Search results for: 4% rule

IF YOU OWN A STOCK in a taxable account that falls in value, you can take some of the sting out of that loss by selling your shares, realizing a capital loss and then using that loss to reduce your annual tax bill. A good idea? Problem is, selling means giving up any chance of making back the loss.
Many folks aren’t keen to do that, so they often look to buy back the shares.

IF YOU MAKE REGULAR annual contributions to a Roth IRA, you can withdraw those contributions at any time with no taxes or penalties owed. It’s a different story, however, with the account’s investment gains.
Those gains will be subject to both income taxes and tax penalties if you withdraw them within the first five years and if you are under age 59½ (or, to put it another way, you need to wait five years and until after age 59½ for the account’s growth to be totally tax-free).

BY THE LATE 1990s, with almost two decades of robust investment returns under their belts, investors would talk about 6%, 8% and even 10% as a reasonable rate at which to draw down a retirement portfolio. But researchers begged to disagree—and the financial markets provided brutal confirmation, hitting stock investors with back-to-back bear markets in 2000–02 and 2007–09.
Today, 4% is considered a safe withdrawal rate (though even that number has been called into question).

ONE RULE OF THUMB suggests that, to retire in comfort, you need 80% of your preretirement income. Why the 20% drop? You are no longer saving 10% or so every year toward retirement and you’re no longer making an employee’s 7.65% payroll-tax contribution to Social Security and Medicare. In addition, you won’t have to buy work clothes or pay commuting costs. Your income tax bill should also go down, in part because a portion of your retirement income will likely come from Social Security benefits,

HOW LONG WILL IT take to double your money, given a particular rate of return? You can get a rough answer by dividing 72 by the annual return. For instance, if you expect to earn 7% a year, it would take just over 10 years to double your money. But at a 3% annual return, the compounding process is much slower, with your money doubling every 24 years.
Obviously, the higher the return you earn,

31 Rules of the Road
Below is a modestly revised version of the Jonathan Clements Money Guide 2015‘s final chapter. 
Looking to improve your money management? Here are 31 rules for the financial road ahead:
1.      Check your retirement progress by taking your nest egg and applying a 4 percent annual portfolio withdrawal rate, equal to $4,000 a year for every $100,000 saved. Will you have enough retirement income—or should you be saving more?

MOST OF US STRUGGLE with self-control. We eat too much, exercise too little and spend excessively. One solution: Adopt rigid rules of behavior.
For instance, I make it a rule to exercise every morning for at least 40 minutes, always buy whole wheat bread, avoid caffeine after 9 a.m. and eat fruit as a midmorning snack. I’ve followed these rules for so long that they’re no longer rules, but rather ingrained, unquestioned habits.
Not surprisingly,

Medicare Part D now limits the patient’s out of pocket costs to $2,100 a year (2026) adjusted each year.
There are conditions. Your Plan D is responsible for tracking your spending. 
Every time you fill a covered prescription:

The pharmacy submits the claim electronically to your Part D plan
The plan records: what the drug costs, what you paid, what the plan paid
Once you hit the limit, you pay $0 for covered drugs for the rest of the year.

Sharing this article (free link, I hope) because it does a great job explaining the ACA “subsidy cliff” — how a small change in income can suddenly make health insurance unaffordable. Hoping it helps people explain this to family or friends and sparks a real conversation about why subsidies matter and how the rules could be improved.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/upshot/obamacare-subsidies-financial-cliff.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JVA.k0hc._GnYquc58qF6&smid=url-share
I’ve tried to explain the ACA and subsidies to a number of friends to limited success.  Between calculating MAGI,

In a recent post, “lost decade” investment periods were mentioned. Looking at safe withdrawal rates, there is an assumption of portfolio continuity.   Uniform returns over a long period of time coupled with consistent withdrawals.    In such an environment, a portfolio which yields 6% annually can sustain a withdrawal rate that begins at 4% and the portfolio will increase in value.  But over 30 years it may decrease in purchasing power.  [1]
But what if a “Lost Decade” occurs? 

The  recent discussion about withdrawal rates – 4% and all  that – got me thinking about the importance and confusion surrounding that decision.  I don’t  personally have to deal with it and gladly so because I’m sure I would not handle it well. My withdrawals are those required by RMDs. 
The current RMD table is based on the 2012 Individual Annuity Mortality (IAM). The table is more generous than a “single life” actuarial table. It is calculated using the Joint Life and Last Survivor expectancy for an individual and a hypothetical beneficiary who is exactly 10 years younger.

WHAT WAS THE road to outstanding investment performance in 2025? For the first time in a long time, it wasn’t Apple, Amazon or Nvidia. It was gold. Delivering its best performance in 45 years, gold rose nearly 65%. Despite these impressive gains, however, I still don’t see gold as a great investment. 
Why not?
The most fundamental problem, in my view, is that gold lacks intrinsic value. Unlike traditional investments such as stocks, bonds and real estate,

MANY PEOPLE FOCUS on building wealth through asset allocation and investment choices. Far fewer think about asset protection. In my opinion, protecting wealth is just as important as building it, especially since decades of disciplined saving and investing can be undone in one unfortunate event.
In this article, I wanted to discuss some of the strategies and tips that I’ve learned, and implemented in my personal finance journey.
Quick disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer,

The advice I keep seeing says that you can safely withdraw 4% a year (adjusted for inflation) from a 60-40 portfolio over 30 years. This is all well and good, if your portfolio is 60-40 and you start withdrawing at age 70 – or 65 if you are more pessimistic about your longevity. I have always planned based on living to 100, without really hoping to make it that long, so this advice would have worked if I had started drawing on my portfolio at 70.

I recently read the HumbleDollar guidance suggesting retirees consolidate old 401(k) accounts for simplicity. My husband and I are both retired (age 62) and are wondering whether that advice still holds when the existing plans are high quality.
We each have a former-employer 401(k):
– Mine is with a large financial institution
– My husband’s is with his union
Both plans have low costs (~ 65 bps all-in), solid investment options, and no required distributions yet.