FREE NEWSLETTER

Forum › In Retirement

The best state to retire? Take a close look.

Geoffrey Schmidt is a CPA and retirement planning expert with a YouTube channel called HolySchmidt. 

In a recent video “The Map is Wrong” he analyzed the five best and worst states to retire and challenged the idea that the best choice was states with no income tax. He based his analysis on median home values and retiree incomes. 

He used the estimated combined spending on property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes and property insurance.  When added together the results showed no income tax is sometimes a misleading criteria, especially in places like Florida and along the Gulf Coast, even in parts of the Midwest where property insurance tipped the scale because of tornado alley. 

Equally interesting, he showed how in some cases retirees in states with an income tax don’t actually pay such tax anyway because of deductions and exclusions applied to seniors. 

NJ is a high tax state, especially property taxes. But in  NJ for example, there is no tax on SS benefits and most seniors can exclude up to $100,000 of pension income (including distributions from IRAs and 401k plans) from income tax. 

In addition, there are several property tax relief programs including the ability to freeze property taxes from increases if your income is $176,870 or less. The median household in for age 65 and older is $69,102.

I doubt many retires are planning to retire to New Jersey, (actually we are paid to stay). No matter, I’m stuck, my family has been here since the 1840s at least. 

In any case the Schmidt exercise makes it clear it is a good idea to look at the big picture. 

More On This Topic

Email Alerts for this Comment Thread
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Andrew Clements
1 month ago

Good points. Florida has worked well for us in retirement, and the lack of a state income tax certainly doesn’t hurt. But as you point out, that’s only one piece of the equation. Property taxes, homeowners and auto insurance, housing costs and other expenses can quickly change the calculation.

I also agree with Jack’s comment about Jonathan. Ultimately, the “best” place to retire isn’t necessarily the place that costs the least. Family, friends, climate and simply where you feel at home can be worth far more than whatever you might save in taxes.

DAN SMITH
1 month ago

In the 2000s when my tax business was not yet sufficient to be my sole source of income, I took a part time job with a trucking company who contracted with the Post Office to haul mail back and forth across the country. We were sort of like the Pony Express, here in Toledo, I’d pick up a truck that came in from Illinois, take it to Pennsylvania, and swap with a driver from Jersey. Our hourly rate was based on where the routes originated from. Our trips originated in Jersey City and San Francisco or Los Angeles. 
The pay was about $300 per day. Just a couple days each week (in addition to my business income) was all I needed to make the ends meet. I always wondered what that income meant to the drivers from Jersey City. According to AI, “Overall, the cost of living in Jersey City is roughly 80% to 110% higher than in Toledo”. 
I think this illustrated the importance of due diligence in selecting an area to retire.

Last edited 1 month ago by DAN SMITH
Howard Schwartz
1 month ago

With all the complaining New Jerseyans do about our high property taxes, according to WalletHub we are eighth in total tax burden. Not great but not apocalyptic either. New Jersey usually is in the top three in income and almost 10% of taxpayers have a net worth over $1,000,000 leading the nation. The reason I live here is simple; I have always lived here, and I know where everything is.