!"
- D.J.
Read more »

Note to HD Writers and Contributors

"Posts with more than one link are held for moderation."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

For Richer, For Poorer: 37 Years of Compounding

"Today you would keep all three in order to make it the first three years of marriage with at least one functioning toaster, as now a days you have replace them annually when they break. As I have said to my wife we put a man on the moon nearly 60 years ago, but we can’t seem to manufacture a toaster that lasts much more than a year"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Treasury Tax Reporting

IF YOU HAVE a Money Market Fund (e.g. VUSXX, VMFXX), Treasury fund (e.g. SGOV), or any other Treasury ETF (e.g. VBIL), you need to know how to report it on your taxes correctly. If you don’t, you are overpaying on your state taxes unknowingly. 

How and why?

These funds hold U.S. Treasury Bills. Treasuries are exempt from state and local taxes. Of course, this only matters if you hold these funds in a taxable brokerage account, which most people do.

The broker sends you a 1099-DIV form, but it’s your responsibility to figure out how to report it on your taxes correctly. By the way, bad tax preparers can miss this sometimes, or if you self-prepare, this may be something you aren't aware of (I hope most of you reading HumbleDollar are familiar with this!)

This is one of those areas where the reporting rules are technically simple, but the execution is where people mess up. The IRS gets their share regardless (since interest is fully taxable at the federal level), but if you don’t adjust properly, your state will too, even when it shouldn’t.

The 1099-DIV doesn’t break out how much of the dividend was allocated to Treasuries. The software also wouldn’t know how much based on the 1099-DIV. This means that you generally have to figure out how to report it (or ensure your CPA does it correctly).

Now, the 1099-DIV will have a breakdown of every single stock/ETF you have, but you have to find out the percentage of a fund that holds Treasuries.

This percentage is not on your brokerage statement. It comes directly from the fund provider (Vanguard, iShares, Schwab, etc), usually buried in their “tax center” or “year-end tax supplement” pages.

Let me give you an actual example.

Say, in 2025, you received $5,000 of dividends from two funds.

Then, if you scroll down, you will see a “Detail Information” of your dividends:

Interest

We can see that $2,456.78 came from Vanguard Federal Money Market fund.

The entire $2,456.78 will be taxed at the federal level, but how do we figure out what’s taxed at the state level?

This is where the extra step comes is.

During the end of the year, the fund manager (e.g Vanguard for VMFXX) will post a “US government source income information” on their Tax page.

This report tells you what portion of the fund’s income is derived from U.S. government obligations (Treasuries), which is the key to the state tax exemption.

VMFXX

We can see that 66.61% of VMFXX holdings for the 2025 tax year were income derived from the U.S. government and, therefore, are not taxable at the state level.

So, we would take $2,456.78 * 0.6661 = $1,636. Of the total, $1,636 is derived from U.S. obligations, and you would only pay state taxes on the remaining ~$819.

That $2,456.78 is still fully taxable federally. This is strictly a state adjustment.

It’s also important to note that some states say "if less than 50% of the fund is from the U.S. government (like Treasury Bills), you can treat it as 0%.”

For example, California, Connecticut, and New York are some of these states. So, if the fund has only 35% coming from the Treasury, you shouldn’t even calculate the exempt amount for these states.

Now, if you buy Treasuries directly from TreasuryDirect, they will send you a 1099-INT, and you can just enter that information directly into the tax software. No extra calculations are needed. That’s because the income is already clearly identified as U.S. government interest, no allocation required.

So, how do you report that dividend interest calculation?

In most tax softwares, after entering the 1099-DIV, it will ask: "Did a portion of dividends came from a U.S. Government interest?'

So, you would just check it off/select and enter the amount from Treasuries ($1,636 in our example).

Behind the scenes, this flows into your state return as a subtraction or adjustment, depending on the state.

Some software might ask for the percentage of dividends that are state tax exempt. However, this is a bit tricky because you might receive other dividends in your brokerage account.

In that case, calculate the amount from the Treasury, say $1,636, and divide it by your total dividend amount (e.g. $5,000)

If you have someone do your taxes and you have some of these Money Market Funds or other Treasury ETFs, double-check your state tax return and see the amounts reported. This will save you some money. It's also not too late to amend your tax return if this was missed.

