FREE NEWSLETTER

Want to succeed financially? Control what you can and ignore what you can’t.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Shopping around – you versus the grocery store

"i think you may need to broaden your grocery shopping experience. Try going to Trader Joe’s or Aldi — no coupons of any kind and both are much smaller than the traditional supermarket. And then there’s Walmart, the biggest grocery seller in the US. The grocery market is quite segmented. The various formats appeal to different shoppers. I love to grocery shop— love them all!"
- Marilyn Lavin
Read more »

For Richer, For Poorer: 37 Years of Compounding

"David, my daughter has a toaster that cost nearly $300. It's a vast, shiny chrome affair, bristling with more knobs and dials than any self-respecting bread-browner has any business having. The first time I tried to use the thing, I couldn't even work out how to get the bread near the elements."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

California, Here They Came

"Glad to hear that, Heidi! Good observation, too. Patience, and satisfaction with incremental progress, does seem undervalued in today's go-go culture."
- D.J.
Read more »

The Vision, the Babe , Einstein and the Q

"Harold Tynes, Let me know the next time you go. I'll buy you a Boulevard KC Pils and we can talk Humble Dollar finance."
- mflack
Read more »

How Far Behind is the IRS?

"Thanks, but my Mom is not really worried about going to prison. I have told her so many times that the IRS is going to throw her in prison that she now understands I am joking. Rightly or wrongly, she has a lot of confidence in me that I will work this out."
- Larry Sayler
Read more »

Note to HD Writers and Contributors

"Welcome back to two of the HD old timers (like me). I hope to see more of them return. 🤞"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Somebody Has to Win

HOW DO YOU COMPETE in an investment contest when you’re a firm believer that investors can’t consistently beat the market averages? That was my dilemma several years ago.

A school not far from where I taught was given money by an alumnus to endow the St. Louis Area Collegiate Investment Contest. All colleges and universities in the area are invited to participate in the competition, which is held regularly. Each is given a hypothetical $1 million and asked to select 20 value stocks. An outside investment firm oversees the contest. They “invest” $50,000 in each of the 20 stocks. Whoever’s portfolio is worth the most two years later wins $10,000—real dollars, that is.

How do we select the 20 stocks for our entry? When I explain the contest to students, I also discuss the evidence that most investors don’t outperform the market. I suggest we could tape the stock pages of The Wall Street Journal to the wall and literally throw darts at it. Several students like this option.

But instead, I distribute Value Line’s current list of 100 stocks most likely to outperform the stock market over the next year. To focus on value stocks, I take these 100 stocks deemed most likely to outperform, circle the 40 or so companies with the lowest price-earnings ratios and ask students to select stocks from this list.

Value Line Investment Survey, which is often available at larger libraries, evaluates approximately 1,700 stocks. Value Line gives each stock a timeliness rating from one to five, indicating its belief that the stock will outperform the market over the next year. My initial list for the students draws on those stocks rated one for timeliness.

Rating             Number of Stocks    Meaning

1                      100                             Most likely to outperform

2                      300

3                      900

4                      300

5                      100                             Least likely to outperform

Value Line has a full-page analysis of each of these 1,700 stocks. Each stock gets a full review every 13 weeks, which means each week it updates this detailed analysis for about 130 stocks. But each week, all 1,700 stocks are evaluated for timeliness.

Some 30 or 40 years ago, there were a few academic studies indicating that Value Line could outperform the market averages. I have seen no recent independent studies of Value Line. My guess is that any advantage Value Line might have had decades ago no longer exists.

While I don’t believe Value Line will outperform the market, it’s one way to narrow down the list of potential stocks. It’s definitely safer than letting college students throw darts in a classroom.

Six schools entered the first contest. We won, receiving $10,000 and an oversized check. I took the check to our next faculty meeting and bragged about our business students. Most faculty assumed I had superior stock-picking skills, and I did not disabuse them of that view. But in my heart, I firmly believed it was just luck.

Six years later, we won again. If six schools enter each year, we ought to win about every six years. I didn’t point out that obvious fact when I went to the faculty meeting with that oversized check.

The very next year, we won again. Did that indicate we had a winning method? No. If six schools enter, and if the winner is completely random, the chance of this year’s winner winning again next year is one out of six. While my method of picking stocks might be superior, I believe two wins in a row is simply a random occurrence.

