FREE NEWSLETTER

Helping Out

John Yeigh  |  October 15, 2020

SOME FAMILY MEMBERS recently asked me to help them find a financial advisor. As luck would have it, soon after, Barron’s published a perfectly timed article, “America’s Best RIA Firms,” which listed 100 highly ranked registered investment advisors (RIAs). Similar lists are available from CNBC and the Financial Times.

It was time for me to get to work. Who wouldn’t want to recommend a “top” firm to his or her family?

The Barron’s article provided four pieces of information for each firm: the number of clients, advisors and offices, as well as the number of states where those offices are located. This allowed me to calculate the client-to-advisor ratio, which ranged from five to 3,855 clients per advisor. My family neither required nor could afford the attention of 20% of an advisor’s time, but they also needed more support than an advisor who was handling thousands of clients.

Some web research indicated that the typical number of clients per advisor is around 150. As few as 50 higher net worth clients is often sufficient for an advisor to generate a decent income. Assuming 2,000 working hours per year, an advisor with 150 clients can devote about one hour per month to each client, but that would include time handling paperwork, developing financial plans, following markets, and keeping up with tax and regulatory changes.

In other words, the advisor might be able to chat with a client for 30 or 40 minutes per month. (In practice, advisors typically talk to clients less frequently, but for longer.) Several articles suggested that, if an advisor wants to maintain a good relationship with his or her clients, the maximum number of clients should be even less—perhaps just 100. That means an important first question to ask any potential new advisor is, how many clients are you currently serving?

This leads to a related question: What’s your average client account balance? I came across several RIAs that had clients with average account balances in excess of $30 million. One RIA required $20 million to open an account. Relatively few RIAs manage average account balances in the low hundreds of thousands. Clearly, many of these firms were working with folks who are in a different league from my family.

My family also wanted to understand the costs involved. From scouring the web, it seems RIA fees range from 2.5% of an account’s value each year to 0.75%, though that lower fee was often only available for larger accounts. That said, many firms don’t openly advertise their fees and nearly all the fine print indicates that the fees are “negotiable.”

Whether a fee is reasonable depends on the services involved. An advisory firm could provide portfolio management only or it could offer full-on financial, retirement, insurance, portfolio, tax and estate planning. It’s also important to find out whether the firm is fee-only or whether it also collects commissions, and whether it operates as a fiduciary, meaning it’s legally obligated to act in the best interest of clients. I found that a financial advisor providing the sort of guidance my family was seeking would likely cost about 1% of their account value each year.

A quick analysis suggested the Barron’s RIAs were not ideal for my family’s situation because the required minimums were too high. Time for Plan B. A number of websites match clients and advisors based on an array of inputs. These include NAPFA.org, PlannerSearch.org and SmartAsset.com. I forwarded these links to my family. Robo-advisors were also an option, but my family needed more support than robos typically offer.

In addition, I encouraged my family to check out the major low-cost brokerage and fund firms. Vanguard Group, Fidelity Investments and Charles Schwab, among others, offer relatively inexpensive advisory services. Vanguard’s fee is just 0.3% a year, with a minimum account size of $50,000. Fidelity’s fee is 0.5%, with an even more modest minimum of $25,000. Likewise, Schwab has a $25,000 minimum, but is significantly more expensive for smaller accounts. Like almost all advisors, these major financial firms will provide a free initial free consultation. They also offer lower-cost—and sometimes free—online alternatives.

My family still hasn’t decided which route to go. But if they opt for an individual investment advisor, rather than one of the large financial firms, I’ve suggested they ensure the advisor has a conservative, low-cost investment philosophy, which would be a good match for their limited investment experience. I’ve also recommended they check out potential advisors through FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. There may be additional information on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website.

John Yeigh is an engineer with an MBA in finance. He retired in 2017 after 40 years in the oil industry, where he helped negotiate financial details for multi-billion-dollar international projects.  His previous articles include While We’re WaitingBankrolling Roth and Losing My Balance.

Do you enjoy HumbleDollar? Please support our work with a donation. Want to receive daily email alerts about new articles? Click here. How about getting our weekly newsletter? Sign up now.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scrooge_McDuck88
Scrooge_McDuck88
6 months ago

Any advisor who charges 2.5% should be shamed, not added to a list of the “best” advisors. Just like the lottery is a tax on those who don’t understand statistics, 2.5% is tax on those who don’t understand compounding.

davebarnes
davebarnes
6 months ago

Or, for zero cost, you could just spend hours reading at Bogleheads and Early-Retirement and make your own decisions.

IAD
IAD
6 months ago

I honestly don’t see the benefit of an ongoing relationship with an advisor. Sure, help in particular spots are useful, but what do they do for you month in and month out? Even a 1% fee adds up…but I guess if they are beating the market by 1% it could be justified…otherwise just out of pocket.

Roboticus Aquarius
Roboticus Aquarius
6 months ago

1% is a pretty heavy cost over the very long run. Over 40 years, it will drain 25% of a typical portfolio’s returns. I do think for people who have special needs, poor money sense, or difficulty with numbers, it may be worthwhile for them. This becomes more true if the individual has a tendency towards ill-considered and drastic actions, or has difficulty with anxiety in relation to their investments. There is wisdom in understanding one’s own areas of difficulty, and finding ways to compensate for them.

However, if at all possible I’d recommend most people learn to manage their investments themselves. The thing is, investing is not complicated. Solid guidance is available in many places for free (I wish I’d had the same resources 25 years ago!) Bogleheads.com is a great place to start.

Where an advisor should provide value add is helping you understand your financial vulnerabilities & opportunities. What kind of insurance you may need, and how much. Better ways to finance your goals. Better ways to manage your budget, even. A review of your investments to ensure your portfolio makes sense. This can be done by fee-only advisors, and you can see them every year if necessary, or once every 5 years if that makes more sense.

John Yeigh
John Yeigh
5 months ago

While many low cost alternatives to advisors exist these days including the Humble Dollar guide, an advisor could be well worth their fees for folks that don’t have sufficient knowledge, time or inclination to manage their fananceswealth.

Free Newsletter

SHARE