FREE NEWSLETTER

In the financial world, complexity is usually a ruse to bamboozle and fleece investors.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Forget the 4% rule.

"Dick, I think your last paragraph is spot on - "Not sure what this means other than there is no such thing as a single desirable withdrawal rate and there is significant value in a steady income stream in retirement-neither of which are a revelation." I think one thing that is often grossly misinterpreted is what the 4% (or now 4.7%) figure really means. It is simply a mathematical result of analysis of historical returns over an extended period. And it happens to be the result arising from retiring at the worst possible time. So it has some merit as a rule of thumb for retirement planning, but certainly should not be the gold standard for retirement planning or withdrawal calculation.  I also think that the psychological benefit of a pension or annuity is very interesting. The concept of "risk free" money that helps retirees spend more is certainly not mathematical, but very emotional. "
- greg_j_tomamichel
Read more »

Home Tax Tips

IF YOU OWN a home or are planning to buy one, there are a few things you need to know from the tax standpoint that could save you money: 1. Mortgage Interest If you have a mortgage, you can typically deduct the interest you pay on the loan up to $750,000 ($1,000,000 if taken before December 16, 2017) but only if you itemize your deductions (schedule A) You can also deduct points you paid if you itemize. Many people miss deducting points on their tax returns when they purchase a house, but you have to meet some criteria like:
  1. The points relate to a mortgage to buy, build or improve your principal residence
  2. Points were reasonable amount charged in that area
  3. You provide funds (at or before closing) at least equal to the points charged
  4. The points clearly show on the settlement statement
In general, points to get a new mortgage or to refinance an existing mortgage are deducted ratably over the term of the loan.  Note that the deductible points not included on Form 1098 (the mortgage interest form) should be entered on Schedule A (Form 1040), Itemized Deductions, line 8c “Points not reported to you on Form 1098.” 2. Property taxes Property taxes can be deducted on your tax return if you itemize deductions. The total amount of taxes (including state and local income taxes) is capped at $40,400 for 2026. This cap is temporary and will increase by 1% annually through 2029 before reverting to $10,000 in 2030. If you make between $500k to $600k of modified adjusted gross income, the $40.4k deduction is reduced by 30% for each dollar you make. At $600k MAGI, the deduction drops to $10k, potentially raising marginal tax rates to 45.5% (!) for singles due to “SALT torpedo” if you are in the $500-600k range. If you are at that range, it’s recommended to mitigate this by lowering AGI/MAGI by maximizing pre-tax 401(k)/403(b), HSA, FSA contributions, timing RSU sales, tax loss harvesting, or deferring income/accelerating expenses for business owners. 3. Improvements Improvements are significant enhancements made to your home that increase its value. Many people overpay on taxes when they ultimately sell their house because they don’t keep track of these improvements. Here are some examples provided by the IRS: > Putting an addition on your home > Replacing an entire roof > Paving your driveway > Installing central air conditioning > Rewiring your home > Building a new deck > Kitchen upgrades > Lawn sprinkler system > New siding > Built in appliances > Fireplace Now, these costs aren’t deducted, but they are added to your home’s cost basis. This could lead to lower capital gains taxes when you sell your property (more on this later). Repairs, on the other hand, don’t impact your basis and don’t affect your taxes (e.g. repairing a broken fixture, patching cracks, etc) You will need to document every improvement, as this can help you save money on taxes. Keep your receipts and invoices (upload them to Google Drive) and record the dates and descriptions of the work done. Taxes when selling your house When you sell your house, here’s the formula: Selling price  > Selling expenses (like realtor fees) > Adjusted cost basis (how much you purchased it for + all these capital improvements I talked about above + any closing costs you paid when you acquired the home (legal fees, recording, survey, stamp taxed, title insurance) = Gain/Loss You will need to pay capital gains tax if there is a gain, but, luckily there is a gain exclusion (Section 121 exclusion) that can also help you save on taxes: 4. Gain exclusion If you sell your primary residence, you may be able to exclude up to $250,000 ($500,000 for married) of the gain from taxes if you meet some conditions. > Ownership (must have owned the home for at least 24 months within the 5 years prior to sale. For married couples only one spouse needs to meet this requirement) > Residence (you must have used the home as your main residence for at least 24 non-consecutive months during the 5 years before the sale. For married couples both spouses must meet requirements. > Look-back (you must not have claimed the exclusion on another home within the 2 years before this sale) Now, many people don’t know this but there is actually a partial exemption.  1. Work related move (i.e. you started a new job at least 50 miles farther from home) 2. Health related move (you moved to obtain, provide, or facilitate care for yourself or a family member) 3. Unforeseeable events (casualty, divorce, death, financial difficulty) 4. Special circumstances So, instead of claiming the full exclusion, you can exclude a prorated portion of the $250,000/$500,000 limit based on how long you owned and lived in the home. By the way, you can rent out a home for 2 years and still qualify for the exemption, as long as you lived there for the required period before selling (many people do this). 5. Tax example selling a home You bought a home for $200,000 (including all other costs) in 2018. You built a new deck, new roof and siding totaling $50,000. You now sold your home for $500,000. You are single. Selling costs are $20,000 (agent fees, etc) Sale price: $500,000 -$20,000 of selling costs (200,000 + 50,000) = -$250,000 (adjusted basis) Total Gain = 230,000 Exclusion = $250,000. Total taxes paid = $0. But what if you didn’t keep track of all your renovation costs like new siding or a deck? You would’ve had to pay taxes on $20,000 of capital gains!  Overall, knowing how these things work can literally save you thousands in taxes. Do you have any tips with homeownership? Share some in the comments!   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