Recently, the contest was modified. Instead of starting just once a year, it now starts every semester. The payoff for winning was reduced from $10,000 once a year to $5,000 each semester. The number of participating schools has dropped to just four or five, increasing our odds of winning each contest.

Although I'm now retired, our school continues to follow the above method. Over the years, we have won $35,000. We call it our slush fund. Our department has used that money for additional faculty enrichment opportunities, student awards, end-of-the-year catered dinners for graduates and their families, and a host of other good causes. Perhaps most important, our finance students have learned some important lessons about how the stock market works.

Larry Sayler is the only person with a Wharton MBA who also graduated from Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey’s Clown College. Earlier in his career, he served as CFO for three manufacturing and service organizations. For 16 years before his retirement, Larry taught accounting at a small Christian college in the Midwest. His brother Kenyon also writes for HumbleDollar. Check out Larry's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Treasury Tax Reporting

IF YOU HAVE a Money Market Fund (e.g. VUSXX, VMFXX), Treasury fund (e.g. SGOV), or any other Treasury ETF (e.g. VBIL), you need to know how to report it on your taxes correctly. If you don’t, you are overpaying on your state taxes unknowingly. 

How and why?

These funds hold U.S. Treasury Bills. Treasuries are exempt from state and local taxes. Of course, this only matters if you hold these funds in a taxable brokerage account, which most people do.

The broker sends you a 1099-DIV form, but it’s your responsibility to figure out how to report it on your taxes correctly. By the way, bad tax preparers can miss this sometimes, or if you self-prepare, this may be something you aren't aware of (I hope most of you reading HumbleDollar are familiar with this!)

This is one of those areas where the reporting rules are technically simple, but the execution is where people mess up. The IRS gets their share regardless (since interest is fully taxable at the federal level), but if you don’t adjust properly, your state will too, even when it shouldn’t.

The 1099-DIV doesn’t break out how much of the dividend was allocated to Treasuries. The software also wouldn’t know how much based on the 1099-DIV. This means that you generally have to figure out how to report it (or ensure your CPA does it correctly).

Now, the 1099-DIV will have a breakdown of every single stock/ETF you have, but you have to find out the percentage of a fund that holds Treasuries.

This percentage is not on your brokerage statement. It comes directly from the fund provider (Vanguard, iShares, Schwab, etc), usually buried in their “tax center” or “year-end tax supplement” pages.

Let me give you an actual example.

Say, in 2025, you received $5,000 of dividends from two funds.

Then, if you scroll down, you will see a “Detail Information” of your dividends:

Interest

We can see that $2,456.78 came from Vanguard Federal Money Market fund.

The entire $2,456.78 will be taxed at the federal level, but how do we figure out what’s taxed at the state level?

This is where the extra step comes is.

During the end of the year, the fund manager (e.g Vanguard for VMFXX) will post a “US government source income information” on their Tax page.

This report tells you what portion of the fund’s income is derived from U.S. government obligations (Treasuries), which is the key to the state tax exemption.

VMFXX

We can see that 66.61% of VMFXX holdings for the 2025 tax year were income derived from the U.S. government and, therefore, are not taxable at the state level.

So, we would take $2,456.78 * 0.6661 = $1,636. Of the total, $1,636 is derived from U.S. obligations, and you would only pay state taxes on the remaining ~$819.

That $2,456.78 is still fully taxable federally. This is strictly a state adjustment.

It’s also important to note that some states say "if less than 50% of the fund is from the U.S. government (like Treasury Bills), you can treat it as 0%.”

For example, California, Connecticut, and New York are some of these states. So, if the fund has only 35% coming from the Treasury, you shouldn’t even calculate the exempt amount for these states.

Now, if you buy Treasuries directly from TreasuryDirect, they will send you a 1099-INT, and you can just enter that information directly into the tax software. No extra calculations are needed. That’s because the income is already clearly identified as U.S. government interest, no allocation required.

So, how do you report that dividend interest calculation?

In most tax softwares, after entering the 1099-DIV, it will ask: "Did a portion of dividends came from a U.S. Government interest?'

So, you would just check it off/select and enter the amount from Treasuries ($1,636 in our example).

Behind the scenes, this flows into your state return as a subtraction or adjustment, depending on the state.

Some software might ask for the percentage of dividends that are state tax exempt. However, this is a bit tricky because you might receive other dividends in your brokerage account.

In that case, calculate the amount from the Treasury, say $1,636, and divide it by your total dividend amount (e.g. $5,000)

If you have someone do your taxes and you have some of these Money Market Funds or other Treasury ETFs, double-check your state tax return and see the amounts reported. This will save you some money. It's also not too late to amend your tax return if this was missed.

