The new kid’s back in town and he’s a bully. Remember active mutual funds, those dinosaurs of yesteryear? Get ready, because here come actively managed ETFs. In 2019, there were only 350 of those guys but now that number has swelled to over 1,600. More than 400 active ETFs were launched in 2023 and another 200 through June of this year. Remarkably, actively managed ETFs gobbled up over 20% of the asset flow into ETFs by midyear.

THE BEST WAY TO WIN a contest for the largest tomato is to paint a cantaloupe red and hope the judges don’t notice, or so says an old adage.
What does that have to do with managing money? Newspapers and magazines frequently interview mutual fund managers who have beaten their competitors, and perhaps the S&P 500 as well. Fund-management firms will even run ads touting the performance of these funds.
These interviews sometimes prompt me to do my own research.

ABOUT ONCE A WEEK, someone will say to me, “I don’t understand bonds.” Sometimes, they’ll state it in stronger terms: “I don’t like bonds.”
Fundamentally, bonds are just IOUs. If you buy a $1,000 Treasury bond, you’re simply lending the government $1,000. The Treasury will then pay you interest twice a year and return your $1,000 when the bond matures. That part is straightforward. What’s more of a mystery is why we should own bonds and what we should expect from them.

Sequels are made by film studios trying to capitalize on the success of the original release. Rocky II became another blockbuster for MGM Studios. J.P. Morgan’s Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is an audience-pleaser right in our own backyard. It’s the glitzy younger sister of the star of the active ETF world, J.P. Morgan’s Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI).
Like most sequels, the new technology-oriented fund borrows a good bit from its predecessor. It’s on a pace to be just as big a moneymaker,

My investing strategy is closely aligned with the game of darts. Aim and hope my picks land in the right place. Does it work?
I make no claim to investing acumen. However, I am proof that even those who know little of what they are doing with no patience for nitty gritty analysis can make money. 
Since all my investments are with Fidelity I used their analysis of my account to evaluate where my darts landed.

If you’ve ever wondered whether Vanguard’s S&P 500 or total stock market fund is the better core holding in your portfolio, you’re probably not alone. Each ETF has over 400 billion in net assets, each has an expense ratio of .03, each has essentially the same dividend (1.25%) and each is categorized by both Vanguard and Morningstar as large blend. Both funds trade at very high volume, making the spread on purchases and sales all but nonexistent.

The search for a bond substitute has been about as lunatic as Don Quixote’s quest for a fantasy world. Why a substitute for the Great Diversifier anyway? Because when interest rates move higher, bonds and stocks disintegrate in tandem. In the scourge of 2022, Vanguard’s total bond ETF lost 13%, not much better than the broad market’s -18%. Seeming more like de-worsification than diversification, the twin collapse spooked adherents of the venerable 60/40 portfolio.
But almost all of the vaunted replacements for bonds put forward by fixed-income detractors have come to naught.

I MAY BE WRONG, but I’m pretty sure Vanguard Group doesn’t have a secret plan to control the U.S. banking system. Not everyone is so confident, however.
There’s a federal regulation that no investor can buy more than 10% of the shares of a U.S. bank without regulatory approval if it’s seeking to “control” the bank. Thanks to the popularity of its index funds, Vanguard funds collectively owned 12.5% of State Street’s shares as of June 30.

DIVIDENDS ARE a seemingly mundane topic. But like many areas of personal finance, it’s one that still generates debate. The most common question: All else being equal, if one stock pays a dividend and another doesn’t, shouldn’t an investor prefer the one that pays the dividend? We’ll examine this question, and then broaden the lens to look at dividend strategies more generally.
To better understand how dividends work, let’s look at Procter & Gamble.

A mutual-fund company’s public relations representative once told me about what she dubbed the “conviction tour.” It was the late 1990s, and she and one of the firm’s star money managers toured the New York media talking about the importance of conviction when picking individual stocks. I guess they figured it was the sort of theme that would resonate with story-hungry financial reporters.
I like the idea of conviction. I think it can be hugely valuable to those with a prudent strategy.

WHEN WAS THE LAST time you got scammed? Mine was about a year ago, when I threw more than chump change into a red-hot newfangled exchange-traded fund called the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (symbol: JEPI).
Now, JEPI could be the name of someone’s pet poodle, but it’s actually one of the more misunderstood high-income products in the burgeoning world of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Just how red hot is the fund? Around for only four years,

IF YOU WORKED AT Vanguard Group, you felt like a kid in a candy store when it came to picking investments. There were so many well-run, low-cost funds to try. Yet my favorite fund wasn’t offered as an investment option in the Vanguard 401(k) plan. Ironically, it’s the fund that made Vanguard’s reputation.
Vanguard opened its S&P 500 index fund (symbol: VFIAX) in 1976. This first commercially offered index fund was designed to earn the U.S.

In going back over the comments on my last couple of articles, two reader concerns popped out at me. One, many of you still had faith in the Vanguard 500 S&P ETF (VOO/VFIAX) despite its concentration in giant AI-infused technology stocks. But, two, some readers would like to know how they might increase their diversification by adding a fund that did not always fluctuate in tune with one of the country’s most trusted large cap index funds.

How do you “stay the course”—in Vanguard founder Jack Bogle’s oft-used phrase—when those around you are losing their heads?
That can be exceedingly difficult, as the late July-early August market swoon demonstrated.
I like the old aphorism from legendary financier and advisor to U.S. presidents Bernard Baruch: “The main purpose of the stock market is to make fools of as many men as possible.”
You can easily appreciate that sentiment when the market seems to be gunning directly for you,

IT’S ONLY BEEN relatively recently that mankind has come to rely on banks, brokerage firms and investment companies to build wealth.
Tangible property—land, gold bars, houses, livestock and so on—was the standard of wealth just a couple of centuries ago. The Bible frequently cites cattle to signify someone’s wealth. If folks had “cattle on a thousand hills,” they were a billionaire in that era. Wealth was something that you could physically lay your hands on.