Sector Fund by Stealth

I'VE RECENTLY MADE the most significant change to my own portfolio in thirty five years. For the first time I've moved away from pure market-cap investing, tilting meaningfully toward Europe and Southeast Asia and bringing my US technology concentration down to around fifteen percent. I'm retired. I don't need to chase the outperformance that concentration might deliver, and I don't need the potential volatility that comes with it. This is a personal position rather than any kind of recommendation; it's nothing more than a risk management decision made at a point in life where I simply don't need the risk. What prompted it was a growing discomfort with something I suspect many everyday investors haven't fully reckoned with: the S&P 500 is no longer quite the animal it once was. A broad market index fund casts a wide net across the economy, and the S&P 500, which tracks the 500 largest US businesses by market value, has long been held up as the sensible default: low cost, well diversified, a bet on the whole rather than any one part of it. A sector fund works differently; it makes a deliberate, concentrated bet on a specific industry. If you believe technology is going to outperform the market as a whole, it gives you the ability to concentrate your capital into exactly the sector your research or gut instinct suspects is going to be the place to be and let it run. The theory behind each is straightforward enough. A broad market fund captures a larger slice of the investment universe and is generally considered the lower-risk path. A sector fund comes with a well-understood trade-off: higher potential returns in good times, sharper drawdowns when sentiment turns. Investors who consciously choose a technology sector fund know what they're signing up for. The risk profile is understood, accepted, and priced into the decision. The problem is that the line between these two things has become a bit fuzzy, and most everyday investors haven't noticed. A handful of technology and technology-related companies (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet) have grown so dominant in their market valuations that they now represent a disproportionate share of the entire index. During the last year, the top ten holdings have accounted for roughly a third of the total weight of all 500 companies. The mechanism behind this is simply how the index works. The S&P 500 is market-cap weighted, meaning the bigger the company, the bigger its slice of the pie. As technology companies scaled their dominance through the 2010s and into the 2020s, their weight within the index ballooned accordingly. The index didn't change its rules; the market just rewarded one particular group of companies so heavily that they came to dominate the scoreboard. This means the investor who bought the S&P 500 believing they were spreading risk broadly across the American economy (energy, healthcare, financials, industrials, consumer staples) owns something that looks quite different to the story they were sold. You buy five hundred companies and a third of your money lands in ten stocks, most of them operating in the same broad technological ecosystem. That is a concentration risk, whether it is labelled as one or not. It's a sector fund “light”, acquired by stealth through the natural mechanics of market-cap weighting. The issue is that millions of everyday investors are carrying a version of that same risk without necessarily knowing it. Although I've used the S&P 500 as an example here, it isn't alone. Most broad-based indexes including developed world trackers will exhibit the same characteristics to varying degrees, because the same companies sit near the top of those indexes too. The MSCI World, often marketed as the global diversifier, allocates somewhere in the region of seventy percent to US equities, and within that, the familiar names reappear. You can cross borders on paper without ever really leaving the room. None of this is an argument against the S&P 500. The concentration reflects real, earned dominance; these companies grew to the top of the index because they genuinely deserved to. And whether my reallocation turns out to be the right call is genuinely unknowable. The concentrated index could continue to outperform for another decade and I'll have left returns on the table, a real possibility I've made my peace with. The point isn't that I've found the correct answer. The point is that I had the information to make a considered choice, weighed it against my own circumstances, and acted accordingly. That's all any investor can do. The uncomfortable truth is that a great many people haven't been given the chance to do the same. They're holding a product that has quietly changed its character, and nobody has thought to mention it. Better information doesn't guarantee better decisions, but it at least puts the decision where it belongs: with the person whose money it is. ___ Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

Tax Smart Retirement

A POPULAR JOKE about retirement is that it can be hard work. That’s because financial planning is like a jigsaw puzzle, and retirement often means rearranging the pieces. In the past, I’ve discussed two key pieces of that puzzle: how to determine a sustainable portfolio withdrawal rate and how to decide on an effective asset allocation. But there’s one more piece of the puzzle to contend with: taxes. Especially if you’re planning to retire on the earlier side, it’s important to have a tax plan. When it comes to tax planning for retirement, there’s one key principle I see as most important, and that’s the idea that in retirement, the goal is to minimize your total lifetime tax bill. That’s important because a fundamental shift occurs the day that retirement arrives: In contrast to our working years, when taxes are, to a large degree, out of our control, in retirement, taxes are much more within our control. By choosing which investments to sell and which accounts to withdraw from, retirees have the ability to dial their income—and thus their tax rate—up or down in any given year. The challenge, though, is that tax planning can be like the game Whac-A-Mole. Choose a low-tax strategy in one year, and that might cause taxes to run higher in a future year. That’s why—dull as the topic might seem—careful tax planning is important. To get started, I recommend this three-part formula: Step 1 The first step is to arrange your assets for tax-efficiency. This is often referred to as “asset location.” Here’s an example: Suppose you’ve decided on an asset allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. That might be a sensible mix, but that doesn't mean every one of your accounts needs to be invested according to that same 60/40 mix. Instead, to help manage the growth of your pre-tax accounts, and thus the size of future required minimum distributions, pre-tax accounts should be invested as conservatively as possible. On the other hand, if you have Roth assets, you’d want those invested as aggressively as possible. Your taxable assets might carry an allocation that’s somewhere in between. If you can make this change without incurring a tax bill, it’s something I’d do even before you enter retirement. Step 2 How can you avoid the Whac-A-Mole problem referenced above? If you’re approaching retirement, a key goal is to target a specific tax bracket. Then structure things so your taxable income falls into that same bracket more or less every year. By smoothing out your income in this way from year to year, the goal is to avoid ever falling into a very high tax bracket. To determine what tax rate to target, I suggest this process: Look ahead to a year in your late-70s, when your income will include both Social Security and required minimum distributions from your pre-tax retirement accounts. Estimate what your income might be in that future year and see what marginal tax bracket that income would translate to. In doing this exercise, don’t forget other potential income sources. That might include part-time work, a pension, an annuity or a rental property. And if you have significant taxable investment accounts, be sure to include interest from bonds. Then, for simplicity, subtract the standard deduction to estimate your future taxable income. Suppose that totaled up to $175,000. Using this year’s tax brackets, that would put your income in either the 24% marginal bracket (for single taxpayers) or 22% (married filing jointly). You would then use this as your target tax bracket. Step 3 With your target tax bracket in hand, the next step would be to make an income plan for each year. The idea here is to identify which accounts you’ll withdraw from to meet your household spending needs while also adhering to your target tax bracket. This isn’t something you’d map out more than one year in advance. Instead, it’s an exercise you’d repeat at the beginning of each year, using that year’s numbers. What might this look like in practice? Suppose you’re age 65, retired and not yet collecting Social Security. In this case, your income—and thus your tax bracket—might be quite low. To get started, you’d want to withdraw enough from your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs but without exceeding your target tax bracket. This would then bring you to a decision. If you’ve taken enough out of your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs and still haven’t hit your target tax rate, then the next step would be to distribute an additional amount from your pre-tax accounts. But with this additional amount, you’d complete a Roth conversion, moving those dollars into a Roth IRA to grow tax-free from that point forward. How much should you convert? The answer here involves a little bit of judgment but is mostly straightforward: You’d convert just enough to bring your marginal tax bracket up into the target range. Some people prefer to go all the way to the top of their target bracket, while others prefer to back off a bit. The most important thing is just to get into the right neighborhood. What if, on the other hand, you’ve taken enough from your pre-tax accounts to reach your target tax rate, but that still isn’t enough to meet your spending needs? In that case, you wouldn’t take any more from your pre-tax accounts, and you wouldn’t complete any Roth conversions. Instead, you’d turn to your taxable accounts, where the applicable tax brackets will almost certainly be lower. Capital gains brackets currently top out at just 20%. Thus, for the remainder of your spending needs, the most tax-efficient source of funds will be your taxable account. What if you aren’t yet age 59½? Would that upend a plan like this? A common misconception is that withdrawals from pre-tax accounts entail a punitive 10% penalty. While that’s true, it isn’t always true, and there’s more than one way around it. One exception allows withdrawals from a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) as long as you leave that employer at age 55 or later. In that case, as long as you don’t roll over the account to an IRA, you’d be free to take withdrawals without penalty. If you’re retiring before age 55, you’ll want to learn about Rule 72(t). This allows for withdrawals from pre-tax accounts at any age, as long as you agree to what the IRS refers to as substantially equal periodic payments (SEPP) from your pre-tax assets. The SEPP approach definitely carries restrictions, but if you’re pursuing early retirement, and the bulk of your assets are in pre-tax accounts, this might be just the right solution.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

One Last Book

"For those of you waiting for the Kindle version of Jonathan’s newest book, it is now available for advanced purchase on Amazon."
- Aaron Hayes
Read more »

Smoke, Sparks and Retirement Spending.

