FREE NEWSLETTER

351 Exchange – Tax-Free Transfer of Individual Stocks to an ETF

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: Ed Kadala on 10/16/2025

In an effort to simplify and consolidate my portfolio, I recently completed what’s known as a Section 351 exchange in a taxable account. This provision of the Internal Revenue Code lets investors transfer assets—such as stocks and securities—to a corporation without recognizing a taxable gain or loss, provided certain conditions are met.

With help from my financial consultant, I exchanged a portfolio of individual stocks in a separately managed account (SMA), held since 2020, for shares in a new exchange-traded fund (ETF). Because the transaction qualified under Section 351, it was tax-free, and my original cost basis carried over to the ETF.

The SMA portfolio held global growth equities, with both long- and short-term gains and losses. The new ETF—a focused growth fund—owns many of the same companies. In fact, the SMA’s asset manager launched this ETF, offering SMA clients the opportunity to contribute their holdings during its initial seeding via the 351 exchange. I could have included other stocks or ETFs I held elsewhere, but I limited the exchange to the SMA positions.

Since opening the SMA, I’ve tracked every purchase, sale, and dividend in Quicken (dividends were not reinvested). I also managed tax-loss harvesting, instructing the manager to temporarily replace any sold stock with an index fund for 30 days to avoid the wash-sale rule. Keeping the SMA synchronized in Quicken took time and discipline, but it provided useful insight into performance and taxes.

There’s an after-tax advantage to ETFs compared with SMAs. I was provided the following example: assuming an 8% annual return, 20% turnover, and less than 1% in dividends, the ETF structure can deliver roughly a 1-percentage-point annual savings after accounting for fees and taxes. Before the exchange, I harvested stock lots with losses to offset this year’s SMA capital gains.

The exchange itself was efficient—only three business days from the removal of the SMA stocks to receipt of the ETF shares. The brokerage provided detailed tax-lot information, including share counts, cost basis, and unrealized gains and losses. Although Quicken doesn’t have a one-click “351 exchange” transaction, it can be recorded accurately by treating it as a non-taxable security swap, ensuring the cost basis carries over properly. (I followed a process laid out by ChatGPT.)

Investors aren’t locked into the ETF. Once received, ETF shares can be sold, donated, or even used in another 351 exchange. Several new ETFs are now being launched through this mechanism, accepting stocks and other securities from investors across multiple custodians. These funds can offer an efficient way to diversify or rebalance portfolios—say, shifting from concentrated technology holdings to value, international, or fixed-income assets—all while deferring taxes.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Bogdan Sheremeta
Admin
7 months ago

Hey Ed, would you be interested in writing an article about this topic in-depth (fees, process, etc). I think many people would find this beneficial (me included)

Sanjib Saha
19 days ago

Exchange Funds – Dollar Mentor

The above is the summary of a small-group discussion on 351 ETFs. Our non-profit for investment education has a monthly group discussion on various investment/finance topics, and 351 ETFs was discussed last March.

Craig Broadbooks
20 days ago

Hi Ed,

Thanks for sharing all of this! You mention that the ETF shares you receive can then be “or even used in another 351 exchange”. I have read that you can’t contribute those shares to another 351 exchange. If you have any reference that you could share about that possibility, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Craig

Last edited 20 days ago by Craig Broadbooks
Michael1
7 months ago

Interesting.

To make sure I understand the capital gains benefit… I gather the idea is that once in the ETF, my old holdings are partially (or completely) swapped into far more, and since that is taking place inside the ETF wrapper, the gains are to the ETF, which because of its unique structure usually doesn’t have to make distributions. So I get the higher diversification without the gains I’d realize by making the trades in my own account.

Still, the old cost basis is carried forward, and if I ever want some money, I will incur the gains. Further, when that time comes, I won’t be able to pick and choose what to sell; that potential tax management tool is gone forever. 

Re Jeff Long’s comment, I’d also want to be sure my cost basis in the ETF would be fully stepped up for my heirs.

I see the benefit if one has an overly large holding that they want to diversify out of. But to consolidate an already diversified portfolio of tens of individual stocks into one ETF just for simplicity, I’m not sure there’s much attraction. 

Sanjib Saha
19 days ago
Reply to  Michael1

Michael, for your comment “I see the benefit if one has an overly large holding that they want to diversify out of.”, there are requirements about the contribution to be “diversified” itself. Specifically, no single stock > 25% of the total contribution and the top 5 must be < 50% of the total contribution. Therefore, it wouldn’t be possible to get rid of one or more “overly large holding”.

I approached the 351 exchange ETF topic with my usual skepticism when I first heard about it, -just like I do it for any new financial products that comes with a sales pitch). I suppose the only investors benefiting from such funds are the ones who have somehow ended up with a handful of stocks that they no longer want to keep (because of undiversified risk, lack of benchmarking, etc.) but are unwilling to sell because of the accumulated tax. Switching to an exchange fund will simply “reduce the risk” for them by diversification without an immediate tax hit.

Now, whether the target ETF is something they’d have owned in the first place (even outside the context of 351 exchange) is the key question. If not, perhaps selling the individual stocks and diversifying into ultra low-cost diversified Index fund would be the better long-term solution.

Michael1
7 months ago
Reply to  Ed Kadala

Thanks Ed. It appears you could make that move via a 351 exchange also, according to Alpha Architect’s intro to the topic, which your piece led me to read, link below for others.

I suppose my next question to myself would be whether I want the new ETF to begin with. It’s going to be actively managed, and there’s no Morningstar or other independent analysis of its management or performance, so not something I’d buy normally.

Btw don’t discount writing an article about this because you’re not an expert. I’ve written a couple of articles on things I wasn’t expert on either. It has had the benefit of inviting others who were experts educate me in their comments.
🙂

https://alphaarchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/compliance/etfarchitect/Intro%20to%20ETF%20Taxation%20and%20351%20Conversions.pdf

OldITGuy
7 months ago

Another tool in the toolbox. Thanks for sharing.

Jeff Long
7 months ago

Never used 351 for other than incorporating a small business. Concerned on death of the shareholder(s) basis step up would be to the corporate shares, based on the FMV of the contributed shares, but the basis of the contributed shares would not change.

B Carr
7 months ago

This is very interesting; I never heard of it. Thanks for describing the process.

Free Newsletter

SHARE