Felt a little uneasy with the market wobbles over the last while? Maybe some quiet anguish watching your numbers dip into the red? If so, welcome back to an old friend, recency bias, because that’s almost certainly what you’re experiencing.
Step back and look at your portfolio over the last 12, 24, 36 months and you’re on a solid upward trajectory. That’s genuinely good news. But you’re not thinking about that, are you? Your mind is stuck on whatever percent you lost last month. It’s not logical, but that’s how we slightly too clever apes are wired.
So what actually is recency bias? Simple. It’s the tendency to overweight recent events when making judgements. Sound familiar?
Here’s a useful way to think about it. Your brain is software. Impressive software, admittedly, but old. We’re talking about code that was largely written on the African savanna somewhere between 50,000 and 200,000 years ago, optimised for a world of immediate physical threats and fast moving predators with pointy teeth. It hasn’t had a meaningful update since. What you’re experiencing right now, that low level dread, that urge to “do something”, is a legacy feature running exactly as intended. It’s just running in completely the wrong environment.
The specific bug is this: the system is designed to weight recent events heavily. If something bad happened near the watering hole yesterday, assume it might happen again today. Don’t go back to the watering hole. This was, in its original context, genuinely excellent advice. The problem is that “bad thing happened recently” now triggers the same subroutine whether you’re being stalked by a slightly peckish lion or watching a portfolio dip three percent in a volatile March.
And it gets sneakier. The software doesn’t just amplify the recent past. It extrapolates it forward. A bad week becomes a bad year in your head. A volatile month starts to feel like the new normal. There’s no popup warning you that this is happening. No error message. Just a quiet, confident, completely wrong projection running in the background while you contemplate what’s happening.
The patch, unfortunately, can’t be downloaded. But there is a work around. Zoom out. Literally, open your portfolio app, switch the chart to the maximum time range, and just look at it. You’re essentially forcing your buggy software to load a larger dataset than it instinctively wants to process. History is not a perfect guide to the future, but it is a reliable antidote to the present. Markets have survived worse than whatever is currently filling the headlines. They will probably survive this too.
The other thing worth remembering? Everyone else is running the same buggy software you are. The market is the output of millions of people experiencing the same glitch in real-time. Which means the moment of maximum collective dread, the point where it genuinely feels like something has permanently broken, is historically quite a good time to be invested, not a good time to be heading for the exit.
You’re not broken for feeling this way. You’re just running slightly old fashioned code in a world it wasn’t designed for. The trick isn’t to fix the software. It’s to know when not to trust it.
I loved your comparison of the psychology of investors with software, Mark!
Just like that bugging Window$ 1x desktop of mine, you just have to do a hard reset. Thinking/wiring differently, if your bowl (portfolio) is big enough, then think of it as an opportunity to buy on the dip.
Mark,
Historically, I haven’t really suffered from recency bias – I either tell myself it’s temporary or stop looking at my statements 🫣.
I’m close to retirement, but not yet retired, so still in the accumulation phase – still have the opportunity to DCA…adding to the portfolio during those dip periods.
I think what I’m going to miss most as an investor in retirement is not being able to buy with new dollars when the market is down. I will have to adjust to this new situation of a “closed system of money“ during the distribution phase. I don’t think the periodic rebalancing process will be as enjoyable as DCAing during those down-market periods. Not sure if there’s a term for that :-). (Although there will be social security at some point down the line, so that may help with this unnamed condition.)
That’s a fun challenge. How about Post-Contribution Depression (PCD)? Or maybe Dry Powder Blues (DPB)? I was getting pretty excited recently about buying the dip when I thought I was going to hit my 15% rebalance threshold on an Asia-Pacific tracker I own… unfortunately—or should I say fortunately?—it never breached the 15% mark and I didn’t get the thrill of buying into a falling market!