Specifically, look for a “U.S. government interest subtraction” or similarly labeled line item on your state return. If it’s zero and you held these funds, that’s a red flag.

If you live in a no tax state, this would not apply to you, but still good to know in case you move!

I hope you found this one valuable.

  Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

The great COLA debate-maybe not the expected solution.

"Richard: I agree with much of that, particularly your last sentence. Seems that should already be the case. Where I differ is that our pensions are partially funded by our employers, partially by mandatory deductions from our pay, and a very small portion, 1-2%, by the State, thus, from taxes. Most of us considered our mandatory deductions to be very much like taxes, and, of course, the portion our employers (school districts) paid was funded primarily through property taxes."
- Dave Melick
Read more »

Happy 50th!

"thanx to bogle and malkiel for helping millions of retail investors everyone should read their books"
- Kenneth Tobin
Read more »

Shopping around – you versus the grocery store

"i think you may need to broaden your grocery shopping experience. Try going to Trader Joe’s or Aldi — no coupons of any kind and both are much smaller than the traditional supermarket. And then there’s Walmart, the biggest grocery seller in the US. The grocery market is quite segmented. The various formats appeal to different shoppers. I love to grocery shop— love them all!"
- Marilyn Lavin
Read more »

For Richer, For Poorer: 37 Years of Compounding

"David, my daughter has a toaster that cost nearly $300. It's a vast, shiny chrome affair, bristling with more knobs and dials than any self-respecting bread-browner has any business having. The first time I tried to use the thing, I couldn't even work out how to get the bread near the elements."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

California, Here They Came

"Glad to hear that, Heidi! Good observation, too. Patience, and satisfaction with incremental progress, does seem undervalued in today's go-go culture."
- D.J.
Read more »

The Vision, the Babe , Einstein and the Q

"Harold Tynes, Let me know the next time you go. I'll buy you a Boulevard KC Pils and we can talk Humble Dollar finance."
- mflack
Read more »

How Far Behind is the IRS?

"Thanks, but my Mom is not really worried about going to prison. I have told her so many times that the IRS is going to throw her in prison that she now understands I am joking. Rightly or wrongly, she has a lot of confidence in me that I will work this out."
- Larry Sayler
Read more »

Note to HD Writers and Contributors

"Welcome back to two of the HD old timers (like me). I hope to see more of them return. 🤞"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Somebody Has to Win

HOW DO YOU COMPETE in an investment contest when you’re a firm believer that investors can’t consistently beat the market averages? That was my dilemma several years ago.

A school not far from where I taught was given money by an alumnus to endow the St. Louis Area Collegiate Investment Contest. All colleges and universities in the area are invited to participate in the competition, which is held regularly. Each is given a hypothetical $1 million and asked to select 20 value stocks. An outside investment firm oversees the contest. They “invest” $50,000 in each of the 20 stocks. Whoever’s portfolio is worth the most two years later wins $10,000—real dollars, that is.

How do we select the 20 stocks for our entry? When I explain the contest to students, I also discuss the evidence that most investors don’t outperform the market. I suggest we could tape the stock pages of The Wall Street Journal to the wall and literally throw darts at it. Several students like this option.

But instead, I distribute Value Line’s current list of 100 stocks most likely to outperform the stock market over the next year. To focus on value stocks, I take these 100 stocks deemed most likely to outperform, circle the 40 or so companies with the lowest price-earnings ratios and ask students to select stocks from this list.

Value Line Investment Survey, which is often available at larger libraries, evaluates approximately 1,700 stocks. Value Line gives each stock a timeliness rating from one to five, indicating its belief that the stock will outperform the market over the next year. My initial list for the students draws on those stocks rated one for timeliness.

Rating             Number of Stocks    Meaning

1                      100                             Most likely to outperform

2                      300

3                      900

4                      300

5                      100                             Least likely to outperform

Value Line has a full-page analysis of each of these 1,700 stocks. Each stock gets a full review every 13 weeks, which means each week it updates this detailed analysis for about 130 stocks. But each week, all 1,700 stocks are evaluated for timeliness.

Some 30 or 40 years ago, there were a few academic studies indicating that Value Line could outperform the market averages. I have seen no recent independent studies of Value Line. My guess is that any advantage Value Line might have had decades ago no longer exists.

