FREE NEWSLETTER

Tax Complications – How SS Benefits interact with Other Income

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Rick Connor on 8/18/2026

A recent post about the taxation of Social Security (SS) benefits provided an example of the complexity of the way that SS benefits are taxed, and how they interact with other sources of income. I’ve read innumerable articles on this complexity, and experienced it first hand while preparing hundreds of tax returns for AARP TaxAide. Clients were frequently surprised and confused by this.

The referenced post’s example posits a couple, 65+, MFJ tax status, with $50,000 in combined SS benefits. The Dinkytown 1040 calculator shows that the couple could have $31,162 of other taxable income and still have $0 taxable income. This is partially due to the additional senior deduction of $12,000 implemented in 2025. In 2026, the senior couple has a total deduction of $47,500 ($35,500 standard and $12,000 senior deduction). The couple’s maximum taxable SS benefit is 85% of the $50,000, or $42,500. Since this is less than their total deduction, no amount of a Roth distribution included in the SS taxability formula would have any impact on the couple’s tax.

I then considered how a significantly larger combined SS benefit would behave. The maximum SS benefit in 2026 is $5,181 per month, or $62,172 per year. The combined couple’s maximum benefit would be $124,344.  The maximum taxable amount of their SS is 85% of this, or $105,692.  If the couple’s only income was their SS benefits, the taxable amount of their benefits would be $21,446, or 17%.  This is well below their deduction, so their tax would be $0.  They could have up to $14,083 in additional taxable income and still have the $47,500 deduction wipe out any tax.  That’s $138,247 in income with no tax. If the entire $138,247 were an IRA distribution, they would pay $10,415 in tax.

To reach the maximum 85% of their benefits being taxable, they would have to have $99,150 in other income.  At that amount of income ($223,494) they would have a tax bill of $25,847.

I also wondered how long-term capital gains (LTCG) would impact the couple’s tax.  LTCGs have preferred tax rates, including a 0% rate for taxpayers in the lower brackets. Consider a scenario with the original $50,000 of SS benefits and $100,000 of other forms of income – Traditional IRA distribution, Roth IRA distribution, and LTCG. Per the Dinkytown calculator, this is how the tax would be calculated for the 3 cases.

1) $100,000 Trad IRA Distribution – $42,500 Taxable SS, $95,000 taxable income, $10,907 tax.

2) $100,000 Roth IRA Distribution – $5,250 Taxable SS, $0 taxable income, $0 tax.

3) $100,000 LTCG – $42,500 Taxable SS, $95,000 taxable income, $0 tax.

Case 3 is interesting because it demonstrates that moving the $95,000 of taxable income into the LTCG category saves the taxpayer $10,907.  I used this concept when managing my mother-in-law’s finances.  Her dementia diagnosis caused most of her memory care expenses to be qualified medical expenses, thus giving her a significant amount of itemized deductions.  This allowed us to withdrawal funds from her Trad IRA tax free, and to later harvest some LTCG tax free.

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Hall Plante
17 days ago

Rick: Thank you for your community service with AARP Tax-Aide. I encourage other Humble Dollar readers to volunteer their time in whatever manner suits them.

William Dorner
19 days ago

Great article will help many. My overall opinion is our tax laws are way too complicated, but I persevere, as I have been doing them since age 16. I still prefer the post card tax or flat tax 17% of income. Done.

DavidHLancaster
22 days ago

Hi Rick,
Great post, but … I couldn’t get your numbers to make sense in my head. I always thought that the percentage of one’s Society Security income that was taxed was dictated by your combined income utilizing only 50% of the SS income. Based on this, I thought that if the combined income will exceed $44K, 85% of the Social Security income will be taxed. As an example say if a couple had a total income of 142K, with 84K of SS, and the balance of the income all regular taxable income wouldn’t they have 85% of SS income taxed, as their combined income would exceed 44K.
Is my mistake that the combined income utilized is after all deductions, ie the 47K, or before?

Last edited 22 days ago by DavidHLancaster
Hung Nguyen
17 days ago

I have the same question about zero tax for the second couple, then I open turbo tax and fake a return, and the tax due is zero. I was wrong for a long time. Thanks.

Dan Smith
22 days ago
Reply to  Rick Connor

“Clear as mud” is how a new client described the worksheet, after he made mistakes while doing his own taxes, and later getting a dreaded notice from the IRS.

DavidHLancaster
22 days ago
Reply to  Rick Connor

Thanks for the explanation Rick, and I have full confidence your numbers are correct, but I just don’t get it. My solution to estimating my taxes when I claim Social Security is to have my nephew who is an accountant run the numbers for me.

Last edited 22 days ago by DavidHLancaster
Joe
22 days ago
Reply to  Rick Connor

Ha! Faint of heart is an understatement!
This is another reason I have someone smarter than me do my taxes.

Edmund Marsh
23 days ago

Excellent analysis. Thanks for your work. As Dan points out, you highlight the importance of tax planning to a financially healthy retirement.

Dan Smith
23 days ago

Rick, your post illustrates how a good tax preparer can help you with more than just the current year’s Form 1040. I think of all these different types of income sort of like a big dance; you need to be careful who you go home with at the end of the night. A good tax preparer can help you pick the right partner; Traditional, Roth, non-qualified brokerage, as well as which investments belong in each bucket in order to minimize taxes in retirement. Similar to saving money for the future, it’s good to begin retirement tax planning at an early age.

Dan Smith
23 days ago
Reply to  Rick Connor

I agree, Rick. My younger clients had little to no interest in tackling the topics of taxes or financial planning. An exception was if they had a large balance due, in which case they’d panic and want to avoid a repeat the following year.

R Quinn
23 days ago

Thanks Rick,

Our effective tax rate for 2025 was 18%. Could I have done better being more tax aware? Maybe, not sure. But an effective tax rate of 18% doesn’t upset me. I set things up so I always get a refund, not optimal efficiency I suspect, but it makes me feel better in March😎

I use the standard deduction, tax-free municipal bonds and QCDs, but other than that I am at the mercy of the IRC …and the Social Security law🤑

William Perry
22 days ago
Reply to  Rick Connor

I think that caring for our older family members when they need our help often triggers us into planning and action so our children have as easy of time as possible when helping us. Let’s hope that will not be soon.

R Quinn
22 days ago
Reply to  William Perry

Just think how those of us who ARE the older family members feel. 🤔

It’s still nice to be the ones giving advice when asked and providing financial assistance when necessary.

Last edited 22 days ago by R Quinn
DavidHLancaster
22 days ago
Reply to  William Perry

Exactly Bill. After seeing what my sister went through for over a year with the probate courts we immediately went to a certified elder attorney to set up a trust, and are planning to enter a CCRC at some point. So no having to go through probate, and no worrying about are mom and dad safe. Also I have been converting my wife’s traditional IRA (about 1/3 of our portfolio) entirely to a Roth with the hope that they will benefit from 30-40 years of tax free compounding of a 100% world stock portfolio.

Last edited 22 days ago by DavidHLancaster

Free Newsletter

SHARE