Specifically, look for a “U.S. government interest subtraction” or similarly labeled line item on your state return. If it’s zero and you held these funds, that’s a red flag.

If you live in a no tax state, this would not apply to you, but still good to know in case you move!

I hope you found this one valuable.

  Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

The Vision, the Babe , Einstein and the Q

"I’ve had many great meals at Jack Stack. Famous for burnt ends. No free meals, though."
- Harold Tynes
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 2: WE GET one shot at making the financial journey from here to retirement—and failure is not an option, so we should save like crazy, avoid big investment bets and insure against major risks.

think

NEGATIVE BONDS. When we buy bonds, we lend to others and receive interest in return. Borrowing can be seen as a negative bond: Others lend to us—and we pay them interest. Typically, the interest rate we pay on borrowed money is higher than the yield we can earn by buying bonds. The upshot: Paying down debt is often the smartest “bond” we can buy.

humans

NO. 2: WE FOCUS on today—and shortchange tomorrow. Our nomadic ancestors didn’t worry about the long term. Instead, they focused on surviving today, which meant consuming as much as they could whenever they could. Those instincts live on within us, driving our spending, saving and investing behavior—and causing long-term financial damage.

act

CHECK YOUR retirement readiness. Try the simple calculators from AARP and Vanguard Group. Neither requires you to create an account. Each will give you a somewhat different assessment—a reminder that such projections are a rough-and-ready business. Still, you should get a sense for whether you're on track for a comfortable retirement or off the rails.

Investment math

Manifesto

NO. 2: WE GET one shot at making the financial journey from here to retirement—and failure is not an option, so we should save like crazy, avoid big investment bets and insure against major risks.

Spotlight: Lists

What Drives You?

We can all recite countless reasons for wanting money. It might be travel, sleeping well at night, early retirement, buying whatever we want or supporting our favorite charities. But if we were going to boil all this down to a single phrase that describes our key motivation, what would we choose?
Here are some possibilities:

To feel financially safe
To spend our days as we wish
To help others
To feel successful
To spend freely
To not worry about money
To leave a legacy
To demonstrate our success to others

There’s obvious overlap among some of these.

Read more »

Rules of the Road

The Forum has been live for more than two months, and it’s been a hit with readers. Each day brings an impressive number of comments and often at least a few new discussion threads. But—as your most irritating boss would remind you—there’s always room for improvement.
Here are six suggestions for Forum participants:

Don’t refer to stocks and funds by their ticker symbols or, at a minimum, not on first reference. I’ve spent my career focused on this stuff,

Read more »

Five Seasons

NICK MAGGIULLI, in his book Just Keep Buying, makes an observation about the world of personal finance: If you Google common questions—such as “how much should I save?”—you’ll receive more than 100,000 results. It’s an overwhelming amount of information. But there’s a bigger issue: Many of the answers contradict each other.
It’s the same with many other personal finance questions. How much should you hold in bonds? Do you need international stocks?

Read more »

What We Believed

THE OLDER WE GET, the easier it is to see the progress we’ve made, both as individuals and as a society. But I’m not just thinking about personal wealth, higher standards of living, better health care and extraordinary technological advances.
As I look back, I also see impressive progress in our financial thinking. Here are eight notions that were conventional wisdom half a century ago—but which today aren’t universally accepted and, in my estimation,

Read more »

Fascinating facts, at least to me

A 10 dollar investment in Berkshire-Hathaway in 1965 would now be worth about $ 500,000 large. Not bad. Or, to quote the late Bob Newhart, ” Oh boy.” ( no exclamation point)
A very financially unsophisticated  woman in New York worked for the same company for 67 years, never earning very high salaries, and when she passed away a few years ago, she had a net worth of almost ten million dollars. Long Term Capital Management had tremendous computers,

Read more »

Read This for FREE!

