FREE NEWSLETTER
RETIREMENT. THE GOLDEN years. A time for travel, relaxation, and maybe a move to a quaint, low-maintenance condo. At least, that’s the image often portrayed. But for us, retirement wasn’t about shrinking our lives. We decided against the downsizing trend, opting to stay put in our familiar home filled with memories. Here’s why we chose comfort over perceived practicality:
The Heart of Our History. Our house isn’t just bricks and mortar; it’s a chronicle of our lives. The chipped floorboard marks where our daughter learned to ride her bike. The worn patch on the couch whispers stories of countless movie nights. Downsizing would mean parting with these tangible reminders, a process that felt emotionally wrenching.
We’d witnessed friends struggle with the emotional toll of downsizing. Saying goodbye to cherished belongings, navigating the logistics of parting with furniture that wouldn’t fit the new space, and the sheer exhaustion of the move—it cast a shadow over their golden years. We wanted our retirement to be a time of joyful reminiscing, not a whirlwind of decluttering and goodbyes.
Rooted in Community. Our neighborhood is more than just an address; it’s a close-knit community. We’ve watched children grow up, shared countless barbecues with neighbors, and built a network of support. Downsizing often means uprooting from established communities, a prospect we found daunting.
The familiar faces we see on our daily walks, the friendly chats over the fence—these connections are a source of comfort and belonging, especially as we age. We worried that downsizing would isolate us, leaving us to navigate retirement in an unfamiliar environment.
Space for the Future. While some envision a retirement focused solely on the present, we wanted a home that could accommodate future possibilities. Our children, scattered across the country, might decide to visit more often when they have families of their own. The extra bedrooms would provide a welcoming space for them, fostering those precious moments with grandchildren.
Perhaps one of us might require in-home care down the line. Our single-story layout already offers easy accessibility, and the extra space could be adapted to accommodate any future needs. Downsizing, with its limited square footage, might not have offered this flexibility.
Financial Considerations. The financial “wisdom” often associated with downsizing wasn’t entirely persuasive for us. The moving costs, realtor fees, and potential capital gains taxes would eat into our retirement savings. While a smaller home might have lower property taxes and utilities, the initial financial burden of selling and buying wasn’t appealing.
Additionally, the housing market can be unpredictable. Downsizing might have meant locking into a new mortgage payment, a financial commitment we weren’t keen on in retirement. Staying put, with our existing mortgage nearing its end, offered financial stability and peace of mind.
Embracing Minimalism, Not Downsizing. Downsizing doesn’t equate to living a minimalist lifestyle. We did embrace a decluttering process, getting rid of unused items and streamlining our belongings. However, this wasn’t a precursor to a move; it was about appreciating what truly mattered within our existing space.
We found creative storage solutions, maximizing vertical space and utilizing out-of-the-way corners. Sentimental items were carefully organized, ensuring they were cherished, not merely collecting dust. This decluttering exercise wasn’t about shedding our past; it was about creating a more organized and functional present.
Retirement Redefined. Ultimately, downsizing isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. We opted for a different path, one that prioritized comfort, familiarity, and the ability to adapt to the unknown. Our retirement is filled with travel adventures, rekindled hobbies, and spending time with loved ones—all within the walls of the home that holds our life’s story.
This isn’t to say downsizing is wrong. For many, it offers financial freedom and a fresh start. But it’s important to challenge the societal pressure to shrink your life in retirement. There’s beauty in staying put, in cherishing your memories, and in embracing a future that unfolds within the familiar walls of your haven. Retirement is a time to redefine what a fulfilling life looks like, and for us, that meant staying put, not downsizing.
The above was created by Google Gemini based on this request: “Write an 800-word article about why we chose not to downsize when we retired.” To read more about this experiment, check out Man vs. Machine.
Want to receive our weekly newsletter? Sign up now. How about our daily alert about the site's latest posts? Join the list.
Please redo the experiment at some point, but do not inform readers at the outset which articles are AI generated. That way you eliminate the bias people have against AI which colors their criticism. I’d be interested to see responses to articles, whether some people don’t notice the difference, and/or others start seeing AI when it’s not there.
It would be an interesting experiment — but, I feel, one that’s unethical. I wouldn’t want to commit a “fraud on the reader.”
I’d bet that a large percentage of HD readers would be fooled.
I’ll only address the bike issue for those who think it’s farfetched. I’ll never forget the Christmas (which one, I’ve forgotten:) when Santa brought our two boys battery powered 3-wheel motorcycles – top speed, 3 mph. Trust me, 3 mph indoors can cause significant havoc.
AI or not, and imperfectly put, this article nevertheless reflects a lot of my wife’s and my own thinking on the case for “staying put”.
I agree with mytimetotravel: Reading that their daughter learned to ride her bike inside the house made me wonder about this AI family. I guess it could have been worse than a chipped floorboard.
I know I’m ranting at AI, but this pushed buttons for me.
Dear Google Gemini:
You’re not being courageous by “bucking the trend.” You’re being selfish. Have you thought of these issues? In no particular order:
The only one of your arguments that made sense to me, GG, is the cost of selling and buying if you downsize, given the current housing market and mortgage interest rates.
Overall, a shallow argument that didn’t make sense at points, as mytimetotravel points out. Grade: C-
I don’t find it all that hard to believe. During hard Montana winters, several of my children learned to rollerskate on the wide hardwood hallway of our home. Needless to say, the floor had to be refinished later on. I have memorable photos of those days. Cherish them and still hear the clomp-clomp-clomp sounds of that part of the learning curve in my mind.
Your criticisms seem to ignore the fact that Jonathan asked Gemini to “Write an 800-word article about why we chose not to downsize when we retired.”
Never heard a condo called “quaint” before. Nor do I buy the daughter learning to ride a bike indoors, nor the chats over the fence – what century is this set in?
Not quite sure why, but although it’s written in the first person, it doesn’t really sound like a person.
Googling “quaint condo” with an exact phrase restriction resulted in 118,000 hits. The bit about the bike is farfetched.
How many hits do you get for “quaint cottage” or even “quaint house”?
This piece reminded me of that amazing 1998 movie “Truman”. Jim Carrey playing the title character had daily interactions with neighbors, his postal carrier, gardener, et al that included all the requisite pleasantries, but after 2 days of witnessing this morning routine play out, you instinctively just knew that something was terribly “off” in his daily world. Re-watching this movie may well prove a good primer for the next phase of AI in the consumer marketplace.
My early take on AI generated content: a hundred miles wide with regard to its potential breadth – a mere 2 inches deep in emotional substance.
I had a similar reaction – the AI generated articles are a good start, but not very deep.
Jonathan, your experiment has reinforced my natural cynicism regarding what I read. To borrow a phrase from you, “I am now better informed!”