FREE NEWSLETTER
I’M ON MY THIRD cup of coffee this morning and it dawned on me how much I’m spending on the stuff. I have one of those machines that use the little K-Cup pods, which may be the most expensive way to make coffee. I find it curious that someone who likes to think of himself as frugal makes coffee at home that can cost 70 cents or more per cup.
If I bought a pound bag of house brand—not designer—coffee, I could enjoy a cup for as little as 12 cents. Why not do that? In a word, convenience. Like many other people, I’ll pay more than five times as much for a cup of home-brewed coffee just to have it quickly and with no mess. Are we spoiled or what? There’s another advantage to the machines—variety. The cups provide an endless choice of coffee and flavors, including that fall delight known as pumpkin spice.
My machine also makes lattes and cappuccinos. The Starbucks standard price for a latte or cappuccino is $4.25. The price for a small—excuse me—“tall” coffee is $1.85. That means they’re charging an extra $2.40 for a little skim milk and perhaps some syrup to upgrade coffee into cappuccino. At that rate, my in-home convenience has a favorable price factor, though without the coffee shop ambiance.
Lattes and cappuccinos have always fascinated me. What’s the difference? Turns out there’s very little difference and it all comes down to foam. A cappuccino has more foam, while a latte has more steamed milk in the coffee and a little foam on top. The real discovery is that someone convinced us there’s a couple of dollars of value in making foamed milk. Probably the same critic who convinced us that modern abstract art was actually art.
There are many ways to make coffee. I’ve used a French press and cold brew. Both work, but they’re messy. I was in a specialty store with a large copper coffee machine on display that looked like a boiler. It was $15,000. I wonder what that amortizes to per cup?
I’m sticking with my machine, but I’m obsessed with not paying full price for my K-Cups. Fact is, every week or so, one brand is on sale, even Starbucks. I’ll buy whatever is a bargain. Every trip to the store requires a trip down the coffee aisle in my quest to save money—or is that to overspend less?
You can buy reusable/refillable K-cups and use bulk coffee or grind your own beans. Amazon has them.
I recall a quality sci-fi novel, maybe Heinlein but I’m not sure, with the observation, “Every planet has something called coffee but none are the same.”
Presumably all are a habit-forming mild stimulant. Presumably, whatever it is, the habituated people on each planet savor their morning cuppa just as much as those on the others.
Linked to that is another pop- culture reference, an exchange between (middle class) Morgan Freeman and (rich guy) Jack Nicholson in The Bucket List film. Freeman refers to the “Chock Full Of Nuts” coffee brand’s slogan, “Better coffee a millionaire’s money can’t buy,” and Nicholson responds, “I wouldn’t bet on that.”
I might bet on it* in this sense: It may not matter much which brand one drinks or how much it costs, because before long they become all the same, just the morning cuppa that you look forward to and often sip on much of the day.
I always liked the quirky the Chock Full O’ Nuts slogan and label design, so that’s what I drink. When I find myself sipping and enjoying fancy stuff away from home I always enjoy it, but realize if I started using it at home within a couple week it would quicly become just the morning cuppa I look forward to, but no more or less than “regular.”
*There may be some poor-quality threshold to which the above does not apply. Related, on this planet roasted beans get rancid after a few months and the product becomes undrinkable.
Wise words indeed.