To my best recollection, I first came across the book Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely while on vacation. While my wife was checking out clothing and jewelry stores—a mild form of torture for me—I found a local bookstore and flipped through some of the more interesting chapters in Ariely’s book. One chapter’s thesis is that getting free stuff can be “a source of irrational excitement.” While the chapter is mostly about how our penchant for free things can be manipulated by marketers,

Read more »

Spotlight: Forsythe

Paid to Play

IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY month or so, one of our kids—and, for the married ones, that includes spouse and little ones—is on vacation. A week or two in Cabo or Cozumel, a road trip out west, or a jaunt to some other interesting destination is commonplace. How is this possible? One of the reasons, I believe, is because they don’t work for themselves. Instead, they work for big institutions, such as corporations, universities, school districts and large nonprofits. I left my position as a prosecutor with the district attorney’s office in 1983, when I got a job offer from a two-man law firm. I happily remained there until I retired in 2017. I took a lot of pride in our firm and enjoyed the independence that came with being our own bosses. But the burdens of running a small business were significant. While my partners and I helped each other in numerous ways, we had an “eat what you kill” system. My income came only from the clients I signed up and personally represented. There was no sharing among the partners. This meant that if I wasn’t working, I wasn’t earning. As I often explained to my dear wife, if we took a vacation, it was a double whammy. Not only did we have the cost of the vacation itself, but also for those days when I was away from the office and not hustling, there was less income—and no new clients. With four kids to get through college, we didn’t take many vacations. Moreover, since my partners and I each did our own work, there was no one to keep up with it while we were gone. Upon return, there were always several hectic days of catchup. But our kids and their spouses enjoy a different life. They have…
Read more »

Fashion Statement

I'VE PREVIOUSLY written about the dramatic turn my life took when I went from carefree bachelor to husband and proud father of four. With multiple college educations looming, I drastically curtailed my spending, including on my professional wardrobe. Initially, instead of the Hickey Freeman suits in which I’d previously indulged, I was happy with the latest sale at Jos. A. Bank. But eventually, I dipped my toe in uncharted waters—buying clothes on eBay. This comes with risks. It’s difficult to judge how something fits until you try it on. A safer option is a men’s consignment store where you can try before you buy. But while women’s consignment stores are plentiful, men’s tend to be scarce and, when you do find one, the selection can be limited. By contrast, the selection on eBay is vast, and there are ways to mitigate the risk. First, many eBay clothes sellers offer returns, with the buyer only paying for shipping. Better still, some sellers pick up the shipping costs on returns. In addition, reputable eBay clothes sellers will offer not only extensive photos of their wares from every angle, but also the exact measurements. What if you’re buying a suit? That’ll require alterations, but so will a retail suit off the rack. Either way, you’ll be paying for tailoring. There are other ways to mitigate the risk. If there’s a particular brand and model of shoe that you’ve previously owned, you know that—if you find the same one in your size—you’ll probably be fine. I like boat shoes. One of the high-quality brands is Sperry. When my current pair is wearing out, I know that if I can find the same or similar model in an 8½, I’m likely going to have a great fit. I’ve had similar experiences with pricey Alden and…
Read more »

Going to the Dogs

"THERE IS A VERY fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'," according to humorist Dave Barry. Some years ago, we had a weekend place—a cabin on acreage—which we greatly enjoyed, even if it did come with challenges. One thing I especially enjoyed: taking the kids on nighttime walks to see how many critters we could spot. That led to an interest in flashlights, and I collected a bunch of them. That, in turn, led to a keen interest in pocketknives. Believe it or not, there’s a strong overlap between flashaholics and knifeaholics. In recent years, I’ve amassed a sizable collection of knives, sharpening equipment and so on, plus a goodly number of shiny new flashlights as the ongoing advances in LED technology continue to impress me. But even more than pocketknives or flashlights, I love dogs. In fact, every member of our family shares this affection for our canine friends. Maybe there’s a gene? Over the years, my wife and I have contributed—regularly, if modestly—to a variety of animal welfare organizations that help the pups. But I’ve always wanted to do more. Nine years ago, I hit upon a way to combine two of my great loves—an annual pocketknife benefit sale. I’m active on a large online knife forum where I regularly discuss—as well as buy and sell—knives. Typical collector that I am, I always have too many knives. I decided to sell a portion and donate the proceeds to worthy organizations that help dogs. If I’m honest, I have to admit that another purpose was served. During most of my career, I worked long hours with no spare time for much else. In recent years, I gradually slowed down my work, allowing me to take on a hobby. Now I’m retired, I have the luxury of even more available…
Read more »

