When you sit down with an annuity salesperson, they’ll probably start with a question that cuts straight to your fears:
“What if you live to 100? Wouldn’t you rather have a guaranteed check every month?”
It sounds comforting — but the truth is, most annuity checks are just your own money coming back to you, with a little interest, minus their cut.
Let’s run some numbers.
Imagine you’re 65 years old with $500,000 in retirement savings. You have two options:
We’ll run both options over 20 years.
The First 5 Years
| Year | Annuity Payment | “Balance”* | Portfolio Withdrawal | Portfolio Balance |
| 1 | $27,500 | $472,500 | $20,000 | $508,800 |
| 2 | $27,500 | $445,000 | $20,600 | $517,492 |
| 3 | $27,500 | $417,500 | $21,218 | $526,050 |
| 4 | $27,500 | $390,000 | $21,855 | $534,448 |
| 5 | $27,500 | $362,500 | $22,510 | $542,654 |
*Annuities don’t actually give you a running balance, but this shows how much of your original $500k is left if you think of the payments as coming from your own principal.
Already you can see the difference — the annuity “balance” steadily drops, while the portfolio balance is growing, even though you’re taking withdrawals.
By Year 20:
While a self-managed portfolio often outperforms, annuities do have a place for certain people:
In other words, annuities are less about beating the market and more about removing uncertainty.
What This Means
The Real Takeaway
The “you might outlive your money” scare works because we humans hate uncertainty more than we hate paying high fees. But with a balanced investment plan, a modest withdrawal rate, and a little patience during market swings, your odds of running out of money are already very low — without locking yourself into an inflexible annuity.
In other words: Some of us can create your own “annuity” — and often, it’ll be bigger, more flexible, and better for your heirs.
These are my thoughts – What did I get wrong?
Note: Research, data and math was AI assisted to help speed up my thoughts.
If you die early the ins company wins, so does Social Security and a pension trust, but your life insurance company loses.
All this theoretical stuff leaves out the human factor. Winning or losing isn’t the goal, minimizing worry over money and a steady income with minimum risk and ongoing decision making are the goals for most people.
You don’t put all your eggs in the annuity basket, just enough to pay the bills you need to pay without worrying about the next withdrawal.
I think about the people who claim they are fine with 80% even 70% income replacement. I sure wouldn’t want to cut it that close and have most of it subject to my investment skills or the uncontrollable stock markets.
The entire concept of maximizing lifetime anything be it SS or annuity is superfluous.
Retirees need to focus on income and maximizing that income when they most need it. Who cares if you beat the actuarial odds be it SS or an annuity?
>>If you die early the ins company wins
In case of annuities (and assuming it is not joint), you can still opt for 10Y or 20Y guaranteed. In this case the annuitants heirs or estate will get the “paychecks”.
This pedantic detail aside, I totally agree with your larger point – this isn’t a win or lose game. It is exactly as you said “Retirees need to focus on income and maximizing that income when they most need it”. And if you can get this with some peace of mind, then all is good.
And of course you pay extra for that extended coverage.