BASED ON THE U.S. experience of the past 50 years, there appears to be a fairly tight connection between economic growth and stock returns. But the story is messier than it seems. While economic growth and per-share profits for the S&P 500 companies grew at a similar pace over the past 50 years, earnings per share were only able to keep up with economic growth because of falling corporate tax rates and rising corporate profitability.
The top corporate tax rate has dropped from 48% in 1965—67 to 21% for 2018 and subsequent years. Thanks to complicated tax maneuvering, many companies manage to pay even less. As corporate income taxes have fallen and profit margins have widened, after-tax corporate profits have grown from 6.5% of GDP in late 1967 to 8.5% in late 2017, according to data compiled by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Today’s level is well above the 50-year average of 6.6%.
Trouble is, falling corporate taxes and widening profit margins are onetime gains. Stock investors can’t benefit again from after-tax corporate profits rising from 6.5% of GDP to 8.5%—unless there was a sharp contraction first. That doesn’t mean tax rates couldn’t fall further and profit margins couldn’t widen further. But there are limits to both. Corporate taxes can’t get any lower than zero. Meanwhile, the share of GDP that goes to corporate profits, which comes at the expense of salaries and wages, can’t keep growing and growing, and lately it’s shown signs of reversing: In early 2012, corporate profits stood at 10.8% of GDP.
A further reversal would be grim news for stock market investors. Over the past 50 years, the combination of falling taxes and rising profitability has helped offset one of the most insidious threats to stock market investors: dilution.
Previous: Stocks and the Economy