While I don’t believe Value Line will outperform the market, it’s one way to narrow down the list of potential stocks. It’s definitely safer than letting college students throw darts in a classroom.

Six schools entered the first contest. We won, receiving $10,000 and an oversized check. I took the check to our next faculty meeting and bragged about our business students. Most faculty assumed I had superior stock-picking skills, and I did not disabuse them of that view. But in my heart, I firmly believed it was just luck.

Six years later, we won again. If six schools enter each year, we ought to win about every six years. I didn’t point out that obvious fact when I went to the faculty meeting with that oversized check.

The very next year, we won again. Did that indicate we had a winning method? No. If six schools enter, and if the winner is completely random, the chance of this year’s winner winning again next year is one out of six. While my method of picking stocks might be superior, I believe two wins in a row is simply a random occurrence.

Recently, the contest was modified. Instead of starting just once a year, it now starts every semester. The payoff for winning was reduced from $10,000 once a year to $5,000 each semester. The number of participating schools has dropped to just four or five, increasing our odds of winning each contest.

Although I'm now retired, our school continues to follow the above method. Over the years, we have won $35,000. We call it our slush fund. Our department has used that money for additional faculty enrichment opportunities, student awards, end-of-the-year catered dinners for graduates and their families, and a host of other good causes. Perhaps most important, our finance students have learned some important lessons about how the stock market works.

Larry Sayler is the only person with a Wharton MBA who also graduated from Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey’s Clown College. Earlier in his career, he served as CFO for three manufacturing and service organizations. For 16 years before his retirement, Larry taught accounting at a small Christian college in the Midwest. His brother Kenyon also writes for HumbleDollar. Check out Larry's earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 70: AS WE decide how much debt to take on and how much money to save, we should ask ourselves a key question: Will our future self be happy with the choices we make today?

Truths

NO. 67: MOST MUTUAL funds are sector bets. Funds often aim for style purity, sticking with just one stock or bond market niche. To gauge whether a fund is any good, compare it to others in the same category. But to build a diversified portfolio, buy just one or two funds from any given category—and diversify with funds from other categories.

think

NEGATIVE BONDS. When we buy bonds, we lend to others and receive interest in return. Borrowing can be seen as a negative bond: Others lend to us—and we pay them interest. Typically, the interest rate we pay on borrowed money is higher than the yield we can earn by buying bonds. The upshot: Paying down debt is often the smartest “bond” we can buy.

humans

NO. 2: WE FOCUS on today—and shortchange tomorrow. Our nomadic ancestors didn’t worry about the long term. Instead, they focused on surviving today, which meant consuming as much as they could whenever they could. Those instincts live on within us, driving our spending, saving and investing behavior—and causing long-term financial damage.

Life events

Manifesto

NO. 70: AS WE decide how much debt to take on and how much money to save, we should ask ourselves a key question: Will our future self be happy with the choices we make today?

Spotlight: Happiness

Your Answers May Vary

IN THE WORLD OF personal finance, there’s no shortage of formulas and frameworks for making financial decisions. But it’s also important, I think, to see these as guidelines rather than as rules. Consider the textbook view of money and happiness.
What the research says is that, all else being equal, we should opt to spend money on experiences rather than things. Let’s say the choice is between spending $1,000 on a new watch or on a weekend away.

Read more »

Around the Obstacles

I WAS 48 years old when the judgement was final and the papers were signed. My former wife and I split our net worth 50/50. There were no arguments over household items like furniture; I didn’t care about that stuff. Pam gladly accepted my proposal that she keep the house, and all its equity, in exchange for me keeping an offsetting amount of the IRAs and my 401(k), a very good move for my future self.

Read more »

Avoiding Unhappiness

“DOES MONEY BUY happiness?” That’s one of the questions in HumbleDollar’s Forum section. I hesitate to say that happiness is a commodity we can buy. But studies—and many people’s personal experiences—suggest a lack of money can bring on unhappiness.
A recent paper, “Financial Stress and Depression in Adults” by researchers at the University of Birmingham in England, supports this conclusion. The researchers reviewed 40 studies examining the relationship between depression and financial stress,

Read more »

My Best Experiences

WORD ON THE STREET is that, if you want to use money to make yourself happy, you should buy experiences rather than things.
In principle, I couldn’t agree more.
There is, however, one kind of experience that I see touted both in the media and on social media that I don’t think reflects money well spent: the expensive family vacation to a distant destination. This status-symbol experience, complete with selfies at ritzy hotels, is supposedly designed to create priceless memories.