"Extravagance—that’s something my forebrain tells me to work on; unfortunately, my instincts recoil at the very thought. I’m slightly envious you can manage it so readily; it’s an uphill struggle for me. Although, I thoroughly enjoyed being in a very high-end boutique shop on Wednesday, with three sales assistants attending to my wife while they sorted out a mother-of-the-bride outfit. I’m normally poking through the sales rails at my local discount store."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Once Burned, Twice Shy

"Mark, Per AI, “only about 10% to 15% of active managers successfully beat their index, a trend that holds consistent over long-term, 10-to-15-year periods.” The odds are dramatically poor that ANYONE would pick a winning active manager. LONG LIVE INDEX FUNDS!"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

How do I scam thee? Let me count the ways

"Scams will ruin you mentally and financially. I have been there and it was too late by the time i reported to get it back but i still had my case submitted "4𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘣𝘺𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴.𝘰𝘳𝘨/𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵#𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵-𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮" to raise awareness and prevent the next person from falling victim for the same thing i fell for. and I got so much peace knowing I have done my part."
- Susan Farke
Read more »

Volatility is your Best Friend

"Greg. I really think people get confused because they simply can't wrap their head around the difference between risk and volatility. Years ago I read something like this about the difference. Volatility is like a stormy sea, it’s a rough ride, but the ship is fine. Risk is a hole in the hull, the ship is actually going down."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

When Your Pastime Takes Ownership

"Dan. If you've read any of my articles, you've probably figured out that I'm seriously into racket sports — tennis, badminton, pickleball, table tennis, padel… if it involves a racket, I'm in. It takes up a fair chunk of my time and a bit of money, but I never let it run the show. Case in point: I normally play tennis on Wednesday mornings, but this week I skipped it to take Suzie dress shopping in Belfast, she's looking for her mother of the bride outfit. And today, despite being a regular pickleball day, the weather was too good to waste, so I ditched the court for the garden and spent the morning and afternoon with my chainsaw and loppers instead. No regrets. That's kind of my philosophy — being passionate about something is great, brilliant even, but only when it sits comfortably alongside the rest of your life."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

How did you avoid being in the 39%?

"In my late 20s I went through the tech bear market. Watching a portfolio collapse early in one’s career is psychologically scarring. At that point I didn’t have much financial capital left—only my future earning power and a mortgage to overshadow it. That experience forced me to educate myself about inflation, risk, and compounding. By the time the Global Financial Crisis arrived, the lesson had already been internalized. I still remember the nausea of watching markets fall, but I did nothing. In hindsight, that restraint made all the difference and it was an important lesson in the psychology of investing. Investing discipline is far harder than the influencers and financial press make it sound. For younger people who ask me about markets, I suggest holding as much as 50% in bonds until they have lived through their first real bear market. Experiencing volatility firsthand is often the only way to understand one’s true risk tolerance. I still have very mixed feelings about the 401(k) plan versus pensions since I am skeptical a vast majority of Americans have the time and interest in this. The next bear market will be another teachable moment for all of us."
- Mark Gardner
Read more »

It’s Never Too Late

"I'm 40 years old and this is EXACTLY what I needed to hear today. I have $60,000 in my retirement account and currently saving 28% of my paycheck but I'm going through a job change and won't be able to maintain that savings rate for the next year or two. I will have to play catch up again and feel pretty scared but it is doable!"
- Jennifer Larson
Read more »

Forget the 4% rule.

"Dick, I think your last paragraph is spot on - "Not sure what this means other than there is no such thing as a single desirable withdrawal rate and there is significant value in a steady income stream in retirement-neither of which are a revelation." I think one thing that is often grossly misinterpreted is what the 4% (or now 4.7%) figure really means. It is simply a mathematical result of analysis of historical returns over an extended period. And it happens to be the result arising from retiring at the worst possible time. So it has some merit as a rule of thumb for retirement planning, but certainly should not be the gold standard for retirement planning or withdrawal calculation.  I also think that the psychological benefit of a pension or annuity is very interesting. The concept of "risk free" money that helps retirees spend more is certainly not mathematical, but very emotional. "
- greg_j_tomamichel
Read more »

Home Tax Tips

IF YOU OWN a home or are planning to buy one, there are a few things you need to know from the tax standpoint that could save you money: 1. Mortgage Interest If you have a mortgage, you can typically deduct the interest you pay on the loan up to $750,000 ($1,000,000 if taken before December 16, 2017) but only if you itemize your deductions (schedule A) You can also deduct points you paid if you itemize. Many people miss deducting points on their tax returns when they purchase a house, but you have to meet some criteria like:
  1. The points relate to a mortgage to buy, build or improve your principal residence
  2. Points were reasonable amount charged in that area
  3. You provide funds (at or before closing) at least equal to the points charged
  4. The points clearly show on the settlement statement
In general, points to get a new mortgage or to refinance an existing mortgage are deducted ratably over the term of the loan.  Note that the deductible points not included on Form 1098 (the mortgage interest form) should be entered on Schedule A (Form 1040), Itemized Deductions, line 8c “Points not reported to you on Form 1098.” 2. Property taxes Property taxes can be deducted on your tax return if you itemize deductions. The total amount of taxes (including state and local income taxes) is capped at $40,400 for 2026. This cap is temporary and will increase by 1% annually through 2029 before reverting to $10,000 in 2030. If you make between $500k to $600k of modified adjusted gross income, the $40.4k deduction is reduced by 30% for each dollar you make. At $600k MAGI, the deduction drops to $10k, potentially raising marginal tax rates to 45.5% (!) for singles due to “SALT torpedo” if you are in the $500-600k range. If you are at that range, it’s recommended to mitigate this by lowering AGI/MAGI by maximizing pre-tax 401(k)/403(b), HSA, FSA contributions, timing RSU sales, tax loss harvesting, or deferring income/accelerating expenses for business owners. 3. Improvements Improvements are significant enhancements made to your home that increase its value. Many people overpay on taxes when they ultimately sell their house because they don’t keep track of these improvements. Here are some examples provided by the IRS: > Putting an addition on your home > Replacing an entire roof > Paving your driveway > Installing central air conditioning > Rewiring your home > Building a new deck > Kitchen upgrades > Lawn sprinkler system > New siding > Built in appliances > Fireplace Now, these costs aren’t deducted, but they are added to your home’s cost basis. This could lead to lower capital gains taxes when you sell your property (more on this later). Repairs, on the other hand, don’t impact your basis and don’t affect your taxes (e.g. repairing a broken fixture, patching cracks, etc) You will need to document every improvement, as this can help you save money on taxes. Keep your receipts and invoices (upload them to Google Drive) and record the dates and descriptions of the work done. Taxes when selling your house When you sell your house, here’s the formula: Selling price  > Selling expenses (like realtor fees) > Adjusted cost basis (how much you purchased it for + all these capital improvements I talked about above + any closing costs you paid when you acquired the home (legal fees, recording, survey, stamp taxed, title insurance) = Gain/Loss You will need to pay capital gains tax if there is a gain, but, luckily there is a gain exclusion (Section 121 exclusion) that can also help you save on taxes: 4. Gain exclusion If you sell your primary residence, you may be able to exclude up to $250,000 ($500,000 for married) of the gain from taxes if you meet some conditions. > Ownership (must have owned the home for at least 24 months within the 5 years prior to sale. For married couples only one spouse needs to meet this requirement) > Residence (you must have used the home as your main residence for at least 24 non-consecutive months during the 5 years before the sale. For married couples both spouses must meet requirements. > Look-back (you must not have claimed the exclusion on another home within the 2 years before this sale) Now, many people don’t know this but there is actually a partial exemption.  1. Work related move (i.e. you started a new job at least 50 miles farther from home) 2. Health related move (you moved to obtain, provide, or facilitate care for yourself or a family member) 3. Unforeseeable events (casualty, divorce, death, financial difficulty) 4. Special circumstances So, instead of claiming the full exclusion, you can exclude a prorated portion of the $250,000/$500,000 limit based on how long you owned and lived in the home. By the way, you can rent out a home for 2 years and still qualify for the exemption, as long as you lived there for the required period before selling (many people do this). 5. Tax example selling a home You bought a home for $200,000 (including all other costs) in 2018. You built a new deck, new roof and siding totaling $50,000. You now sold your home for $500,000. You are single. Selling costs are $20,000 (agent fees, etc) Sale price: $500,000 -$20,000 of selling costs (200,000 + 50,000) = -$250,000 (adjusted basis) Total Gain = 230,000 Exclusion = $250,000. Total taxes paid = $0. But what if you didn’t keep track of all your renovation costs like new siding or a deck? You would’ve had to pay taxes on $20,000 of capital gains!  Overall, knowing how these things work can literally save you thousands in taxes. Do you have any tips with homeownership? Share some in the comments!   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