Friday the 13th, the Luckiest Day of My Life

Happy Friday the 13th, everyone. They say that one of the best financial decisions you can make, if you’re married, is to stay married. So I figure that gives me just enough of a hook to justify sharing on Humble Dollar why I celebrate today. I met my wife Rosalinda for the first time…twice. In 1977, I was a 2nd year law student at the University of Texas in Austin. That spring I found myself spending another boring and tedious weekend studying at the UT law library. I took a break and was walking the halls when I saw a beautiful girl sitting alone on the steps. I mustered my courage and sat down beside her. We talked for just a few minutes and I thought things were going pretty well---right up until she told me she was there with her boyfriend. I said my goodbyes and left, impressed not only with her beauty but with her kindness. Ten years later I was a lawyer in Austin, enjoying my bachelor life. One Friday at a local Happy Hour, I noticed a woman enter. She was quite a distance away, but her smile lit up the whole room. There was something absolutely electric about her presence. I walked over, introduced myself and said, “I think we’ve met somewhere before.” Naturally, she rolled her eyes at the oldest line in the book. But somehow a distant memory had surfaced in my mind. “You’re from the Rio Grande Valley”, I said. “Your father is Mexicano and your mother is Puertorriquena. You once had an orange sweatshirt. And, about 10 years ago, you spent time in the law school library.” How a 10 minute conversation survived 10 years in my musty brain, I can only attribute to fate. But I got her attention, and eventually…
Read more »

Slim Pickings

WHY DO I AVOID individual stocks today? I’ve previously written about the big loss on a broker-recommended stock that led me to manage my own investments. That loss, however, didn’t deter me. In my early days as a do-it-yourself investor, I mainly bought mutual funds, albeit too many of the high-fee actively managed variety. But I still had an interest in picking individual stocks. In fact, it was part of my investing heritage. My father had always invested in individual stocks. In his day, mutual funds—much less index mutual funds and exchanged-traded index funds—weren’t yet “a thing.” And he had done well with individual stocks, so his success was likely in my thoughts. I don’t know exactly how he picked his stocks, but some of it was probably based on the advice of stockbrokers. In addition, my dad was involved in business and civic affairs in our hometown of Dallas, and knew many of the people who ran some of the companies he invested in. If he thought that they were capable and of good character—character was paramount to my dad—he likely thought that was a good enough reason to invest in their company. The upshot: In my early days, I wanted to put at least some of our modest investment money into individual stocks. But I’m not the public citizen my dad was and have no personal insights into how any company is run. I have virtually no education or work experience in finance or accounting. When I read a company’s annual report or SEC filings, frankly, it’s pretty much Greek to me. So what’s a boy to do? Well, a smart one would’ve chucked the whole idea, bought some funds and been happy. But that would’ve been too easy, so I decided on a method of picking individual…
Read more »

What’s Cooking?

COUNTLESS ARTICLES on HumbleDollar speak of the need to save, especially for those early in their careers, so they can eventually retire in comfort. The powerful effect of compounding means that the sooner those dollars are saved and invested, the greater the sum down the road. But where can folks find those extra savings? Let me offer a suggestion: learn to cook. The amount Americans of all income levels spend on eating out, whether it’s sit-down restaurants, fast food places or takeout, is staggering, according to studies cited by Richard Quinn in an article last year. Americans spend an average of $787.28 a month on meals outside the home, found one survey. The timing of this screed may seem insensitive. After all, the restaurant industry was decimated by the pandemic and its underpaid workers were hit hard. I have nothing against the restaurant industry. I worked as a waiter during college. Two of our kids have also worked in restaurants, and my niece is part owner of two successful restaurants and bars. But I have an old-fashioned view of restaurant meals. Eating out is a treat, an occasional indulgence, not a several-times-a-week habit. I’m not saying to give it up entirely. For those retirees and others who enjoy it and can afford it, by all means indulge. Among those who have a future to save for, however, I’d suggest calculating what dining out is costing you and then look to reduce that sum. The total tab can be quite surprising. Years ago, my wife checked the bank account of one of our kids, then in college. In one month, the cost for restaurants was around $600. That was a shocking amount even to our dining-out college student, who promised to reform. You don’t have to be a gourmet chef to…
Read more »