Read more »

Get to Choose

AS A YOUNG ENGINEER at General Electric, I took a three-day class on career development. That class strongly influenced my thinking about my career—and my life. The class made use of a great little book by David P. Campbell called If You Don’t Know Where You’re Going, You’ll Probably Wind Up Somewhere Else.
The premise of the book is that life is a journey, not a destination. We should set some basic goals that help guide our journey,

Read more »

Any Seat Will Do

WHEN OUR CHILDREN were little, we had season tickets to the Children’s Theatre in Minneapolis. We started taking our older child, and then brought his brother along when he was old enough to enjoy the show. We had tickets in the front row of the balcony.
Before my youngest son’s first show, he looked over the balcony railing at all of the people below. He asked why we were clear up here, when there were all of those people below us.

Read more »

Spotlight: Marsh

Getting Old

I COULD BE KIND TO my home and say it has rustic charm, but that would be pretentious. The truth is, it’s an old house, built in 1930 by my maternal grandparents. It sits on a remnant of the farm my family once owned. It’s a place I love, and where I’d like to grow old, and therein lies the challenge. More than 20 years ago, my father and I extensively renovated the house inside and out. Within the house, every surface was replaced or refinished. My wife gets credit for a share of the painting. We gave it air conditioning to tame the hot, Georgia summers and a furnace to take some of the chill out of winter. The house is still old and drafty, however. Warmth from the wood heater in the fireplace, fed by trees that I cut on the property, draws the family near when nights are frigid. Though the inside of the house is mostly neat, I can’t say the same for the surrounding property. The rambling yard is decidedly weedy, divided by haphazard beds of old-fashioned bulbs and flowering shrubs lovingly planted by my grandmother, supplemented by annual additions from my wife and me. On three sides, it’s difficult to tell where the yard ends and the surrounding small woodland begins. Out back, the old smokehouse, which once held hams and bacon, is now home to a clutter of tools and is in obvious need of repair. The dilapidated barn is beyond repair, and is waiting to be put out of its misery. Wildlife wanders about when Lottie the Labrador retriever is asleep on the porch. This year, on St. Patrick’s Day morning, after letting Lottie out of her kennel, a familiar sound rang out from near the vegetable garden. From our porch, my wife…
Read more »

Why Wait?

Several months ago, I wrote of my wife's and my decision to simplify our financial lives by reducing our investments to the bare minimum. Our thinking is in the same vein as our editor's, and a number of others in the HumbleDollar community, judging from my recollection of reader comments. Now, I know that many others have a different opinion of where to place their money, and that's okay. I'm not implying they're wrong. Indeed, I freely admit that I don't know the future, and time may show that their decision is justified. But, given the uncertainties of life, of our health and mental capacity as we age, is the chance of a little more gain worth the risk of greater loss from the gradual erosion of our ability to nimbly manage a complex portfolio? And what of the present? An interest in investing is, perhaps, the thickest common thread that brings us together here. It's an intensely interesting hobby for many of us. But with time ticking progressively faster, is it a habit that keeps us from other pursuits that may bring more happiness? We each have our own answer to that question, but aside from taxes and similar good reasons for keeping the complexities in place, why wait to embrace simplicity?    
Read more »

Retirement Rehearsal

As I finish this article, I'm sitting in an Airbnb in an older community undergoing a renaissance, nestled between a small mountain and my family's favorite little city. Atop the mountain, my daughter is attending a three-day "get acquainted" gathering at the college perched there, while my wife and I hang out and practice being a couple again. Across the room, my wife is catching up on her reading. Freedom from home or family duties feels like a vacation to her, even if we're not running to and fro to catch the sights. Meanwhile, indulging in semi-dedicated writing time foreshadows my vision of retirement. Paired with gardening, my other hobby, I hope writing provides a balance to the busy retirement I expect to experience. Currently, my writing is relegated to early-morning, late -evening or odd stretches of time snatched from my busy schedule. I say "semi-dedicated" because my wife and I have an itinerary that intermingles short hikes and good food with down time in the Airbnb. That's an easy mix to throw together, since it's just a brief walk to strike a trail leading up the mountain, while a cluster of restaurants close by promise a tasty menu. There's no set schedule, so I'm following my plan to fire up the keyboard when my wife is otherwise occupied Until recently, retirement planning for my wife and me meant fretting over our investment mix and running the numbers to be certain there's money to pay the bills after our work days are over for good. But we've learned money is not the only scarce resource to work out a plan for. Once we're satisfied our pile of treasure is high enough to quit working--should we choose to do so--how should we spend our new-found free time? Our list of possible…
Read more »