Sector Fund by Stealth

I'VE RECENTLY MADE the most significant change to my own portfolio in thirty five years. For the first time I've moved away from pure market-cap investing, tilting meaningfully toward Europe and Southeast Asia and bringing my US technology concentration down to around fifteen percent. I'm retired. I don't need to chase the outperformance that concentration might deliver, and I don't need the potential volatility that comes with it. This is a personal position rather than any kind of recommendation; it's nothing more than a risk management decision made at a point in life where I simply don't need the risk. What prompted it was a growing discomfort with something I suspect many everyday investors haven't fully reckoned with: the S&P 500 is no longer quite the animal it once was. A broad market index fund casts a wide net across the economy, and the S&P 500, which tracks the 500 largest US businesses by market value, has long been held up as the sensible default: low cost, well diversified, a bet on the whole rather than any one part of it. A sector fund works differently; it makes a deliberate, concentrated bet on a specific industry. If you believe technology is going to outperform the market as a whole, it gives you the ability to concentrate your capital into exactly the sector your research or gut instinct suspects is going to be the place to be and let it run. The theory behind each is straightforward enough. A broad market fund captures a larger slice of the investment universe and is generally considered the lower-risk path. A sector fund comes with a well-understood trade-off: higher potential returns in good times, sharper drawdowns when sentiment turns. Investors who consciously choose a technology sector fund know what they're signing up for. The risk profile is understood, accepted, and priced into the decision. The problem is that the line between these two things has become a bit fuzzy, and most everyday investors haven't noticed. A handful of technology and technology-related companies (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet) have grown so dominant in their market valuations that they now represent a disproportionate share of the entire index. During the last year, the top ten holdings have accounted for roughly a third of the total weight of all 500 companies. The mechanism behind this is simply how the index works. The S&P 500 is market-cap weighted, meaning the bigger the company, the bigger its slice of the pie. As technology companies scaled their dominance through the 2010s and into the 2020s, their weight within the index ballooned accordingly. The index didn't change its rules; the market just rewarded one particular group of companies so heavily that they came to dominate the scoreboard. This means the investor who bought the S&P 500 believing they were spreading risk broadly across the American economy (energy, healthcare, financials, industrials, consumer staples) owns something that looks quite different to the story they were sold. You buy five hundred companies and a third of your money lands in ten stocks, most of them operating in the same broad technological ecosystem. That is a concentration risk, whether it is labelled as one or not. It's a sector fund “light”, acquired by stealth through the natural mechanics of market-cap weighting. The issue is that millions of everyday investors are carrying a version of that same risk without necessarily knowing it. Although I've used the S&P 500 as an example here, it isn't alone. Most broad-based indexes including developed world trackers will exhibit the same characteristics to varying degrees, because the same companies sit near the top of those indexes too. The MSCI World, often marketed as the global diversifier, allocates somewhere in the region of seventy percent to US equities, and within that, the familiar names reappear. You can cross borders on paper without ever really leaving the room. None of this is an argument against the S&P 500. The concentration reflects real, earned dominance; these companies grew to the top of the index because they genuinely deserved to. And whether my reallocation turns out to be the right call is genuinely unknowable. The concentrated index could continue to outperform for another decade and I'll have left returns on the table, a real possibility I've made my peace with. The point isn't that I've found the correct answer. The point is that I had the information to make a considered choice, weighed it against my own circumstances, and acted accordingly. That's all any investor can do. The uncomfortable truth is that a great many people haven't been given the chance to do the same. They're holding a product that has quietly changed its character, and nobody has thought to mention it. Better information doesn't guarantee better decisions, but it at least puts the decision where it belongs: with the person whose money it is. ___ Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

