FREE NEWSLETTER

Why We Try

Robin Powell

BEATING THE STOCK market over the long term is no mean feat. Only a tiny proportion of investors—professional or otherwise—manage to do it. So why do so many people think they can?

Meir Statman, a finance professor at Santa Clara University, cites eight key reasons. In a new monograph titled Behavioral Finance: The Second Generation, he slots these reasons into two broad categories—five cognitive and emotional errors, followed by three expressive and emotional benefits:

1. They forget that trading is competitive.

Statman suggests the first mistake that investors make is a so-called framing error. Specifically, investors assume that trading is analogous to an activity such as plumbing. A plumber’s work improves the more experienced he or she becomes. But the analogy with investing is flawed because “pipes and fittings do not compete against the plumber, inducing her to choose the wrong fitting,” Statman writes. A trader, on the other hand, “always faces a competing trader on the other side of his trade, sometimes inducing him to choose the wrong trading strategy.”

2. They don’t compare their returns to the market.

This is another framing error. Many investors, Statman says, frame their returns relative to zero, rather than relative to the market return—the performance they could have earned by investing in a low-cost index fund. “A 15% annual return is excellent,” he says, “but it is inferior when an index fund delivers 20%.”

3. They don’t properly calculate their returns.

Another reason investors mistakenly believe that markets are easy to beat: They tend to form a general impression of their results, instead of properly calculating them. This leads to confirmation errors, whereby they focus on the winners in their portfolio and overlook the losers. A study of amateur investors in the U.S., for instance, found that they overestimated their investment returns by an average 3.4 percentage points.

4. They’re fooled by small numbers.

It’s reasonable, Statman suggests, to form an opinion of a restaurant on the strength of 10 visits: “Seven bad meals out of 10 or even two bad meals out of three might well be all we need for a general conclusion that it is best to forgo dining at that restaurant.” What makes trading different is the random nature of outcomes. Things can either go very well or very badly. It’s perfectly possible for a trader to enjoy a streak of wins, purely because of luck.

5. They’re susceptible to availability errors.

The final error that Statman highlights is often referred to as availability bias. Investors tend to base their opinions on information that’s easily available. Whether it’s someone at the local bar, a colleague at work or a relative at a family gathering, we’ve all had conversations with people who claim to have profited greatly from buying a particular stock or fund. People who share these sorts of stories are often less inclined to disclose the bad investments they’ve made. The same applies to stories in the media. Generally, the funds that are written about are those which have outperformed.

6. They like to gamble.

After articulating the above five errors, Statman turns his attention to what investors want. It’s well known that some of us enjoy gambling. There are those who, even when faced with large losses, keep gambling because they like the buzz so much.

There’s evidence that some investors are motivated by the same sort of enjoyment. For example, a 2018 study of 421 pump-and-dump schemes in Germany found that the average loss for investors was nearly 30%. Yet, during the sample period, some 11% of pump-and-dump investors participated in four or more schemes.

7. They enjoy it as they would a hobby.

It isn’t just the prospect of a big win that makes people try their hand at active trading. In one study, active investors in the Netherlands were asked about their motivations. More of them agreed with the statement “I invest because it is a nice free-time activity” than with the statement “I invest because I want to safeguard my retirement.” A study of amateur U.S. traders by Fidelity Investments found that more than half enjoyed learning new skills and sharing news of their wins and losses with friends and family.

8. They think of themselves as better than average.

The final motivation for active trading, Statman argues, is the need to feel that we’re better than average. This need, he says, is reflected in the way that funds are marketed. He refers to two TV commercials, both for investment companies.

One denigrates index funds as average, and concludes with a man standing on a stage as a sign lights up: “Why invest in average?” In the second ad, the announcer asks, “If passive investing was called ‘don’t try,’ would you still be interested?” The irony: Index investing is, of course, a way of ensuring that you receive returns that outpace those of the typical investor.

Robin Powell is an award-winning journalist. He’s a campaigner for positive change in global investing, advocating better investor education and greater transparency. Robin is the editor of The Evidence-Based Investor, which is where a version of this article first appeared. His previous articles include Good for YouBetter Than Timing and Writing WrongsFollow Robin on Twitter @RobinJPowell.

Want to receive our weekly newsletter? Sign up now. How about our daily alert about the site's latest posts? Join the list.

Browse Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roboticus Aquarius
Roboticus Aquarius
4 years ago

Thanks, this is a good list, and I definitely fall into category 7. I fence my investment process with strict limits to avoid doing stupid things.

There is a valid reason to attempt to beat the market, and that’s when you have an edge. Unique or specialized knowledge or perspective, for example. A Warren Buffet or Peter Lynch might fall in this category.

However, the majority of people struggle to understand that beating the market also usually means taking on more risk, and risk is not something you can readily characterize or control. It’s common to have an inadequate understanding of that risk and thus fail spectacularly. I think of Long Term Capital Management as a well funded company with brilliant investors and academics behind it. They clearly had an edge. However, they didn’t understand the full range of risks they were taking. They were very successful until they so famously imploded a couple decades back.

David J. Kupstas
David J. Kupstas
4 years ago

#8. Good. I hope people keep trying to beat the market. If everyone goes passive, then I suspect the strategy would no longer work.

Free Newsletter

SHARE