FREE NEWSLETTER

Does Vanguard Know Something?

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Mark Crothers on 6/26/2026

I recently received an email from Vanguard informing me they’re updating the prospectus on a developed world fund I hold with them. The change relates to concentration limits. Under existing European regulation, no single company can normally represent more than 10% of a fund. However, there is a pre-existing exemption available to index-tracking funds that allows this ceiling to be raised to 20%. Vanguard are now choosing to apply that exemption.

Here’s what caught my attention: no company has actually hit that 10% threshold yet. But if one did, Vanguard would be legally obligated to sell shares in that company to stay compliant, meaning the fund would no longer perfectly track the index it’s supposed to mirror.

So the question isn’t really about the rule change itself. The exemption has always been there. The more interesting question is why Vanguard are choosing to activate it now. Do they see a company, almost certainly Nvidia, approaching that limit in the future and want the flexibility to let it ride rather than be forced to trim a winning position?

The option to go to 20% has existed all along. The timing of this decision is what’s telling, are they showing conviction? Then again, maybe I’m just a retired guy with too much time on his hands, thinking too hard about things.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Mark Eckman
19 days ago

Concentration risk is real. I would prefer to invest in an S&P 493 fund – the S&P 500 without the Mag 7.

Mike inLA
19 days ago
Reply to  Mark Eckman

Well, quick solutions are either an equal weight fund (not quite 493, but minimizes the concentration issue) or an S+P fund plus 7 put options. The risk is real; are you willing to pull the trigger on a change, though?

William Perry
20 days ago

My guess is they are being proactive with their compliance with regulatory ownership caps and trying to head off potential future litigation for not meeting such disclosures. As they may have the right to sell most everywhere in the world they may be trying to meet not only US and EU requirements but every country and state that has regulatory requirements that they have to abide by.

I received a similar notice.

I hope someone can offer a reference to authoritative guidance.

Last edited 20 days ago by William Perry
Hung Nguyen
19 days ago
Reply to  William Perry

That is the best explanation. Compliance run check daily for any potential violation, since after 10% there is no 11%, 12% the next one is 20%, therefore the fund manager should consider that.

Free Newsletter

SHARE