Tax Smart Retirement

A POPULAR JOKE about retirement is that it can be hard work. That’s because financial planning is like a jigsaw puzzle, and retirement often means rearranging the pieces. In the past, I’ve discussed two key pieces of that puzzle: how to determine a sustainable portfolio withdrawal rate and how to decide on an effective asset allocation. But there’s one more piece of the puzzle to contend with: taxes. Especially if you’re planning to retire on the earlier side, it’s important to have a tax plan. When it comes to tax planning for retirement, there’s one key principle I see as most important, and that’s the idea that in retirement, the goal is to minimize your total lifetime tax bill. That’s important because a fundamental shift occurs the day that retirement arrives: In contrast to our working years, when taxes are, to a large degree, out of our control, in retirement, taxes are much more within our control. By choosing which investments to sell and which accounts to withdraw from, retirees have the ability to dial their income—and thus their tax rate—up or down in any given year. The challenge, though, is that tax planning can be like the game Whac-A-Mole. Choose a low-tax strategy in one year, and that might cause taxes to run higher in a future year. That’s why—dull as the topic might seem—careful tax planning is important. To get started, I recommend this three-part formula: Step 1 The first step is to arrange your assets for tax-efficiency. This is often referred to as “asset location.” Here’s an example: Suppose you’ve decided on an asset allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. That might be a sensible mix, but that doesn't mean every one of your accounts needs to be invested according to that same 60/40 mix. Instead, to help manage the growth of your pre-tax accounts, and thus the size of future required minimum distributions, pre-tax accounts should be invested as conservatively as possible. On the other hand, if you have Roth assets, you’d want those invested as aggressively as possible. Your taxable assets might carry an allocation that’s somewhere in between. If you can make this change without incurring a tax bill, it’s something I’d do even before you enter retirement. Step 2 How can you avoid the Whac-A-Mole problem referenced above? If you’re approaching retirement, a key goal is to target a specific tax bracket. Then structure things so your taxable income falls into that same bracket more or less every year. By smoothing out your income in this way from year to year, the goal is to avoid ever falling into a very high tax bracket. To determine what tax rate to target, I suggest this process: Look ahead to a year in your late-70s, when your income will include both Social Security and required minimum distributions from your pre-tax retirement accounts. Estimate what your income might be in that future year and see what marginal tax bracket that income would translate to. In doing this exercise, don’t forget other potential income sources. That might include part-time work, a pension, an annuity or a rental property. And if you have significant taxable investment accounts, be sure to include interest from bonds. Then, for simplicity, subtract the standard deduction to estimate your future taxable income. Suppose that totaled up to $175,000. Using this year’s tax brackets, that would put your income in either the 24% marginal bracket (for single taxpayers) or 22% (married filing jointly). You would then use this as your target tax bracket. Step 3 With your target tax bracket in hand, the next step would be to make an income plan for each year. The idea here is to identify which accounts you’ll withdraw from to meet your household spending needs while also adhering to your target tax bracket. This isn’t something you’d map out more than one year in advance. Instead, it’s an exercise you’d repeat at the beginning of each year, using that year’s numbers. What might this look like in practice? Suppose you’re age 65, retired and not yet collecting Social Security. In this case, your income—and thus your tax bracket—might be quite low. To get started, you’d want to withdraw enough from your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs but without exceeding your target tax bracket. This would then bring you to a decision. If you’ve taken enough out of your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs and still haven’t hit your target tax rate, then the next step would be to distribute an additional amount from your pre-tax accounts. But with this additional amount, you’d complete a Roth conversion, moving those dollars into a Roth IRA to grow tax-free from that point forward. How much should you convert? The answer here involves a little bit of judgment but is mostly straightforward: You’d convert just enough to bring your marginal tax bracket up into the target range. Some people prefer to go all the way to the top of their target bracket, while others prefer to back off a bit. The most important thing is just to get into the right neighborhood. What if, on the other hand, you’ve taken enough from your pre-tax accounts to reach your target tax rate, but that still isn’t enough to meet your spending needs? In that case, you wouldn’t take any more from your pre-tax accounts, and you wouldn’t complete any Roth conversions. Instead, you’d turn to your taxable accounts, where the applicable tax brackets will almost certainly be lower. Capital gains brackets currently top out at just 20%. Thus, for the remainder of your spending needs, the most tax-efficient source of funds will be your taxable account. What if you aren’t yet age 59½? Would that upend a plan like this? A common misconception is that withdrawals from pre-tax accounts entail a punitive 10% penalty. While that’s true, it isn’t always true, and there’s more than one way around it. One exception allows withdrawals from a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) as long as you leave that employer at age 55 or later. In that case, as long as you don’t roll over the account to an IRA, you’d be free to take withdrawals without penalty. If you’re retiring before age 55, you’ll want to learn about Rule 72(t). This allows for withdrawals from pre-tax accounts at any age, as long as you agree to what the IRS refers to as substantially equal periodic payments (SEPP) from your pre-tax assets. The SEPP approach definitely carries restrictions, but if you’re pursuing early retirement, and the bulk of your assets are in pre-tax accounts, this might be just the right solution.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

One Last Book

"For those of you waiting for the Kindle version of Jonathan’s newest book, it is now available for advanced purchase on Amazon."
- Aaron Hayes
Read more »

Smoke, Sparks and Retirement Spending.

"Extravagance—that’s something my forebrain tells me to work on; unfortunately, my instincts recoil at the very thought. I’m slightly envious you can manage it so readily; it’s an uphill struggle for me. Although, I thoroughly enjoyed being in a very high-end boutique shop on Wednesday, with three sales assistants attending to my wife while they sorted out a mother-of-the-bride outfit. I’m normally poking through the sales rails at my local discount store."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Once Burned, Twice Shy

"Mark, Per AI, “only about 10% to 15% of active managers successfully beat their index, a trend that holds consistent over long-term, 10-to-15-year periods.” The odds are dramatically poor that ANYONE would pick a winning active manager. LONG LIVE INDEX FUNDS!"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

How do I scam thee? Let me count the ways

"Scams will ruin you mentally and financially. I have been there and it was too late by the time i reported to get it back but i still had my case submitted "4𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘣𝘺𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴.𝘰𝘳𝘨/𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵#𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵-𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮" to raise awareness and prevent the next person from falling victim for the same thing i fell for. and I got so much peace knowing I have done my part."
- Susan Farke
Read more »

Volatility is your Best Friend

"Greg. I really think people get confused because they simply can't wrap their head around the difference between risk and volatility. Years ago I read something like this about the difference. Volatility is like a stormy sea, it’s a rough ride, but the ship is fine. Risk is a hole in the hull, the ship is actually going down."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 21: A HIGH income makes it easier to grow wealthy. But no matter how much we earn, we’ll struggle to amass a healthy nest egg—unless we learn to spend less than we earn.

humans

NO. 70: FOCUS on the negative and we’ll feel miserable, while focusing on the positive can boost our mood. Suffering through a long workout? Imagine how good breakfast will taste afterwards. Upset because stocks are struggling? Focus on how well the rest of your portfolio is holding up, or on how your nest egg is worth so much more than it was five years ago.

act

REVISIT YOUR DEBTS. Think of borrowed money as a negative investment: Instead of making you money, it’s costing you. If you have high-cost debt, paying it off—or replacing it with lower-cost debt—should be a top priority. What about lower-cost debt? That might also be worth paying off, especially if the alternative is to hold bonds or cash.

Truths

NO. 12: WE STRUGGLE with self-control and rely on tricks to compensate. To limit spending, we shift money from our checking account to accounts we deem untouchable. To force ourselves to save, we sign up for payroll contributions to our 401(k). We adopt rules such as “save all income from the second job” and “never dip into capital.”

What we don’t do

Manifesto

NO. 21: A HIGH income makes it easier to grow wealthy. But no matter how much we earn, we’ll struggle to amass a healthy nest egg—unless we learn to spend less than we earn.

Spotlight: Investing

Fidelity Funds

I have a small employer that I have set up with a Simple IRA directly with Vanguard.  Now Vanguard is farming out their Simple and 401K business to a firm called Ascensus.  We are going to move the Simple business to Fidelity. The employees tend to not take a detailed understanding of finance and we look for simple fund of funds approach.  I have always been a fan of FBALX Fidelity and retirement date funds are always a choice.

Read more »

Still Not Buying It

THIS IS ABOUT my crypto journey. Spoiler alert: I still don’t own any.
My journey began in 2013, when I was serving as an assistant principal in Philadelphia. Since I was always giving advice on our 403(b) plan based on my voracious reading of personal finance blogs, a colleague asked what I thought about bitcoin and whether she should invest. Back then, the price was well under $100—close to $30, I think. I dismissively told her to avoid it.

Read more »

Stocks on Sale

YOU MIGHT WANT TO check your mailbox. Mr. Market has been sending around a book of discount coupons on some great index funds and individual stocks.
Twenty-two percent off the S&P 500’s closing high set earlier this year. Seventeen percent off the Dow Jones Industrial Average. How about a whopping 33% off the Nasdaq Composite?
Still kicking yourself for not scooping up Amazon’s stock (symbol: AMZN) in early 2020 when it was—adjusted for the recent stock split—below $100?

Read more »

The Wager Revisited

IN BERKSHIRE Hathaway’s 2006 annual report, Warren Buffett devoted several paragraphs to scathing criticism of the hedge fund industry. Their fees, Buffett wrote, were so exorbitant and so stacked against investors that they amounted to a “grotesque arrangement.”
Indeed, Buffett has frequently recommended that individual investors opt for low-cost index funds. To reinforce this point, he issued a public challenge in 2007: He would bet anyone $1 million that, over a 10-year period, a simple S&P 500-index fund would beat the performance of a portfolio of hedge funds.

