Retirement

This is from a survey of only 240 people from WalletHub August 2026, but still, the results are not optimistic. 
For example, 43% of those surveyed believe it is not realistic for the average American to expect to retire comfortably. “Not realistic?” How do HD readers feel about that?

Pension preference: 7 in 10 people believe a pension is better than a 401(k).  Understandable, but for most workers this is not practical because you need to be a participant in a pension plan (generally one employer) for decades to generate a significant retirement income and the average tenure with one employer is only 4-6 years +-
Americans worry about retirement: More than 1 in 3 Americans are not confident that they will have enough money to retire.

Advice, please: My employer moved our 401(k) program from Vanguard to Empower. The offerings are skimpy: no target date retirement funds, no life strategy funds, no balanced or all-in-one funds.  Instead we can choose from 15 funds, many of them with fees higher than index funds.  When I ask Empower why it tolerates this weak menu, I get variations of, “Tolerate? I didn’t know we even allowed plans this narrow.” And when I invite the employer’s managers to broaden the selection,

I read daily about seniors who can’t pay their bills in retirement, who say it’s unfair for them to pay property taxes for schools, who say they deserve higher SS COLAs etc.
Some people, through no fault of their own, because of uncontrollable misfortune, did not have the ability to save and build retirement income at whatever level they were throughout life. But those folks are far from the majority. 
So what happened that after forty years of working so many seniors seem poorly positioned to live in retirement?

Trusts are said to be a tool for its grantor to control from the grave. The first things I look at every morning when I open HD are Jonathan’s quips above the “Latest Posts”, and the most recent thoughts in the “Get Educated” section. 
I sort of think of “Get Educated” as the legacy that Jonathan has granted to us; his way of continuing to guide and educate. 
One of today’s topics is Monte Carlo analysis,

Young adults entering the job market often focus on the salary or hourly wage first, and that makes sense. Pay matters. But the benefits package can be just as important, and sometimes a slightly lower-paying job with stronger benefits is actually the better deal.
Health insurance, deductibles, retirement matching, vesting rules, paid leave, sick time, disability coverage, tuition assistance, promotion potential, and work-life balance all have real value. A 401(k) match, for example, is part of your pay.

I posed this question to an AI program (because I don’t know how to use a spreadsheet).
“If my income is $3,000 per month, I save 10%, I expect to earn 8% per year on invested money and my income will increase by 2.5% per year (basically inflation). How much will I have in 40 years?”
Here’s the answer.
You’d have about $1.29 million after 40 years, assuming you invest the savings monthly, earn 8% per year compounded monthly,

Like most people, I’ll get to feeling overwhelmed. Too many choices, too much complexity, just too much. Once the overwhelm kicks in, there are two ways forward; take a big deep breath and calmly work through the issue, or simply put the whole thing aside. I would like to think that I do more of the former, but as a human being, sometimes it’s the latter.
And it worries me that when financial advice is broadcast to a wide audience,

In some of my previous posts I have touted the Australian Superannuation program as a possible solution to America’s retirement funds problem. I admit that this was based on limited knowledge. This is Morningstar’s take on if this is the answer to our problem:
https://www.morningstar.com/retirement/what-us-could-learn-australias-retirement-savings-system?utm_source=eloqua&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningDigest&utm_content=None_73036&utm_id=38090
I would be interested in our Aussie HD readers take on this assessment of their system, and whether they agree with the conclusions about their system.

From what I read, many if not the great majority, of HD readers are the exception to much of this dilemma.
The responsibility for retirement income has steadily shifted to individuals and away from employers (unless you work for government), but far too few workers have accepted that responsibility. Longterm thinking does not seem a widespread skill. I find this information a bit depressing. How do we change the situation? 
Frankly I don’t know, but if we don’t make changes- if individuals don’t make changes in their financial behavior and if we don’t do better for those with inadequate means to fend for themselves,

A witty, honest and poignant short film:
Retirement Plan
With a lesson:
“Time is the one asset you can’t compound; spend it while the market is still open.”
 

According to a May 2025 Gallup survey, only 61% of Americans age 65 and older own stocks in any way, including IRAs, 401ks, etc. I found that a bit shocking and a little sad. I’m pretty certain HD readers and writers are not among the 39%. 
If that is an accurate percentage, no wonder many retirees are in poor financial shape, no wonder social media is full of videos with seniors claiming they need and deserve higher social security benefits and higher COLA adjustments.

I don’t have the right stuff to be an engineer, as the math involved boggles my mind. But that didn’t stop my infatuation with spreadsheets in the nascent days of computer ownership. That was around 1990, roughly the same time-frame as the implementation of my employer’s 401k. 
Oh boy, enabled by my new love of Excel, my life was planned out via extrapolations of future earnings, savings rates, and stock market performance. My plan had me comfortably retired at age 55.

Most personal finance advice is beautifully simple: save more.
Early in life, that advice is almost always right. But like most good rules, it has limits.
There comes a point in a saver’s life when retirement growth is driven far more by compounding than by new contributions. Past that point, continuing to save aggressively still increases your balance—but it may no longer be the best use of every additional dollar.
Recognizing when that shift has occurred can create flexibility without recklessly undermining your future.

My wife was laid off the other day. After thirty years at one company. For the first time in her working life, forty years, she was told her services were no longer needed.
Even though we’re financially fine, and now that she may join me in retirement, I’m unsettled. I think it’s because we have both crossed the retirement line. We’re no longer actively working to make money. We’re now 100% earning money passively. We’re relying on all the acorns that we’ve saved,

An article in Commonweal Magazine is a bit unkind to 401k plans from the interesting perspective that asking people to save on their own takes away from other uses.
“But there’s increasing evidence that our current approach is not only economically inefficient but also a key contributor to the precarity and isolation unraveling the social fabric. “
“What was once a balanced system of collective and individual support has come to rely on a single,