Adam Grossman recently wrote a good piece about “barbell” strategies.
A barbell—literally—is a metal bar with weights on each end like you see in a gym or an old Popeye cartoon. There are no weights in the middle, just on the opposite ends.
In investment terms, a to implement a barbell strategy is to overweight assets at opposing ends of the spectrum. A common approach is to create a barbell of bond funds with short-term maturities and those with long-term maturities and not much in the middle.

This HumbleDollar guide explains mutual funds and ETFs. Which do you favor, and why? Do you choose differently depending on whether the investments are in a taxable brokerage account, a traditional pretax account such as an IRA or 401(k), or a Roth account such as a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k)?
Mine are all mutual funds, in all three types of accounts. Initially that was because ETFs weren’t available when I started investing. Now it’s because I don’t wish to deal with bid-ask spreads,

I only own two individual stocks. I have shares in the company I retired from in my 401(k) and shares in my current company in my Roth IRA. Returns so far this year: 93% for my old company and 122% for my current employer. Did you ever buy stock in your employer’s company, and how long did you hold it?

I am shocked. When sifting through Morningstar for an international index mutual fund, I naturally turned to Vanguard’s popular Total International Stock (VTIAX). I noticcd its expense ratio is .12, uncharacteristically high for the definitive purveyor of low-cost funds.
My eyebrows raised, I thought I should take a peek at a comparable Fidelity offering. I discovered the behemoth fund group sponsored a contraption named the Zero International Index fund (FTIHX). Incredibly, that zero refers to the expense ratio.

BACK IN 1987, Nassim Nicholas Taleb was a trader on Wall Street. But unlike most of his peers, Taleb wasn’t pinning his hopes on a market rally. Instead, he’d positioned himself to benefit from a market meltdown. On Oct. 19, just such an event occurred. For no apparent reason—in the midst of an otherwise strong market—the S&P 500 dropped 23% in a single day. The result: Taleb made a fortune—enough to retire at age 27.

I have 10% of my portfolio in I-Bonds, 10% in Short term treasuries. With interest rates likely to go down, would long/intermediate bond funds make sense?

I hate change.  When Schwab acquired TD Ameritrade where I had my brokerage account, I knew at some point I would have to use the Schwab platform.  Well it happened a month and a half ago.  I am not thrilled by Schwab but it’s not as bad as I feared.  Anyone go through this?

What is the general opinion of TIPS in this current environment ?

Target date funds (TDFs) have similar risk until they approach their target date, which is intended to be your retirement date — typically age 65.  Risk at the target date ranges from 20% risky assets to 90% risky assets, with most in the 90% group. There are 2 groups — safe and risky.
So what is the “right” level of risk for those near retirement? Academics have addressed this question extensively, and their answer is “very safe”,

First a question and then the backstory.
Mid-60’s and nearing retirement with 80% domestic allocation of stocks (60% domestic/40% international) in tech heavy QQQ. Sold 20% of my shares yesterday, and now have $200k+ to reinvest. Tax basis is 13% of the current market price. Long term capital gain rate of 15% applies, plus 3.8% NIIT. Gain is $192.5k.
How would you reinvest the sales proceeds to slowly sell off this concentrated QQQ position in a taxable account?

I have a small employer that I have set up with a Simple IRA directly with Vanguard.  Now Vanguard is farming out their Simple and 401K business to a firm called Ascensus.  We are going to move the Simple business to Fidelity. The employees tend to not take a detailed understanding of finance and we look for simple fund of funds approach.  I have always been a fan of FBALX Fidelity and retirement date funds are always a choice.

In recent weeks, I’ve been asked by several friends if and by how much am I invested in NVDIA. Well, overall I have about a 5% position, similar to that of the broadest market index funds. The typical response is, “Is that all? Why not more?” Many of them have devoted anywhere from 20-50% of their savings to the stock and are blithely delighting in their wisdom. Of course, the answer depends on very many factors—age,

I am keen to hear from readers, but my thinking on this subject has changed recently. (Hint: I think owning a 100% stock portfolio makes a lot of sense.)

BACK IN 2021, Keith Gill wasn’t well known. A video game enthusiast, he liked to spend time in his basement, day-trading and making videos. But with his online persona, Roaring Kitty, Gill drew a following that reached into the millions. He used that platform to direct attention to the shares of video game retailer GameStop, which was nearing insolvency. 

Gill’s videos drew enough attention in 2021 to cause a “short squeeze” in GameStop shares. The result: At least one hedge fund,

AS THE SAYING GOES, “Never ask a barber if it’s time for a haircut.”

This isn’t to suggest that barbers lack integrity. Rather, the point is that—when faced with a question with no definitive answer—business people often offer an answer that reflects their own best interest. For a barber, it’s always a good time for a haircut. The barber is neither wrong nor correct. It’s a judgment call. But the barber is undoubtedly invested in his opinion,