Read more »

What? Spend It?

HISTORY IS FULL of fringe investments that make headlines after rapid—and often inexplicable and indefensible—price increases. Bitcoin is one of the latest examples, leaving even casual observers asking, “What is it and should I buy some?”
First traded in 2009, bitcoin is the best-known cryptocurrency. Thousands of others have been introduced, but many have since died. That’s one problem with trying to pick the right digital currency to purchase: There are low barriers to entry.

Read more »

But Will It Work?

IN RECENT WEEKS, the world met WeWork founder Adam Neumann. The meeting did not go well. WeWork had been preparing an initial public offering for its stock and things seemed on track. But the IPO was shelved and Neumann was out of a job. 
The proximate cause: A Wall Street Journal profile of Neumann detailed the entrepreneur’s odd habits and fanciful notions. Among Neumann’s stated goals: to become president of the world,

Read more »

Spotlight: Cutler

An Ordinary Life

MY GRANDFATHER FALLS into the category of folks who are “not long remembered.” He died more than 75 years ago. None of his children or their spouses is alive. The one grandchild alive at the time of his death was only a few months old. It’s safe to say his memory has been all but erased, and yet his story offers a glimpse into what working life was like in the first half of the 1900s. Emil Cutler was born in 1887, the second son of farmers who lived in rural Maryland. His older brother, Willitts, had been born two years before. A sister, Lorena, was born in 1889, but died from dysentery—attributed to eating a green apple—just before her first birthday. In 1891, another sister, Beatrice, was born to complete the family. In the family letters I have, there isn’t a lot of information about my grandfather’s early years. For high school, he went to the Tome School for Boys, a prestigious boarding school in nearby Port Deposit, Maryland. There, he took the “commercial course,” graduating in 1907. After graduation, he wasn’t sure what career to pursue. He made an inquiry with the U.S. Marines, seeking information about how to join as an officer. Another career he considered was forestry—he looked into enrolling in the Biltmore Forest School. Eventually, he landed a sales job and moved to Philadelphia. From there, he relocated to Camden, New Jersey, and helped his parents start a fruit jelly company, Cutler and Cutler. His parents took care of production at their Maryland farm, while he was instrumental in procuring supplies, such as jars and labels. In 1912 and 1913, while living in Camden, he received a lot of letters and invitations from a mysterious Aunt Lucy, who lived in nearby Philadelphia. Lucy, a young single lady, had an active social calendar and was very interested in the details of Emil’s life: “How are you now? I am still in the Lace Department at John Wanamaker’s. No one has been kind enough to ask your poor old aunt to marry them so I am still very much here. But I thought that you would probably be on the way (to marriage) as you meet so many nice girls, eh? ‘Fess up.” Lucy was pleased to introduce him to other young ladies, and occasionally he was asked to escort her to an event. She invited him to various activities that included a Valentine’s party, surprise birthday parties, music shows, assorted dinner gatherings and even her dancing class. A letter from Emil’s sister Beatrice, written in late 1913 from Oriental, North Carolina, requests that he send her a photo of himself because the “people down here want to see my peoples’ pictures.” Her affection is evident in her closing: “Now, Emil, write soon. With love, I am your sincere Sister Beatrice.” In 1914, Emil began taking night classes in accounting at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. During the three years he attended night school, he was employed by companies such as Alexander Brothers Leather Belting and Haverford Cycle Co. [caption id="attachment_1543741" align="alignright" width="300"] Emil Cutler Sr. and Jr.[/caption] That brings us to 1917—a significant year in Emil’s life. In January, he married Esther, and he also graduated from Wharton that year. The following year again brought big changes. In February, Emil and Esther’s first child—my father—was born. He was named after my grandfather. Tragedy struck in October when Emil’s older brother Willitts took ill, becoming a casualty of 1918’s great influenza pandemic. Willitts left behind a young widow and two children. After two years marked by significant changes, Emil settled into a routine. He held a steady job with Ace Motor Corp. in Philadelphia. Another son was born. The family moved to nearby Moorestown, New Jersey, in 1919. A few years later, Emil’s parents also relocated to Moorestown. They’d lost their Maryland farm after Emil’s father cosigned a loan for a friend. Five years into his career at Ace, the company ran into hard times. Emil needed a new job and wrote a letter to Irving Collins, then the president of a local chain of lumber and hardware stores headquartered in Moorestown. From the draft of his letter: “I have been thinking that possibly you could use a man of my experience and caliber in your organization. I am 35 years of age, married, a graduate of high school and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. For the past five years I have been auditor for the Ace Motor Corporation [in] Philadelphia. This business was closed out through receivership and they are now ready to make the final distribution to the creditors.” He continued: “In this position I supervised the accounting work and for about two years looked after the treasurer’s duties in the absence of the treasurer. When the business went into receivership, I was made auditor for the federal receivers…. I am willing to accept a moderate salary to start and would be pleased to call at your convenience to talk the matter over.” Although my grandfather had fibbed a bit about his age—he was actually 37, not 35—his letter quickly got the attention of Collins: “I am very much interested in your letter of Oct. 28, and would like to have an audience with you. I will be in the Moorestown office Friday and Saturday mornings until 10 o’ clock.” Emil secured a position as an accountant at J.S. Collins & Son, and spent the rest of his career there. Many years later, my father—another accounting graduate from Wharton night school—would join the same company. For a time, Dad worked side-by-side with my grandfather. When my dad, who was nicknamed “June” as shorthand for “Junior,” was eight, Emil took him for a week-long trip to the Jersey Shore. He wrote a letter back to “Wifey and Boys” from Stone Harbor, reporting that “June’s appetite was not so good Sunday and Monday, but he surely is making up for it now.” The two of them finished a pound and a half of steak for lunch that day. He goes on: “The only time he spends in the apartment is while he sleeps at night and about 15 or 20 minutes for each meal. Soon as he gets his dessert he is gone. He has made friends with a boy about his age who lives in one of the houses in back of the apartment. The boy has a collie named ‘King Tut’ and the three play together…. June says he wants to stay for a month.” My father remembered his dad as being quiet, honest and “not… aggressive.” He also thought his dad might have been a little stingy—he didn’t help my father pay for his college education. But there may have been good reasons for my grandfather’s penny-pinching. Life got more demanding for Emil as time went on. When the Great Depression came, he was able to keep his job. In 1930, his earnings from Collins were $3,880, equal to some $72,000 in today’s dollars. By 1934, his pay was down to $2,600. He had other challenges on the home front. Two of his five sons had significant developmental disabilities. He also faced health difficulties. In his 40s, he started experiencing symptoms attributed to diabetes. He had to avoid carbohydrates and ended up eating a lot of bran muffins. By his late 50s, his vision was very poor. Unfortunately, he didn’t have a happy marriage. Esther grew resentful of Emil, blaming him for giving her two “retarded” children. When he developed diabetes, it just meant more work for her. At one point, she told him she should never have married him. When my dad—the favored son—was older, she would take him on trips to the Jersey Shore, leaving her husband behind. On the last day of 1948, Emil had a heart attack. My father was 30 at the time and living with his parents. When he found his father, Dad felt pain in his own chest, as if he too were going to have a heart attack. He was told to get a doctor, and actually ended up getting two doctors to come to the house. There was nothing they could do. Emil was dead at age 61. It was the most traumatic day of my father’s life. When I was young, it never dawned on me that most people have two sets of grandparents. I only knew my mother’s parents. My dad’s father had been dead 14 years by the time I was born. His mother, Esther, lived a mile away from our house, but I never met her. She had a history of being nasty to my mom. After a disturbing incident that threatened the safety of one of my infant sisters, Esther was never again allowed to be in contact with any of her grandchildren. She passed away when I was eight. I had no idea she’d died and certainly didn’t attend the funeral, if there even was one. Emil lived an ordinary life for his era, the kind of story that’s easily lost to the sands of time. Although no one is left who could share memories of Emil, a cache of century-old documents permits his story to be told afresh. I’m thankful those papers have been preserved for my generation. Ken Cutler lives in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and has worked as an electrical engineer in the nuclear power industry for more than 38 years. There, he has become an informal financial advisor for many of his coworkers. Ken is involved in his church, enjoys traveling and hiking with his wife Lisa, is a shortwave radio hobbyist, and has a soft spot for cats and dogs. Follow Ken on X @Nuke_Ken and check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Back to the Future

