FREE NEWSLETTER

Forum › Investing

Average vs. Humble Average

No one describes themselves as average at anything. We’re above-average drivers. Above-average parents. Above-average judges of character.

Statistically, that can’t be true—but it’s how we think.

Investing is no different. The average investor almost always believes they are above average. They read. They pay attention. They try to make smart decisions.

And yet, year after year, investors as a group earn returns that fall short of the market itself.

That raises a simple but uncomfortable question:

What’s the difference between earning the market’s average return and earning the return of the average investor?

Two Very Different “Averages”

When we talk about average in investing, we usually mean one of two things:

  • The market average
  • The average investor

They sound similar. They are not.

The Market Average

The market average—think of the S&P 500—is “average” only in the sense that it owns everything:

  • Every sector
  • Every style
  • Every winner and every loser

When you look at long-term sector performance charts, the S&P 500 is never at the top and never at the bottom. Because it owns every sector, it must fall between the extremes. What looks like mediocrity is actually design. The index doesn’t chase leadership or flee weakness. It simply holds everything and lets time do the work.

The market average:

  • Never chases performance
  • Never panics
  • Never second-guesses itself
  • Rebalances automatically

Its advantage doesn’t come from prediction or insight, but from limiting mistakes.

The Average Investor

The average investor, by contrast, is very human.

They:

  • Chase recent winners
  • Sell laggards just before recoveries
  • Trade too often
  • React to headlines
  • Confuse activity with progress

Ironically, the average investor rarely earns the market’s average return. Not because they lack intelligence—but because they make predictable behavioral mistakes. The tragedy isn’t that investors get average returns. It’s that most don’t.

Sector Chasing in Action

Each year, a handful of sectors dominate performance. Technology one year. Energy the next. Financials after that.

The problem is simple:

  • You only know the winners after the fact
  • By the time leadership is obvious, prices already reflect it
  • Leadership rotates faster than investor conviction

Chasing sectors becomes a dog chasing its tail—busy, exhausting, and ultimately unproductive. The market average doesn’t chase. It waits.

Average Isn’t the Problem—Behavior Is

We’re taught that average means mediocre. In investing, the opposite is often true. The market’s average return reflects:

  • Broad ownership
  • Discipline
  • Patience
  • Humility

The average investor’s return reflects:

  • Overconfidence
  • Timing errors
  • Emotional reactions

Market average limits mistakes. The average investor multiplies them.

The Real Advantage of Indexing

Index funds don’t succeed because they’re clever. They succeed because they’re behaviorally superior. They remove the need to predict, eliminate most bad decisions, and protect investors from themselves.

Indexing isn’t about settling for average. It’s about refusing to pretend you’re above average.

A Final Thought

Everyone wants to be an above-average investor.

Ironically, the most reliable way to get there has been to accept the market’s average—and stop trying to outsmart it.

So the real question isn’t whether you’re above average—it’s whether you’re willing to accept the humble dollar average.

I know how hard that is, because I’m an average investor too—and I still catch myself believing I’m above average more often than I should.

More On This Topic

Email Alerts for this Comment Thread
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
William Dorner
8 months ago

Excellent article William H. It took 20 years, but I proved that the S&P index over long periods was definitely better than my picks. Sure I had some better, but how long! and how many big losers, so 75% etc. Right now not even the Buffett stock BRK-b is keeping up with S&P. For the rest of my life, it is 85% S&P and 15% cash for those years to tide us over, that are in the Red. Amen.

normr60189
9 months ago

Average may be insufficient. Yes, over very long periods of time the S&P provides good returns. Dividends have historically made up about 32% of S&P 500 returns. I understand those total returns have been about 10% per year.

However, for shorter periods of time, “average” may not be desireable. For example, from 2000-2009 “specific yearly figures show losses e.g., -9.10% in 2000, -36.55% in 2008…..Positive dividend contribution only slightly [mitigated] significant drops, resulting in a substantial overall decline for the decade despite eventual recovery by 2009’s end.” In 2009 the S&P 500 finally had a significant turn around of +25.94%.

This was important to me. At age 51 I had begun an unusual savings and investment campaign for my retirement. Yet, at the beginning of the “lost decade” I was debt free with a Net Worth of only $5,315.

At age 54 the “lost decade” began and continued until I was age 63.  

Commencing at age 51, if I had performed per the very long term “averages”,  i.e. 10% return per year, I never have been able to retire.  In fact, had I tracked the performance of the S&P I would have experienced a very different outcome. Instead, by age 67 I was in phased retirement, owned a condo, had met my goals, accumulated 72% of my current peak. I was able to travel extensively, relocate, upgrade from the condo to a house, etc.  

normr60189
9 months ago

I was below average. At the age of 51 my retirement savings were a measly $848. I didn’t own a home, etc.

With an aggressive plan I turned that around. It required a lot of work, an unusual savings plan and a take-charge investment approach. This was coupled with a withdrawal plan.

For the next decade I worked the equivalent of two well-paying jobs. I funded a Roth, IRA and 401(k), purchased a condo for cash and funded the children’s college (out of state private universities – Cha- Ching!).

After a few years and having gained some knowledge, I became interested in better returns with improved risk. I began to pay attention to fund costs, averages and the S&P 500 and the DOW. I was interested in knowing what might be achieved. Prior to this, these indexes provided me with a broad brush indicator of how the market was doing. I didn’t treat them as a comparative tool. I don’t today. I also began running CAGR numbers. I was interested in determining the measure of my investment’s annual growth rate over time. I had goals and targets. Meeting them meant I would have the retirement funds I needed when the time came.

My portfolio grew and at one time I had 63 holdings. Today I have about 25, including sector funds, low-cost mutual funds, individual stocks and bonds with a few bond funds (TIPS, for example).

At FRA I took social security and invested my benefit.

As of 12/31/2025 the portfolios have a CAGR of 19.16% since 1995, which is as far back as my reliable data exists.  

At the age of 67 I began a “phased retirement”, reducing my work hours and income year after year. In partial retirement, at age 67 I purchased a Class B RV and began travelling exte