FREE NEWSLETTER

robert waldorff

    Forum Posts

    Comments

    • Ken, you are correct per Mary Beth Franklin who speaks and writes about SS. She states the system is designed to provide similar results at the life expectancy age.

      Post: THE REAL RETURN ON DELAYING SOCIAL SECURITY

      Link to comment from November 13, 2025

    • Appreciate the input, here is an article also delving into the topic that presents NPV considerations. Jason Zwieg posted the link. https://www.financialplanningassociation.org/learning/publications/journal/SEP24-net-present-value-analysis-roth-conversions-OPEN I took SS early and saved IRA funds to grow, my IRA grew to an additional balance of ~ $290,000 during the time I received early SS. This extra balance will be eroded as my lower SS benefit will not be what I would have received at age 70. Should I earn 4% on this balance going forward I will have increased my break even age to 92. If I earn 5.5% my remaining additional IRA won't be exhausted until age 102. I plan to track the remaining balance for a few years as I tend to question things and want to learn. My wife and I have earned the same wages so we took mine early and let hers grow to age 70, our benefits were $16 different. Also should she pass I will get her higher amount and the remaining additional IRA I earned, she will receive her benefit and my additional IRA should I pass. Mary Beth Franklin presents excellent info on SS and various options depending on individual circumstances. Taking SS early worked well for me.

      Post: THE REAL RETURN ON DELAYING SOCIAL SECURITY

      Link to comment from November 13, 2025

    SHARE