The first movie I ever saw in a theater was 2001: A Space Odyssey. My sister Carol took me to it when I was six years old. She wasn’t sure I’d like it, but I really loved it—except for a bit of primitive violence in the opening scene that was too intense for my young eyes (and stomach). In particular, the future technology depicted in the film fired my imagination. People in 2001 casually used video telephone calling and iPad-like tablet computers. And who could forget the talking, intelligent—but ultimately sinister—computer named HAL 9000? In 1968, when the movie came out, these were indeed just technological fantasies. Spurred on by that movie, throughout my childhood and adolescence I had a keen interest in reading science fiction and predictions about future technology. As a pre-teen, I was fascinated with my father’s copy of the best-selling book Future Shock by Alvin Toffler, which was published in 1970. Over fifty years have passed since those early childhood days. For better or worse, our world is filled with the stuff of yesteryear’s science fiction. If time travel to today from 1968 were possible (spoiler alert: not quite yet), a cinematic camera crew simply filming day-to-day life in an advanced country like the U.S. or Japan would have the elements for an epic sci-fi blockbuster.  In my lifetime, technology has advanced at a staggering pace. The period from 1969-2000 is sometimes called the Third Industrial Revolution, encompassing the use of ever-more sophisticated electronics and computers to automate processes, as well as the rise of the internet. We are currently in the mind-boggling Fourth Industrial Revolution, where a mature internet has evolved to include “the internet of things” and artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing. Sophisticated technology used to be quite expensive and out of the reach of many people. Today, due to technological advances, just about everyone can afford a compact smartphone that contains many amazing capabilities—including video calls—that could not be obtained at any price in 1968. Personal computers have come way down in price, and the internet, providing access to almost unlimited stores of information, is free for all to use. Our friends living 50 or 60 years ago would be in complete awe of what we take for granted. Interestingly, in 1970 Alvin Toffler foreshadowed the rise of the internet and AI. Here’s a bit of what Toffler said about a computer concept called OLIVER (On-line Interactive Vicarious Expediter and Responder): “As computerized information systems ramify, (OLIVER) would tap into a worldwide pool of data stored in libraries, corporate files, hospitals, retail stores, banks, government agencies, and universities. OLIVER would thus become a kind of universal question-answerer…. It is theoretically possible to construct an OLIVER that would analyze the content of its owner’s words, scrutinize his choices, deduce his value system, update its own program to reflect changes in his values and ultimately handle larger and larger decisions for him…. Meetings could take place among groups of OLIVERs representing their respective owners, without the owners themselves being present.” I would have been flabbergasted if, as a youngster, I’d been clued in about the technological advances I would witness in my lifetime. I’ve truly lived a science fiction kind of life. But all the technology hasn’t resulted in a utopia. Advances in AI make deepfakes more believable all the time. My Facebook feed is increasingly cluttered with AI generated videos and pictures, making it harder to distinguish between fact and fiction—especially judging by the comments people leave. The connected nature of the internet adds to the seeming cloudiness of truth. Cybercrime is a constant threat. Sometimes I wonder if it will all come crashing down, as in the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel. How about you? Are you optimistic that our technological advances eventually will be self-correcting and propel society to greater heights? Or do you have an uneasy feeling that technology has raced ahead of what mankind is capable of handling? Is the best yet to come? Or have we peaked?
Read more »

Retirement Realignment

I retired from my 38-year career as an electrical engineer with the country’s largest operator of nuclear power plants on September 5, 2023. I’d often dreamed about having an enjoyable encore career, and a week after retirement I began working part-time as a Chief Engineer in a consulting firm with a few hundred employees. The job has largely been true to my dream. In the roughly 16 months since I retired from full-time work, my wife Lisa and I have undergone many changes related to our financial lives. Here are 10: Emptied our TreasuryDirect accounts. Given the current mediocre returns on savings bonds, along with a desire to simplify our finances, we cashed in all our on-line savings bond holdings, zeroing out our TreasuryDirect accounts. Cashed in paper U.S. Savings Bonds. The process of dealing with the Federal Government bureaucracy to redeem savings bonds seems clunky and slow. Many banks are no longer redeeming bonds, even for longtime customers. My bank still provides that service, so I’ve been cashing them in there. I’ve worked through all the highest denomination bonds. This has had tax implications as our interest/dividend income has been much higher than normal. I’ve adjusted my pension and earnings withholdings accordingly. Went on Medicare. Well, at least Lisa did. It was a very smooth process, all successfully completed online. I didn’t even feel the need to purchase ‘Medicare for Dummies’ to help navigate through the decision making. Plenty of good information was available here on HumbleDollar. And no, she is not enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. Spent 50% more on eating out. My son Dan and I meet almost every Thursday for lunch. Dan is a software engineer who works from home and lives about a half hour away from me. My wife, daughter and daughter-in-law get together monthly for a Cutler girls’ meal. Having lots of flexibility in my schedule, I regularly meet for meals with a variety of friends. So does Lisa. And there are date nights, of course. Replaced our gas heating system. When a major part in our 23-year-old gas heater broke, I didn’t hesitate to replace the entire unit rather than getting it repaired. Furthermore, I didn’t spend any time agonizing before selecting the more expensive but higher efficiency replacement option. Cut the cord on cable TV. The addition of basic TV to our cable internet package was costing us about an extra $70 a month. Most of our TV viewing involves YouTube or Amazon Prime. Occasionally we watch our local TV channel, which comes in very clearly with an antenna. In fact, we can pick up about 11 channels over the air. Given our viewing habits, there was absolutely no reason to continue paying for cable TV. Funded Roth IRAs in retirement. Since I still have a modest earned income, we can fully fund Roth IRAs for both me and Lisa. I look at the Roth IRAs as our last line of financial defense. They are in essence our long-term care insurance policies, to be used only when all other resources have been exhausted. We hope to be able to transfer these policies intact to our heirs. Began modest withdrawals from my 401(k). About two-thirds of our financial wealth is in my 401(k). I realized that although our asset allocation is satisfactory to me, our asset location profile is not. It’s time to start slowly chipping away at the ticking tax bomb before the RMD grenade explodes in 13 years. I’m taking a baby step by starting withdrawals at an amount roughly equivalent to what a financial planner might charge me in fees. Increased focus on estate planning. Lisa and I are not getting any younger. At our ages, things can change quickly. My current focus on asset location is partly a nod to estate planning. We plan to update our wills this year. I continue to add more details to my ‘sudden death’ instructions letter for Lisa. Fixed a date to begin taking Social Security. Based on results from Michael Piper’s Open Social Security calculator, Lisa and I should both start taking our benefits at her full retirement age. That’s what we’re planning to do. As you can see, a lot can happen financially in a little over a year. I doubt that things will settle down in 2025. I may have a part-time job, but retirement is a full-time endeavor.
Read more »

A Crisis of Competence?