In Different Places

MY WIFE HAS PLANS for retirement. Travel plans. For too many years, she’s lived a mostly travel-free life. We’ve logged just a few short excursions to hither and yon. Yes, there have been reasons for this dearth of travel that were largely beyond our control. But her biggest obstacle has been—and continues to be—me. I’m mostly a homebody, and I’ve been reluctant to change my ways. My wife didn’t choose to love traveling. Rather, she was born into a family of travelers. When she was a child, her family spent summers and holidays camping all over California and other western states. Later, one of her brothers roamed Europe and elsewhere during 20 summer breaks from teaching school. I’ve written about another brother and a cousin who live abroad. In that article, there wasn’t enough space to list all my wife’s kin who live or have lived overseas. I suspect this familial wanderlust began when an ancestor decided to hitch up his wagon and head west. By contrast, my family genetics incline us to move once and stay put. There are exceptions, but a majority of my family members hew to this trait. It was certainly true of my parents. My mother still lives in the house they bought in 1952, and she can list her traveling vacations on two hands—with fingers to spare. My genes tell me to be still. Despite that, I’m not completely opposed to traveling. I’d like our retirement to have an ample amount. That’s where our differences start, however. My idea of ample falls short of what my wife considers barely adequate. While she’s dreaming of destinations and thinking of the itinerary details, I’m fine-tuning the latest iteration of my home project list. We’re both searching for happiness, but looking in different locales. My wife, it…
Read more »

Spending Their Future

WHY DO SOME PEOPLE save more for retirement than others, even when their income is the same? It turns out that a difference in spending behavior, rather than a larger salary, may separate better savers from those who struggle to set aside funds for their future. The Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management joined forces to examine the spending and saving behavior of 10,000 households. The households, which were analyzed by age cohort, were divided into three groups based on the percentage of salary each contributed to a 401(k) plan. In the bottom 25%, low savers sock away about 2% to 3% of their income. Middling savers—those in the middle 50%—save about 5% to 6%. High savers, in the top 25%, start by contributing about 9% of salary and increase that amount as they get closer to retirement. The researchers then compared the salaries of low and middling savers, and found that the two groups earn about the same. Yet, even though there’s only a small difference in salary between low and middling savers, at all ages middling savers sock away about three percentage points more toward retirement than low savers. This difference is meaningful down the road, as the two groups approach retirement age. Compared to low savers, middling savers accumulate twice as much by age 60. What drags down low savers and keeps them from achieving the same results as middling savers, who earn an equivalent salary? The answer is spending. Low savers spend about 2% to 3% more of their salary than middling savers, especially when they’re younger. This difference in spending may account for the additional savings that middling savers set aside for their golden years. The bulk of the difference consists of increased spending on housing, transportation, and food and beverages. Throughout…
Read more »

Doin’ the Charleston

I WROTE RECENTLY about my wife’s lifelong love of traveling, and of my resolve to get in step with her as she resumes her rambles. To that end, earlier this summer, I drove our family to Charleston, South Carolina, to attend the retirement ceremony for my cousin Chris, and to see a bit of the city, to boot. As our departure time approached, we learned that the original schedule for retirement day had been altered. Chris advised my wife that he understood if we wanted to change our plans. She assured him she wouldn't miss an event that got her stay-at-home family—my daughter and me—to travel somewhere, anywhere, and especially to Charleston. She’s enamored of the city, but for years has been unsuccessful at enticing me to accompany her there for a tour. Chris’s big day was just the lure to get me out of the house and into the car. After a morning drive from our home near Atlanta, we began our Charleston excursion with a tour of the U.S.S. Yorktown, a World War II-era aircraft carrier resting permanently at Patriots Point. We explored the ship from engine room to captain’s chair, including a stroll on the flight deck to investigate the variety of aircraft on display. Along the way, we tried to imagine the sailors and naval aviators at work in dangerous locations far removed from the quiet of Charleston Harbor. The next day was devoted to helping Chris and his friend Matt say so long to the United States Air Force in a dual retirement ceremony. Their lives have been intertwined for years. They graduated college together and were commissioned as Air Force officers on the same day. After spending much of their 22 years of active and reserve service together, they were now sharing their retirement…
Read more »