Go to main Forum page »
I’ve always had a bit of a dark side, one I never really tried to control and certainly didn’t think of as a problem. This was especially true when I ran my own business. Through sheer effort and hard work, that business threw off a lot of free cash flow. With all that cash sloshing around, I christened my peculiar habit: Random Spontaneous Generosity (RSG).
RSG would manifest in unpredictable ways, at random times. For instance, I was walking past the pay station at a restaurant after a dinner I was attending and, on a complete whim, decided to pay for the entire 30-person seated dinner. Another time, I promised a friend’s daughter ownership of one of my (admittedly older) cars if she passed her driving test on the first attempt—and yes, I carried through on that promise. I even remember filling a person’s heating oil tank when I found out they couldn’t afford oil during a cold snap. The list, believe me, goes on.
I should quickly add, all this was in addition to every single one of my own expenses, investment goals, and savings being fully met and funded. I accept that this generosity stemmed from a place of reasonable abundance. But now, since I’m retired and drawing from my portfolio and fixed income, I’ve had to face facts: I need to stop doing it. At least to the same degree.
The simple key to control in many situations, I’ve found, is recognition. Once I understood the beast, I could start to tame it. I’ve since implemented a few simple protocols to manage my self-named RSG issue, creating a layered defense system. Sounds technical doesn’t it?
My first line of defense is, ironically enough, a line itself. This line lives in my expenses spreadsheet under “discretionary generosity.” Once this monthly allocation is depleted, that’s it. I have to play hardball with myself; the well’s dry until next month.
My second defense measure is a 24-hour cooling-off period. Before making any sudden offers of help or grand gestures, I force myself to wait a full day. This pause gives me time to properly consider the decision and its implications, rather than just acting on an impulse.
But my third, and frankly, most solid line of defense is my wife, Suzie. Now, before any RSG urgings can take hold, I run them through the “wife filter” before I commit to anything. Just for laughs, I’ve even put Suzie’s number on speed dial, because you never know I might get the urge when ordering a Guinness in a crowded bar!
It feels good to have these boundaries in place. It means I can still be the generous person I am, but in a way that’s eminently more sensible, and at the very least, it’s going to stop my friends’ delight in exaggerating my past hair-brained gestures even further from reality.
Your reflection on Random Spontaneous Generosity really struck a chord. It’s admirable that you’ve been able to give so freely, and I can see how that instinct might feel tricky to manage now that you’re retired and thinking more carefully about long-term balance. It’s almost like generosity has two sides—the joy of giving and the responsibility of sustainability.
I wonder, have you found any strategies that let you still indulge that generous spirit in small, meaningful ways without putting too much pressure on your retirement budget?
Sometimes I think about how balance applies in other parts of life too—like when people seek subtle improvements through things such as non-surgical treatments that enhance confidence without going overboard. It’s that same idea of enjoying the benefits while keeping things in check.
I just got an email that GoFundMe is starting its own donor-advised fund. This could be a nice option for giving to individual needs.
You’ve gone from Random Spontaneous Generosity to Carefully Curated Benevolence… sounds dreadfully mature. Are you feeling alright? 😉
Well you’ve certainly made me laugh 😅 so everything is fine in my world this very moment.
I like to have money available for spontaneous acts of charity, but I’m a bit more organized about it. We have a donor-advised fund with Fidelity that we contribute to every month. We also make regular donations to our church and individuals whose work we support, and we donate regularly to several charities, both local and national. All of that is automated through Fidelity. We also usually will make an extra year-end holiday gift to the entities we support regularly and, in some cases, an extra gift in June for the end of the fiscal year.
However, those regular, automated gifts don’t exhaust our entire giving fund, and that’s intentional. If something comes up—a natural disaster, something that catches my attention/tugs my heartstrings—there’s always a slush fund available to act upon it. Now, that’s different from your examples of filling someone’s gas tank or giving someone a car—you can’t do those from a donor fund and you don’t get a tax deduction for them. But I think it’s cool that you do stuff like that, though obviously not to the extent that you can’t pay your own bills. We need more generosity in this world, not less.
I’m beginning to think your real initials are AI.
Good thing you have a spreadsheet to protect you, from yourself.
Filling the oil tank was a generous act of charity, I’m not so sure I would call the others that…more a tad showing off perhaps. 🤗
I can’t make any such claims of significance.
Once I opened my wallet and told a homeless boy to take what he needed. He took $20 when he could have taken about $120.
What modicum of generosity I have I mostly reserve for family and tipping servers 25-30%
Filling the oil tank was a generous act of charity, I’m not so sure I would call the others that…more a tad showing off perhaps. 🤗
I think impulse is a better more rounded word 🤔
Definitely impulse, but for whose benefit? Do we need a psychologist here😃
Well, you never know, we might have one lurking on the site. And I’ve seen the light. I’m a reformed character now 😊
Actually we do, but he hasn’t surfaced in awhile. Steve, where are you!