Do you think we are moving toward a competency crisis in this country? I told this story in a comment on an article a few months back: “Seven years ago, I bought a 2005 Outback. Despite the pink slip being clearly written by the dealer, the title came back with ‘Culter’ as my last name. I went to AAA for advice and they filled out a correction form for me. The title was revised to read ‘Renneth Culter’. I couldn’t believe it. Sent another correction form with very explicit instructions to correct both names included. It came back ‘Kenneth Culter’ again. I ended up having to drive to DMV headquarters an hour away to resolve the issue in person.” That experience with a faceless bureaucracy concerned me—was it the canary in the coal mine? If I can’t trust Department of Motor Vehicles employees to fix a simple typo, what else could go wrong in future encounters with government entities? Currently, there’s something like a two-month delay to redeem U.S. savings bonds by mail. What will the wait be in a few years when my bonds mature? And will the bonds even make it to their destination? Recently, in my neighborhood, a lot of mail is being mis-delivered…something that rarely happened even a few years ago. The post office is having a hard time finding anyone to cover certain routes. I’m told drug testing is out the window. I read news stories about “quiet quitting” and how slacking off is the new workplace norm. While I am a proponent of work-life balance, I’m concerned about the aggregate effect of work being increasingly less valued in our culture. This isn’t meant to be a shot at younger generations. I’ve worked with many engineers in their 20s who are diligent and competent. My son, a software engineer, has worked harder than I did at his age. My daughter, a proofreader and pre-flight specialist for a printing company, does her job with excellence and a pleasant demeanor. I think it’s important for people to take pride in their work, whatever it is. The corollary is that all people demonstrating a good work ethic deserve respect, regardless of the status society assigns to their job. Structural problems and management challenges contribute to declining competence trends. The healthcare complex comes to mind. Although we have high-tech equipment to aid in addressing various conditions, complaining about staff shortages seems to be de rigueur for both hospital patients and employees. With not enough workers to go around, preventable mistakes and errors of omission are increasingly made—despite our technology. Those workers who are trying their best under difficult conditions can be susceptible to burnout. It's not that everything is falling apart. My wife recently went on Medicare. I was pleasantly surprised at how smoothly the enrollment process went. Of course, everything was done online and she didn’t have to speak even one time to a live person. Not being particularly handy, I have lots of respect for craftsmen who are masters at what they do. I have a fantastic auto mechanic. In the past few years, we’ve had windows replaced, our heater furnace changed out, and a new roof installed. In each case, I was thoroughly satisfied with the job done and grateful that the workers took pride in doing an excellent job. I hope that my experience is typical but fear it may be less common than in the past. Without getting partisan, I think some of my unease is due to the incompetency on display by many of our most prominent politicians. The bar is set so low. Neil Postman wrote a highly acclaimed book in 1985 entitled Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Postman has turned out to be a reliable prophet—unfortunately for us. I wish I felt that our political class could make progress on fiscal issues like debt reduction and shoring up Social Security. I think that a collective lack of political competency will lead to a crisis and adoption of less than adequate solutions for these problems.
Read more »

Full Circle

My first encounter with Jonathan was at an annual client appreciation event in Hershey, PA hosted by my in-laws’ financial advisor, Tim Decker. My wife Lisa and I attended as guests of her parents. The snacks served were nothing special, but the evening was still very worthwhile. Tim gave an “state of the union” update for his many clients in attendance and then turned the microphone over to Jonathan for the keynote presentation. I can’t recall any details from Jonathan’s talk that night a decade ago but I remember finding it quite interesting. I was happy to leave with a signed copy of his book Money Guide 2015, which is sitting on my desk in front of me as I type this. It wasn’t until about eight years later that I was re-introduced to Jonathan, when I stumbled across HumbleDollar. As fee-only advisors, Tim and his associates have done a good job for my in-laws. My father-in-law passed away a few years ago but my 91-year-old mother-in-law remains a satisfied client. Knowing I had an interest in personal finance, over the years Mom would occasionally pass along information or advice that Tim provided. Eventually, I got on Tim’s mailing list and started listening to podcasts of his weekly radio program that airs on a local AM station. I even paid for an hour of Tim’s advice several years ago when I first started contemplating retiring. I’m a bit sporadic listening to Tim’s podcast these days. I typically scan the weekly email topic summary to see if anything catches my interest. Today’s email included the following: “Tim announces that a very special, well-known guest will join him for the show on June 21.” HumbleDollar readers are a sharp bunch and you already know the rest. Jonathan is that special guest. I may try to tune in live to WHP 580 at 10 AM (EST) on June 21, but at the very least, I will listen to the podcast. You can too:   Financial Freedom
Read more »

A Target On My Back

Early in my career, I took a quiz meant to determine how suitable a person was to be an entrepreneur. A high score indicated that one’s personality and interests were aligned with a life of entrepreneurship. A score close to zero was neutral, indicating neither a proclivity nor an aversion to being an entrepreneur. I scored deep in negative territory. I determined at that point to always be a salaryman, a path that worked out well for me. Some people fall into traps, wanting to be their own boss and fooling themselves that they have what it takes to be a successful entrepreneur. About thirty years ago, I went through a period where I thought I had a target on my back. A certain well-known multi-level marketing scheme was popular at that time. In the course of a year, I had at least five different people approach me with their spiel.  It was always the same: they built me up, saying they noticed I was a sharp guy and that they were impressed at how well I handled myself.  The implication was that such an astute person would be able to recognize a great opportunity. Only after this flattering preamble would they get to the point of the phone call, in which they carefully avoided saying the name of their organization. A brother of one of my friends called and asked wouldn’t it be great to make more money so I could do whatever I wanted. I responded that I was happy with my income and didn’t need or want any more. That conversation ended quickly. Another guy randomly struck up a conversation with me in a bookstore at the local mall. We chatted a bit and he found out my name and where I worked. A week or so later, he cold-called me with his pitch. I politely declined. Six months or so later, this same fellow struck up a conversation with me in the mall again, completely oblivious that he had hit on me before. He was shocked when I called him by name. Darned if he didn’t phone me again with his sales pitch, as if he had never done so before. My response: “Look Fernando, I wasn’t interested the first time you called me about this and I’m not interested now.” Once again, he was flummoxed. I’ve known people who gave up secure, well-paying jobs to follow their dreams. In some cases, their new path became a gateway to success far beyond what they would have achieved working for a large company. In other cases, it resulted in disappointment and a huge step backwards. There are those who doggedly persevere through decades of lean times, because being their own boss is so important to them. It's good to know oneself. There’s certainly no shame in not having entrepreneurial skills and living your life accordingly. On the other hand, if you truly have the drive and internal qualities that are conducive to success as an entrepreneur, you may owe it to yourself to give it a whirl.
Read more »