Go to main Forum page »
When I was growing up in a loving but economically stretched household, birthdays and Christmas presents were nice. But what really rang my bell was a gift of cash. These sometimes materialised when an aunt or uncle couldn’t think of anything better. As a kid those crisp notes were full of potential, self-directed treats, a true treasure.
My parents were exclusively a cash using family; if there was ever any excess it ended up in a bank savings account or credit union. I followed this path during my first seasonal job as a young teenager, potato picking and hay and straw baling when required on a local farm. Taking my savings book to the teller and getting the interest marked up was a nice experience, but it didn’t take long for me to wonder if it was possible to earn more than the pittance added to my balance.
That pittance of interest felt good until I thought deeper. Inflation was running near 12% at the time and I was earning 10% on my savings book. Even at that age I figured out I was losing money. Every time I held those crisp notes, I was no longer seeing “potential” or “treasure”; I was seeing reduced value. The prophet hadn’t just stopped giving; it was now actively taking. This made me look for a different solution.
Luck stepped in with the solution to my dilemma. Around that time, the UK government began aggressively selling off public utilities, with British Telecom being one of the largest. The popular campaign, urging ordinary citizens to buy shares, made this feel different from the quiet credit union.
With the money earned, I took the plunge and bought shares in the BT IPO. Suddenly, my cash wasn’t passively decaying; it was transformed into capital that grew with a major national asset. This single transaction was my first, tangible lesson: true wealth is found in ownership, not in mere possession.
That initial purchase of a public utility stock caused a shift in my opinion of cash. The magic of those crisp notes I once treasured as a child was an illusion of wealth, a promise of potential that inflation silently broke. Cash, the False Prophet, promises safety but guarantees slow decline. The real treasure is not in the dollar or pound bill itself, but in the principle of production. I began to understand that true wealth is achieved not by saving, but by taking a calculated risk and becoming an owner of shares in wealth-producing businesses.
I still hold that first stock purchase from 1984. It’s now part of a diversified tracker portfolio, and I’ve done a few calculations—okay, I admit, I got Google Gemini to do the calculations. The £1,000 cash I used for the IPO would buy me approximately £400 worth of goods today if it had been left in a savings account. My utility stock has been a pretty uninspiring investment, but even so, it’s worth £17,000 of current purchasing power. That’s wealth beyond my younger self’s dreams, simply delivered by abandoning cash in favour of the market.
Yet I’ve come full circle with my cash journey. Today, I hold a portion of my portfolio in cash as a risk mitigation tool, possibly the only legitimate use for cash in an investment strategy. The False Prophet of cash is unmasked not for being worthless, but for pretending to be something it’s not: a long-term store of value. It has its place, just not on the childhood pedestal where I once kept it.
Anyone who was an adult in the US in the ’70s and ’80s is well aware of the dangers of inflation. Mortgage rates were in the teens. As late as 1991 when I refinanced my mortgage for 15 years I was still paying 7 3/4%. Those memories informed my decision to wait until 70 to take SS, to get the largest base for future COLAs. It’s why I find pensions without COLAs so problematic.
I agree. We purchased a home in 1985, assumed the mortgage held by the seller at around 8% which covered about half the purchase price, and took out another mortgage at 12%, with an adjustable rate. This is a reminder to myself what harm inflation can cause, and why I opted to maximize my SSA benefit with its built-in COLA!
You can take over another person’s mortgage in the states? That’s a novel concept for me!
This was California in 1985. Not sure that is still available these days.
Mark, those were the good old days. Assumable mortgages are pretty much non-existent these days. I think VA (loans from the Veterans Administration), and a few other government sponsored mortgages may be an exception.
That’s a very interesting bit of knowledge. So would that have gotten the seller a premium on the property price if they had a mortgage rate below the current market rates of the day?
Good question… I never heard of that happening. Perhaps someone with a deeper knowledge of real estate can jump in here.
Yep, Dan and Mark, the answer is yes. If the seller had an attractive mortgage to offer along with the house, it did actually increase the value of the home, at least to a non-cash buyer.
And generally the seller’s mortgage holder was willing to go along in order to keep a paying account on their books. In those days of double-digit rates, the mortgage business was insanely competitive and the business cost of acquiring a new account was very high. So if the lender could retain an existing account, even at a few points under the going rate, it was worth it.
Not an expert… and never acquired an existing loan… just had close friends who were realtors.
And Dan, you’re correct that many government-backed mortgages are still assumable if the buyer can pay off the seller’s equity.
There’s a very entertaining dramedy from HBO, The Penguin Lessons, about an English teacher in Argentina in 1976. When he receives his first paycheck, he is instructed to instantly spend it. The inflation rate in the country was around 400%, and it would be near worthless in the following days.
Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic in post-WWI Germany was worse. People moved cash around in wheelbarrows. One cause for the rise of the Nazi party.
I cannot imagine living through those times. Despite all the bad things happening around us today, we have a good life. I do not take that fact for granted.
Thanks Mark, another interesting read.
Based upon my other articles, I’m sure you could guess how much cash we hold!